查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1446804

全球生物殺蟲劑市場 - 2023-20230

Global Bionematicides Market - 2023-20230
出版日期: | 出版商: DataM Intelligence | 英文 195 Pages | 商品交期: 約2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

簡介目錄

概述

全球生物殺蟲劑市場在2022年達到2.267億美元，預計到2030年將達到7.264億美元，2023-2030年預測期間CAGR為15.6%。

人們非常關注永續發展和減少農業對環境的影響。生物殺線蟲劑更環保，作為化學殺線蟲劑的永續替代品越來越受到重視。由於需求不斷成長，製造商正在開發各種產品並擴大生物殺蟲劑市場。 2023年7月，農業公司先正達推出了CERTANO生物解決方案和Cropwise數位技術，以應對甘蔗田的線蟲、蛾和疾病。

各國政府和監管機構正在對化學農藥的使用實施更嚴格的規定。生物殺線蟲劑毒性較低，對環境的影響也較小，因此作為合規替代品受到青睞。植物寄生線蟲正在對化學殺線蟲劑產生抗藥性。生物殺線蟲劑提供了有效管理線蟲的寶貴工具，特別是當化學選擇變得不太有效時。

土壤處理由於直接針對根部線蟲而在生物殺線蟲劑市場中佔有重要佔有率。由於北美日益關注永續和生態友善農業，因此在生物殺線蟲劑市場中佔有重要佔有率。 2021年9月，Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.宣布向美國監管機構提交其下一代殺線蟲劑/殺蟲劑MBI-306。此外，該公司還宣布，提交 MBI-206 已進入最後階段，MBI-206 是一種廣泛使用的生物殺蟲劑種子處理劑，已在美國超過 1000 萬英畝的土地上應用。

動力學

線蟲造成的農作物損失日益嚴重

線蟲導致全球農作物產量嚴重損失。根據全印度種植系統線蟲協調研究計畫 (AICRP) 的數據，植物寄生線蟲每年造成 21.3% 的農作物損失，金額達盧比。 1020.3979 億（15.8 億美元）。線蟲以植物根部為食，導致生長發育不良，減少養分吸收，最終降低作物產量。面臨線蟲侵擾的農民正在積極尋求有效的解決方案來減輕這些損失。

傳統的化學殺線蟲劑會對環境和健康產生負面影響。向更永續和生態友善的農業實踐的轉變使生物殺蟲劑成為有吸引力的選擇。生物殺線劑提供了一種更永續的替代方案，因為它們通常被認為對環境更安全。它們的分解速度更快，對非目標生物體的毒性更低，從而減少了整體環境影響。

對有機食品的需求不斷成長

根據FiBL統計，2021年有機零售額攀升40億歐元，達到近1,250億歐元。由於擔心傳統作物上的農藥殘留，消費者擴大尋求有機食品。他們更喜歡不使用合成化學農藥種植的產品。因此，對有機食品的需求增加，推動了對生物殺線蟲劑等有機害蟲防治解決方案的需求。

為了滿足有機認證標準，有機農民必須使用經批准的有機害蟲防治方法。生物殺線蟲劑被認為符合有機農業實踐，使其成為希望在保持有機狀態的同時控制線蟲侵擾的有機農民的自然選擇。

作用速度慢，保存期限短

生物殺線蟲劑通常由活生物體或天然化合物組成，無法立即控制線蟲，而是比合成殺線蟲劑需要更長的時間才能發揮作用。這種行動的延遲可能是一個缺點，特別是線上蟲族群快速成長威脅作物產量的情況下。農民可能更喜歡效果更快的化學殺線蟲劑。

與合成化學殺線蟲劑相比，生物殺線蟲劑的保存期限通常較短。有限的保存期限可能會給製造商、分銷商和零售商帶來物流挑戰。它可能需要特殊的儲存條件，並且產品過期的風險可能導致庫存浪費。

目錄

第 1 章：方法與範圍

  • 研究方法論
  • 報告的研究目的和範圍

第 2 章：定義與概述

第 3 章：執行摘要

  • 按類型分類的片段
  • 按表格列出的片段
  • 按作物摘錄
  • 感染片段
  • 按申請模式分類的片段
  • 按地區分類的片段

第 4 章：動力學

  • 影響因素
    • 促進要素
      • 線蟲造成的農作物損失日益嚴重
      • 對有機食品的需求不斷成長
    • 限制
      • 作用速度慢，保存期限短
    • 機會
    • 影響分析

