表紙
市場調查報告書

美國的微創 (MIS) 脊椎移植市場

Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Report Suite | US | 2019-2025 | MedSuite

出版商 iData Research Inc. 商品編碼 601882
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 309 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
美國的微創 (MIS) 脊椎移植市場 Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Report Suite | US | 2019-2025 | MedSuite
出版日期: 2019年06月02日內容資訊: 英文 309 Pages
簡介

美國國內的微創 (MIS) 脊椎移植的市場規模,2018年達18億美元,預計2025年達22億6000萬美元,以3.3%的年複合成長率 (CAGR) 擴大。

本報告提供美國的微創 (MIS) 脊椎移植市場相關調查分析,市場分析 (銷售台數,ASP,市場金額、成長率趨勢),推動市場要素與阻礙要素,競爭分析,最近的M&A等系統性資訊。

摘要整理

美國的微創 (MIS) 脊椎移植市場:概要

競爭分析

市場趨勢

市場發展

治療數量

分析對象市場

主要報告的更新情形

過去的版本

分析方法

  • IDATA的9等級分析方法

疾病概要

  • 簡介
    • 變性椎間盤疾病
    • 脊椎變形
    • 外傷、腫瘤
    • 脊椎壓迫性骨折

產品評估

  • 簡介
  • 產品系列
  • 產品平台:主要企業的情況
  • 顛覆性技術
    • 3D列印式植入
    • 脊椎內視鏡手術
    • 醫療設備的金屬加工/合金
    • 奈米技術的脊椎移植利用
    • 手術室的自動化和網路連接
  • FDA (美國食品藥物管理局) 的產品回收:主要企業的情況
  • 臨床實驗趨勢:主要企業的情況

美國的微創脊椎移植市場概要

  • 簡介
  • 市場概要
  • 各部門趨勢分析
  • 推動及阻礙市場要素
  • 各企業市場佔有率分析
  • 企業合併、收購 (M&A)
  • 企業簡介
    • Aesculap (B. Braun)
    • Alphatec Spine
    • CTL Amedica (SINTX Technologies, Inc.)
    • DePuy Synthes
    • DJO Global
    • Globus Medical
    • K2M (Stryker)
    • Medtronic
    • NuVasive
    • Orthofix
    • SI-BONE
    • Stryker
    • Zimmer Biomet
  • SWOT分析:主要企業的情況

治療數量

  • 簡介
  • 治療數量

微創 (MIS) 椎間設備市場

  • 簡介
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析、預測
    • 椎間設備市場全體
    • 後方進入椎間融合術(MIPLIF) 市場
    • 一側進入腰椎後側椎間融合術(MITLIF) 市場
    • 一側方面進入椎間融合術(LLIF) 市場
    • 前方進入椎間融合術(OLIF) 市場
  • 推動及阻礙市場要素
  • 各企業的市場佔有率分析

微創 (MIS) 椎弓骨釘市場

  • 簡介
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析、預測
    • 椎弓骨釘市場全體
    • 由於經皮插入的椎弓骨釘市場
    • 由於開創部的插入的椎弓骨釘市場
    • 由於開創部的非插入的椎弓骨釘市場
  • 推動及阻礙市場要素
  • 各企業的市場佔有率分析

脊椎突起固定市場

  • 簡介
  • 市場分析、預測
  • 推動及阻礙市場要素
  • 各企業的市場佔有率分析

椎間關節固定市場

  • 簡介
  • 市場分析、預測
  • 推動及阻礙市場要素
  • 各企業的市場佔有率分析

薦腸關節固定市場

  • 簡介
  • 市場分析、預測
  • 推動及阻礙市場要素
  • 各企業的市場佔有率分析

脊椎內視鏡市場

  • 簡介
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析、預測
  • 推動及阻礙市場要素
  • 各企業的市場佔有率分析

微創 (MIS) 脊椎用手術器具市場

  • 簡介
  • 市場分析、預測
    • 內視鏡市場
    • 儀器市場
  • 推動及阻礙市場要素
  • 各企業的市場佔有率分析

簡稱一覽

本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

目錄
Product Code: iDATA_USMIS19_MS

The full report suite on the U.S. market for spinal implants and VCF includes segments for traditional cervical and thoracolumbar fixation devices, interbody devices, motion preservation devices, vertebral compression fracture (VCF) treatment, spinal electrical stimulation and spinal instrumentation.

