Cover Image


Infrastructure Sharing in Africa and the Middle East: Debt Reduction and Rural Coverage Requirements Drive Sharing

出版商 GlobalData 商品編碼 342498
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 41 Pages
Back to Top
中東、非洲的基本設備共享:債務的削減和地方的區域要求促進共享 Infrastructure Sharing in Africa and the Middle East: Debt Reduction and Rural Coverage Requirements Drive Sharing
出版日期: 2015年10月23日 內容資訊: 英文 41 Pages




本報告提供中東、非洲的基本設備共享 (設備共享、共用) 調查分析、基本設備共享定義、運用與經濟上的優點、業者的風險與疑慮、推動因素與障礙、主要企業等相關的系統性資訊。


  • 基本設備共享定義
  • 被動式基本設備共享定義
  • 主動式基本設備共享定義
  • 基本設備共享的合資企業


  • 基本設備共享的價值主張
  • OPEX的節約:網站的合理化
  • CAPEX的效率:網路發展
  • CAPEX、OPEX的節約:塔缷載分流和外包
  • 區域的提高


  • 行動基本設備共享的障礙:反競爭性的行動
  • 中東、非洲的行動基本設備共享
  • 行動基本設備共享:全球情形
  • 中東、非洲的基本設備共享的業者的可能性


  • 中東、非洲的自主共享協定
  • 中東、非洲的塔缷載分流和外包
  • 中東、非洲的主要獨立型塔業者


  • 案例研究:Airtel
  • 案例研究:Ministry of Communications




Product Code: TC0010IR


In the Africa and Middle East region, passive infrastructure sharing is finally beginning to gain momentum, primarily through the offloading of towers to independent tower management companies. Driving the trend in Africa is the need to cost-effectively reach low-density, rural areas and to lower the cost of operating network towers, which due to the exceedingly high energy costs on the continent can be exorbitant. In the Middle East, meanwhile, the need to quickly roll out state-of-the-art 4G networks will push operators into both passive and active sharing agreements. Many of the region's largest operators, including Airtel, MTN and Orange have embraced infrastructure sharing as a way to reduce capex and opex. Others, such as Econet Wireless in Zimbabwe and Safaricom in Kenya, have butted heads with regulators over the issue of mandated infrastructure sharing.

Key Findings

Mobile infrastructure sharing can help MNOs reduce opex by up to XX% and capex by as much as XX%, depending on factors such as the physical landscape and the stage of mobile network deployment.

Regulatory authorities in many countries scrutinize infrastructure sharing deals to keep in check any anticompetitive behavior by the MNOs. In Africa and the Middle East, regulators have also been supporting infrastructure sharing in order to lower barriers to entry for new telecom players as well as help reduce the environmental impact of networks.

Tower offloading by mobile operators is becoming the norm in Africa and the Middle East, as it saves mobile operators significant amounts and eases the entry for new operators. By year-end 2015, roughly XX% of the region's towers will be managed by independent tower companies, with the "Big Four" accounting for more than XX% of externally managed towers.

Given the growing demand for mobile and data services, the need for towers will increase in the future. The huge investments required in order to meet that need make tower sharing a logical alternative for operators. Operators can also expand their networks quickly by renting existing towers from independent tower companies.

XX Commercial in Confidence.


'Infrastructure Sharing in Africa and the Middle East: Debt Reduction and Rural Coverage Requirements Drive Sharing,' a Telecom Insider Report by Pyramid Research, analyzes the various types of infrastructure sharing, the operational and economic benefits as well as the risks and concerns of operators around sharing their infrastructure assets. The report also explains the factors supporting and hindering infrastructure sharing, with examples from several markets in Africa and the Middle East and helps the market players:

  • Define infrastructure sharing and the various business models employed in the Africa/Middle East region.
  • Identify the operational and economic benefits of mobile infrastructure sharing.
  • Understand obstacles to mobile infrastructure sharing
  • Learn from best practices in the region.

