市場調查報告書

產業用微生物學的品管的全球市場 (2019-2028年)

Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market: Focus on Technology Trends, Application, Regulatory Framework, and Competitive Mapping Analysis and Forecast 2019-2028

出版商 BIS Research Inc. 商品編碼 811799
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 420 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
Back to Top
產業用微生物學的品管的全球市場 (2019-2028年) Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market: Focus on Technology Trends, Application, Regulatory Framework, and Competitive Mapping Analysis and Forecast 2019-2028
出版日期: 2019年03月20日內容資訊: 英文 420 Pages
簡介

全球產業用微生物學的品管的市場在預測期間內預計將以6.22%的年複合成長率 (CAGR) 發展,成長到2028年36億2000萬美元的規模。

本報告提供全球產業用微生物學的品管的市場調查,市場定義和概要,相關的法律上的必要條件、各種法規,主要的技術與普及率、市場規模預測,市場成長的各種影響因素分析,各最終用途產業、地區/主要國家趨勢與市場規模的變化與預測,競爭環境與市場佔有率,主要企業簡介等資訊彙整。

摘要整理

第1章 市場概要

  • 簡介
  • 全球產業用微生物學的品管市場:概要
  • 微生物學的品管失敗造成的經濟負擔

第2章 產業分析

  • 主要的開發、策略
  • 法律上的必要條件、規定
  • 專利分析

第3章 技術趨勢

  • 簡介
  • 即時PCR
    • 簡介
    • 市場普及率
  • MALDI-TOF質譜分析
    • 簡介
    • 市場普及率
    • 市場規模、預測
  • 生物冷光技術
    • 簡介
    • 市場普及率
  • 流式細胞技術
    • 簡介
    • 市場普及率
    • 市場規模、預測
  • 薄膜過濾
    • 簡介
    • 市場普及率
    • 市場規模、預測
  • 螢光技術
    • 簡介
    • 市場普及率
    • 市場規模、預測
  • 測顏色技術
    • 簡介
    • 市場普及率
    • 市場規模、預測
  • 三明治雜合反應
    • 簡介
    • 市場普及率
    • 市場規模、預測
  • ELFA
    • 簡介
    • 市場普及率
    • 市場規模、預測
  • 其他
    • 簡介
    • 市場普及率
    • 市場規模、預測

第4章 市場動態

  • 市場動態:概要
  • 成長推動因素
  • 課題
  • 市場機會
  • 影響分析

第5章 競爭分析

  • 製造商:各產品部門
  • 市場佔有率分析
  • 成長佔有率矩陣
  • 波特的五力分析
  • 競爭目錄
  • 價值鏈分析
  • 供應鏈分析
  • 品牌價值矩陣

第6章 成本、價格趨勢

第7章 消費者分析

  • 概要
  • 產品實驗室
  • 研究、學術機構
  • 製藥、生物科技企業
  • 法規、環境相關機關
  • 食品、飲料企業
  • 其他

第8章 全球產業用微生物市場:各產業

  • 概要
  • 醫藥品
  • 食品、飲料
  • 乳製品
  • 農業、發酵
  • 造紙
  • 生物科技
  • 化妝品、個人保養品
  • 水、環境
  • 其他

第9章 全球產業用微生物學的品管市場:各地區、國家

  • 市場概要
  • 北美
  • 歐洲
  • 亞太地區
  • 南美
  • 其他

第10章 企業簡介

  • 3M Company
  • Becton, Dickinson and Company
  • Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
  • Biolog, Inc.
  • bioMerieux SA
  • BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH
  • Bruker Corporation
  • Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
  • Danaher Corporation
  • Merck KGaA
  • Novacyt S.A. (Primerdesign Ltd.)
  • QIAGEN N.V.
  • R-Biopharm AG
  • Sartorius AG
  • 島津製作所
  • Sysmex Corporation
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

第11章 調查範圍、調查手法

目錄
Product Code: BH116C

Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Product to Reach $3.62 Billion by 2028

Over the past few decades, companies have invested in the quality control of the production process, equipment, and training for product testing. These investments and resulting improvements are not consistent for all the industries. However, the increasing globalization of the supply of the products continues to drive immense changes and improvements in the overall industrial microbiological QC market. Although microbiological testing is reasonably spread around the world, testing practices within various geographic regions vary significantly. Automation provides significant time and cost savings, while also reducing the potential of human error. It also enables the provision of consistently reliable and accurate results. There are commercially available automated and semi-automated systems that are based on several technologies such as real-time PCR, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, flow cytometry, bioluminescence technology, and Enzyme-linked Fluorescent Assay (ELFA), among others. Most of these technologies are aimed at providing efficiency gains when compared to traditional laboratory technologies, and therefore have significant potential for both time and cost savings. Hence, these technologies are adopted for the detection and identification of pathogens and other micro-organisms in the manufacturing process of industries, to avoid the further chances of the product recalls.

