查看購物車
  • Simplified Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1304533

全球浮式生產儲油卸油船（FPSO）市場 - 2023-2030

Global Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) Market - 2023-2030
出版日期: | 出版商: DataM Intelligence | 英文 215 Pages | 商品交期: 約2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

簡介目錄

市場概述

全球浮式生產儲油卸油船（FPSO）市場規模在2022年達到142億美元，預計到2030年將達到235億美元，2023-2030年的年複合成長率為6.5%。

當前的地緣政治局勢非常有利於全球FPSO市場的成長。隨著中東傳統出口國的供應被亞洲國家買斷，歐洲國家正依靠南美和非洲新興出口國填補其能源進口缺口。非洲不斷擴大的海上油氣生產將在中長期內創造對FPSO的新需求。

海洋工程公司正在開發新的設計，以提高FPSO的能源效率和整體性能。例如，2023年5月，馬來西亞海洋工程公司MISC推出了一種新型FPSO設計，該設計採用超大型模組上部結構，提高了系統整合能力，並允許採用永續技術。

市場動態

全球液化天然氣需求成長

與煤炭和石油相比，液化天然氣被認為是一種燃燒更清潔的燃料，因此溫室氣體排放量更低。包括LNG在內的天然氣通常被認為是邁向低碳未來的過渡燃料。此外，由於俄烏戰爭導致俄羅斯天然氣供應中斷，歐洲國家擴大轉向液化天然氣（LNG）以滿足其能源需求。

對液化天然氣需求的上升導致海上氣田勘探和開發的增加。其中許多氣田位於偏遠和具有挑戰性的海上環境，傳統的固定平台並不可行。 FPSO為這些海上氣田的LNG生產、儲存和卸載提供了靈活、經濟的解決方案。

FPSO可以在船上採用先進的天然氣處理和液化技術。這些技術可將天然氣轉化為液化天然氣，使其更易於運輸和儲存，成本效益更高。在FPSO上整合天然氣處理和液化功能可簡化整個生產流程，支持全球液化天然氣市場的成長。

海上平台退役

當海上平台的生產壽命結束時，必須進行退役。與其完全放棄油田，不如部署FPSO來開採剩餘儲量，延長油田的生產壽命。 FPSO能夠繼續生產、儲存和卸載碳氫化合物，最大限度地提高海上資產的價值，減少完全拆除平台的需要。

FPSO為固定海上平台的退役提供了具有成本效益的替代方案。拆除海上平台既昂貴又複雜，涉及重型起重和拆卸作業。通過在油田部署FPSO，營運商可以避免昂貴的平台拆除和處置過程。相反，他們可以利用現有的基礎設施和設備繼續生產。

高資本成本

開發和部署FPSO涉及大量的前期資本投資。與FPSO的工程設計、建造、安裝和調試相關的成本可能相當可觀。後疫情時期新建浮式生產儲油裝置的成本尤其高昂。例如，2021年6月，巴西國有能源公司Petrobras從韓國DSME造船公司訂購了一艘新的FPSO P-79，價格為23億美元。

FPSO項目的巨額資本支出影響了投資回報率和盈利能力。收回初始投資所需的投資回收期較長，再加上全球油價和項目業績的不確定性，會使其對融資方的吸引力降低。這可能導致營運商採取謹慎態度，並影響全球FPSO市場的成長。

COVID-19影響分析

大流行病對包括油氣行業在內的全球經濟造成了破壞。因此，許多營運商推遲了投資決策，推遲或取消了計劃中的FPSO項目。大流行病持續時間和嚴重程度的不確定性，加上油價波動，導致該行業資本支出減少。

大流行病導致全球供應鏈中斷。國際旅行限制、封鎖措施和生產設施的臨時關閉影響了FPSO項目所需的關鍵部件和設備的供應和交付。儘管大流行病造成了短期挑戰，但FPSO市場的長期前景依然樂觀。

烏克蘭-俄羅斯戰爭影響

俄烏衝突導致歐盟和美國對俄羅斯實施嚴厲的經濟制裁。制裁導致西方對俄羅斯的技術轉讓完全受阻。制裁使俄羅斯無法獲得先進的海上浮式生產儲油裝置，以勘探北極地區的近海石油和天然氣儲量。

