市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1087148

航太·防衛用3D印刷:全球市場預測(2022年∼2027年)

Aerospace and Defense 3D Printing Market - Forecasts from 2022 to 2027

出版日期: | 出版商: Knowledge Sourcing Intelligence | 英文 125 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內

價格
  • 全貌
  • 簡介
  • 目錄
簡介

全球航太·防衛用3D印刷的市場規模在2020年估算為14億1,076萬美金,在預測期間內預計將以23.12%的年複合成長率擴大,到2027年達到60億5,113萬3,000美元。

本報告提供航太·防衛用3D印刷的世界市場調查,提供市場規模和預測,市場促進因素及課題,市場趨勢,各市場區隔的市場分析,競爭情形,主要企業的簡介等系統性資訊。

目錄

第1章 簡介

  • 市場定義
  • 市場區隔

第2章 調查手法

  • 調查資料
  • 假設

第3章 摘要整理

  • 調查的重點

第4章 市場動態

  • 推動市場要素
  • 阻礙市場要素
  • 波特的五力分析
    • 供給企業談判力
    • 買方議價能力
    • 替代品的威脅
    • 新加入廠商者的威脅
    • 競爭企業間的敵對關係
  • 產業的價值鏈分析

第5章 航太·防衛用3D印刷市場:各材料

  • 簡介
  • 金屬
  • 聚合物
  • 陶瓷

第6章 航太·防衛用3D印刷市場:各技術

  • 簡介
  • SLS
  • SLA
  • 材料噴塗
  • 其他

第7章 航太·防衛用3D印刷市場:各用途

  • 簡介
  • 原型製作
  • 工具
  • 零件
  • 設備
  • 塗料

第8章 航太·防衛用3D印刷市場:各地區

  • 簡介
  • 北美
    • 美國
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 南美
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 其他
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 法國
    • 英國
    • 西班牙
    • 其他
  • 中東和非洲
    • 沙烏地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公國
    • 以色列
    • 其他
  • 亞太地區
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 韓國
    • 台灣
    • 泰國
    • 印尼
    • 日本
    • 其他

第9章 競爭情形與分析

  • 主要企業策略分析
  • 新興企業與市場的有利性
  • 合併,收購,協定,及合作
  • 供應商競爭力矩陣

第10章 企業簡介

  • Stratasys Ltd.
  • 3D Systems, Inc.
  • Materialise
  • EOS Group
  • SLM Solutions Group AG
  • ENVISIONTEC, INC.
  • Renishaw plc
  • Extrude Hone (ExOne) Company
  • Concept Laser GmbH (GE子公司)
  • MTU Aero Engines
目錄
Product Code: KSI061613029

The aerospace and defense 3D printing market was valued at US$1,410.760 million in 2020 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 23.12% over the forecast period to reach a market size of US$6,051.133 million by 2027.

A 3D printer uses a software program to receive a command and create a three-dimensional object, which is called additive manufacturing. In addition to aerospace and manufacturing, 3D printers are used in medical fields and in the medical field. As advanced technology 3D printers become available, the aerospace and defence industries' 3D printing capabilities should improve in the coming years Aerospace companies were among the first to adopt 3D printing technology. Today, the aerospace industry continues to be considered the one that is most adept at using 3D printing technologies. A multitude of factors contribute to this, such as faster production delivery, lower production quantities, and the ability to design for additive manufacturing. Several aerospace companies have already adopted this technology in their operations. Boeing is one such company that has been experimenting with 3D printing. In 2019, Boeing developed the first metal 3D printed satellite antenna using 3D printing for satellite production. Located in Israel, the antenna was designed by the Israeli satellite launch company Spacecom, which successfully launched AMOS 17. In the near future, 3D printing may have an increasing impact on the aerospace industry, thereby making the market more profitable.

Commercial aircraft, military aircraft, and space technology are examples of areas where the aerospace and defense (A&D) industries have adopted additive manufacturing technology. In the aircraft 3D printing industry, in both the commercial aviation and military aviation sectors, some of the current applications include building 3D printed PMA replacement parts and designing complex aerospace parts. The aerospace industry is a major market for the U.S. In 2019, combined sales for the aerospace and defense industry reached $909 billion, an increase of 6.7% over the previous year. The majority of this revenue, -- $399 billion -- was driven by shared supply chains, that support both aerospace and defense. (source: aia-aerospace.org). Based on these estimates, the aerospace industry generates significant investment and revenue, which impacts the growth of 3D printing in the field.

Growth Factors:

  • A high growth rate is expected for the aircraft segment

Developing and designing an aircraft involves taking into account the aircraft's weight. Fuel consumption of lighter aircraft has decreased. There are low profits on aircraft, so aircraft that are more fuel-efficient are given preference. In technologically advanced aircraft, lightweight advanced materials - like components, parts, and airframes are used to create lightweight and advanced components without compromising strength or aerodynamics. Several companies, including Lockheed Martin Corporation and Arconic, have recently announced joint development agreements (JDA) to develop next-generation, advanced manufacturing processes, and advanced materials. As part of their future plans, the two companies will improve current and next-generation aerospace and defense solutions by designing lightweight material systems and incorporating advanced manufacturing technologies such as metal 3D printing. A combination of the factors described above has led to increased demand for newer generation aircraft, and may also drive the growth of the additive manufacturing industry. According to Boeing, the aircraft segment commanded the largest share of 3D printed parts during 2018.

