封面
市場調查報告書
商品編碼
1325375

全球船橋模擬器市場 - 2023-2030

Global Ship Bridge Simulator Market - 2023-2030

出版日期: | 出版商: DataM Intelligence | 英文 192 Pages | 商品交期: 約2個工作天內

價格

本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

簡介目錄

市場概況

全球船橋模擬器市場於2022年達到22億美元,預計到2030年將達到31億美元,2023-2030年預測期間年複合成長率為6.4%。

由於海事行業對先進培訓和模擬系統的需求不斷成長,全球船橋模擬器市場正在經歷顯著成長。船橋模擬器為培訓船員並在現實和身臨其境的環境中提高他們的技能提供了一個安全且經濟高效的平台。

近年來,海運業見證了重大技術進步和全球貿易活動的增加。各個因素導致人們更加關注安全和效率,促使船東和培訓機構投資船橋模擬器。

交互式船橋模擬器細分市場在該類型細分市場中佔據主導地位,經歷了快速成長並佔據了一半以上的市場佔有率。顯著的成長可歸因於技術的進步和對海上安全的需求不斷成長。同樣,北美在船橋模擬器系統市場中佔有最大的市場佔有率,佔總市場佔有率的三分之一以上。北美在船橋模擬器系統市場中展現出巨大的潛力,這主要是由於海事技術的進步以及對海事人員有效培訓和評估的需要。

市場動態

專注於具有成本效益的培訓和技術進步

面對不斷上升的營運成本和對高效培訓方法的需求,船橋模擬器為海上培訓提供了一種經濟高效的解決方案。傳統的船上培訓可能既耗時又昂貴,需要大量資源,並對船員和船舶都構成風險。船橋模擬器允許學員重複練習各種場景,而不會對船舶、船員或環境造成任何實際風險。澳大利亞海事安全局 (AMSA) 已經認知到模擬器在降低培訓成本和增強技能發展方面的價值。

船橋模擬器市場見證了技術的快速進步,推動了其在各種海事機構和組織中的採用。現代模擬器配備了最先進的技術,包括高解析度可視化系統、先進的運動平台和即時天氣模擬。各自的進步使船橋模擬器高度逼真,為學員提供了緊密複製現實世界場景的身臨其境的體驗。

各國政府和監管機構還通過贈款和補貼鼓勵採用先進的模擬器。例如,歐盟 (EU) 一直通過 Horizo​​n 2020 框架等資助計劃支持海事模擬技術的研究和開發計劃。

海事培訓的進步和對船舶操縱技能的需求不斷成長

促進船橋模擬器市場成長的關鍵促進因素之一是越來越注重提高海事培訓和安全標準。隨著船舶營運的複雜性不斷增加以及對熟練航海員的需求不斷增加,船橋模擬器已成為實踐培訓的重要工具。

世界各國政府和海事監管機構一直強調船員培訓和使用模擬器提高船舶操作技能的重要性。根據國際海事組織 (IMO) 的規定,培訓、認證和值班標準 (STCW) 公約強制規定使用模擬器進行培訓。

STCW 公約制定了海員培訓和認證的標準,並強制要求使用模擬器來提供真實有效的培訓,確保安全航行和船舶營運。全球航運業對能夠在各種具有挑戰性的條件下操縱船舶的熟練航海員的需求激增。

船橋模擬器提供了一個無風險的環境,可以在惡劣的天氣條件、狹窄的航道和擁擠的港口等複雜場景下練習船舶操縱。對安全航行、燃油效率和減少環境影響的日益重視進一步擴大了對綜合船舶操縱培訓的需求。

發展中地區初始投資成本高且可及性有限

船橋模擬器市場面臨的主要限制之一是與先進模擬器系統的採購和安裝相關的初始投資成本高昂。複雜的模擬器需要最先進的硬體和軟體組件來創建真實且身臨其境的培訓環境。

此外,維護和更新這些系統的成本可能很高,增加了模擬器操作員的總體費用。根據國際海事組織 (IMO) 的一份報告,全任務船舶橋樑模擬器的初始投資可達 200 萬美元至 500 萬美元,具體取決於系統的複雜性和功能。各自巨大的前期成本通常會阻礙小型海事培訓機構和發展中國家投資此類先進的模擬器技術。

船橋模擬器市場的另一個重要限制是模擬器在發展中地區的可及性和滲透率有限。雖然已開發國家已經建立了設備齊全的海上訓練設施,但許多發展中國家缺乏必要的基礎設施和資金來投資先進的模擬器系統。

這各自造成了模擬器培訓機會分佈不均,並阻礙了整體市場的成長。世界銀行的統計數據顯示,低收入國家的海事培訓設施不太普及,其中只有 18% 的國家擁有先進的模擬器技術。相比之下,高收入國家配備模擬器的海上培訓設施覆蓋率高達 82%。各自的差異表明需要增加支持和資金,以促進發展中地區船橋模擬器市場的成長。