Overall, the U.S. minimally invasive spinal implants market was valued at $1.8 billion in 2018. This is expected to increase over the forecast period at a CAGR of 3.3% to reach $2.26 billion by 2025.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS I

LIST OF FIGURES XI

LIST OF CHARTS XVII

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW 1

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 3

MARKET TRENDS 6

MARKET DEVELOPMENTS 8

PROCEDURE NUMBERS 9

PROCEDURE CODES INVESTIGATED 10

MARKETS INCLUDED 11

VERSION HISTORY 11

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 12

  • Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection 12
  • Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research 15
  • Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design 17
  • Step 4: Performing Primary Research 18
  • Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates 20
  • Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis 21
  • Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities 23
  • Step 8: Final Review and Market Release 24
  • Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring 25

DISEASE OVERVIEW 26

  • 2.1 INTRODUCTION 26
    • 2.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease 26
      • 2.1.1.1 Disc Herniation 26
      • 2.1.1.2 Stenosis 27
      • 2.1.1.3 Spondyloisthesis 28
      • 2.1.1.4 Arthritis 28
    • 2.1.2 Spinal Deformities 28
      • 2.1.2.1 Scoliosis 28
      • 2.1.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis 29
    • 2.1.3 Trauma and Tumor 30
    • 2.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures 30
      • 2.1.4.1 Osteoporosis 30
      • 2.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures 31

PRODUCT ASSESSMENT 32

  • 3.1 INTRODUCTION 32
  • 3.2 PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS 32
    • 3.2.1 Cervical Fixation 32
      • 3.2.1.1 Anterior Cervical Fixation 33
      • 3.2.1.1.1 Constrained 33
      • 3.2.1.1.2 Semi-Constrained 33
      • 3.2.1.1.3 Dynamic 33
      • 3.2.1.1.4 Bioresorbable 34
      • 3.2.1.2 Posterior Cervical Fixation 34
    • 3.2.2 Thoracolumbar Fixation 37
      • 3.2.2.1 Traditional Systems 37
      • 3.2.2.2 Minimally Invasive Systems 37
    • 3.2.3 Interbody Devices 42
      • 3.2.3.1 Approaches 42
      • 3.2.3.1.1 ALIF 42
      • 3.2.3.1.2 PLIF 43
      • 3.2.3.1.3 TLIF 43
      • 3.2.3.1.4 Minimally Invasive PLIF 43
      • 3.2.3.1.5 Minimally Invasive TLIF 44
      • 3.2.3.1.6 LLIF 44
      • 3.2.3.1.7 OLIF 44
      • 3.2.3.1.8 Cervical 44
      • 3.2.3.1.9 VBR/Corpectomy 45
      • 3.2.3.2 Materials 45
      • 3.2.3.2.1 Metal 45
      • 3.2.3.2.2 PEEK 45
      • 3.2.3.2.3 Machined Bone Allograft 45
    • 3.2.4 Motion Preservation Devices 51
      • 3.2.4.1.1 Artificial Discs 51
      • 3.2.4.1.2 Dynamic Stabilization 51
      • 3.2.4.1.3 Nucleus Replacement 52
      • 3.2.4.1.4 Facet Arthroplasty 52
    • 3.2.5 Spinous Process Fixation 55
    • 3.2.6 Facet Fixation 57
    • 3.2.7 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion 59
    • 3.2.8 Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices 61
      • 3.2.8.1.1 Percutaneous Vertebroplasty 61
      • 3.2.8.1.2 Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Including Kyphoplasty 62
    • 3.2.9 Spine Endoscopes 64
    • 3.2.10 Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices 66
  • 3.3 PRODUCT PIPELINES 68
    • 3.3.1 Nexxt Spine 68
      • 3.3.1.1 SAXXONY™ Posterior Cervical Thoracic System 68
      • 3.3.1.2 NEXXT MATRIXX™ Cervical Interbody/VBR System 68
    • 3.3.2 NLT Spine/SeaSpine 69
      • 3.3.2.1 PROW FUSION-V™ - Expandable Intervertebral Fusion Device 69
      • 3.3.2.2 PROW FUSION-L™ - Lateral Intervertebral Fusion Device 69
      • 3.3.2.3 SIJ- Expandable Screw 69
    • 3.3.3 SpineArt 69
      • 3.3.3.1 PERLA® 69
      • 3.3.3.2 OTELO®LL 69
    • 3.3.4 SpineFrontier 70
      • 3.3.4.1 SIJ-Fuse Rod 70
      • 3.3.4.2 SIJ-Fuse Screw 70
      • 3.3.4.3 VBR 70
      • 3.3.4.4 PedFuse Rely 70
      • 3.3.4.5 LESplasty 70
      • 3.3.4.6 Expanding P-LIFT 70
  • 3.4 DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES 71
    • 3.4.1 3D Printed Implants 71
    • 3.4.2 Endoscopic Spine Surgery 72
    • 3.4.3 Metallurgy/Alloy of Instrumentation 72
    • 3.4.4 Nanotechnology Use in Spinal Implants 72
    • 3.4.5 Operating Room Automation and Connectivity 73
  • 3.5 FDA RECALLS 74
    • 3.5.1 Alphatec Spine 74
    • 3.5.2 Amedica 75
    • 3.5.3 Back 2 Basics Direct 75
    • 3.5.4 DePuy Synthes 76
    • 3.5.5 Innovasis 77
    • 3.5.6 Interventional Spine 78
    • 3.5.7 Kiscomedica 78
    • 3.5.8 Medacta 79
    • 3.5.9 Medtronic 79
    • 3.5.10 Neuropro Spinal Jaxx 82
    • 3.5.11 Orthofix 82
    • 3.5.12 OrthoPediatrics Corp 84
    • 3.5.13 SpineArt 85
    • 3.5.14 Stryker 85
    • 3.5.15 Ulrich Medical USA Inc 87
    • 3.5.16 XTANT MEDICAL INC 87
    • 3.5.17 Zimmer Biomet 88
  • 3.6 CLINICAL TRIALS 90
    • 3.6.1 DePuy Synthes 90
    • 3.6.2 Duke University 91
    • 3.6.3 Globus Medical 91
    • 3.6.4 Hamilton Health Sciences 92
    • 3.6.5 K2M (Stryker) 92
    • 3.6.6 Medtronic 93
    • 3.6.7 Nexxt Spine 96
    • 3.6.8 RTI Surgical 97
    • 3.6.9 Stryker 97
    • 3.6.10 Orthofix 98
    • 3.6.11 Premia Spine 99
    • 3.6.12 Zimmer Biomet 99