在歐洲，能源供應從俄羅斯徹底轉向美國和中東。該地區的許多國家開始在國際市場上購買大量液化天然氣（LNG），以填補俄羅斯能源供應中斷留下的缺口。這就產生了對FPSO的臨時需求，以確保在陸上建造長期儲存設施的同時安全儲存液化天然氣。

目錄

第一章研究方法和範圍

  • 研究方法
  • 研究目的和報告範圍

第2章：定義和概述

第3章：執行摘要

  • 按類型摘錄
  • 按載體類型分類
  • 按水深分類
  • 按船體類型分類
  • 按區域分類

第四章：動態

  • 影響因素
    • 驅動因素
      • 石油和天然氣需求成長
      • 海上天然氣加工和液化的增加
      • 全球液化天然氣需求成長
      • 海上平台退役
    • 限制因素
      • 資本成本高
      • 來自其他生產系統的競爭
    • 機會
    • 影響分析

第五章行業分析

  • 波特五力分析法
  • 供應鏈分析
  • 定價分析
  • 法規分析

第六章：COVID-19分析

  • COVID-19分析
    • COVID之前的情景
    • COVID期間的情景
    • COVID之後的情景
  • COVID-19 期間的定價動態
  • 供求關係
  • 大流行期間與市場相關的政府計劃
  • 製造商的戰略計劃
  • 結論

第七章：按類型

  • 石油
  • 液化石油氣
  • 液化天然氣
  • 其他類型

第八章：按船型分類

  • 改裝船舶
  • 新建船舶
  • 重新部署

第九章：按水深分類

  • 淺水區
  • 深水和超深水

第10章：按船體類型

  • 單船體
  • 雙殼

第十一章：按地區

  • 北美洲
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 法國
    • 法國
    • 西班牙
    • 歐洲其他地區
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 南美其他地區
  • 亞太地區
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 澳大利亞
    • 亞太其他地區
  • 中東和非洲

第十二章：競爭格局

  • 競爭格局
  • 市場定位/佔有率分析
  • 合併與收購分析

第十三章：公司簡介

  • BP Plc
    • 公司概況
    • 類型組合和描述
    • 財務概況
    • 近期發展
  • Aker Solutions AS
  • Shell Global
  • Bluewater Energy Services BV
  • Bumi Armada Berhad
  • BW Offshore
  • Chevron
  • ExxonMobil Corporation
  • MODEC, Inc.
  • Petrobras

第十四章：附錄

簡介目錄
Product Code: EP5310

Market Overview

The Global Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) Market reached US$ 14.2 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 23.5 billion by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 6.5% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

The current geopolitical situation has been highly conducive to the growth of the global FPSO market. With supplies from traditional exporters in the Middle East being bought up by Asian countries, European countries are relying upon newly emerging exporters in South America and Africa to fill gaps in its energy imports. Expanding offshore oil and gas production in Africa will create new demand for FPSOs in the medium and long-term.

Marine engineering companies are developing new designs to improve the energy efficiency and overall performance of FPSOs. For instance, in May 2023, MISC, a Malaysian marine engineering company unveiled a new FPSO design that utilizes mega-module topsides , improving systems integration and allowing for sustainable technologies.

Market Dynamics

Growing Global LNG Demand

LNG is considered a cleaner-burning fuel than coal and oil, resulting in lower greenhouse gas emissions. Natural gas, including LNG, is often considered a transitional fuel towards a low-carbon future. Furthermore, with the disruption in Russian natural gas supplies due to the Russia-Ukraine war, European countries are increasingly turning to liquified natural gas (LNG) to fulfill their energy demand.

The rising demand for LNG has led to increased exploration and development of offshore gas fields. Many of these fields are located in remote and challenging offshore environments where traditional fixed platforms are not feasible. FPSOs offer a flexible and cost-effective solution for LNG production, storage, and offloading in these offshore gas fields.

FPSOs can incorporate advanced technologies for gas processing and liquefaction on board. The technologies enable the conversion of natural gas into LNG, making it easier and more cost-effective to transport and store. The integration of gas processing and liquefaction capabilities on FPSOs streamlines the overall production process and supports the growth of the global LNG market.

Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms

Decommissioning becomes necessary as offshore platforms reach the end of their production life. Instead of altogether abandoning the field, FPSOs can be deployed to extract remaining reserves and extend the field's productive life. FPSOs enable continued production, storage, and offloading of hydrocarbons, maximizing the value of offshore assets and reducing the need for full platform removal.

FPSOs offer a cost-effective alternative to decommissioning fixed offshore platforms. Removing offshore platforms can be expensive and complex, involving heavy lifting and dismantling operations. By deploying an FPSO to the field, operators can avoid the costly platform removal and disposal process. Instead, they can continue production while using the existing infrastructure and facilities.

High Capital Costs

Developing and deploying an FPSO involves substantial upfront capital investment. The costs associated with engineering, construction, installation, and commissioning of FPSOs can be considerable. New FPSOs in the post-pandemic period have become especially expensive. For instance, in June 2021, Petrobras, Brazil's state-owned energy company, ordered a new FPSO P-79 from South Korea's DSME shipbuilding company for US$ 2.3 billion.

The significant capital outlay for FPSO projects affects the return on investment and profitability. The long payback period required to recoup the initial investment, coupled with uncertainties in global oil prices and project performance, can make it a less attractive proposition for financers. It can lead to a cautious approach from operators and impact the growth of the global FPSO market.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

The pandemic caused disruptions across the global economy, including the oil and gas industry. As a result, many operators postponed their investment decisions and delayed or canceled planned FPSO projects. Uncertainty regarding the duration and severity of the pandemic, coupled with volatile oil prices, led to reduced capital expenditure in the industry.

The pandemic resulted in disruptions to global supply chains. Restrictions on international travel, lockdown measures, and temporary shutdowns of manufacturing facilities affected the availability and delivery of critical components and equipment necessary for FPSO projects. Despite the short-term challenges caused by the pandemic, the long-term outlook for the FPSO market remains positive.

Ukraine-Russia War Impact

The Russia-Ukraine conflict led to European Union (EU) and the U.S. imposing stringent economic sanctions on Russia. The sanctions caused the complete blockage of Western technology transfer to Russia. The sanctions deprived Russia of access to advanced FPSOs for the exploration of offshore oil and gas reserves in the Arctic.

A radical reorientation of energy supplies from Russia to the U.S. and the Middle East occurred in Europe. Many countries in the region started buying large cargoes of liquified natural gas (LNG) on the international markets to fill the gap left by the disruption of Russian energy supplies. It created a temporary demand for FPSOs to ensure secure LNG storage while long-term storage facilities were built onshore.

Segment Analysis

The Global FPSO Market is segmented based on type, carrier type, water depth, hull type and region.

Double-Hulled Ships are the Most Widely Used for FPSO

The primary advantage of double-hulled ships is their improved safety and environmental protection features. The double hull design provides an extra layer of protection, reducing the risk of oil spills in the event of a collision or grounding. The outer hull acts as a protective barrier, minimizing the chances of oil leakage and offering increased resistance to damage.

Double-hulled tankers meet or exceed stringent regulatory requirements set by international maritime organizations and environmental agencies. Regulations such as the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) MARPOL Convention mandate the phase-out of single-hulled tankers and the use of double-hulled vessels to prevent oil pollution. By using double-hulled ships, FPSOs can comply with these regulations and ensure higher environmental protection.

FPSOs are long-term investments, with operational lifetimes spanning 15-20 years. Double-hulled ships are generally more durable and have longer service lives than single-hulled vessels. The added protection provided by the double hull design helps extend the life of the FPSO, reducing the risks of structural fatigue, corrosion and potential failures associated with aging single-hulled tankers.

Geographical Analysis

Commercial Production from New Reserves Will Propel Demand from South America

New commercial offshore reserves have been discovered in South America, mainly off the coast of Guyana and Brazil. The discovery of retail oil and gas deposits has increased demand for FPSOs as companies scramble to exploit these reserves. Traditional South American producers such as Venezuela are increasing their capacity. For instance, in January 2023, a Trinidad and Tobago company was awarded a license to develop a new offshore gas field in Venezuela.

