首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 材料

包裝/容器塑膠

市場調查報告書

商品編碼

1382541

全球可生物分解紙和塑膠包裝市場 - 2023-2030

Global Biodegradable Paper and Plastic Packaging Market - 2023-2030

出版日期: 2023年11月17日 | 出版商:

DataM Intelligence | 英文 187 Pages | 商品交期: 約2個工作天內

價格

※ 本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

簡介目錄

概述

2022年，全球可生物分解紙和塑膠包裝市場達到145億美元，預計2030年將達到234億美元，2023-2030年預測期間CAGR為9.6%。

傳統塑膠包裝的普遍存在引發了一場史無前例的危機。這種不可生物分解的塑膠可能需要數百年才能分解，污染生態系統和海洋，並對野生動物構成重大威脅。在環境議題至關重要的時代，全球包裝產業正在經歷深刻的變革。在尋求永續包裝解決方案的過程中，可生物分解包裝已成為遊戲規則的改變者。

雖然可生物分解包裝市場的成長前景廣闊，但並非沒有挑戰。可生物分解材料的成本可能高於傳統塑膠，堆肥和回收這些材料仍然存在基礎設施限制。此外，確保可生物分解包裝的性能和保存期限仍然是研究和開發的重點。

澱粉基塑膠佔市場佔有率的1/3以上。同樣，亞太地區在可生物分解紙和塑膠包裝市場上佔據主導地位，佔據最大市場佔有率，超過 1/3。政府的激勵措施、環境問題和材料技術的進步都是該地區成長的主要原因。

動力學

減少塑膠污染的需求不斷成長

塑膠污染是一個全球性問題，引起了各國政府、環保組織和公眾的高度關注。可生物分解包裝市場的一個關鍵驅動力是希望透過用環保替代品取代不可生物分解材料來減少塑膠污染。海洋保護協會的統計數據顯示，塑膠袋和食品包裝紙是海灘清理過程中收集的前十大物品之一。

塑膠污染對海洋生物和生態系統的有害影響促使人們呼籲採取行動。可生物分解的包裝被視為減少塑膠廢物及其對環境影響的有前途的解決方案。因此，減少塑膠污染的需求不斷成長是市場的主要驅動力。

材料科學的技術進步

材料科學和技術的進步在可生物分解包裝解決方案的開發中發揮了關鍵作用。可生物分解塑膠和生物基紙等材料的創新使製造商能夠創造出符合環境和性能標準的包裝。一個著名的例子是生物塑膠的開發，它源自於玉米澱粉或甘蔗等可再生資源。

這種生物塑膠可用於生產從袋子到容器的各種包裝材料。上述產品的可生物分解性質使其成為傳統塑膠的有吸引力的替代品。此外，製造流程的進步使得生產可生物分解包裝更具成本效益，縮小了與傳統材料的價格差距。

企業永續發展舉措

許多領先企業都將永續發展作為其業務策略的核心部分。相應的事實包括承諾透過採用可生物分解的包裝來減少環境足跡。這些舉措不僅體現了企業責任，也引起了消費者的共鳴，他們擴大根據公司的永續發展努力做出購買決定。

例如，麥當勞在 2020 年宣布了一項新的包裝策略，旨在到 2025 年其包裝 100% 來自可再生、回收或經過認證的來源。上述策略包括在其許多產品中過渡到可生物分解材料。因此，企業永續發展措施在確保市場成長方面發揮著至關重要的作用。

與替代品相比，耐用性有限

可生物分解的包裝旨在在環境中分解，這對於減少塑膠廢物來說是一個積極的特徵。然而，這種特性也可能是限制，特別是對於需要較長保存期限或防潮和其他環境因素的產品。

例如，在食品業，包裝在保持產品新鮮度方面發揮著至關重要的作用，可生物分解包裝有限的耐用性可能是一個重大限制。根據糧食及農業組織（FAO）的報告，一些可生物分解包裝材料的保存期限較短可能會導致食物浪費增加，抵消了一些環境效益。

生產成本高

與傳統塑膠包裝相比，可生物分解包裝產業最重要的限制之一是生產成本較高。雖然PLA（聚乳酸）和PHA（聚羥基脂肪酸酯）等可生物分解材料源自可再生資源，但其生產過程通常更加複雜且能源密集，導致製造成本更高。

據美國農業部(US$A)稱，生物分解塑膠的生產成本比傳統塑膠高出50%。上述成本差異可能成為企業轉向可生物分解包裝的主要障礙，特別是在價格敏感的市場。

Overview

Global Biodegradable Paper and Plastic Packaging Market reached US$ 14.5 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 23.4 billion by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 9.6% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

The omnipresence of traditional plastic packaging has precipitated a crisis of epic proportions. Such non-biodegradable plastics can take hundreds of years to decompose, polluting ecosystems and oceans and posing a significant threat to wildlife. In an era where environmental concerns are paramount, the global packaging industry is undergoing a profound transformation. Biodegradable packaging has emerged as a game-changer in the quest for sustainable packaging solutions.