U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW 101

  • 4.1 INTRODUCTION 101
    • 4.1.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion 101
      • 4.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 102
      • 4.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion 103
      • 4.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion 103
      • 4.1.1.4 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion 104
    • 4.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws 104
      • 4.1.2.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems 104
      • 4.1.2.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems 104
    • 4.1.3 Spinous Process Fixation 105
    • 4.1.4 Facet Fixation 105
    • 4.1.5 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion 105
    • 4.1.6 MIS Spine Endoscopes 106
  • 4.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 107
  • 4.3 TREND ANALYSIS BY SEGMENT 112
  • 4.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 116
    • 4.4.1 Market Drivers 116
    • 4.4.2 Market Limiters 117
  • 4.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 119
  • 4.6 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS 126
  • 4.7 COMPANY PROFILES 130
    • 4.7.1 Aesculap (B. Braun) 130
    • 4.7.2 Alphatec Spine 131
    • 4.7.3 CTL Amedica (SINTX Technologies, Inc.) 132
    • 4.7.4 DePuy Synthes 134
    • 4.7.5 DJO Global 135
    • 4.7.6 Globus Medical 136
    • 4.7.7 K2M (Stryker) 137
    • 4.7.8 Medtronic 138
    • 4.7.9 NuVasive 140
    • 4.7.10 Orthofix 141
    • 4.7.11 SI-BONE 142
    • 4.7.12 Stryker 143
    • 4.7.13 Zimmer Biomet 144
  • 4.8 SWOT ANALYSIS 146
    • 4.8.1 Aesculap (B. Braun) 146
    • 4.8.2 Alphatec Spine 147
    • 4.8.3 CTL Amedica (SINTX Technologies, Inc.) 148
    • 4.8.4 DePuy Synthes 149
    • 4.8.5 DJO Global 150
    • 4.8.6 Globus Medical 151
    • 4.8.7 Medtronic 153
    • 4.8.8 NuVasive 154
    • 4.8.9 Orthofix 155
    • 4.8.10 SI-BONE 156
    • 4.8.11 Stryker 157
    • 4.8.12 Zimmer Biomet 158