COVID-19 影響分析

COVID-19 大流行給全球各個行業留下了不可磨滅的印記,海事部門也不例外。在海上培訓和安全中發揮著關鍵作用的全球船橋模擬器市場也受到了疫情的影響。船橋模擬器是海事專業人員用來模擬現實生活場景並提高其導航、通訊和決策技能的先進培訓工具。

這些模擬器複製了船舶的駕駛台和周圍環境,為各種場景(包括導航、船舶裝卸和緊急情況)的培訓提供了安全且經濟高效的平台。來自國際海事組織 (IMO) 等海事監管機構的政府數據可以為全球船橋模擬器市場的成長趨勢和挑戰提供有價值的見解。

隨著疫情在全球蔓延,旅行限制和封鎖措施嚴重影響了海上訓練活動。許多培訓機構和海事院校被迫暫停或減少現場培訓項目。培訓計劃的中斷導致對船橋模擬器的需求下降,影響了大流行期間的市場成長。

目錄

第 1 章:方法和範圍

  • 研究方法論
  • 報告的研究目的和範圍

第 2 章:定義和概述

第 3 章:執行摘要

  • 按類型分類
  • 解決方案片段
  • 按組織規模分類
  • 最終用戶的片段
  • 按地區分類

第 4 章:動力學

  • 影響因素
    • 司機
      • 專注於具有成本效益的培訓和技術進步
      • 海事培訓的進步和對船舶操縱技能的需求不斷成長
    • 限制
      • 發展中地區初始投資成本高且可及性有限
    • 機會
    • 影響分析

第 5 章:行業分析

  • 波特五力分析
  • 供應鏈分析
  • 定價分析
  • 監管分析

第 6 章:COVID-19 分析

  • COVID-19 分析
    • 新冠疫情爆發前的情景
    • 新冠疫情期間的情景
    • 新冠疫情后的情景
  • COVID-19 期間的定價動態
  • 供需譜
  • 疫情期間政府與市場相關的舉措
  • 製造商戰略舉措
  • 結論

第 7 章:按類型

  • 交互式船橋模擬器
  • 非交互式船橋模擬器

第 8 章:通過解決方案

  • 現場培訓
  • 專業培訓
  • 建設性培訓
  • 虛擬培訓
  • 系統培訓
  • 遊戲模擬訓練

第 9 章:按組織規模

  • 大型組織
  • 中型組織
  • 小型組織

第 10 章:最終用戶

  • 海洋
  • 教育性

第 11 章:按地區

  • 北美
    • 我們
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 歐洲
    • 德國
    • 英國
    • 法國
    • 義大利
    • 俄羅斯
    • 歐洲其他地區
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 南美洲其他地區
  • 亞太
    • 中國
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 澳大利亞
    • 亞太其他地區
  • 中東和非洲

第 12 章:競爭格局

  • 競爭場景
  • 市場定位/佔有率分析
  • 併購分析

第 13 章:公司簡介

  • Wartsila
    • 公司簡介
    • 產品組合和描述
    • 財務概覽
    • 主要進展
  • Rheinmetall AG
  • General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
  • AVEVA Group plc
  • Presagis Canada Inc.
  • ST Engineering
  • BMT Group Ltd
  • ARI Simulation
  • PC Maritime
  • FORCE TECHNOLOGY

第 14 章:附錄

簡介目錄
Product Code: ICT6599

Market Overview

Global Ship Bridge Simulator Market reached US$ 2.2 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 3.1 billion by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 6.4% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

The global ship bridge simulator market is experiencing remarkable growth, driven by the increasing demand for advanced training and simulation systems in the maritime industry. ship bridge simulator provides a safe and cost-effective platform for training ship crews and enhancing their skills in a realistic and immersive environment.

In recent years, the maritime industry has witnessed significant technological advancements and an upswing in global trade activities. The respective factors have led to an increased focus on safety and efficiency, prompting shipowners and training institutes to invest in ship bridge simulators.

The interactive ship bridge simulators segment dominates the type segment, experiencing rapid growth and capturing over half of the market share. The remarkable growth can be attributed to advancements in technology and rising demand for maritime safety. In a similar vein, the North America holds the largest market share in the ship bridge simulator system market, accounting for over one-third of the total market share. North America exhibits vast potential in the ship bridge simulator system market, primarily due to advancements in maritime technology and the need for effective training and evaluation of maritime personnel.

