表紙
市場調查報告書

農業技術即服務的全球市場 分析與預測 (2019-2024年):服務類型、技術、用途、定價模式、損益分歧點分析

Global Agriculture Technology as a Service Market: Focus on Service Type, Technology, Application, Pricing Models, Break-Even Analysis - Analysis and Forecast, 2019-2024

出版商 BIS Research Inc. 商品編碼 909210
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 298 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
Back to Top
農業技術即服務的全球市場 分析與預測 (2019-2024年):服務類型、技術、用途、定價模式、損益分歧點分析 Global Agriculture Technology as a Service Market: Focus on Service Type, Technology, Application, Pricing Models, Break-Even Analysis - Analysis and Forecast, 2019-2024
出版日期: 2019年08月21日內容資訊: 英文 298 Pages
簡介

全球農業技術即服務市場規模,預計至2024年達到24億9,260萬美元。

本報告提供全球農業技術即服務市場相關調查,市場概要,市場動態,各市場區隔 (技術、用途、地區)的分析與預測,及主要企業的簡介等系統性資訊。

摘要整理

第1章 市場概要

第2章 市場動態

  • 概要
  • 影響分析
  • 市場成長促進因素
  • 阻礙市場成長要素
  • 市場機會

第3章 競爭情形

  • 主要策略、發展
  • 競爭基準

第4章 產業分析

  • 費用模式
  • 損益分歧點分析
  • 先進解決方案

第5章 全球農業技術即服務市場:各技術

  • 市場概要
  • 資料分析、情報
  • 指導技術
  • 感測技術
  • 變動比率應用技術
  • 其他

第6章 全球農業技術即服務市場:各用途

  • 市場概要
  • 產額製圖、監測
  • 土壤管理
  • 作物健康管理
  • 導航、定位
  • 其他

第7章 全球農業技術即服務市場:各地區

  • 市場概要
  • 北美
  • 歐洲
  • 亞太地區
  • 其他 (RoW)

第8章 企業簡介

  • 農業OEM
    • AGCO Corporation
    • CLAAS Group
    • CNH Industrial N.V.
    • Deere & Company
    • Kubota Corporation
    • 洋馬
  • 資料分析 & 情報企業
    • 365FarmNet GmbH
    • Agrivi
    • CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
    • 富士通
    • IBM Corporation
    • Microsoft Corporation
    • Robert Bosch GmbH
    • Trimble Inc.
  • 農業用UAV/無人機企業
    • Parrot SA
    • Pixhawk
    • PrecisionHawk Inc.
    • SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
  • 農業用機器人企業
    • Harvest Automation Inc.
    • Naio Technologies
    • Small Robot Company
  • 其他農業技術企業
    • Accenture plc
    • Airbus S.A.S.
    • AT&T
    • Ceres Imaging Inc.
    • Hexagon Agriculture
    • Intertek Group plc
    • Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
    • Raven Industries Inc.
    • SGS S.A.
    • Taranis
    • Teejet Technologies
    • Topcon Corporation

第9章 調查範圍、手法

第10章 附錄

目錄
Product Code: AG045A

"Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market Anticipated to Reach $2,492.6 Million by 2024."

Key Questions Answered in this Report:

  • What is the expected global agriculture technology-as-a-service market size in terms of value from 2018 to 2024?
  • What is the expected future scenario and revenue generation by the different types of service including software-as-a-service (SaaS) and equipment-as-a-service (EaaS)?
  • What is the expected future scenario and revenue generation by different types of agriculture technologies offered as service including data analytics and intelligence, guidance technology, sensing technology, and variable rate application technology, among others?
  • What is the expected future scenario and revenue generation by the application segments for which agriculture technologies are offered as service including yield mapping and monitoring, soil management, crop health management, and navigation and positioning, among others?
  • Which region is the largest market for global agriculture technology-as-a-service market?
  • What is the expected future scenario and the revenue generation by different regions and countries in the agriculture technology-as-a-service market - North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Rest-of-the-World?
  • What is the competitive strength of the key players in the agriculture technology-as-a-service market on the basis of the analysis of their recent developments, product offerings, and regional presence?
  • What are the different pricing models available in the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market?
  • How is the adoption scenario, related opportunities, and challenges associated with agriculture technology-as-a-service?
  • What are the market dynamics of the global agriculture drones and robots market including market drivers, restraints, and opportunities?
  • What is the SWOT analysis for leading companies in the agriculture technology-as-a-service market?

