表紙
市場調查報告書

CONOPs概念在世界安全城市行業中的演變

Evolving Concept of Operations (CONOPs) Within the Global Safe City Industry, 2020

出版商 Frost & Sullivan 商品編碼 953250
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 85 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
CONOPs概念在世界安全城市行業中的演變 Evolving Concept of Operations (CONOPs) Within the Global Safe City Industry, 2020
出版日期: 2020年07月31日內容資訊: 英文 85 Pages
簡介

將IT技術應用於防災和公共安全的"安全城市"概念正在世界各地的大城市中傳播。此外,正在將這一概念納入智能城市系統的"智能安全城市"計劃正在陸續開發。但是,為了實現該計劃,需要解決各種短期和長期挑戰,包括資金短缺,技術老化,缺乏靈活性。成功的智能/安全計劃要求平衡使用每種技術,遵守嚴格的操作流程並完整報告檢測到的事件和威脅。由於運營環境,政治結構,數字化的進展以及公眾的理解存在很大差異,因此,智慧城市將對智能/安全城市計劃(CONOP)的概念進行精心計劃的方法。是成功的唯一途徑。

本報告分析了CONOPs概念(商業概念)在世界安全城市行業中的滲透和利用,並根據其智慧/安全城市計劃的規模和進展選擇了全球100個城市。排名後,調查每個城市的業務概念/人力資源計劃的利用,IT技術的應用,自動化的促進等-以及物理/網絡威脅響應的狀態和概念我們將提供信息,例如實際功能和度量之間的差距,度量,城市之間的功能和解決方案之間的相互比較,對未來投資計劃和目標的影響等。

目錄

執行摘要

分析範圍和方法

威脅狀況對世界城市的影響

  • 數字威脅與物理安全事件(針對城市基礎設施的常規攻擊)並行增長
  • 針對城市的主要物理威脅
  • 個人或意識形態復仇的"孤狼"式攻擊實現
  • 軟目標攻擊-擴展攻擊目標
  • 恐懼引發既定目標的恐怖主義
  • 針對城市的主要數字威脅
  • 勒索軟件:持續攻擊的優勢
  • 惡意軟件入侵,長期感染和數據竊取
  • 濫用特權憑證攻擊管理員

CONOP(操作概念):為了安全地執行城市計劃

  • CONOPs-確定最佳城市策略
  • 安全城市解決方案-設計注意事項
  • 智慧城市安全計劃-公民保護
  • CONOPs-智能/安全城市計劃規模
  • CONOPs人事驅動策略
  • CONOPs混合數字策略
  • CONOPs-技術驅動策略

當前技術/解決方案組合

  • CONOPs-以人員為中心的體系結構
  • CONOPs-數字混合架構
  • 以CONOPs-技術為中心的體系結構
  • 案例研究-芝加哥
  • 案例研究-東京
  • 案例研究-密涅瓦計劃,英國
  • 案例研究-新加坡市/政府
  • 案例研究-洛杉磯市
  • 案例研究-布宜諾斯艾利斯蒂格雷市

智能/安全城市計劃中功能與解決方案之間的差距

  • 最重要的是:智慧/安全城市計劃的內在風險
  • 最重要的一點:智慧/安全城市計劃的覆蓋範圍
  • 趨勢分析-克服風險因素
  • 趨勢分析-填補解決方案空白
  • 最佳做法:智能/

競爭分析:智慧城市技術/解決方案供應商

  • 智能/安全程序解決方案供應商選擇
  • 功能影響:不斷發展的技術

增長機會和建議的行動

  • 增長機會(1):向雲過渡
  • 增長機會(2):舊版程序的數字化
  • 增長機會(3):所有傳感器
  • 增長機會(4):運營自動化
  • 增長機會(5):多源事件分析
  • 成功與成長的戰略挑戰

主要分析結果

結論

附錄

關於Frost & Sullivan

目錄
Product Code: K4C1-23

Understanding the Growth and Technology Strategies Influencing the Design, Acquisition, and Implementation of SmartSafe City Programs

In a city's continued journey to progressing its municipality to a global smart city designation, a key tenet of Smart Cities is the establishment of SmartSafe City programs that can help centralize disaster response and public safety monitoring and response, and better coordinate public safety initiatives and goals. Many cities or law enforcement agencies have launched similar programs on a smaller scale or in limited neighborhoods within a city; however, the ability to scale these programs to serve broader public safety goals has continued to be a major challenge for cities both in the immediate and long terms. Cities struggle with scalability due to impacted program funding, outdated technologies, or a combination of both factors, which only continue to hinder a city's progress in adopting broader initiatives.

The success of many SmartSafe City programs also hinges on a delicate balance between technology products in use for public safety activities, strict processes in place to maintain ongoing operations or respond to and report detected events and threats, and the policies put in place regarding threat or incident reporting, data privacy, and compliance. Due to the significant differences in operational structure, political landscapes, digitalization progress, and public willingness to allow more robust public safety activities, cities are finding that a tailored approach to their concept of operations for SmartSafe City programs is the only way to come up with a solution that can work for them.