In May 2023, SBM Offshore, a Dutch oilfield services company, signed a long-term maintenance contract with the multinational energy company Exxon Mobil Corporation for the company's FPSO fleet servicing the Starboek offshore block near Guyana. In December 2022, Petrobras, the Brazilian state-owned oil and gas company, announced that it had begun the tendering process to obtain two new FPSOs for operation in the Atapu and Sepia deepwater oil fields.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players include: BP Plc, Aker Solutions AS, Shell Global, Bluewater Energy Services B.V., Bumi Armada Berhad, BW Offshore, Chevron, ExxonMobil Corporation, MODEC, Inc. and Petrobras.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the Global FPSO Market segmentation based on type, carrier type, water depth, hull type and region, and understand critical commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous diamond art painting market-level data points with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The Global FPSO Market Report Would Provide Approximately 64 Tables, 66 Figures And 215 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Oil and Gas Companies
  • Energy Trading Companies
  • Marine Engineering Companies
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Carrier Type
  • 3.3. Snippet by Water Depth
  • 3.4. Snippet by Hull Type
  • 3.5. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Rising Demand for Oil and Gas
      • 4.1.1.2. Increase in Offshore Gas Processing and Liquefaction
      • 4.1.1.3. Growing Global LNG Demand
      • 4.1.1.4. Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. High Capital Costs
      • 4.1.2.2. Competition from Other Production Systems
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2. Oil*
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. LPG
  • 7.4. LNG
  • 7.5. Others

8. By Carrier Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Carrier Type
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Carrier Type
  • 8.2. Converted Ship*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. New Built Ship
  • 8.4. Redeployed

9. By Water Depth

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Water Depth
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Water Depth
  • 9.2. Shallow Water*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Deep and Ultra-deep Water

10. By Hull Type

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Hull Type
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Hull Type
  • 10.2. Single Hull*
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3. Double Hull

11. By Region

  • 11.1. Introduction
    • 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 11.2. North America
    • 11.2.1. Introduction
    • 11.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Carrier Type
    • 11.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Water Depth
    • 11.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Hull Type
    • 11.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.2.7.1. The U.S.
      • 11.2.7.2. Canada
      • 11.2.7.3. Mexico
  • 11.3. Europe
    • 11.3.1. Introduction
    • 11.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Carrier Type
    • 11.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Water Depth
    • 11.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Hull Type
    • 11.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.3.7.1. Germany
      • 11.3.7.2. The UK
      • 11.3.7.3. France
      • 11.3.7.4. Italy
      • 11.3.7.5. Spain
      • 11.3.7.6. Rest of Europe
  • 11.4. South America
    • 11.4.1. Introduction
    • 11.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Carrier Type
    • 11.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Water Depth
    • 11.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Hull Type
    • 11.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.4.7.1. Brazil
      • 11.4.7.2. Argentina
      • 11.4.7.3. Rest of South America
  • 11.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 11.5.1. Introduction
    • 11.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Carrier Type
    • 11.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Water Depth
    • 11.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Hull Type
    • 11.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.5.7.1. China
      • 11.5.7.2. India
      • 11.5.7.3. Japan
      • 11.5.7.4. Australia
      • 11.5.7.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 11.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 11.6.1. Introduction
    • 11.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Carrier Type
    • 11.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Water Depth
    • 11.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Hull Type

12. Competitive Landscape

  • 12.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 12.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 12.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13. Company Profiles

  • 13.1. BP Plc*
    • 13.1.1. Company Overview
    • 13.1.2. Type Portfolio and Description
    • 13.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 13.1.4. Recent Developments
  • 13.2. Aker Solutions AS
  • 13.3. Shell Global
  • 13.4. Bluewater Energy Services B.V.
  • 13.5. Bumi Armada Berhad
  • 13.6. BW Offshore
  • 13.7. Chevron
  • 13.8. ExxonMobil Corporation
  • 13.9. MODEC, Inc.
  • 13.10. Petrobras

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

14. Appendix

  • 14.1. About Us and Services
  • 14.2. Contact Us