PROCEDURE NUMBERS 160

  • 5.1 INTRODUCTION 160
  • 5.2 PROCEDURES 162
    • 5.2.1 Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures 162
    • 5.2.2 MIS Interbody Device Procedures 167
      • 5.2.2.1 Total MIS Interbody Device Procedures 167
      • 5.2.2.1.1 Total Levels Treated by MIS Interbody Device 169
      • 5.2.2.2 MIPLIF Procedures 171
      • 5.2.2.3 MITLIF Procedures 172
      • 5.2.2.4 LLIF Procedures 173
      • 5.2.2.5 OLIF Procedures 174
    • 5.2.3 MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures 175
      • 5.2.3.1 Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures 175
      • 5.2.3.1.1 Total Levels Treated by MIS Pedicle Screw 177
      • 5.2.3.2 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures 179
      • 5.2.3.3 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures 180
      • 5.2.3.4 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures 181
    • 5.2.4 Spinous Process Fixation Procedures 182
    • 5.2.5 Facet Fixation Procedures 184
    • 5.2.6 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures 186
    • 5.2.7 Spine Endoscope Procedures 188

MIS INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET 190

  • 6.1 INTRODUCTION 190
    • 6.1.1 Approach Types 191
      • 6.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion 191
      • 6.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 191
      • 6.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion 192
      • 6.1.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion 192
      • 6.1.1.5 eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion 192
      • 6.1.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion 193
      • 6.1.1.7 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion 193
  • 6.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 194
  • 6.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 199
    • 6.3.1 Total MIS Interbody Device Market 199
    • 6.3.2 MIPLIF Market 201
    • 6.3.3 MITLIF Market 204
    • 6.3.4 LLIF Market 207
    • 6.3.5 OLIF Market 210
  • 6.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 213
    • 6.4.1 Market Drivers 213
    • 6.4.2 Market Limiters 214
  • 6.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 216

MIS PEDICLE SCREW MARKET 222

  • 7.1 INTRODUCTION 222
    • 7.1.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems 222
    • 7.1.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems 223
  • 7.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 224
  • 7.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 229
    • 7.3.1 Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market 229
    • 7.3.2 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market 231
    • 7.3.3 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market 234
    • 7.3.4 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market 237
  • 7.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 240
    • 7.4.1 Market Drivers 240
    • 7.4.2 Market Limiters 241
  • 7.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 243

SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET 248

  • 8.1 INTRODUCTION 248
  • 8.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 249
  • 8.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 252
    • 8.3.1 Market Drivers 252
    • 8.3.2 Market Limiters 253
  • 8.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 255

FACET FIXATION MARKET 259

  • 9.1 INTRODUCTION 259
  • 9.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 260
  • 9.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 263
    • 9.3.1 Market Drivers 263
    • 9.3.2 Market Limiters 264
  • 9.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 266

SI JOINT FUSION MARKET 270

  • 10.1 INTRODUCTION 270
  • 10.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 272
  • 10.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 275
    • 10.3.1 Market Drivers 275
    • 10.3.2 Market Limiters 276
  • 10.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 279

SPINE ENDOSCOPE MARKET 283

  • 11.1 INTRODUCTION 283
  • 11.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 284
  • 11.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 289
    • 11.3.1 Endoscope Market 289
    • 11.3.2 Instrumentation Market 291
  • 11.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 293
    • 11.4.1 Market Drivers 293
    • 11.4.2 Market Limiters 294
  • 11.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 296

MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL SURGERY INSTRUMENTATION MARKET 299

  • 12.1 INTRODUCTION 299
  • 12.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 300
  • 12.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 303
    • 12.3.1 Market Drivers 303
    • 12.3.2 Market Limiters 304
  • 12.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 306