Global Agriculture Technology as a Service Market Forecast, 2019-2024

The Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Industry Analysis by BIS Research projects the market to grow at a significant CAGR of 21.75% during the forecast period from 2019 to 2024. High growth in the market is expected to be driven by the growing need to adopt agriculture technologies across the industry, conversion of capital expenditure into operational expenditure for customers, and greater customer retention for service providers. The added benefits of lower costs, scalability, integration, and accessibility associated with ATaaS are also expected to be responsible for the reported growth of the business model.

Agriculture is the source of livelihood and sustenance of economy in several regions of the world. Hence, the need to adopt advanced technologies in the agriculture industry has driven favorable initiatives, policies, and support shown by governments in countries such as the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany, France, Australia, India, and China. In emerging countries, the growth of the market is expected to be driven by rising awareness among governments and manufacturers-turned-service providers about the need to elevate farm produce, while evaluating the farm expenditure of their growers. Furthermore, rising concerns over global food security and sustainability have led to extensive investments by the governments across the world.

Expert Quote

"ATaaS business model allows the customers to procure their desired agriculture technologies as services under different affordable pricing models rather than acquiring them as a one-time purchase. By relieving the customers of ownership of agriculture technologies through the service model, the entire responsibility of ownership of assets relies on the service providers, leading to a higher cost of operations for them. Despite these additional costs, by adopting the Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service model, service providers are expected to experience better customer retention and recurring revenue, owing to the direct contact with their customers for constant feedback."

Scope of the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market

The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market research provides a detailed perspective regarding the service type, its value, and estimation, among others. The purpose of this market analysis is to examine the agriculture technology-as-a-service industry outlook in terms of factors driving the market, trends, developments, and regulatory landscape, among others.

The report further takes into consideration the market dynamics and the competitive landscape along with the detailed financial and product contributions of the key players operating in the market. The agriculture technology-as-a-service report is a compilation of different segments including market breakdown by service type, technology, application, and region.

Market Segmentation

The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market (on the basis of service type) is segmented into software-as-a-service (SaaS) and equipment-as-a-service (EaaS). The Software-as-a-Service segment dominated the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market in 2018 and is anticipated to maintain its dominance throughout the forecast period (2019-2024).

The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market (on the basis of technology) is segmented into data analytics and intelligence, guidance technology, sensing technology, variable rate technology, and other technologies. The data analytics and intelligence segment dominated the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market in 2018 and is anticipated to maintain its dominance throughout the forecast period (2019-2024).

The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market (on the basis of application) is segmented into yield mapping and monitoring, soil management, crop health management, navigation and positioning, and other applications. The yield mapping and monitoring segment dominated the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market in 2018 and is anticipated to maintain its dominance throughout the forecast period (2019-2024).

The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market by region is segregated under four major regions, namely North America, Europe, APAC, and Rest-of-the-World. Data for each of these regions is provided by country.

Key Companies in the Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Industry

The key market players in the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market include: Trimble Inc., Deere & Company, AGCO Corporation, CNH Industrial N.V., Accenture plc, Airbus S.A.S., AT&T Inc., Raven Industries, Topcon Corporation, SGS S.A., Intertek plc, Taranis, PrecisionHawk, Naio Technologies, IBM Corporation, and Microsoft Corporation, among others.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1. Market Dynamics

  • 1.1. Overview
  • 1.2. Impact Analysis
  • 1.3. Market Drivers
    • 1.3.1. Increasing Demand for Global Food Production
    • 1.3.2. Economic Need for Precision Agriculture
    • 1.3.3. Low Capital Investment for Customers
  • 1.4. Market Restraints
    • 1.4.1. Price Inflation of Agricultural Produce
    • 1.4.2. Lack of Technical Awareness Amongst Farmers
  • 1.5. Market Opportunities
    • 1.5.1. Growth of Agriculture Service Economy
    • 1.5.2. Increasing Investments for Agriculture Technology
    • 1.5.3. Rising Trend of Farming-as-a-Service in India