第 5 章：產業分析

  • 波特五力分析
  • 供應鏈分析
  • 定價分析
  • 監管分析

第 6 章：COVID-19 分析

  • COVID-19 分析
    • 新冠疫情爆發前的情景
    • 新冠疫情期間的情景
    • 新冠疫情後的情景
  • COVID-19 期間的定價動態
  • 供需譜
  • 疫情期間政府與市場相關的舉措
  • 製造商策略舉措
  • 結論

第 7 章：按類型

  • 微生物
  • 生化品

第 8 章：按形式

  • 乾燥
  • 液體

第 9 章：依作物分類

  • 穀物及穀物
  • 油籽和豆類
  • 水果和蔬菜
  • 其他

第10章：被感染

  • 根結線蟲
  • 囊腫線蟲
  • 病斑線蟲
  • 其他

第 11 章：依申請方式

  • 種子處理
  • 土壤處理
  • 葉面噴施
  • 其他

第 12 章：按地區

  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 法國
    • 義大利
    • 俄羅斯
    • 歐洲其他地區
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 南美洲其他地區
  • 亞太
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 澳洲
    • 亞太其他地區
  • 中東和非洲

第13章：競爭格局

  • 競爭場景
  • 市場定位/佔有率分析
  • 併購分析

第 14 章：公司簡介

  • FMC Corporation
    • 公司簡介
    • 產品組合和描述
    • 財務概覽
    • 最近的發展
  • Corteva
  • Agri Life
  • Certis USA LLC
  • Pro Farm Group Inc
  • T.Stanes and Company Limited
  • Valent BioSciences
  • Crop IQ Technology Ltd
  • Biotech International Limited
  • KILPEST INDIA LTD

第 15 章：附錄

簡介目錄
Product Code: AG7972

Overview

Global Bionematicides Market reached US$ 226.7 million in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 726.4 million by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 15.6% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

There is a strong focus on sustainability and reducing the environmental impact of agriculture. Bionematicides, being more environmentally friendly, are gaining traction as a sustainable alternative to chemical nematicides. Due to this growing demand, manufacturers are developing a wide range of products and expanding the bionemticides market. In July 2023, Syngenta, an agriculture company, introduced CERTANO biological solution and Cropwise digital technology to tackle nematodes, moths, and diseases in sugarcane fields.

Governments and regulatory bodies are imposing stricter regulations on the use of chemical pesticides. Bionematicides, with their lower toxicity and reduced environmental impact, are finding favor as compliant alternatives. Plant-parasitic nematodes are developing resistance to chemical nematicides. Bionematicides provide a valuable tool to manage nematodes effectively, especially when chemical options become less effective.

Soil treatment holds a significant share of the bionematicides market due to its direct targeting of nematodes at the root level. North America held a significant share of the bionematicides market due to its increasing focus on sustainable and eco-friendly agriculture. In September 2021, Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. declared submitting MBI-306, its next-generation nematicide/insecticide, to regulatory authorities in the United States. Additionally, the company declared that it was in the final stages of submitting MBI-206, a widely used bionematicide seed treatment that is applied on over 10 million acres in the United States.

Dynamics

Growing Cropp Loss due to Nematode

Nematodes are responsible for substantial crop yield losses worldwide. According to the All India Coordinated Research Project (AICRP) on Nematodes in Cropping Systems, Plant-parasitic nematodes result in 21.3% of crop losses each year, amounting to Rs. 102,039.79 million (1.58 billion USD). Nematodes feed on plant roots, causing stunted growth, reduced nutrient uptake, and ultimately decreased crop yields. Farmers facing nematode infestations are actively seeking effective solutions to mitigate these losses.

Traditional chemical nematicides can have negative environmental and health impacts. The shift towards more sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural practices has made bionematicides an attractive choice. Bionematicides offer a more sustainable alternative because they are generally considered safer for the environment. They break down more rapidly and have lower toxicity to non-target organisms, reducing the overall environmental impact.