Boeing (US) and Oerlikon (Switzerland) signed a five-year agreement in 2019 to support the development of titanium 3D printing processes. Airbus and Safran have made great progress with their Ariane6 rocket ;-using 3D printing, a single part of the injector head replaced 248 parts. Additionally, AM technology was used to successfully print a combustion chamber that was successfully tested. Relativity Space will also work with Lockheed Martin on a 2023 NASA mission, which will involve the construction of lightweight rockets customized for the mission. Airbus has developed a spacer panel for the A320 commercial aircraft that is 15% lighter than the original. The panel is located alongside the overhead storage compartments. A 3D-printed metal bracket from an aircraft, for example, could save 2.5 million gallons of fuel per year by reducing its weight by 50-80%. Such major developments by these companies are fuelling the growth of the market.

Restrain:

  • High Cost

Global aerospace and defense 3D printing market growth, however, may be hindered by high acquisition costs associated with 3D printing and a lack of raw materials. In contrast to mills and injection mold presses, many 3D printers, including industrial printers, have relatively small build chambers. A large part would need to be sliced into sections and stitched together later, after the printer's build chamber is full. Due to the increased printing costs and the manual labor involved, the market growth will be curtailed.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Aerospace and Defense 3D Printing Market

As COVID-19 spread quickly, the market's expectations were ruined. Adding to the industry's challenges, the pandemic weakened its sales to the lowest level in a decade. Lockdowns in several countries have caused disruptions in supply chains and operational activities, worsening the market conditions. Recent IATA estimates state that RPKs for the airline industry are expected to drop by 65.9% in 2020 as a result of the pandemic. Therefore, the market for aerospace and defense 3D printing is predicted to decline sharply in 2020, resulting in a crushing decline in sales.

Market Segmentation:

  • By Material

Metals

Polymers

Ceramics

  • By Technology

SLS

SLA

Material Jetting

Others

  • By Application

Prototyping

Tooling

Parts

Fixtures

Coating

  • By Geography

North America

  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico

South America

  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Others

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Spain
  • Others

Middle East and Africa

  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • Israel
  • Others

Asia Pacific

  • China
  • India
  • South Korea
  • Taiwan
  • Thailand
  • Indonesia
  • Japan
  • Others

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1. Market Definition
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • 2.1. Research Data
  • 2.2. Assumptions

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • 3.1. Research Highlights

4. MARKET DYNAMICS

  • 4.1. Market Drivers
  • 4.2. Market Restraints
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.3.1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.3.2. Bargaining Powers of Buyers
    • 4.3.3. Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.3.4. Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.3.5. Competitive Rivalry in Industry
  • 4.4. Industry Value Chain Analysis

5. AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE 3D PRINTING MARKET, BY MATERIAL

  • 5.1. Introduction
  • 5.2. Metals
  • 5.3. Polymers
  • 5.4. Ceramics

6. AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE 3D PRINTING MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. SLS
  • 6.3. SLA
  • 6.4. Material Jetting 
  • 6.5. Others

7. AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE 3D PRINTING MARKET, BY APPLICATION

  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. Prototyping
  • 7.3. Tooling
  • 7.4. Parts
  • 7.5. Fixtures
  • 7.6. Coating 

8. AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE 3D PRINTING MARKET, BY GEOGRAPHY

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. North America
    • 8.2.1. United States
    • 8.2.2. Canada
    • 8.2.3. Mexico
  • 8.3. South America
    • 8.3.1. Brazil
    • 8.3.2. Argentina
    • 8.3.3. Others
  • 8.4. Europe
    • 8.4.1. Germany
    • 8.4.2. France
    • 8.4.3. United Kingdom 
    • 8.4.4. Spain 
    • 8.4.5. Others
  • 8.5. Middle East and Africa
    • 8.5.1. Saudi Arabia
    • 8.5.2. UAE
    • 8.5.3. Israel
    • 8.5.4. Others
  • 8.6. Asia Pacific
    • 8.6.1. China
    • 8.6.2. India
    • 8.6.3. South Korea
    • 8.6.4. Taiwan
    • 8.6.5. Thailand
    • 8.6.6. Indonesia 
    • 8.6.7. Japan
    • 8.6.8. Others

9. COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT AND ANALYSIS

  • 9.1. Major Players and Strategy Analysis
  • 9.2. Emerging Players and Market Lucrativeness
  • 9.3. Mergers, Acquisition, Agreements, and Collaborations
  • 9.4. Vendor Competitiveness Matrix

10. COMPANY PROFILES

  • 10.1. Stratasys Ltd.
  • 10.2. 3D Systems, Inc.
  • 10.3. Materialise
  • 10.4. EOS Group
  • 10.5. SLM Solutions Group AG
  • 10.6. ENVISIONTEC, INC.
  • 10.7. Renishaw plc
  • 10.8. Extrude Hone (ExOne) Company
  • 10.9. Concept Laser GmbH (GE Subsidary)
  • 10.10. MTU Aero Engines