Market Dynamics

Focus on Cost-Effective Training and Technological Advancements

In the face of rising operational costs and the need for efficient training methods, ship bridge simulators offer a cost-effective solution for maritime training. Traditional onboard training can be time-consuming and expensive, requiring significant resources and posing risks to both crew and vessel. Ship bridge simulators allow trainees to practice various scenarios repeatedly without any actual risk to vessels, crew, or the environment. The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) has recognized the value of simulators in reducing training costs and enhancing skill development.

The ship bridge simulator market has witnessed rapid technological advancements, driving its adoption across various maritime institutions and organizations. Modern simulators are equipped with state-of-the-art technology, including high-resolution visualization systems, advanced motion platforms, and real-time weather simulations. The respective advancements have made ship bridge simulators highly realistic, providing trainees with an immersive experience that closely replicates real-world scenarios.

Governments and regulatory bodies are also encouraging the adoption of advanced simulators through grants and subsidies. For instance, the European Union (EU) has been supporting research and development initiatives in maritime simulation technology through funding programs such as the Horizon 2020 framework.

Advancements in Maritime Training and Rising Demand for Vessel Maneuvering Skills

One of the key drivers contributing to the growth of the ship bridge simulator market is the increasing focus on enhancing maritime training and safety standards. With the rising complexities in ship operations and the need for skilled navigators, ship bridge simulators have emerged as crucial tools for hands-on training.

Governments and maritime regulatory authorities worldwide have been emphasizing the importance of competent crew training and the use of simulators to improve ship handling skills. According to the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the application of simulators for training purposes is mandated under the Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping (STCW) convention.

The STCW convention sets the standards for the training and certification of seafarers and mandates the use of simulators to provide realistic and efficient training, ensuring safe navigation and ship operation. The global shipping industry has witnessed a surge in the demand for skilled navigators capable of maneuvering vessels in various challenging conditions.

Ship bridge simulators offer a risk-free environment to practice ship handling in complex scenarios, such as adverse weather conditions, narrow channels, and congested ports. The increasing emphasis on safe navigation, fuel efficiency, and reduced environmental impact has further amplified the demand for comprehensive ship handling training.

High Initial Investment Costs and Limited Accessibility in Developing Regions

One of the primary restraints faced by the ship bridge simulator market is the high initial investment costs associated with the procurement and installation of advanced simulator systems. The sophisticated simulators require state-of-the-art hardware and software components to create a realistic and immersive training environment.

Additionally, the cost of maintaining and updating these systems can be substantial, adding to the overall expenses for simulator operators. According to a report by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the initial investment for a full mission ship bridge simulator can range from US$ 2 million to US$ 5 million, depending on the complexity and features of the system. The respective significant upfront cost often deters smaller maritime training institutes and developing countries from investing in such advanced simulator technologies.

Another significant restraint for the ship bridge simulator market is the limited accessibility and penetration of simulators in developing regions. While developed countries have established well-equipped maritime training facilities, many developing nations lack the necessary infrastructure and funding to invest in advanced simulator systems.

The respective creates an uneven distribution of simulator training opportunities and hampers the overall market growth. Statistics from the World Bank reveal that maritime training facilities are less prevalent in low-income countries, with only 18% of these countries having access to advanced simulator technologies. In contrast, high-income countries boast an 82% coverage of maritime training facilities equipped with simulators. The respective disparity points to the need for increased support and funding to facilitate the growth of the ship bridge simulator market in developing regions.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

The COVID-19 pandemic has left an indelible mark on various industries worldwide, and the maritime sector is no exception. The global ship bridge simulator market, which plays a critical role in maritime training and safety, has also felt the effects of the pandemic. Ship bridge simulators are advanced training tools used by maritime professionals to simulate real-life scenarios and enhance their navigation, communication, and decision-making skills.

These simulators replicate the ship's bridge and surrounding environment, offering a safe and cost-effective platform for training in various scenarios, including navigation, ship handling, and emergencies. Government data from maritime regulatory bodies, such as the International Maritime Organization (IMO), can provide valuable insights into the global ship bridge simulator market's growth trends and challenges.

As the pandemic spread globally, travel restrictions and lockdown measures severely impacted maritime training activities. Many training institutions and maritime academies were forced to suspend or reduce their on-site training programs. This disruption in training schedules led to a decline in the demand for ship bridge simulators, affecting the market's growth during the pandemic.

Segment Analysis

The global ship bridge simulator market is segmented based on type, solution, organization size, end-user and region.

Advancements in Technology

Ship bridge simulators are advanced training tools that replicate real-life scenarios and enable maritime professionals to develop essential navigational skills and enhance decision-making abilities in a risk-free environment. Among the various segments of the ship bridge simulator market, interactive ship bridge simulators stand out as a key driver of growth. Interactive ship bridge simulators are sophisticated training systems that provide a realistic and immersive experience for seafarers.