Rising Demand for Organic Food Products

According to FiBL, in 2021, organic retail sales climbed by 4 billion euros and reached nearly 125 billion euros. Consumers are increasingly seeking organic food products due to concerns about pesticide residues on conventional crops. They prefer products that are grown without synthetic chemical pesticides. As a result, the demand for organic food products has risen, driving the need for organic pest control solutions like bionematicides.

To meet organic certification standards, organic farmers must use approved organic pest control methods. Bionematicides are considered compliant with organic farming practices, making them a natural choice for organic farmers looking to manage nematode infestations while maintaining their organic status.

Slow Speed of Action and Short Shelf Life

Bionematicides, which typically consist of living organisms or natural compounds, do not provide immediate control of nematodes, rather it takes longer to act than synthetic nematicides. This delay in action can be a drawback, especially in situations where rapid nematode population growth threatens crop yields. Farmers may prefer chemical nematicides that offer quicker results.

Bionematicides often have shorter shelf lives compared to synthetic chemical nematicides. This limited shelf life can pose logistical challenges for manufacturers, distributors, and retailers. It may require special storage conditions, and the risk of product expiration can lead to wasted inventory.

Segment Analysis

The global bionematicides market is segmented based on type, form, crop, infestation, mode of application and region.

Soil Treatment Held the Highest Share in the Bionematicides Market

Soil treatment as a mode of application in bionematicides promotes numerous agricultural benefits. It enhances seed germination, accelerates plant growth, optimizes moisture and nutrient utilization, and ultimately leads to increased crop yields. This approach significantly contributes to the highest share in the bionematicides market.

Soil treatment allows bionematicides to be applied directly to the root zone where nematodes primarily reside and cause damage. This direct targeting increases the efficacy of bionematicides in controlling nematode populations. In January 2022, Certis Biologicals, a pioneer in the development of biological pesticides, announced the launch of its new bionematicide, MeloCon LC. MeloCon LC enables late-season nematode control by being applied up to 14 days before planting, during the growth season, and at planting.

Geographical Penetration

North America's Growing Focus on Sustainability

North America is increasingly recognizing the significance of sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural practices. In this context, bionematicides have gained prominence as a greener alternative to chemical nematicides, in line with the region's sustainability objectives.

The region has seen substantial investments in research and development related to bionematicides, resulting in the introduction of more effective and reliable products. In August 2023, Indigo Ag, a provider of sustainable agriculture solutions, declared the launch of Biotrinsic Z15, the company's first bionematicide for the U.S. market. Biotrinsic Z15 for soybean and maize is an extension of the business's biological inventions.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players include FMC Corporation, Corteva, Agri Life, Certis USA L.L.C., Pro Farm Group Inc, T.Stanes and Company Limited, Valent BioSciences, Crop IQ Technology Ltd, Biotech International Limited, KILPEST INDIA LTD

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

COVID Impact

The pandemic increased awareness of the importance of sustainable and resilient food systems. This shift in mindset favored the adoption of bionematicides as a more sustainable and environmentally friendly pest control solution. Consumer demand for organic and pesticide-free produce grew during the pandemic. Bionematicides, being compatible with organic farming, gained traction as a means of meeting this demand.

However, the pandemic disrupted supply chains, causing delays in the production and distribution of agricultural inputs, including bionematicides. Lockdowns, travel restrictions, and labor shortages affected the availability of these products. Many farmers faced challenges in accessing markets due to lockdowns and social distancing measures. This limited their ability to purchase and use bionematicides.

Russia- Ukraine War Impact

The conflict disrupted transportation routes and supply chains in the region, and it affected the availability of bionematicides, especially where key production or distribution facilities are located in the affected areas. Geopolitical instability due to the war impacted the economic stability of the countries involved and neighboring regions. This led to fluctuations in currency exchange rates and overall market uncertainty, affecting the cost and availability of agricultural inputs like bionematicides.

Economic sanctions impacted the country's ability to import agricultural products like biopesticides and seeds. The war affected the agricultural activities in the region. As a result, there is a reduced demand for various agricultural inputs including bionematicides in the region which impacted its market growth.