While the growth of the biodegradable packaging market is promising, it's not without challenges. The cost of biodegradable materials can be higher than traditional plastics and there are still infrastructure limitations for composting and recycling these materials. Additionally, ensuring the performance and shelf-life of biodegradable packaging remains a focus for research and development.

The starch based plastic, accounts for over 1/3rd of the market share. Similarly, the Asia-Pacific dominates the biodegradable paper and plastic packaging market, capturing the largest market share of over 1/3rd. Government incentives, environmental concerns and advancements in material technology all act as major reasons behind the region's growth.

Dynamics

Growing Demand for Plastic Pollution Reduction

Plastic pollution is a global concern that has garnered significant attention from governments, environmental organizations and the public. A key driver of the biodegradable packaging market is the desire to mitigate plastic pollution by replacing non-biodegradable materials with eco-friendly alternatives. Statistics from Ocean Conservancy show that plastic bags and food wrappers are among the top ten items collected during beach cleanups.

The harmful effects of plastic pollution on marine life and ecosystems have prompted a call for action. Biodegradable packaging is seen as a promising solution to reduce plastic waste and its environmental impact. Thus, growing demand for plastic pollution reduction act as major driver for the market.

Technological Advancements in Material Science

Advancements in material science and technology have played a pivotal role in the development of biodegradable packaging solutions. Innovations in materials such as biodegradable plastics and bio-based paper have enabled manufacturers to create packaging that meets both environmental and performance criteria. One notable example is the development of bioplastics, which are derived from renewable resources such as cornstarch or sugarcane.

Such bioplastics can be used to produce a wide range of packaging materials, from bags to containers. The biodegradable nature of the above mentioned prodcuts makes them an attractive alternative to traditional plastics. Additionally, advancements in manufacturing processes have made it more cost-effective to produce biodegradable packaging, narrowing the price gap with conventional materials.

Corporate Sustainability Initiatives

Many leading corporations are embracing sustainability as a core part of their business strategy. The respective fact includes a commitment to reducing their environmental footprint by adopting biodegradable packaging. Such initiatives not only demonstrate corporate responsibility but also resonate with consumers who are increasingly making purchasing decisions based on a company's sustainability efforts.

For example, in 2020, McDonald's announced a new packaging strategy aimed at sourcing 100% of its packaging from renewable, recycled or certified sources by 2025. The aforementioned strategy includes a transition to biodegradable materials in many of its products. Thus, corporate sustainability initiatives play a vital role in ensuring the growth of the market.

Limited Durability Compared to Alternatives

Biodegradable packaging is designed to break down in the environment, which is a positive feature in terms of reducing plastic waste. However, this property can also be a limitation, especially for products that require long shelf lives or protection against moisture and other environmental factors.

For instance, in the food industry, where packaging plays a crucial role in preserving product freshness, the limited durability of biodegradable packaging can be a significant constraint. According to a report by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the shorter shelf life of some biodegradable packaging materials can lead to increased food waste, offsetting some of the environmental benefits.

High Cost of Production

One of the most significant restraints in the biodegradable packaging industry is the higher cost of production compared to traditional plastic packaging. While biodegradable materials such as PLA (Polylactic Acid) and PHA (Polyhydroxyalkanoates) are derived from renewable resources, their production processes are often more complex and energy-intensive, leading to higher manufacturing costs.

According to U.S. Department of Agriculture (US$A), the production cost of biodegradable plastics can be up to 50% higher than that of conventional plastics. The aforementioned cost differential can be a major barrier for businesses looking to transition to biodegradable packaging, especially in price-sensitive markets.

Segment Analysis

The global biodegradable paper and plastic packaging market is segmented based on material, end-user and region.

Environmental Consequences of Plastic Pollution

Plastic pollution has become a global crisis, with millions of tons of plastic waste ending up in our oceans, landfills and natural ecosystems. As the world grapples with the environmental consequences of plastic pollution, there is a growing interest in sustainable and biodegradable packaging solutions. Starch-based plastics have emerged as a promising alternative in the quest for eco-friendly packaging materials.

