全球肉類形態測試市場 - 2023-2030

市場概況

全球肉類形態測試市場在 2022 年達到 19 億美元，預計到 2030 年將達到 26 億美元，2023-2030 年預測期間年複合成長率為 4.1%。

基於 DNA 的測試使科學家能夠從一塊肉中提取 DNA 並進行分析。通過將 DNA 序列與已知肉類物種的數據庫進行比較，可以確定樣品中存在的特定物種。物種鑑定涉及識別肉製品或樣品中存在的特定物種。

下一代測序結果可以與包含來自不同肉類品種的已知基因的參考資料集進行比較。這種比較可以更準確地識別物種並驗證下一代測序數據。質譜 (MS) 是一種強大的分析技術，用於初級肉類檢測，用於識別和量化肉類樣品中的蛋白質和肽。

肉類摻假是指故意添加劣質或廉價品種的肉類、非肉類產品或貼錯標籤，以誤導消費者或獲取經濟優勢。 肉類特異性檢測有助於確保市場上肉類產品的真實性和品質，保護消費者的健康和安全。信心。

市場動態

肉類食品欺詐事件的上升推動了肉類形態測試市場的發展

肉類行業中食品造假現像日益普遍，推動了用於檢測肉類品質的肉類專用測試的銷售。食品欺詐是指為了經濟利益而故意歪曲或歪曲食品，給消費者造成嚴重健康風險的行為。行業聲譽和公共衛生肉類產品特別容易受到被稱為貼錯標籤動物的欺詐行為的影響。欺詐性企業家可以通過用更便宜的肉類替代優質或更昂貴的品種來賺取巨額利潤。

由於貼錯標籤或摻假，肉類可能會以高價或以虛假藉口出售。肉類行業通常涉及複雜的供應鏈，有許多中介機構和流程。這些複雜性為欺詐活動創造了機會，因為整個供應鏈中肉類的來源和真實性很難確定。如果沒有適當的分析，就很難確定肉製品的真實性和來源。如果沒有適當的追踪和記錄，欺詐者很容易替換肉類品種或貼錯標籤，導致供應鏈不負責任和缺乏透明度。這創造了對肉類形態測試的需求。

肉類形態測試檢測方法的快速進步推動市場成長

用於初級肉類檢測的肉類識別技術的快速發展在市場的成長中發揮著重要作用。準確、靈敏、高通量篩選方法開發的進步導致肉類品種分析應用和技術得到更多採用。基於 DNA 的分析、DNA 篩選技術（例如聚合酶鍊式反應 (PCR) 和即時 PCR）的進步極大地提高了這些方法的準確性和靈敏度，以便檢測和識別來自特定肉類品種的少量 DNA。

準確識別物種特異性標記的能力提供了可靠且值得信賴的結果，降低了錯誤標籤和欺詐行為的風險，因此快速檢測方法的引入顯著減少了肉類特異性測試所需的時間。傳統技術，例如顯微鏡或血清學方法，通常涉及耗時的過程。然而，隨著 PCR 等技術的進步，現在可以在幾小時或幾分鐘內獲得結果。更快的周轉時間使食品製造商、監管機構和其他利益相關者能夠及時做出決策，從而提高營運效率和食品安全。

肉類形態測試缺乏標準化阻礙了市場成長

在缺乏標準化測試方法的情況下，實驗室可以採用自己的肉類特定測試程序和方法。這可能會導致測試方法的差異，從而導致結果和解釋不一致。缺乏一致性使得很難在實驗室之間比較和驗證結果，從而阻礙了實踐中的合作和統一。缺乏標準可能會損害依賴它的測試結果的準確性和能力。如果無法保證標準化方法，包括食品製造商、監管機構和消費者在內的利益相關者對測試結果的信心可能會有限。

這種信心的缺乏可能會導致市場成長放緩，因為它可能會阻礙對肉類研究的投資並影響採用。缺乏標準化方法使得很難比較和對比實驗室或研究之間的測試結果。這限制了建立全行業指標和業務模型的能力。如果沒有統一的框架，就很難評估測試應用程式和技術的效率和品質，從而阻礙市場成長。

COVID-19 影響

由於封鎖、旅行限制和肉類加工廠的暫時關閉，全球肉類供應因疫情而受到干擾。這些問題影響了肉類產品的供應和分配，給開展初級肉類試驗帶來了挑戰。樣本量的下降和供應鏈的變化影響了研究工作的需求。 COVID-19 大流行加劇了消費者對食品安全和衛生的擔憂。