ABBREVIATIONS 309

LIST OF CHARTS

  • Chart 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 2
  • Chart 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview, U.S., 2018 & 2025 2
  • Chart 4 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 109
  • Chart 4 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 110
  • Chart 4 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 111
  • Chart 4 4: Growth Rates by Segment, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 115
  • Chart 4 5: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2018 125
  • Chart 5 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 164
  • Chart 5 2: Levels Treated by Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 166
  • Chart 5 3: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 168
  • Chart 5 4: Total MIS Interbody Device Levels Treated, U.S., 2015 - 2025 170
  • Chart 5 5: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 176
  • Chart 5 6: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Levels Treated by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 178
  • Chart 5 7: Total Spinous Process Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 183
  • Chart 5 8: Facet Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 185
  • Chart 5 9: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 187
  • Chart 5 10: Spine Endoscope Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 189
  • Chart 6 1: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 196
  • Chart 6 2: MIS Interbody Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 197
  • Chart 6 3: MIS Interbody Device Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 198
  • Chart 6 4: MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 200
  • Chart 6 5: MIPLIF Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 203
  • Chart 6 6: MITLIF Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 206
  • Chart 6 7: LLIF Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 209
  • Chart 6 8: OLIF Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 212
  • Chart 6 9: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2018 221
  • Chart 7 1: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 226
  • Chart 7 2: MIS Pedicle Screw Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 227
  • Chart 7 3: MIS Pedicle Screw Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 228
  • Chart 7 4: MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 230
  • Chart 7 5: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 233
  • Chart 7 6: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 236
  • Chart 7 7: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 239
  • Chart 7 8: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2018 247
  • Chart 8 1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 251
  • Chart 8 2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2018 258
  • Chart 9 1: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 262
  • Chart 9 2: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2018 269
  • Chart 10 1: SI Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 274
  • Chart 10 2: Leading Competitors, SI Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2018 282
  • Chart 11 1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 286
  • Chart 11 2: Spine Endoscope Market Breakdown, U.S., 2018 287
  • Chart 11 3: Spine Endoscope Market Breakdown, U.S., 2025 288
  • Chart 11 4: Endoscope Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 290
  • Chart 11 5: Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 292
  • Chart 11 6: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, U.S., 2018 298
  • Chart 12 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 302