The purpose of the study is to gain a holistic view of the global industrial microbiological QC market in terms of various factors, including regulatory reforms and technological advancements, which are influencing the market. The market has been segmented into 'applications', 'technologies', 'consumers', and 'regions'. The scope of this report is centered upon conducting a detailed study of the products allied with the global industrial microbiological QC market. The market has also been broadly classified into product revenue, testing revenue, and testing volume for each of the aforementioned segments. In addition, the study also includes the exhaustive information on the unmet needs, perception on the new products, competitive landscape, market share of leading manufacturers, growth potential of application, technology, consumer, region, and companies, as well as other vital information with respect to global industrial microbiological QC market. The report presents the reader with an opportunity to unlock comprehensive insights with respect to the market and helps in forming well-informed strategic decisions. The research uncovers some of the substantial parameters that must be taken into consideration before entering into the market.

This research report aims at answering various aspects of the global industrial microbiological QC market with the help of the key factors driving the market, the restraints, and the current growth opportunities that are going to shape the future trajectory of the market expansion. The report includes an in-depth examination of the key players and recent developments taking place in this market. Moreover, the report includes chapters on market dynamics (market drivers, opportunities, and challenges) and industry analysis as well.

The research study highlights the factors governing the industry attractiveness with Porter's Five Forces for a comprehensive understanding of the global industrial microbiological QC market. Moreover, the study includes detailed product mapping, market estimation, and analysis of key trends in multiple geographical regions, growth of global industrial microbiological QC market in each region for different applications, and the key strategies and developments by the prominent manufacturers.

The answers to the following key questions can be derived from this report:

  • What are the major market drivers, challenges, and opportunities in the global industrial microbiological QC market?
  • What are the underlying structures resulting in the emerging trends within the global industrial microbiological QC market?
  • How is each segment of the global industrial microbiological QC market expected to grow during the forecast period and what is the anticipated revenue generated by each of the segments by the end of 2028?
  • What are the key developmental strategies which are implemented by the major players in order to sustain in the competitive market? What are the key standardization implications in developed regions for industrial microbiological QC products?
  • What are the countermeasures in case of failing QC procedures for each industry?
  • What are the key success factors for companies to remain relevant and competitive in this crowded market?
  • Who are the leading players with significant offerings to the global industrial microbiological QC market? What is the current market dominance for each of these leading players?
  • What is the expected compound growth rate witnessed by the leading players in the market during the forecast period 2019-2028? Which industrial microbiology QC product type is anticipated to have the most promising growth?
  • What are the key applications in the global industrial microbiological QC market? What are the major segments of these applications? What technologies are dominating these application segments?
  • What are the major technologies that are employed in the global industrial microbiological QC market? Which is the dominating technology?
  • Who are the primary consumers of the global industrial microbiological QC market? Which is the fastest growing consumer segment in the global industrial microbiological QC market?
  • Who are the key manufacturers in the global industrial microbiological QC market, and what are their contributions? Also, what is the growth potential of each major manufacturer?
  • What is the scope of the global industrial microbiological QC market in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Rest-of-the-World?

The key manufacturers who have been contributing significantly to the global industrial microbiological QC market include 3M Company, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Biolog, Inc., bioMerieux SA, BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH, Bruker Corporation, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Danaher Corporation, Merck KGaA, Novacyt S.A. (Primerdesign Ltd.), QIAGEN N.V., R-Biopharm AG, Sartorius AG, Shimadzu Corporation, Sysmex Corporation, and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., among others.

Executive Summary

Product safety is a global concern and is becoming evident among the general public. The governmental regulators and product manufacturers are keenly focused on maintaining the optimum quality of the products. The manufacturers are subjected to a stringent level of regulations to guarantee the microbiological quality control and composition of the product. The microbial quality control tests are carried out throughout the production process, from the initial stage of raw material till the dispatch of the product. The environment of the production process is also monitored at regular intervals using the microbiological tests. Several technological advancements have been made in the field of industrial microbiology, those of which include the introduction of Rapid Microbiological Methods (RMMs). RMM technologies allow quicker detection, but often require a short enrichment stage before the microbiological screening.