因此，人們更加重視確保肉製品的安全性和真實性。初級肉類檢測在驗證標籤和解決這些嚴重的消費者擔憂以識別任何潛在的摻假或失實陳述方面發揮著至關重要的作用。議會和政府短期內已對食品安全立法進行了修改，以應對大流行帶來的挑戰。

目錄

第 1 章：方法和範圍

• 研究方法論
• 報告的研究目的和範圍

第 2 章：定義和概述

第 3 章：執行摘要

• 按物種分類
• 技術片段
• 按表格列出的片段
• 按地區分類

第 4 章：動力學

• 影響因素
  • 司機
    • 肉類食品欺詐事件的上升推動了肉類形態測試市場的發展
    • 肉類形態測試檢測方法的快速進步推動市場成長
  • 限制
    • 肉類形態測試缺乏標準化阻礙了市場成長
  • 機會
  • 影響分析

第 5 章：行業分析

• 波特五力分析
• 供應鏈分析
• 定價分析
• 監管分析

第 6 章：COVID-19 分析

• COVID-19 分析
  • 新冠疫情爆發前的情景
  • 新冠疫情期間的情景
  • 新冠疫情后的情景
• COVID-19 期間的定價動態
• 供需譜
• 疫情期間政府與市場相關的舉措
• 製造商戰略舉措
• 結論

第 7 章：按物種分類

• 奶牛
• 豬
• 雞
• 馬
• 羊
• 其他

第 8 章：按技術

• 聚合酶鍊式反應
• 酶聯免疫吸附試驗
• 其他

第 9 章：按形式

• 生的
• 熟的
• 處理

第 10 章：按地區

• 北美
  • 美國
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
• 歐洲
  • 德國
  • 英國
  • 法國
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 歐洲其他地區
• 南美洲
  • 巴西
  • 阿根廷
  • 南美洲其他地區
• 亞太
  • 中國
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳大利亞
  • 亞太其他地區
• 中東和非洲

第 11 章：競爭格局

• 競爭場景
• 市場定位/佔有率分析
• 併購分析

第 12 章：公司簡介

• Eurofins Scientific
• 公司簡介
• 產品組合和描述
• 財務概覽
• 主要進展
• VWR International, LLC
• Rapid Test Methods Ltd.
• AB Sciex Pte. Ltd.
• LGC Limited
• Neogen Corporation
• ALS
• BioCheck Inc.
• EnviroLogix
• EMSL Analytical, Inc

第 13 章：附錄

Market Overview

Global Meat Speciation Testing Market reached US$ 1.9 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 2.6 billion by 2030 growing with a CAGR of 4.1% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

DNA-based testing allows scientists to extract DNA from a piece of meat and analyze it. By comparing the DNA sequence to a database of known meat species, the specific species present in the sample can be determined. Species identification involves identifying the specific species present in the meat product or sample.

Next-generation sequencing results can be compared with reference datasets containing known genes from different meat species. This comparison allows for more accurate species identification and validation of the next-generation sequencing data. Mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful analytical technique used in primary meat testing to identify and quantify proteins and peptides in meat samples.

Meat adulteration refers to the deliberate addition or mislabeling of inferior or cheaper varieties of meat, non-meat products, to mislead consumers or to gain economic advantage Meat specificity testing helps ensures the authenticity and quality of meat products on the market and protects consumer health and confidence.

Market Dynamics

Rising Incidences of Food Fraud in Meet Drives the Market of Meat Speciation Testing

The increasing prevalence of food fraud in the meat industry drives the sales of meat-specific tests to detect quality of the meat. Food fraud refers to the deliberate misrepresentation or distortion of food products for financial gain, causing serious health risk to consumers. Industry reputation and public health meat products are particularly vulnerable to fraudulent practices hear as mislabelled animals. Fraudulent entrepreneurs can make huge profits by substituting premium or more expensive varieties with cheaper meat.

By mislabeling or adulteration, meat can be sold at inflated prices or under false pretenses. The meat industry generally involves a complex supply chain with many intermediaries and processes. These complexities create opportunities for fraudulent activity, as the origin and authenticity of meat throughout the supply chain is difficult to determine. Without proper analysis, it can make it difficult to determine the authenticity and origin of meat products. Without proper tracking and documentation, fraudsters can easily substitute or mislabel meat varieties, leading to unaccountability and lack of transparency in the supply chain. This creates demand for the meat speciation testing.