LIST OF FIGURES

  • Figure 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2018 (1 of 2) 3
  • Figure 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2018 (2 of 2) 4
  • Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, U.S., 2018 5
  • Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2) 6
  • Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2) 7
  • Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2017 - 2019 8
  • Figure 1 7: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Procedures Covered, U.S., 2018 9
  • Figure 1 8: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2018 (1 of 2) 10
  • Figure 1 9: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Markets Covered, U.S., 2018 11
  • Figure 1 10: Version History 11
  • Figure 3 1: Cervical Fixation Devices by Company (1 of 2) 35
  • Figure 3 2: Cervical Fixation Devices by Company (2 of 2) 36
  • Figure 3 3: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (1 of 4) 38
  • Figure 3 4: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (2 of 4) 39
  • Figure 3 5: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (3 of 4) 40
  • Figure 3 6: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (4 of 4) 41
  • Figure 3 7: Interbody Devices by Company (1 of 5) 46
  • Figure 3 8: Interbody Devices by Company (2 of 5) 47
  • Figure 3 9: Interbody Devices by Company (3 of 5) 48
  • Figure 3 10: Interbody Devices by Company (4 of 5) 49
  • Figure 3 11: Interbody Devices by Company (5 of 5) 50
  • Figure 3 12: Cervical Artificial Disc Devices by Company 53
  • Figure 3 13: Lumbar Artificial Disc Devices by Company 54
  • Figure 3 14: Dynamic Posterior Stabilization Devices by Company 54
  • Figure 3 15: Interspinous Process Decompression Devices by Company 54
  • Figure 3 16: Spinous Process Fixation Devices by Company 56
  • Figure 3 17: Facet Fixation Devices by Company 58
  • Figure 3 18: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Devices by Company 60
  • Figure 3 19: Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices by Company 63
  • Figure 3 20: Spine Endoscopes by Company 65
  • Figure 3 21: Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices by Company 67
  • Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall ELAN 4 Air System 74
  • Figure 3 23: Class 2 Device Recall Alphatec Spine 74
  • Figure 3 24: Class 2 Device Recall Omni Spine Anterior Cervical Plate System 75
  • Figure 3 25: Class 2 Device Recall Dymaxeon Spine System 75
  • Figure 3 26: Class 2 Device Recall Concorde Lift 76
  • Figure 3 27: Device Recall MODEL: Aegis Torque Handle CATALOG NO. : 287110800 76
  • Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall Synthes Flex Arm 76
  • Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Concorde Lift 77
  • Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall DePuy Synthes 77
  • Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall Opteryx Variable Rescue Screw 77
  • Figure 3 32: Class 2 Device Recall G3 Opticage Expandable Interbody Fusion Device 78
  • Figure 3 33: Class 2 Device Recall LVarlock Cage/Trial Implant Holder 78
  • Figure 3 34: Class 2 Device Recall M.U.S.T. Rod 79
  • Figure 3 35: Class 2 Device Recall Specify neurostimulation leads 79
  • Figure 3 36: Class 2 Device Recall Spinous Process Clamp 80
  • Figure 3 37: Class 2 Device Recall StealthStation System 80
  • Figure 3 38: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic Navigated Solera Screwdrivers 80
  • Figure 3 39: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic Navigated Cannulated Taps 81
  • Figure 3 40: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic CD HORIZON Spinal System MULTIAXIAL SCREW FOR 5.5/6.0MM RODS 81
  • Figure 3 41: Class 2 Device Recall Spinal Jaxx Interbody Fusion Device 82
  • Figure 3 42: Class 2 Device Recall Manual General Surgery Drill Guide 82
  • Figure 3 43: Class 2 Device Recall Firebird NXG Spinal Fixation System Set Screw Driver 83
  • Figure 3 44: Class 2 Device Recall Firebird Spinal Fixation System 83
  • Figure 3 45: Class 2 Device Recall Rod and screw spinal instrumentation 83
  • Figure 3 46: Class 2 Device Recall Response BandLoc 5.5/6.0 Tensioner Instrument 84
  • Figure 3 47: Class 2 Device Recall thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system 84
  • Figure 3 48: Class 2 Device Recall TRYPTIK(R) 2 CPLATE SELFTAPPING POLYAXIAL SCREW 85
  • Figure 3 49: Class 2 Device Recall AVS Aria Cage 85
  • Figure 3 50: Class 2 Device Recall Reprocessed HARMONIC Ace 7, 5mm Diameter Shears with Advanced Hemostasis (HARH) 86
  • Figure 3 51: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Spine 86
  • Figure 3 52: Class 2 Device Recall UniVise Inserter 86
  • Figure 3 53: Class 2 Device Recall uNion CPS 87
  • Figure 3 54: Class 2 Device Recall Calix Lumbar Spinal Implant System 87
  • Figure 3 55: Class 2 Device Recall Fortex Pedicle Screw System 88
  • Figure 3 56: Class 2 Device Recall Altius MINI OCT Posterior Spinal Fixation System 88
  • Figure 3 57: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet 88
  • Figure 3 58: Class 3 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet Spine 89
  • Figure 3 59: An ACDF Multi-Center Study Using ViviGen Cellular Bone Matrix 90
  • Figure 3 60: ACDF Comparison Trial 91
  • Figure 3 61: A Retrospective Study Using CALIBER® TLIF Expandable Spacer in the Treatment of DDD: 2 Year Follow-up. 91
  • Figure 3 62: To Brace or Not to Brace for Single Level Lumbar Fusion Pilot (BRACE Pilot). 92
  • Figure 3 63: Comparing Pedicle Screw Systems for the Treatment of Adolescent Paediatric Spine Deformity 92
  • Figure 3 64: An Investigation of the Metal Concentration in Patients Implanted With the PRESTIGE LP™ Cervical Disc 93
  • Figure 3 65: A Prospective, 5-Year Global Study on MAST™ 94
  • Figure 3 66: OLIF25™ /OLIF51™ Study 94
  • Figure 3 67: Spinal Cord Stimulation to Treat Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation (SCS-PAF) 95