2. Competitive Insights

  • 2.1. Key Strategies and Developments
    • 2.1.1. Product Launches and Developments
    • 2.1.2. Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
    • 2.1.3. Business Expansions and Contracts
    • 2.1.4. Mergers and Acquisitions
    • 2.1.5. Others (Awards and Recognition)
  • 2.2. Competitive Benchmarking

3. Industry Analysis

  • 3.1. Pricing Models
    • 3.1.1. Bundled Per Acre
    • 3.1.2. Per Pass/Service
    • 3.1.3. Percentage of Yield Bump/Gain
    • 3.1.4. Per Unit of Product Sold
  • 3.2. Break-Even Analysis
    • 3.2.1. Introduction
    • 3.2.2. Components of Break-Even Analysis
    • 3.2.3. Calculation of Break-Even Analysis
    • 3.2.4. Case Studies
  • 3.3. Advanced Solutions
    • 3.3.1. Agriculture Robot-as-a-Service (ARaaS)
    • 3.3.2. Agriculture Drone-as-a-Service (ADaaS)

4. Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million

  • 4.1. Assumptions and Limitations for Analysis and Forecast of the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • 4.2. Market Overview
  • 4.3. Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)
  • 4.4. Equipment-as-a-Service (EaaS)

5. Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million

  • 5.1. Market Overview
  • 5.2. Data Analytics and Intelligence
  • 5.3. Guidance Technology
  • 5.4. Sensing Technology
  • 5.5. Variable Rate Application Technology
  • 5.6. Others

6. Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million

  • 6.1. Market Overview
  • 6.2. Yield Mapping and Monitoring
  • 6.3. Soil Management
  • 6.4. Crop Health Management
  • 6.5. Navigation and Positioning
  • 6.6. Others

7. Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Region), $Million

  • 7.1. Market Overview
  • 7.2. North America
    • 7.2.1. North America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
      • 7.2.1.1. U.S.
      • 7.2.1.2. Canada
      • 7.2.1.3. Rest-of-North America
  • 7.3. Europe
    • 7.3.1. Europe Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
      • 7.3.1.1. Germany
      • 7.3.1.2. U.K.
      • 7.3.1.3. France
      • 7.3.1.4. Italy
      • 7.3.1.5. Rest-of-Europe
  • 7.4. Asia-Pacific
    • 7.4.1. Asia-Pacific Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
      • 7.4.1.1. Australia
      • 7.4.1.2. China
      • 7.4.1.3. Japan
      • 7.4.1.4. India
      • 7.4.1.5. Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
  • 7.5. Rest-of-the-World (RoW)
    • 7.5.1. RoW Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
      • 7.5.1.1. Brazil
      • 7.5.1.2. Argentina
      • 7.5.1.3. Israel
      • 7.5.1.4. South Africa
      • 7.5.1.5. Rest-of-RoW