Rapid Advancements in the Detection Methods of Meat Speciation Testing Drives Market Growth

Rapid development of meat identification techniques for primary meat testing plays a significant role in the growth of the market. Improvements in the development of accurate, sensitive, high-throughput screening methods have led to greater adoption of meat species analytical applications and technologies. Advances in DNA-based analysis, DNA screening techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR have greatly improved the accuracy and sensitivity of these methods in order to detect and identify even small amounts of DNA from specific meat species.

The ability to accurately identify species-specific markers provides reliable and trustworthy results, reducing the risk of mislabeling and fraudulent practices so the introduction of rapid detection methods has significantly reduced the time required for meat-specific testing. Traditional techniques, such as microscopy or serological methods, often involved time-consuming procedures. However, with advances in technology such as PCR, results can now be obtained in hours or minutes. Faster turnaround times allow food manufacturers, regulators, and other stakeholders to make timely decisions, increasing operational efficiency and food safety.

Lack of Standardization in Meat Speciation Testing Hampers Market Growth

In the absence of standardized test methods, laboratories may adopt their own meat-specific testing procedures and methods. This can lead to differences in test methods, leading to inconsistent results and interpretations. Lack of consistency makes it difficult to compare and validate results across laboratories, hindering cooperation and uniformity in practice. Lack of standards can compromise the accuracy and ability of test results relies on it. Stakeholders including food manufacturers, regulators, and consumers may have limited confidence in test results if there is no assurance of standardized methods.

This lack of confidence can provide market growth has slowed as it may discourage investment in meat research and compromise adoption. The lack of standardized methods makes it difficult to compare and contrast test results between laboratories or studies. This limits the ability to establish industry-wide metrics, and business models. Without a uniform framework, it is difficult to assess the efficiency and quality of testing applications and technologies, hindering market growth.

COVID-19 Impact

The global meat supply has been disrupted by the outbreak due to lockdowns, travel restrictions and the temporary closure of meat processing plants. These problems have affected the availability and distribution of meat products, creating challenges in developing primary meat trials. The decline in sample sizes and changes in the supply chain affected the demand for research work. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased consumer concerns about food safety and hygiene.

Consequently, more emphasis has been placed on ensuring the safety and authenticity of meat products. Primary meat testing plays a vital role in verifying labeling and addressing these acute consumer concerns to identify any potential adulteration or misrepresentation Parliamentary and governmental short-term has implemented changes in food safety legislation to address the challenges posed by the pandemic.

Segment Analysis

The global meat speciation testing market is segmented based on species, technology, form, and region.

Increase in the Consumers Demand for the Chicken Helps to Boost Segment Growth Over the Forecast Period.

The global meat speciation testing market by species has been segmented by cow, swine, chicken, horse, sheep and others.

Poultry meat specificity testing refers to a method for determining the origin of poultry meat products. This testing is necessary to ensure food safety, prevent fraud and comply with regulatory standards. Identifying a particular type of poultry can detect any adulteration. Stringent regulations and standards set by food safety authorities and regulatory agencies lead to specific inspection requirements in the poultry industry.

The purpose of these laws is to ensure labeling accuracy, prevent adulteration, and protect consumer health. Increased consumer awareness of food authenticity, sourcing, and the ethical concerns surrounding food production have increased the demand for accurate ethnic identification Consumers are increasingly interested in location identification whose food sources, including poultry and meat products. The poultry industry and those involved in the supply chain, including producers, processors, and retailers, prioritize quality control and inspection. Specification testing helps ensure quality, prevent substitution or contamination, and protect brand reputation.

Geographical Analysis

North America Region Held the Largest Share in Meat Speciation Testing Market

North America has well-established regulatory frameworks and strict food safety laws that emphasize accurate labeling and prevention of food fraud. These laws require specialized meat testing to ensure that they comply and protect consumers health. Developing countries in the region like United States and Canada has a robust food testing program, with specialized laboratories equipped with advanced technology. These facilities enable accurate and efficient primary meat testing, attracting businesses and consumers looking for reliable testing services.