The aforementioned simulators are equipped with cutting-edge technologies, including high-definition displays, advanced navigation systems, and realistic sound effects, to recreate various maritime scenarios accurately. Interactive ship bridge simulators enable trainees to practice ship handling, navigation, and emergency response in a controlled environment, thereby enhancing their skills and confidence before they encounter real-life situations at sea.

The rapid advancements in technology have played a pivotal role in driving the growth of interactive ship bridge simulators. With the integration of state-of-the-art hardware and software components, these simulators offer a highly realistic and interactive training experience. The incorporation of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies has further elevated the level of immersion and engagement, making the training process more effective and enjoyable for trainees.

Geographical Analysis

Booming Maritime Industry in North America

Ship bridge simulators are sophisticated tools that replicate real-life scenarios, offering a safe and controlled environment for training, navigation practice, and emergency response exercises. North America, comprising countries such as U.S. and Canada, has emerged as a key player in the global ship bridge simulator market.

The region's dominant position can be attributed to various factors, including robust maritime infrastructure, a strong emphasis on safety and training standards, and significant investments in maritime education and research. Government sources provide valuable statistics and insights into North America's contribution to the global ship bridge simulator market, showcasing its remarkable growth and importance in the maritime industry.

Further, North America is home to some of the world's busiest and most strategic ports, making it a vital hub for international maritime trade. Ports like Los Angeles, Long Beach, New York-New Jersey, and Vancouver handle massive cargo volumes, facilitating global supply chains and trade networks. According to the United States Census Bureau, the total value of U.S. imports and exports amounted to US$ 4.9 trillion in 2020. The respective thriving maritime trade has fueled the demand for highly skilled and well-trained marine personnel, driving the adoption of ship bridge simulators for efficient training and assessment.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include Wartsila, Rheinmetall AG, General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., AVEVA Group plc, Presagis Canada Inc., ST Engineering, BMT Group Ltd, ARI Simulation, PC Maritime and FORCE TECHNOLOGY.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global ship bridge simulator market segmentation based on type, solution, organization size, end-user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of ship bridge simulator market-level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global ship bridge simulator market report would provide approximately 69 tables, 61 figures and 192 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Solution
  • 3.3. Snippet by Organization Size
  • 3.4. Snippet by End-User
  • 3.5. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Focus on Cost-Effective Training and Technological Advancements
      • 4.1.1.2. Advancements in Maritime Training and Rising Demand for Vessel Maneuvering Skills
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. High Initial Investment Costs and Limited Accessibility in Developing Regions
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2. Interactive Ship Bridge Simulators*
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Non-Interactive Ship Bridge Simulators

8. By Solution

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Solution
  • 8.2. Live Training*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Professional Training
  • 8.4. Constructive Training
  • 8.5. Virtual Training
  • 8.6. System Training
  • 8.7. Game Simulation Training

9. By Organization Size

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Organization Size
  • 9.2. Large Scale Organizations*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Medium Scale Organizations
  • 9.4. Small Scale Organizations

10. By End-User

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-User
  • 10.2. Marine*
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3. Educational

11. By Region

  • 11.1. Introduction
    • 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 11.2. North America
    • 11.2.1. Introduction
    • 11.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.2.7.1. U.S.
      • 11.2.7.2. Canada
      • 11.2.7.3. Mexico
  • 11.3. Europe
    • 11.3.1. Introduction
    • 11.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.3.7.1. Germany
      • 11.3.7.2. UK
      • 11.3.7.3. France
      • 11.3.7.4. Italy
      • 11.3.7.5. Russia
      • 11.3.7.6. Rest of Europe
  • 11.4. South America
    • 11.4.1. Introduction
    • 11.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.4.7.1. Brazil
      • 11.4.7.2. Argentina
      • 11.4.7.3. Rest of South America
  • 11.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 11.5.1. Introduction
    • 11.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.5.7.1. China
      • 11.5.7.2. India
      • 11.5.7.3. Japan
      • 11.5.7.4. Australia
      • 11.5.7.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 11.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 11.6.1. Introduction
    • 11.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

12. Competitive Landscape

  • 12.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 12.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 12.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13. Company Profiles

  • 13.1. Wartsila*
    • 13.1.1. Company Overview
    • 13.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 13.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 13.1.4. Key Developments
  • 13.2. Rheinmetall AG
  • 13.3. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
  • 13.4. AVEVA Group plc
  • 13.5. Presagis Canada Inc.
  • 13.6. ST Engineering
  • 13.7. BMT Group Ltd
  • 13.8. ARI Simulation
  • 13.9. PC Maritime
  • 13.10. FORCE TECHNOLOGY

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

14. Appendix

  • 14.1. About Us and Services
  • 14.2. Contact Us