The market potential for starch-based plastics in the global biodegradable paper and plastic packaging sector is substantial. Consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable and environmentally responsible products and companies are responding by incorporating starch-based plastics into their packaging solutions.

Furthermore, the ongoing research and development efforts in the field of bioplastics are likely to lead to innovations that improve the performance and cost-effectiveness of starch-based plastics. As a result, these materials are expected to become even more competitive in the packaging industry. As the market for starch-based plastics continues to expand, it offers a promising solution to reduce the environmental impact of traditional plastics in the packaging industry.

Geographical Penetration

Growing Environmental Consciousness Among Consumers and Global Shift Towards Biodegradable Packaging

The global push for sustainability and eco-consciousness has led to a significant transformation in the packaging industry. One of the key trends driving this transformation is the increasing adoption of biodegradable packaging materials. Among these materials, biodegradable paper and plastic packaging have gained significant attention.

Many Asia-Pacific countries have introduced stringent regulations and policies to curb plastic pollution. For instance, India implemented a nationwide ban on single-use plastics, driving the demand for biodegradable alternatives. Similarly, China, one of the world's largest plastic consumers, has initiated measures to reduce plastic waste and promote biodegradable packaging solutions.

Moreover, growing environmental consciousness among consumers has significantly impacted the market. Consumers are increasingly demanding eco-friendly packaging options, pushing manufacturers and retailers to adopt biodegradable materials. The shift in consumer behavior has spurred innovation and investment in biodegradable packaging solutions in the Asia-Pacific.

Therefore, Asia-Pacific is likely to continue playing a pivotal role in the global shift towards biodegradable packaging. As sustainability remains a top priority for businesses and consumers alike, the demand for biodegradable packaging materials in the region is expected to persist and even accelerate in the coming years.

Competitive Landscape

major global players in the market include: Riverside Paper Co. Inc., SmartSolve Industries, Ozsoy Plastik, Ultra Green Sustainable Packaging, Hosgor Plastik, Eurocell S.r.l, Tetra Pak International SA, Kruger Inc., Amcor PLC, Mondi, International Paper Company and Smurfit Kappa.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

Even before the pandemic, there was a growing emphasis on sustainable and eco-friendly packaging solutions. Consumers were becoming increasingly conscious of the environmental impact of traditional plastic packaging, leading to a surge in demand for biodegradable alternatives. Government sources, such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S., reported that in the years leading up to 2020, the demand for sustainable packaging was steadily rising.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had far-reaching effects on various industries globally and the packaging industry is no exception. While the pandemic created challenges for businesses and supply chains, it also accelerated certain trends, particularly in sustainable packaging. Lockdowns, supply chain disruptions and shifts in consumer behavior had a significant impact on packaging demand and preferences.

In the initial months of the pandemic, there was a surge in demand for essential products like food and hygiene items. The respective fact has led to an increased use of traditional plastic packaging, particularly single-use plastics, as consumers and businesses prioritized safety and hygiene over sustainability. Regulations and policies aimed at reducing plastic waste and promoting eco-friendly alternatives became more common across the world.

Nonetheless, the pandemic heightened consumer awareness of health, safety and the environment. As the situation improved and people adjusted to the new normal, there was a renewed focus on sustainability. Consumers began to favor products with eco-friendly packaging. Further, the biodegradable packaging industry responded to the challenges posed by the pandemic by introducing innovative solutions.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis

The Russia-Ukraine war has disrupted global supply chains, particularly in the chemicals and plastics industries. Both Russia and Ukraine were key players in the production of petrochemicals and plastics, with Ukraine, in particular, being a significant exporter. The conflict disrupted production and exports, leading to a shortage of raw materials, including those required for biodegradable plastics.

Further, the disruption in the supply of key raw materials, such as biodegradable polymers derived from petrochemicals, has caused prices to surge. Manufacturers of biodegradable packaging materials have faced increased production costs, which in turn have affected pricing in the market. The respective fact has put pressure on businesses looking to adopt or expand their use of biodegradable packaging.

Nonetheless, while the Russia-Ukraine war has presented challenges to the biodegradable packaging market, it has also underscored the importance of diversifying supply chains and investing in sustainable materials. As the conflict continues, businesses in the packaging industry are exploring alternative sources for biodegradable materials and investing in research and development to create more sustainable packaging solutions.

The demand for biodegradable packaging is likely to continue growing as consumers and governments globally prioritize sustainability. The aforementioned fact presents opportunities for businesses to develop innovative biodegradable products that not only meet environmental goals but also cater to the evolving preferences of conscious consumers.