The district has a robust food testing program, with specialized laboratories equipped with advanced technology. These facilities enable accurate and efficient primary meat testing, attracting businesses looking for reliable testing services. Consumers in region have recognized the authenticity, origin and quality of their food. This has led to the demand for meat-specific testing to verify claims and ensure products meet expectations.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players include Eurofins Scientific., VWR International, LLC, Rapid Test Methods Ltd., AB Sciex Pte. Ltd., LGC Limited, Neogen Corporation, ALS, BioCheck Inc., EnviroLogix and EMSL Analytical, Inc.

Why Purchase the Report?

• To visualize the global meat speciation testing market segmentation based on species, technology, form, and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
• Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
• Excel data sheet with numerous data points of meat speciation testing market-level with all segments.
• PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
• Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global meat speciation testing market report would provide approximately 61 tables, 60 figures and 122 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

• Manufacturers/ Buyers
• Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
• Research Professionals
• Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

• 1.1. Research Methodology
• 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Snippet by Species
• 3.2. Snippet by Technology
• 3.3. Snippet by Form
• 3.4. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

• 4.1. Impacting Factors
  • 4.1.1. Drivers
    • 4.1.1.1. Rising Incidences of Food Fraud in Meet Drives the Market of Meat Speciation Testing
    • 4.1.1.2. Rapid Advancements in the Detection Methods of Meat Speciation Testing Drives Market Growth
  • 4.1.2. Restraints
    • 4.1.2.1. Lack of Standardization in Meat Speciation Testing Hampers Market Growth
  • 4.1.3. Opportunity
  • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

• 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
• 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
• 5.3. Pricing Analysis
• 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

• 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
  • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
  • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
  • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
• 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
• 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
• 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
• 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
• 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Species

• 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Species
  • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Species
• 7.2. Cow*
  • 7.2.1. Introduction
  • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
• 7.3. Swine
• 7.4. Chicken
• 7.5. Horse
• 7.6. Sheep
• 7.7. Others

8. By Technology

• 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
  • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Technology
• 8.2. PCR *
  • 8.2.1. Introduction
  • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
• 8.3. ELISA
• 8.4. Others

9. By Form

• 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
  • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Form
• 9.2. Raw*
  • 9.2.1. Introduction
  • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
• 9.3. Cooked
• 9.4. Processed

10. By Region

• 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
  • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
• 10.2. North America
  • 10.2.1. Introduction
  • 10.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 10.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Species
  • 10.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
  • 10.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
  • 10.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 10.2.6.1. The U.S.
    • 10.2.6.2. Canada
    • 10.2.6.3. Mexico
• 10.3. Europe
  • 10.3.1. Introduction
  • 10.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 10.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Species
  • 10.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
  • 10.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
  • 10.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 10.3.6.1. Germany
    • 10.3.6.2. The U.K.
    • 10.3.6.3. France
    • 10.3.6.4. Italy
    • 10.3.6.5. Spain
    • 10.3.6.6. Rest of Europe
• 10.4. South America
  • 10.4.1. Introduction
  • 10.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 10.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Species
  • 10.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
  • 10.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
  • 10.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 10.4.6.1. Brazil
    • 10.4.6.2. Argentina
    • 10.4.6.3. Rest of South America
• 10.5. Asia-Pacific
  • 10.5.1. Introduction
  • 10.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 10.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Species
  • 10.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
  • 10.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
  • 10.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
    • 10.5.6.1. China
    • 10.5.6.2. India
    • 10.5.6.3. Japan
    • 10.5.6.4. Australia
    • 10.5.6.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
• 10.6. Middle East and Africa
  • 10.6.1. Introduction
  • 10.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
  • 10.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Species
  • 10.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
  • 10.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form

11. Competitive Landscape

• 11.1. Competitive Scenario
• 11.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
• 11.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

12. Company Profiles

• 12.1. Eurofins Scientific*
  • 12.1.1. Company Overview
  • 12.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
  • 12.1.3. Financial Overview
  • 12.1.4. Key Developments
• 12.2. VWR International, LLC
• 12.3. Rapid Test Methods Ltd.
• 12.4. AB Sciex Pte. Ltd.
• 12.5. LGC Limited
• 12.6. Neogen Corporation
• 12.7. ALS
• 12.8. BioCheck Inc.
• 12.9. EnviroLogix
• 12.10. EMSL Analytical, Inc

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

13. Appendix

• 13.1. About Us and Services
• 13.2. Contact Us