A wide range of techniques have been applied to develop these rapid microbiological test methods are aimed at quantifying the product quality parameters. RMMs can help in saving a significant amount of time in the quality control procedure of the industrial process, though a common barrier in the adoption of this technology is the high cost associated with the technology. RMMs are expanding their application area and are now being looked upon by the microbiologists as a viable alternative to the traditional methods.

The global industrial microbiological QC market has been witnessing a steady growth. The market is expected to continue to grow with a single digit CAGR of 6.22% during the forecast period, 2019-2028. Growing at a CAGR of 4.70% during the forecast period of 2019-2028, the conventional culture-based methods segment is anticipated to generate a value of $793.1 million in 2028. However, the market for rapid microbiological methods currently dominates the global industrial microbiological QC market, and is anticipated to grow at the fastest CAGR of 7.33% during the forecast period 2019-2028.

The purpose of the study is to gain a holistic view of the global industrial microbiological QC market in terms of various factors, such as recent trends and product advancements, influencing the market. The scope of this report is centered upon conducting a detailed study of the products allied with the global industrial microbiological QC market, which includes various products, broadly classified as rapid microbiological methods and conventional culture-based methods. However, the market estimation only comprises manufacturers of these products. The global industrial microbiological QC market is segmented into four different segments namely technology, consumers, applications, and regions. These segments are further segmented into several sub-segments to ease the market estimation and to gain a holistic view of the market. The market has also been broadly segmented into product revenue, testing revenue, and testing volume with respect to the consumers and applications that are present in the market. The global market value was estimated using different approaches and validated with each other.

Based on region, the global industrial microbiological QC market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Rest-of-the-World (RoW). The regions have further been analyzed for product revenues, testing revenues, and testing volumes of the various products and processes present in the market.

The key manufacturers who have been contributing significantly to the global industrial microbiological QC market include 3M Company, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Biolog, Inc., bioMerieux SA, BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH, Bruker Corporation, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Danaher Corporation, Merck KGaA, Novacyt S.A. (Primerdesign Ltd.), QIAGEN N.V., R-Biopharm AG, Sartorius AG, Shimadzu Corporation, Sysmex Corporation, and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., among others.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1 Market Overview

  • 1.1 Market Introduction
  • 1.2 Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market Overview
  • 1.3 Economic Burden of the Failed Microbiological QC
    • 1.3.1 Pharmaceutical Industry
    • 1.3.2 Food, Beverage, Agriculture & Fermentation Industry
    • 1.3.3 Cosmetic Industry
    • 1.3.4 Water Industry
    • 1.3.5 Paper Industry
    • 1.3.6 Biotechnology Industry
    • 1.3.7 Other Industries

2 Industry Insights

  • 2.1 Key Developments and Strategies
    • 2.1.1 Awards, Recognition, Investments, and Expansions
    • 2.1.2 Product Launches and Approvals
    • 2.1.3 Collaborations, Partnerships, Joint Venture, and Agreements
    • 2.1.4 Mergers and Acquisitions
  • 2.2 Legal Requirements and Regulations
    • 2.2.1 Microbiology Standards
    • 2.2.2 Pharmaceutical Industry
      • 2.2.2.1 FDA Guidance
      • 2.2.2.2 EU Directives
      • 2.2.2.3 Permissible Limits for Microorganisms
    • 2.2.3 Food and Beverage Industry
      • 2.2.3.1 FDA Guidance
      • 2.2.3.2 EU Directive
      • 2.2.3.3 Permissible Limits for Microorganisms
    • 2.2.4 Dairy Industry
      • 2.2.4.1 FDA Guidelines
      • 2.2.4.2 EU Directive
      • 2.2.4.3 Permissible Limits for Microorganisms
    • 2.2.5 Agriculture and Fermentation Industry
      • 2.2.5.1 FDA Guidelines
      • 2.2.5.2 EU Directive
      • 2.2.5.3 Permissible Limits for Microorganisms
    • 2.2.6 Paper Industry
      • 2.2.6.1 FDA Guidelines
      • 2.2.6.2 EU Directive
    • 2.2.7 Biotechnology Industry
      • 2.2.7.1 FDA Guidelines
      • 2.2.7.2 EU Directive
    • 2.2.8 Cosmetic Industry
      • 2.2.8.1 FDA Guidelines
      • 2.2.8.2 EU Directive
    • 2.2.9 Water Industry
      • 2.2.9.1 FDA Guidelines
      • 2.2.9.2 EU Directives
  • 2.3 Patent Analysis
    • 2.3.1 by Country
    • 2.3.2 by Year