By Type

  • Microbials
  • Biochemicals

By Form

  • Dry
  • Liquid

By Crop

  • Cereals & Grains
  • Oilseeds & Pulses
  • Fruits & Vegetables
  • Others

By Infestation

  • Root-Knot Nematodes
  • Cyst Nematodes
  • Lesion Nematodes
  • Others

By Mode of Application

  • Seed Treatment
  • Soil Treatment
  • Foliar Spray
  • Others

By Region

  • North America
    • U.S.
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • France
    • Italy
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

  • In December 2022, Corteva Agriscience, an American agricultural chemical and seed company, introduced Lumialza, a biological nematicide for seed treatment in Brazil. Lumialza contains a naturally occurring organism, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens bacteria (strain PTA-4838). This organism colonises the root region and forms a biological barrier against a variety of dangerous nematodes.
  • In August 2021, Sumitomo Chemical introduced Aveo in Brazil. It is a novel biological method of treating seeds to combat nematodes.
  • In October 2022, Holganix, a biotechnology company, declared that it had been granted a US patent (US 11,447,427 B2) for a new microbial bionematicide technology.
  • In December 2021, BASF SE, a manufacturer of chemicals, plastics, crop protection products, etc. introduced its first bionematicide under the Votivo Prime trade name.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global bionematicides market segmentation based on type, form, crop, infestation, mode of application and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of Bionematicides market-level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global bionematicides market report would provide approximately 77 tables, 78 figures and 195 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Form
  • 3.3. Snippet by Crop
  • 3.4. Snippet by Infestation
  • 3.5. Snippet by Mode of Application
  • 3.6. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Growing Cropp Loss due to Nematode
      • 4.1.1.2. Rising Demand for Organic Food Products
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. Slow Speed of Action and Short Shelf Life
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2. Microbials *
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Biochemicals

8. By Form

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Form
  • 8.2. Dry*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Liquid

9. By Crop

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Crop
  • 9.2. Cereals & Grains*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Oilseeds & Pulses
  • 9.4. Fruits & Vegetables
  • 9.5. Others

10. By Infestation

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Infestation
  • 10.2. Root-Knot Nematodes*
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3. Cyst Nematodes
  • 10.4. Lesion Nematodes
  • 10.5. Others

11. By Mode of Application

  • 11.1. Introduction
    • 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Mode of Application
  • 11.2. Seed Treatment*
    • 11.2.1. Introduction
    • 11.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 11.3. Soil Treatment
  • 11.4. Foliar Spray
  • 11.5. Others

12. By Region

  • 12.1. Introduction
    • 12.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 12.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 12.2. North America
    • 12.2.1. Introduction
    • 12.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 12.2.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.2.8.1. U.S.
      • 12.2.8.2. Canada
      • 12.2.8.3. Mexico
  • 12.3. Europe
    • 12.3.1. Introduction
    • 12.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 12.3.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.3.8.1. Germany
      • 12.3.8.2. UK
      • 12.3.8.3. France
      • 12.3.8.4. Italy
      • 12.3.8.5. Russia
      • 12.3.8.6. Rest of Europe
  • 12.4. South America
    • 12.4.1. Introduction
    • 12.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 12.4.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.4.8.1. Brazil
      • 12.4.8.2. Argentina
      • 12.4.8.3. Rest of South America
  • 12.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 12.5.1. Introduction
    • 12.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application
    • 12.5.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 12.5.8.1. China
      • 12.5.8.2. India
      • 12.5.8.3. Japan
      • 12.5.8.4. Australia
      • 12.5.8.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 12.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 12.6.1. Introduction
    • 12.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 12.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 12.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 12.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Crop
    • 12.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Infestation
    • 12.6.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Mode of Application

13. Competitive Landscape

  • 13.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 13.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 13.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

14. Company Profiles

  • 14.1. FMC Corporation*
    • 14.1.1. Company Overview
    • 14.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 14.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 14.1.4. Recent Developments
  • 14.2. Corteva
  • 14.3. Agri Life
  • 14.4. Certis USA L.L.C.
  • 14.5. Pro Farm Group Inc
  • 14.6. T.Stanes and Company Limited
  • 14.7. Valent BioSciences
  • 14.8. Crop IQ Technology Ltd
  • 14.9. Biotech International Limited
  • 14.10. KILPEST INDIA LTD

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

15. Appendix

  • 15.1. About Us and Services
  • 15.2. Contact Us