Reasons To Buy

  • Offers a comprehensive and detailed understanding of infrastructure sharing in the mobile telecommunications markets in Africa and the Middle East, including an investigation of the factors that are driving infrastructure sharing.
  • Provides information regarding the local developments in mobile network deployment, management and outsourcing provide a resource for more detailed planning, while its actionable analysis of current trends offers a wider perspective.
  • Taking a broad yet detailed perspective, includes recent agreements for active and passive infrastructure sharing as well as tower offloading deals by operators, helping executives understand the markets where infrastructure sharing arrangements are more keenly pursued.
  • The key finding enables the operators, tower companies, vendors and regulators to extract the crucial trends in network sharing in Africa and the Middle East, while its forward-looking recommendations help them develop effective longer-term strategies for their networks.
  • Boasts of presentation quality that allows it to be turned into presentable material immediately for the executive-level audience

Table of Contents

Introduction: Defining infrastructure sharing

  • Defining infrastructure sharing
  • Defining passive infrastructure sharing
  • Defining active infrastructure sharing
  • Infrastructure sharing joint ventures

Operational and economic benefits of mobile infrastructure sharing

  • Value proposition of infrastructure sharing
  • Opex savings - site rationalization
  • Capex efficiencies - network deployment
  • Capex and opex savings - tower offloading and outsourcing
  • Coverage improvements

Obstacles to mobile infrastructure sharing, and the threat to competition

  • Obstacles for mobile infrastructure sharing Anticompetitive behaviors
  • Mobile infrastructure sharing in Africa and the Middle East
  • Mobile infrastructure sharing - global context
  • Operator willingness to share infrastructure in Africa and the Middle East

Infrastructure sharing regulation in Africa and the Middle East

  • Voluntary sharing agreements in Africa and the Middle East
  • Tower offloading and outsourcing in Africa and the Middle East
  • Major independent tower operators in Africa and the Middle East

Market detail: Case studies

  • Case study: Airtel looks to share towers to reduce its debt and cut costs in its African operations
  • Case study: Ministry of Communications approves Israel's first RAN sharing deal, between Partner
  • Communications and Hot Mobile

Key findings and recommendations

  • Key findings
  • Recommendations

Appendix: Acronyms and definitions

  • About Pyramid Research

List of Figures

  • Exhibit 1: Key factors directly affecting MNO profitability
  • Exhibit 2: Passive network sharing elements (a non-exhaustive list)
  • Exhibit 3: Compound and tower sharing example
  • Exhibit 4: Active network sharing elements (a non-exhaustive list)
  • Exhibit 5: Full RAN sharing illustrated
  • Exhibit 6: Common structure and objectives of mobile infrastructure sharing joint ventures
  • Exhibit 7: Value delivered by infrastructure sharing based on geographic setting and stage of network deployment
  • Exhibit 8: Typical structure of network costs in emerging markets (self-provided backhaul)
  • Exhibit 9: Capex efficiencies of infrastructure sharing
  • Exhibit 10: Risks and long-term effects of tower offloading and outsourcing
  • Exhibit 11: Key factors affecting mobile operators' willingness to share infrastructure
  • Exhibit 12: Potential anticompetitive behaviors resulting from infrastructure sharing
  • Exhibit 13: Mobile infrastructure sharing level of activity by region, 2014
  • Exhibit 14: Willingness to share infrastructure among selected mobile operators, Africa and Middle East
  • Exhibit 15: Regulations on infrastructure sharing, selected markets in Africa and Middle East, 2015
  • Exhibit 16: Examples of voluntary mobile infrastructure sharing agreements, Africa and Middle East
  • Exhibit 17: Major tower offloading deals, Africa and Middle East
  • Exhibit 18: Major independent tower operators, Africa and Middle East
  • Exhibit 19: Financial results of Airtel Africa
Back to Top