Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Report:DAC (Direct Air Capture) 企業 - 13 家 DAC 公司的策略和執行能力評估
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1328596

Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Report:DAC (Direct Air Capture) 企業 - 13 家 DAC 公司的策略和執行能力評估

Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Report - Direct Air Capture Companies: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 13 Direct Air Capture Companies

出版日期: | 出版商: Guidehouse Insights | 英文 49 Pages; 18 Tables, Charts & Figures | 訂單完成後即時交付

價格

DAC(直接空氣捕獲)等碳去除技術將在全球推動減緩氣候變遷方面發揮重要作用。DAC 透過直接從空氣中吸收二氧化碳來使用再生電力運行,與永久二氧化碳儲存相結合,成為負排放技術。捕獲的二氧化碳也可用於減少其他部門的排放。

DAC計畫目前約佔營運中的碳捕集、利用和封存計畫的5%,但它們規模極小,僅佔全球二氧化碳捕集能力的不到0.02%。大多數 DAC 專案規模如此之小的原因之一是技術相對不成熟,尚未經過測試和最佳化。到 2015 年,全球僅有四家 DAC 公司在營運。然而,在過去五年中,擁有新技術和創新方法的第二代公司已經進入該領域。阻礙 DAC 廣泛使用的另一個因素是其高成本。一些 DAC 公司旨在透過規劃大型專案來利用規模經濟來降低成本,而其他公司則選擇模組化方法,根據需要部署額外的單元,以最大限度地降低初始專案成本。

Guidehouse Insights 排行榜檢查了 13 家領先公司的 DAC 產品,並對它們進行比較,以確定哪些公司提供最有用的 DAC 解決方案。

目錄

第1章 摘要整理

第2章 市場概要

  • 市場定義
  • 推動市場要素
  • 阻礙市場要素
  • 市場趨勢

第3章 Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

  • Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard的類別
    • 領導者
    • 競爭者
    • 挑戰者
    • 追隨者
  • Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard的電網

第4章 企業排行榜

  • 領導者
    • Climeworks
  • 競爭者
    • Carbon Engineering
    • Global Thermostat
    • Baker Hughes/Mosaic Materials
    • CarbonCapture
    • Aircapture
    • Carbyon
    • Noya
    • Prometheus Fuels
  • 挑戰者
    • Mission Zero
    • Verdox
    • Sustaera
    • Carbominer

第5章 縮寫·簡稱的一覽

第6章 目錄

第7章 圖表

第8章 分析範圍·手法

Product Code: LB-CREC-23

Carbon removal technologies such as direct air capture (DAC) will play a key role in the global push for climate change mitigation. By sucking CO2 directly from the air, DAC can be a negative emissions technology when run on renewable electricity and coupled with permanent CO2 storage. Alternatively, the captured CO2 can be used to reduce emissions from other sectors.

DAC projects currently account for about 5% of the carbon capture utilization and sequestration projects in operation, but the projects are very small scale, representing less than 0.02% of total installed global CO2 capture capacity. One reason most DAC projects are so small is that the technology is relatively immature and still undergoing testing and optimization. By 2015, only four DAC companies were operating around the world. Over the last five years, however, a flood of second-generation companies has entered the space with new and innovative technologies and approaches. Another impediment to DAC uptake is its high costs. While some DAC companies aim to cut expenses by planning large-scale projects to leverage economies of scale, others are taking a modular approach, preferring to deploy additional units as necessary in order to minimize initial upfront costs for a project.

This Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard examines the DAC offerings from 13 leading companies and measures them against one another to determine which are providing the most useful DAC solutions.

Top 10 Vendors

1. Climeworks

2. Carbon Engineering

3. Global Thermostat

4. Baker Hughes/Mosaic

5. CarbonCapture

6. Aircapture

7. Carbyon

8. Noya

9. Prometheus Fuels

10. Mission Zero

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1 Market Introduction
  • 1.2 Vendor Selection
  • 1.3 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1 Market Definition
  • 2.2 Market Drivers
  • 2.3 Market Barriers
  • 2.4 Market Trends

3. The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

  • 3.1 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Categories
    • 3.1.1 Leaders
    • 3.1.2 Contenders
    • 3.1.3 Challengers
    • 3.1.4 Followers
  • 3.2 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

  • 4.1 Leaders
    • 4.1.1 Climeworks
  • 4.2 Contenders
    • 4.2.1 Carbon Engineering
    • 4.2.2 Global Thermostat
    • 4.2.3 Baker Hughes/Mosaic Materials
    • 4.2.4 CarbonCapture
    • 4.2.5 Aircapture
    • 4.2.6 Carbyon
    • 4.2.7 Noya
    • 4.2.8 Prometheus Fuels
  • 4.3 Challengers
    • 4.3.1 Mission Zero
    • 4.3.2 Verdox
    • 4.3.3 Sustaera
    • 4.3.4 Carbominer
  • 4.4 Followers

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology

  • 8.1 Scope of Study
  • 8.2 Sources and Methodology
    • 8.2.1 Vendor Selection
    • 8.2.2 Ratings Scale
      • 8.2.2.1 Score Calculations
    • 8.2.3 Criteria Definitions
      • 8.2.3.1 Strategy
      • 8.2.3.2 Execution

List of Figures

The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid: Direct Air Capture Companies

Climeworks Strategy and Execution Scores

Carbon Engineering Strategy and Execution Scores

Global Thermostat Strategy and Execution Scores

Baker Hughes/Mosaic Materials Strategy and Execution Scores

CarbonCapture Strategy and Execution Scores

Aircapture Strategy and Execution Scores

Carbyon Strategy and Execution Scores

Noya Strategy and Execution Scores

Prometheus Fuels Strategy and Execution Scores

Mission Zero Strategy and Execution Scores

Verdox Strategy and Execution Scores

Sustaera Strategy and Execution Scores

Carbominer Strategy and Execution Scores