8. Company Profiles

  • 8.1. Agriculture OEMs
    • 8.1.1. AGCO Corporation
      • 8.1.1.1. Company Overview
      • 8.1.1.2. Role of AGCO Corporation in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.1.1.3. Financials
      • 8.1.1.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.1.2. CLAAS Group
      • 8.1.2.1. Company Overview
      • 8.1.2.2. Role of CLAAS Group in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.1.2.3. Financials
      • 8.1.2.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.1.3. CNH Industrial N.V.
      • 8.1.3.1. Company Overview
      • 8.1.3.2. Role of CNH Industrial N.V. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.1.3.3. Financials
      • 8.1.3.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.1.4. Deere & Company
      • 8.1.4.1. Company Overview
      • 8.1.4.2. Role of Deere & Company in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.1.4.3. Financials
      • 8.1.4.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.1.5. Kubota Corporation
      • 8.1.5.1. Company Overview
      • 8.1.5.2. Role of Kubota Corporation in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
      • 8.1.5.3. Financials
      • 8.1.5.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.1.6. Yanmar Co. Ltd.
      • 8.1.6.1. Company Overview
      • 8.1.6.2. Role of Yanmar Co. Ltd in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
      • 8.1.6.3. Financials
      • 8.1.6.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.2. Data Analytics & Intelligence Companies
    • 8.2.1. 365FarmNet GmbH
      • 8.2.1.1. Company Overview
      • 8.2.1.2. Role of 365FarmNet GmbH in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.2.1.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.2.2. Agrivi
      • 8.2.2.1. Company Overview
      • 8.2.2.2. Role of Agrivi in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.2.2.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.2.3. CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
      • 8.2.3.1. Company Overview
      • 8.2.3.2. Role of CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd. In Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.2.3.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.2.4. Fujitsu Limited
      • 8.2.4.1. Company Overview
      • 8.2.4.2. Role of Fujitsu Limited in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.2.4.3. Financials
      • 8.2.4.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.2.5. IBM Corporation
      • 8.2.5.1. Company Overview
      • 8.2.5.2. Role of IBM Corporation in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
      • 8.2.5.3. Financials
      • 8.2.5.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.2.6. Microsoft Corporation
      • 8.2.6.1. Company Overview
      • 8.2.6.2. Role of Microsoft Corporation in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.2.6.3. Financials
      • 8.2.6.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.2.7. Robert Bosch GmbH
      • 8.2.7.1. Company Overview
      • 8.2.7.2. Role of Robert Bosch GmbH in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.2.7.3. Financials
      • 8.2.7.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.2.8. Trimble Inc.
      • 8.2.8.1. Company Overview
      • 8.2.8.2. Role of Trimble Inc. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.2.8.3. Financials
      • 8.2.8.4. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.3. Agriculture UAV/Drone Companies
    • 8.3.1. Parrot SA
      • 8.3.1.1. Company Overview
      • 8.3.1.2. Role of Parrot SA in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
      • 8.3.1.3. Financials
      • 8.3.1.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.3.2. Pixhawk
      • 8.3.2.1. Company Overview
      • 8.3.2.2. Role of Pixhawk in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.3.2.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.3.3. PrecisionHawk Inc.
      • 8.3.3.1. Company Overview
      • 8.3.3.2. Role of PrecisionHawk Inc. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.3.3.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.3.4. SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
      • 8.3.4.1. Company Overview
      • 8.3.4.2. Role of SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.3.4.3. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.4. Agriculture Robot Companies
    • 8.4.1. Harvest Automation Inc.
      • 8.4.1.1. Company Overview
      • 8.4.1.2. Role of Harvest Automation Inc. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.4.1.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.4.2. Naio Technologies
      • 8.4.2.1. Company Overview
      • 8.4.2.2. Role of Naio Technologies in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.4.2.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.4.3. Small Robot Company
      • 8.4.3.1. Company Overview
      • 8.4.3.2. Role of Small Robot Company in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.4.3.3. SWOT Analysis
  • 8.5. Other Agriculture Technology Companies
    • 8.5.1. Accenture plc
      • 8.5.1.1. Company Overview
      • 8.5.1.2. Role of Accenture plc in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.5.1.3. Financials
      • 8.5.1.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.5.2. Airbus S.A.S.
      • 8.5.2.1. Company Overview
      • 8.5.2.2. Role of Airbus S.A.S. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.5.2.3. Financials
      • 8.5.2.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.5.3. AT&T
      • 8.5.3.1. Company Overview
      • 8.5.3.2. Role of AT&T in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.5.3.3. Financials
      • 8.5.3.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.5.4. Ceres Imaging Inc.
      • 8.5.4.1. Company Overview
      • 8.5.4.2. Role of Ceres Imaging Inc. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.5.4.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.5.5. Hexagon Agriculture
      • 8.5.5.1. Company Overview
      • 8.5.5.2. Role of Hexagon Agriculture in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.5.5.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.5.6. Intertek Group plc
      • 8.5.6.1. Company Overview
      • 8.5.6.2. Role of Intertek Group plc in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.5.6.3. Financials
      • 8.5.6.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.5.7. Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
      • 8.5.7.1. Company Overview
      • 8.5.7.2. Role of Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.5.7.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.5.8. Raven Industries Inc.
      • 8.5.8.1. Company Overview
      • 8.5.8.2. Role of Raven Industries Inc. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.5.8.3. Financials
      • 8.5.8.4. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.5.9. SGS S.A.
      • 8.5.9.1. Company Overview
      • 8.5.9.2. Role of SGS S.A. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.5.9.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.5.10 Taranis
      • 8.5.10.1. Company Overview
      • 8.5.10.2. Role of Taranis in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.5.10.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.5.11 Teejet Technologies
      • 8.5.11.1. Company Overview
      • 8.5.11.2. Role of Teejet Technologies in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.5.11.3. SWOT Analysis
    • 8.5.12 Topcon Corporation
      • 8.5.12.1. Company Overview
      • 8.5.12.2. Role of Topcon Corporation in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
      • 8.5.12.3. Financials
      • 8.5.12.4. SWOT Analysis