Research Scope:

This research service includes information on the concept of operations variance across global cities that have been classified according to Frost & Sullivan's internal SmartSafe City ranking criteria. Using this ranking structure, Frost & Sullivan has classified the select top-100 cities across the world according to their level of development for their SmartSafe City programs. Additionally, this research looks into the range of concept of operation structures for SmartSafe City Programs, classifying them according to 3 types of programs based on human resources, technical reliance, automation, and other factors. This study also focuses on the physical and digital threat landscape that is increasingly targeting city operations and public safety, as well as profiling relevant use cases of each type of SmartSafe City concept of operations model from across the globe. This service then focuses on technology and solutions that best fit the customer needs of each SmartSafe City program type, relevant growth opportunities for solution vendors, and the solution types and vendor landscape currently operational in the industry.

This research service also discusses how various technology solutions and the technical maturity of cities affects how they plan for future investments in their SmartSafe City programs. This service also identifies industry growth opportunities by city development type and provides a succinct conclusions section that highlights trends in the market.

Key Issues Addressed:

  • What are the types of concept of operations that influence how SmartSafe City programs are run globally?
  • What are the similarities that exist between cities utilizing the various models?
  • What security technologies and capability mix are required to build and achieve the goals of a broader SmartSafe City program?
  • Which are the key stakeholders involved in a SmartSafe City program, its system design, purchase, and implementation?
  • What are the critical pain points and threat vectors facing city operators, necessitating the use of more SmartSafe City solutions? How can they be overcome?
  • What are the top Mega Trends of new technologies poised to disrupt or drive growth and investment in SmartSafe City solutions? Which vendors could bring about these solutions?
  • What are the key capabilities that city operators continue to explore and look for potential investment opportunities?

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

  • Analysis Factsheet
  • Development Scale of Safe City Programs for Top 100 Cities
  • Trends Impacting Demand
  • Executive Summary-Key Predictions
  • Technical Landscape-How Technology Helps Safe City Programs Achieve Key Program Goals
  • Mapping of Safe City Stakeholders and Influence Levels
  • Major Goals and Objectives of Safe Cities

Research Scope and Methodology

  • Research Scope
  • Top 100 Smart Cities for Safe City Project Consideration
  • Top 100 Smart Cities for Safe City Project Consideration (continued)
  • Technical Categorization-City Rankings and Definitions
  • Technical Categorization-City Rankings and Definitions (continued)
  • Technology Segmentation-Definitions
  • Research Objectives and Questions

Threat Landscape Affecting Global Cities

  • Rising Digital Threats Alongside Physical Security Incidents-Previous Attacks Targeting City Infrastructure
  • Major Physical Threats Targeting Cities
  • Lone Wolf Attacks-Serving a Personal or Ideological Vendetta
  • 'Soft Target' Attacks-Amplifying the Attack's Purpose
  • Terrorism-Inciting Fear for a Stated Goal
  • Major Digital Threats Targeting Cities
  • Ransomware-Profiting on Successful Attacks
  • Malware Infiltration-Long-term Infection and Data Siphoning
  • Privileged Credential Abuse-Attacking the Administrators

Concept of Operations-Safe City Program Operations

  • Concept of Operations-Determining City's Best Strategy
  • Safe City Solutions-Design Considerations
  • SmartSafe City Programs-Securing Citizens
  • Concept of Operations-Scale for SmartSafe City Programs
  • Concept of Operations-People-Driven Strategies
  • Concept of Operations-Hybrid-Digital Strategies
  • Concept of Operations-Technology-Driven Strategies

Current Technology and Solution Mix

  • People-Focused Concept of Operations Architecture
  • Hybrid-Digital Concept of Operations Architecture
  • Technology-Focused Concept of Operations Architecture
  • Case Study-City of Chicago
  • Case Study-Tokyo Metropolitan Area
  • Case Study-Minerva Programme, United Kingdom
  • Case Study-Singapore City-State
  • Case Study-City of Los Angeles
  • Case Study-Tigre City, Buenos Aires

Capability and Solution Gaps in SmartSafe City Programs

  • Top of Mind-Inherent Risks for SmartSafe City Solutions
  • Top of Mind-Gaps in SmartSafe City Program Coverage
  • Trend Analysis-Overcoming Risk Factors
  • Trend Analysis-Patching Solution Gaps
  • Best Practices-Top Considerations for SmartSafe City Programs

Competitive Analysis-Suppliers for Safe City Technology Solutions

  • Select Vendors for SmartSafe City Program Solutions
  • Capability Impact-Evolving Technologies
  • Capability Impact-Evolving Technologies (continued)

Growth Opportunities and Companies to Action

  • Growth Opportunity 1-Cloud Migration
  • Growth Opportunity 2-Digitalization of Legacy Programs
  • Growth Opportunity 3-Sensorization of Everything
  • Growth Opportunity 4-Automated Operations
  • Growth Opportunity 5-Multi-source Event Analysis
  • Strategic Imperatives for Success and Growth

Key Conclusions

  • Key Conclusions

The Last Word

  • The Last Word-3 Big Predictions
  • Legal Disclaimer

Appendix

  • Abbreviations
  • Abbreviations (continued)
  • Additional Sources of Information on Safe City Solutions
  • List of Exhibits

The Frost & Sullivan Story

  • The Frost & Sullivan Story
  • Value Proposition-Future of Your Company & Career
  • Global Perspective
  • Industry Convergence
  • 360° Research Perspective
  • Implementation Excellence
  • Our Blue Ocean Strategy