Cover Image
市場調查報告書

K-12學校的桌上型電腦,筆記型電腦及Chromebook的引進:2017年

Deployment of Desktops, Laptops and Chromebooks in K-12 Schools 2017

出版商 SIMBA Information, Inc. 商品編碼 556869
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 32 Pages
訂單完成後即時交付
價格
Back to Top
K-12學校的桌上型電腦,筆記型電腦及Chromebook的引進:2017年 Deployment of Desktops, Laptops and Chromebooks in K-12 Schools 2017
出版日期: 2017年09月11日 內容資訊: 英文 32 Pages
簡介

本報告提供美國的K-12學校的教育用桌上型電腦,筆記型電腦及Chromebook的普及情形,和教育用行動裝置的使用率相關資訊相關的系統性資訊。

調查手法

摘要整理

簡介

調查結果:運算設備與學生的比率

調查結果:桌上型電腦,筆記型電腦及Chromebook的庫存

調查結果:K-12的筆記型電腦及Chromebook品牌

  • 圖表:K-12最受歡迎的筆記型電腦品牌
  • 圖表:K-12最受歡迎的Chromebook品牌
  • 圖表:電腦引進的未來趨勢

調查結果:學生設備使用所花費的時間

調查結果:新設備的取得計劃

調查結果:技術的資金來源

調查結果:技術支出趨勢

調查結果:技術支出對教材的影響

結論

附錄

目錄
Product Code: CURP15474269

Deployment of Desktops, Laptops & Chromebooks in K-12 Schools 2017 provides information on the penetration of computing devices in U.S. K-12 schools and details how much those devices are being used by students during the average school day. It highlights the shift from the purchasing of desktop computers to the purchasing of laptops and Chromebooks and indicates which brands of laptops and Chromebooks are most popular.

The report provides information on whether schools are increasing spending on hardware and how hardware spending impacts funding available for instructional materials purchases. Additionally, the report looks at what sources schools tap for technology purchases.

Deployment of Desktops, Laptops & Chromebooks in K-12 Schools 2017 is the third in a series of reports from Simba Information providing information on the K-12 education market, specifically how K-12 schools are supplementing traditional instructional materials in classrooms with growing implementations of technology.

This report, and the other three in the 2017 publication series on technology in K-12 education-Deployment of Display Devices in K-12 Schools 2017, Deployment of Tablets/Mobile Devices in K-12 Schools 2017, and the summative report K-12 Deployment Patterns and Purchasing Plans for Computing/Display Devices 2017-are based on a survey of educators during the 2016-2017 school year. Those educators included superintendents, district technology coordinators, district curriculum directors, principals and school technology coordinators. All survey responses are cross-tabulated by job title, grade level, school type, region, and other variables in order to present a comprehensive portrait of the technology market in K-12 schools in the 2016-17 school year.

Table of Contents

METHODOLOGY

  • Table 1: National Survey of K-12 Technology Usage Survey Sample Matrix by Job Title
  • Table 2: National Survey of K-12 Technology Usage Survey Sample Matrix by Grade Level
  • Table 3: National Survey of K-12 Technology Usage Survey Sample Matrix by District Size

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION

  • Table 4: Profile of Computing Devices in K-12, 2013-2014

RESULTS: RATIO OF STUDENTS TO COMPUTING DEVICES

  • Table 5: 2016-2017 Overall Ratio of Students to Computing Devices
  • Table 6: 2016-2017 Ratio of Students to Computing Devices, as reported by Survey Subgroup
  • Table 7: Time Frame for Reaching the 1:1 Computing Goal

RESULTS: INVENTORY OF DESKTOPS, LAPTOPS & CHROMEBOOKS

  • Table 8: Estimated Number of Computing Devices by Type, 2016

RESULTS: LAPTOP AND CHROMEBOOKS BRANDS IN K-12

  • Table 9: Most Popular Laptop Brands in K-12
  • Table10: Most Popular Chromebook Brands in K-12
  • Table 11: Future Trends in Computer Deployment

RESULTS: TIME STUDENTS SPEND USING DEVICES

  • Table 12: Time Students Spend Using Computing Devices

RESULTS: SCHEDULE FOR ACQUIRING NEW DEVICES

  • Table 13: Schedule for Replacing/Acquiring Devices

RESULTS: SOURCES OF TECHNOLOGY FUNDING

  • Table 14: Funding Used to Purchase Classroom Technology

RESULTS: TECHNOLOGY SPENDING TREND

  • Table 15: Technology Spending Changes, 2016-2017 School Year

RESULTS: EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY SPENDING ON INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

  • Table 16: Subgroups Most and Least Likely to Divert Funds for Technology

CONCLUSION

  • Table 17: Estimated Number of Computing Devices by Type, 2016 vs. 2014

APPENDIX

Back to Top