Guidehouse Insights 排行榜報告：資產績效管理 (APM) - 評估公用事業 APM 解決方案的九家領先供應商的策略和執行情況

鑑於 APM 範圍內的大量需求和不斷增長的模組列表，設備效能管理 (APM) 系統的競爭格局是獨一無二的。因此，由傳統 OEM（通用電氣 [GE Digital]、施耐德電氣、日立能源）和專業軟體供應商（IBM、mPrest、DNV、SAP、IPS Energy、Bentley Systems）組成的供應商池規模較小。變得更加複雜。

這些 APM 供應商以傳統創新（例如模組化、基於微服務的設計原則）為基礎，並擁抱廣泛的前瞻性業務和技術支點。產品和策略路線圖因供應商而異，但包括架構轉型（可擴展性、開放性、互通性）、重新思考定價和部署模型、簡化更新框架、調整傳輸和分配操作、行動擴展、雲端支持以及其他大趨勢常見的。

Guidehouse Insights 排行榜報告檢查了九家領先公司的電網 APM 解決方案，並將它們相互比較，以確定哪些供應商為公用事業客戶提供最有用的 APM 解決方案。

目錄

第1章 摘要整理

第2章 市場概要

• 市場定義
• 推動市場要素
• 阻礙市場要素
• 市場趨勢

第3章 Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

• Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard的類別
  • 領導者
  • 競爭者
  • 挑戰者
  • 追隨者
• Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard的電網

第4章 企業排行榜

• 領導者
  • GE Vernova
  • Schneider Electric
  • IBM
• 競爭者
  • Hitachi Energy
  • mPrest
  • DNV
  • SAP
  • IPS Energy
  • Bentley Systems

第5章 縮寫·簡稱的一覽

第6章 目錄

第7章 圖表

第8章 分析範圍·手法

The competitive landscape for asset performance management (APM) systems is unique given the extensive requirements and growing list of modules captured under the APM umbrella. Over time, this has led to a smaller, more refined pool of vendors made up of traditional OEMs (General Electric [GE Digital], Schneider Electric, Hitachi Energy) and specialized software providers (IBM, mPrest, DNV, SAP, IPS Energy, Bentley Systems).

These APM providers are building upon conventional innovations (e.g., modular, microservices-based design principles) with a wide mix of forward-looking business and technology reorientations. While product and strategy roadmaps naturally vary by vendor, common macrotrends include architectural transformations (i.e., scalable, open, interoperable), revamped pricing and deployment models, streamlined upgrade frameworks, coordinated transmission and distribution operations, mobile extensions, and cloud enablement, among many others.

This Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard report examines the grid APM solutions from nine leading companies and measures them against one another, to determine which are providing the most useful APM solutions to utility customers.

Top Vendors

1. GE Vernova

2. Schneider Electric

3. IBM

4. Hitachi Energy

5. mPrest

6. DNV

7. SAP

8. IPS Energy

9. Bentley Systems

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

• 1.1 Market Introduction
• 1.2 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

• 2.1 Market Definition
• 2.2 Market Drivers
• 2.3 Market Barriers
• 2.4 Market Trends

3. The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

• 3.1 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Categories
  • 3.1.1 Leaders
  • 3.1.2 Contenders
  • 3.1.3 Challengers
  • 3.1.4 Followers
• 3.2 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

• 4.1 Leaders
  • 4.1.1 GE Vernova
  • 4.1.2 Schneider Electric
  • 4.1.3 IBM
• 4.2 Contenders
  • 4.2.1 Hitachi Energy
  • 4.2.2 mPrest
  • 4.2.3 DNV
  • 4.2.4 SAP
  • 4.2.5 IPS Energy
  • 4.2.6 Bentley Systems

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology

• 8.1 Scope of Study
• 8.2 Sources and Methodology
  • 8.2.1 Vendor Selection
  • 8.2.2 Ratings Scale
    • 8.2.2.1 Score Calculations
  • 8.2.3 Criteria Definitions
    • 8.2.3.1 Strategy
    • 8.2.3.2 Execution

List of Tables

• Grid APM Spending by Region, World Markets: 2022-2031

The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Overall Scores

IBM Maximo Application Suite APM Modules

Key DNV Cascade Modules

Key IPS APM Modules

Key Bentley Systems AssetWise Modules

Vendor Scores

Vendor Scores on Strategy Criteria

Vendor Scores on Execution Criteria

List of Figures

The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

• Grid APM Spending by Region, World Markets: 2022-2031

GE Vernova Strategy and Execution Scores

Schneider Electric Strategy and Execution Scores

IBM Strategy and Execution Scores

Hitachi Energy Strategy and Execution Scores

mPrest Strategy and Execution Scores

DNV Strategy and Execution Scores

SAP Strategy and Execution Scores

IPS Energy Strategy and Execution Scores

Bentley Systems Strategy and Execution Scores