By Material

Plastic
- Starch Based plastic
- Cellulose Based Plastics
- Polylactic Acid (PLA)
- Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA)
Paper

By End-User

Food and Beverage
Catering Service wares
Personal and Home Care
Healthcare
Others

By Region

North America
- U.S.
- Canada
- Mexico
Europe
- Germany
- UK
- France
- Italy
- Russia
- Rest of Europe
South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
Asia-Pacific
- China
- India
- Japan
- Australia
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

In 2021, Mondi, a major packaging and paper manufacturer launched its EcoSolutions range of biodegradable and recyclable packaging. The respective range of products are designed to reduce environmental impact while maintaining the quality and functionality that consumers expect from packaging.
Smurfit Kappa unveiled its "Better Planet Packaging" initiative in 2020. The company is committed to creating sustainable packaging solutions using biodegradable materials. The products in the respective initiatives include innovative paper-based packaging designed to replace single-use plastics.
In 2021, Danimer Scientific launched Nodax, a biodegradable plastic that breaks down naturally in the environment. The product has gained attention for its potential to replace traditional plastics in various packaging applications.

Why Purchase the Report?

To visualize the global biodegradable paper and plastic packaging market segmentation based on material, end-user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
Excel data sheet with numerous data points of biodegradable paper and plastic packaging market-level with all segments.
PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global biodegradable paper and plastic packaging market report would provide approximately 57 tables, 50 figures and 187 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

Manufacturers/ Buyers
Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
Research Professionals
Emerging Companies

1. Methodology and Scope

1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

3.1. Snippet by Material
3.2. Snippet by End-User
3.3. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

4.1. Impacting Factors
- 4.1.1. Drivers
  - 4.1.1.1. Growing Demand for Plastic Pollution Reduction
  - 4.1.1.2. Technological Advancements in Material Science
  - 4.1.1.3. Corporate Sustainability Initiatives
- 4.1.2. Restraints
  - 4.1.2.1. Limited Durability Compared to Alternatives
- 4.1.3. Opportunity
- 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
5.3. Pricing Analysis
5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
- 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
- 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
- 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
6.6. Conclusion

7. By Material

7.1. Introduction
- 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Material
- 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Material
7.2. Plastic*
- 7.2.1. Introduction
- 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
- 7.2.3. Cellulose Based Plastics
- 7.2.4. Polylactic Acid (PLA)
- 7.2.5. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA)
- 7.2.6. Starch Based Plastic
- 7.2.7. Others
7.3. Paper

8. By End-User

8.1. Introduction
- 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-User
8.2. Food and Beverage*
- 8.2.1. Introduction
- 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
8.3. Catering Service wares
8.4. Personal and Home Care
8.5. Healthcare
8.6. Others

9. By Region

9.1. Introduction
- 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
- 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
9.2. North America
- 9.2.1. Introduction
- 9.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Material
- 9.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 9.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 9.2.5.1. U.S.
  - 9.2.5.2. Canada
  - 9.2.5.3. Mexico
9.3. Europe
- 9.3.1. Introduction
- 9.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Material
- 9.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 9.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 9.3.5.1. Germany
  - 9.3.5.2. UK
  - 9.3.5.3. France
  - 9.3.5.4. Italy
  - 9.3.5.5. Russia
  - 9.3.5.6. Rest of Europe
9.4. South America
- 9.4.1. Introduction
- 9.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Material
- 9.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 9.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 9.4.5.1. Brazil
  - 9.4.5.2. Argentina
  - 9.4.5.3. Rest of South America
9.5. Asia-Pacific
- 9.5.1. Introduction
- 9.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Material
- 9.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 9.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 9.5.5.1. China
  - 9.5.5.2. India
  - 9.5.5.3. Japan
  - 9.5.5.4. Australia
  - 9.5.5.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
9.6. Middle East and Africa
- 9.6.1. Introduction
- 9.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 9.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Material
- 9.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

10. Competitive Landscape

10.1. Competitive Scenario
10.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
10.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

11. Company Profiles

11.1. Riverside Paper Co. Inc. *
- 11.1.1. Company Overview
- 11.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
- 11.1.3. Financial Overview
- 11.1.4. Key Developments
11.2. SmartSolve Industries
11.3. Ozsoy Plastik
11.4. Ultra Green Sustainable Packaging
11.5. Hosgor Plastik
11.6. Eurocell S.r.l
11.7. Tetra Pak International SA
11.8. Kruger Inc.
11.9. Amcor PLC
11.10. Mondi
11.11. International Paper Company
11.12. Smurfit Kappa