9. Report Scope and Methodology

  • 9.1. Report Scope
  • 9.2. Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market Segmentation
  • 9.3. Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market Research Methodology
    • 9.3.1. Assumptions
    • 9.3.2. Limitations
    • 9.3.3. Primary Data Sources
    • 9.3.4. Secondary Data Sources
    • 9.3.5. Data Triangulation
    • 9.3.6. Market Estimation and Forecast

10. Annexure

  • 10.1. Annexure A: List of Key Strategies and Developments in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (May 2016-May 2019)

List of Tables

  • Table 1.1: Impact Analysis of Market Drivers
  • Table 1.2: Impact Analysis of Market Restraints
  • Table 3.1: Summary Table of Satellite Sensor Features
  • Table 3.2: Cost Features of Satellite Sensors
  • Table 3.3: Key Players with ARaaS Business Model and their Products
  • Table 3.4: Key Players with ARaaS Business Model and their Products
  • Table 4.1: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Table 4.2: Key Players with SaaS Service Type
  • Table 4.3: Key Players with EaaS Service Type
  • Table 5.1: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Table 5.2: Key Data Analytics & Intelligence Services in Global ATaaS Market
  • Table 5.3: Key Guidance Technology Services in Global ATaaS Market
  • Table 5.4: Key Sensing Technology Services in Global ATaaS Market
  • Table 5.5: Key Variable Rate Application Technology Services in Global ATaaS Market
  • Table 6.1: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Table 6.2: Key Yield Mapping and Monitoring Services in Global ATaaS Market
  • Table 6.3: Key Soil Management Services in Global ATaaS Market
  • Table 6.4: Key Crop Health Management Services in Global ATaaS Market
  • Table 6.5: Key Navigation and Positioning Services in Global ATaaS Market
  • Table 7.1: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (By Region), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Table 7.2: North America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Table 7.3: Europe Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Table 7.4: Asia-Pacific Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Table 7.5: RoW Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Table 8.1: AGCO Corporation: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.2: CLAAS Group: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.3: CNH Industrial N.V.: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.4: Deere & Company: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.5: Kubota Corporation: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.6: Yanmar Co. Ltd: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.7: 365FarmNet GmbH: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.8: Agrivi: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.9: CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd.: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.10: Fujitsu Limited: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.11: IBM Corporation: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.12: Microsoft Corporation: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.13: Robert Bosch GmbH: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.14: Trimble Inc.: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.15: Parrot SA: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.16: Pixhawk: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.17: PrecisionHawk Inc. Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.18: SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.19: Harvest Automation Inc.: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.20: Naio Technologies: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.21: Small Robot Company: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.22: Accenture plc: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.23: Airbus S.A.S.: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.24: AT&T: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.25: Ceres Imaging Inc.: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.26: Hexagon Agriculture: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.27: Intertek Group plc: Services Portfolio
  • Table 8.28: Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.29: Raven Industries Inc.: Service Portfolio
  • Table 8.30: SGS S.A.: Services Portfolio
  • Table 8.31: Taranis: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.32: Teejet Technologies: Product Portfolio
  • Table 8.33: Topcon Corporation: Service Portfolio