  • Figure 3 68: Fenestrated Screw Study (FNS) 95
  • Figure 3 69: Lumbar Fusion With Nexxt Spine 3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Cages 96
  • Figure 3 70: ViBone in Cervical and Lumbar Spine Fusion 97
  • Figure 3 71: BIO4 Clinical Case Study: Cervical Spine 97
  • Figure 3 72: AccuLIF® PROSPECTIVE PATIENT OUTCOMES STUDY (APROPOS) 98
  • Figure 3 73: Study Using the SpinalStim Device Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery 98
  • Figure 3 74: A Pivotal Study of the Premia Spine TOPS™ System 99
  • Figure 3 75: Radiological and Clinical Efficacy of a Hybrid Spinal Implant ("Topping Off"): a Mono-center, Prospective Clinical Trial 99
  • Figure 3 76: Post-Market Surveillance Study of the TM Ardis Interbody Fusion System 100
  • Figure 4 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 (US$M) 108
  • Figure 4 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Growth by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 114
  • Figure 4 3: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2018 118
  • Figure 4 4: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2018 124
  • Figure 4 5: SWOT Analysis, Aesculap (B. Braun) 146
  • Figure 4 6: SWOT Analysis, Alphatec Spine 147
  • Figure 4 7: SWOT Analysis, CTL Amedica (SINTX Technologies, Inc.) 148
  • Figure 4 8: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes 149
  • Figure 4 9: SWOT Analysis, DJO Global 150
  • Figure 4 10: SWOT Analysis, Globus Medical (1 of 2) 151
  • Figure 4 11: SWOT Analysis, Globus Medical (2 of 2) 152
  • Figure 4 12: SWOT Analysis, Medtronic 153
  • Figure 4 13: SWOT Analysis, NuVasive 154
  • Figure 4 14: SWOT Analysis, Orthofix 155
  • Figure 4 15: SWOT Analysis, SI-BONE 156
  • Figure 4 16: SWOT Analysis, Stryker 157
  • Figure 4 17: SWOT Analysis, Zimmer Biomet (1 of 2) 158
  • Figure 4 18: SWOT Analysis, Zimmer Biomet (2 of 2) 159
  • Figure 5 1: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2018 161
  • Figure 5 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 163
  • Figure 5 3: Levels Treated by Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 165
  • Figure 5 4: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 167
  • Figure 5 5: Total Levels Treated by MIS Interbody Device, U.S., 2015 - 2025 169
  • Figure 5 6: MIPLIF Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 171
  • Figure 5 7: MITLIF Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 172
  • Figure 5 8: LLIF Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 173
  • Figure 5 9: OLIF Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 174
  • Figure 5 10: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 175
  • Figure 5 11: Total Levels Treated by MIS Pedicle Screw, U.S., 2015 - 2025 177
  • Figure 5 12: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 179
  • Figure 5 13: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 180
  • Figure 5 14: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 181
  • Figure 5 15: Total Spinous Process Fixation Device Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 182
  • Figure 5 16: Facet Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 184
  • Figure 5 17: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 186
  • Figure 5 18: Spine Endoscope Procedures, U.S., 2015 - 2025 188
  • Figure 6 1: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 (US$M) 195
  • Figure 6 2: MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 199
  • Figure 6 3: MIPLIF Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 202
  • Figure 6 4: MITLIF Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 205
  • Figure 6 5: LLIF Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 208
  • Figure 6 6: OLIF Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 211
  • Figure 6 7: Drivers and Limiters, MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2018 215
  • Figure 6 8: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2018 220
  • Figure 7 1: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 (US$M) 225
  • Figure 7 2: MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 229
  • Figure 7 3: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 232
  • Figure 7 4: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 235
  • Figure 7 5: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 238
  • Figure 7 6: Drivers and Limiters, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2018 242
  • Figure 7 7: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2018 246
  • Figure 8 1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 250
  • Figure 8 2: Drivers and Limiters, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2018 254
  • Figure 8 3: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2018 257
  • Figure 9 1: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 261
  • Figure 9 2: Drivers and Limiters, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2018 265
  • Figure 9 3: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2018 268
  • Figure 10 1: SI Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 273
  • Figure 10 2: Drivers and Limiters, SI Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2018 278
  • Figure 10 3: Leading Competitors, SI Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2018 281
  • Figure 11 1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, U.S., 2015 - 2025 (US$M) 285
  • Figure 11 2: Endoscope Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 289
  • Figure 11 3: Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 291
  • Figure 11 4: Drivers and Limiters, Spine Endoscope Market, U.S., 2018 295
  • Figure 11 5: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, U.S., 2018 297
  • Figure 12 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2015 - 2025 301
  • Figure 12 2: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2018 305
  • Figure 12 3: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2018 308