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Macroeconomic Trends Impacting the Farming Industry Growth
  • Figure 2: Future Agriculture Field Scenario with Smart Farm Technologies
  • Figure 3: Drivers and Restraints: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Figure 4: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market Snapshot
  • Figure 5: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service, by Service Type, 2019 and 2024
  • Figure 6: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million 2019 and 2024
  • Figure 7: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million 2019 and 2024
  • Figure 8: Regional Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2019-2024
  • Figure 1.1: Market Dynamics and Impact Analysis
  • Figure 1.2: The Global Agricultural Productivity Index, 2004-2050
  • Figure 1.3: The U.S. Farm Expenditure Vs. Income Statistics, 2011-2017
  • Figure 2.1: Strategies Adopted by the Key Players (May 2016- May 2019)
  • Figure 2.2: Share of Key Market Strategies and Developments (May 2016 - May 2019)
  • Figure 2.3: Product Launches and Development Share (by Company)
  • Figure 2.4: Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures Share (by Company)
  • Figure 2.5: Business Expansion and Contract Share (by Company)
  • Figure 2.6: Mergers and Acquisitions Share (by Company)
  • Figure 2.7: Competitive Benchmarking Matrix
  • Figure 3.1: Advantages-Disadvantages of Bundled Per Acre Model
  • Figure 3.2: Advantages-Disadvantages of Per Pass/Service Model
  • Figure 3.3: Advantages-Disadvantages of Percentage of Yield Bump/Gain Model
  • Figure 3.4: Advantages-Disadvantages of Per Unit of Product Sold Model
  • Figure 3.5: Graphical Representation of Break-Even Analysis
  • Figure 3.6: Mathematical Representation of Break-Even Analysis
  • Figure 3.7: Break-Even Point of Satellite Images (ha)
  • Figure 4.1: Service Type in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Figure 4.2: Advantages of Agriculture SaaS Service Type
  • Figure 4.3: Software-as-a-Service in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 4.4: Key Applications of AI & ML in Agriculture
  • Figure 4.5: Growth of Equipment-as-a-Service with Agriculture Technology
  • Figure 4.6: Equipment-as-a-Service in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million, 2019-2024
  • Figure 4.7: Advantages of Equipment-as-a-Service
  • Figure 5.1: Applications in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Figure 5.2: Technologies in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Figure 5.3: Advantages of Data Analytics for Agriculture Industry
  • Figure 5.4: Data Analytics & Intelligence in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 5.5: Guidance Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 5.6: Sensing Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 5.7: Variable Rate Application Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 5.8: Other Technologies in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 6.1: Applications in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Figure 6.2: Applications in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Figure 6.3: Yield Mapping and Monitoring in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 6.4: Soil Management in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 6.5: Crop Health Management in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 6.6: Navigation and Positioning in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 6.7: Other Applications in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.1: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, Market Share and CAGR (By Region)
  • Figure 7.2: North America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.3: North America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.4: The U.S. Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.5: Use of Guidance Technologies by ATaaS Retailers in U.S., $Million, 2005-2017
  • Figure 7.6: Use of Sensing Technologies by ATaaS Retailers in U.S., $Million, 2005-2017
  • Figure 7.7: Canada Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.8: Rest-of-North America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.9: Europe Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.10: Europe Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (By Country), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.11: Germany Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.12: The U.K. Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.13: France Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.14: Italy Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.15: Rest-of-Europe Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.16: Asia-Pacific Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.17: Asia-Pacific Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (By Country), $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.18: Major Field of Innovation in Agriculture Technology (by CSIRO Australia)
  • Figure 7.19: Australia and New Zealand Agriculture Robots Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.20: Employment in Agriculture (% of total employment) in China, 1991 and 2017
  • Figure 7.21: China Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.22: Japan Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.23: India Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.24: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.25: Rest-of-the-World Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.26: Brazil Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.27: Argentina Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.28: Israel Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 7.29: South Africa Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2017-2028
  • Figure 7.30: Rest-of-RoW Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2018-2024
  • Figure 8.1: Share of Key Companies
  • Figure 8.2: AGCO Corporation: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.3: AGCO Corporation: Net Revenue by Major Products 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.4: AGCO Corporation: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.5: AGCO Corporation: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.6: CLAAS Group: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.7: CLAAS Group: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.8: CLAAS Group: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.9: CNH Industrial N.V.: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.10: CNH Industrial: Net Revenue by Business Segments 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.11: CNH Industrial N.V.: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.12: CNH Industrial N.V.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.13: Deere & Company: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.14: Deere & Company: Net Revenue, by Business Segment, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.15: Deere & Company: Net Revenue, by Regional Segment, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.16: Deere & Company: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.17: Kubota Corporation: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.18: Kubota Corporation: Net Revenue by Segments 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.19: Kubota Corporation: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.20: Kubota Corporation: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.21: Yanmar Co. Ltd.: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.22: Yanmar Co. Ltd: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.23: 365FarmNet GmbH: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.24: Agrivi: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.25: CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.26: Fujitsu Limited: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.27: Fujitsu Limited: Net Revenue by Operating Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.28: Fujitsu Limited: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.29: Fujitsu Limited: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.30: IBM Corporation: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.31: IBM Corporation: Net Revenue by Business Segment, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.32: IBM Corporation: Net Revenue by Regional Segment, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.33: IBM Corporation: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.34: Microsoft Corporation: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.35: Microsoft Corporation: Net Revenue by Business Segment, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.36: Microsoft Corporation: Net Revenue by Regional Segment, 2017-2018
  • Figure 8.37: Microsoft Corporation: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.38: Robert Bosch GmbH: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.39: Robert Bosch GmbH: Net Revenue by Operating Segment, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.40: Robert Bosch GmbH: Net Revenue by Regional Segment, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.41: Robert Bosch GmbH: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.42: Trimble Inc.: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.43: Trimble Inc.: Net Revenue by Operating Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.44: Trimble Inc.: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.45: Trimble Inc.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.46: Parrot SA: Overall Financials, 2015-2017
  • Figure 8.47: Parrot SA: Net Revenue (by Business Segment), 2015
  • Figure 8.48: Parrot SA: Net Revenue (by Business Segment), 2016-2017
  • Figure 8.49: Parrot SA: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2015-2017
  • Figure 8.50: Parrot SA: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.51: Pixhawk: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.52: PrecisionHawk Inc.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.53: SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.54: Harvest Automation Inc.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.55: Naio Technologies: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.56: Small Robot Company: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.57: Accenture plc: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.58: Accenture plc: Net Revenue by Business Segment, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.59: Accenture plc: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.60: Accenture plc: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.61: Airbus S.A.S.: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.62: Airbus S.A.S.: Net Revenue by Operating Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.63: Airbus S.A.S.: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.64: Airbus S.A.S.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.65: AT&T: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.66: AT&T: Net Revenue by Operating Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.67: AT&T: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.68: AT&T: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.69: Ceres Imaging Inc.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.70: Hexagon Agriculture: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.71: Intertek Group plc: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.72: Intertek Group plc: Net Revenue by Operating Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.73: Intertek Group plc: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.74: Intertek Group plc: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.75: Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.76: Raven Industries Inc.: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.77: Raven Industries Inc.: Net Revenue by Segments 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.78: Raven Industries Inc.: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.79: Raven Industries Inc.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.80: SGS S.A.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.81: Taranis: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.82: Teejet Technologies: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 8.83: Topcon Corporation: Overall Financials, 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.84: Topcon Corporation: Net Revenue by Business Segments 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.85: Topcon Corporation: Net Revenue by Regional Segment 2016-2018
  • Figure 8.86: Topcon Corporation: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 9.1: Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market Scope
  • Figure 9.2: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market Segmentation
  • Figure 9.3: Report Methodology
  • Figure 9.4: Primary Interviews Breakdown, by Player, Designation, and Region
  • Figure 9.5: Sources of Secondary Research
  • Figure 9.6: Data Triangulation
  • Figure 9.7: Top Down-Bottom-Up Approach for Market Estimation
Back to Top