3 Technology Trends

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Real-Time PCR
    • 3.2.1 Introduction
    • 3.2.2 Market Penetration
  • 3.3 MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry
    • 3.3.1 Introduction
    • 3.3.2 Market Penetration
    • 3.3.3 Market Size and Forecast
  • 3.4 Bioluminescence Technology
    • 3.4.1 Introduction
    • 3.4.2 Market Penetration
  • 3.5 Flow Cytometry
    • 3.5.1 Introduction
    • 3.5.2 Market Penetration
    • 3.5.3 Market Size and Forecast
  • 3.6 Membrane Filtration
    • 3.6.1 Introduction
    • 3.6.2 Market Penetration
    • 3.6.3 Market Size and Forecast
  • 3.7 Fluorescent-based Technology
    • 3.7.1 Introduction
    • 3.7.2 Market Penetration
    • 3.7.3 Market Size and Forecast
  • 3.8 Colorimetric Technology
    • 3.8.1 Colorimetric Technology: Introduction
    • 3.8.2 Market Penetration
    • 3.8.3 Market Size and Forecast
  • 3.9 Sandwich Hybridization
    • 3.9.1 Introduction
    • 3.9.2 Market Penetration
    • 3.9.3 Market Size and Forecast
  • 3.10 Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay (ELFA)
    • 3.10.1 Introduction
    • 3.10.2 Market Penetration
    • 3.10.3 Market Size and Forecast
  • 3.11 Other Technologies
    • 3.11.1 Introduction
    • 3.11.2 Market Penetration
    • 3.11.3 Market Size and Forecast

4 Market Dynamics

  • 4.1 Market Dynamics: Overview
  • 4.2 Drivers
  • 4.3 Challenges
  • 4.4 Opportunities
  • 4.5 Impact Analysis

5 Competitive Insights

  • 5.1 Industrial Microbiological QC Manufacturers by Industrial Areas
  • 5.2 Market Share Analysis, by Company
    • 5.2.1 bioMérieux SA
    • 5.2.2 Merck KGaA
    • 5.2.3 Market Share Analysis, Becton, Dickinson and Company
    • 5.2.4 3M Company
    • 5.2.5 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
    • 5.2.6 Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
    • 5.2.7 Danaher Corporation
    • 5.2.8 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
    • 5.2.9 Market Share Analysis, Sartorius AG
    • 5.2.10 Hygiena, LLC
    • 5.2.11 Bruker Corporation
    • 5.2.12 Qiagen N.V.
    • 5.2.13 Shimadzu Corporation
  • 5.3 Growth Share Matrix
    • 5.3.1 Company
    • 5.3.2 by Technology
    • 5.3.3 by Region
  • 5.4 Porter's Five Force Analysis
    • 5.4.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 5.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 5.4.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 5.4.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 5.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
  • 5.5 Comprehensive Competitive Index
  • 5.6 Competitor Value Chain Analysis
  • 5.7 Competitor Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.8 Competitor Brand-Value Matrix

6 Cost & Pricing Trends

  • 6.1 Microbiological QC Cost Per Product
  • 6.2 Microbiological QC Cost Vs Production Cost

7 Consumer Analysis

  • 7.1 Overview
  • 7.2 Product Testing Laboratories
  • 7.3 Research and Academic Institutions
  • 7.4 Pharma and Biotech Companies
  • 7.5 Regulatory and Environment Agencies
  • 7.6 Food and Beverage Companies
  • 7.7 Other Industries

8 Global Industrial Microbiology Market by Application

  • 8.1 Overview
  • 8.2 Pharmaceutical Industry
  • 8.3 Food and Beverage Industry
  • 8.4 Dairy Industry
  • 8.5 Agriculture and Fermentation Industry
  • 8.6 Paper Industry
  • 8.7 Biotechnology Industry
  • 8.8 Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Cosmetic and Personal Care Industry
  • 8.9 Water and Environmental Industry
  • 8.10 Other Industries

9 Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market by Region

  • 9.1 Market Overview
  • 9.2 North America
  • 9.2.1 The U.S.
    • 9.2.2 Canada
  • 9.3 Europe
    • 9.3.1 Germany
    • 9.3.2 France
    • 9.3.3 The U.K.
    • 9.3.4 Italy
    • 9.3.5 Spain
    • 9.3.6 Rest-of-Europe
  • 9.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 9.4.1 China
    • 9.4.2 Japan
    • 9.4.3 India
    • 9.4.4 Australia
    • 9.4.5 Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
  • 9.5 Latin America
    • 9.5.1 Brazil
    • 9.5.2 Mexico
    • 9.5.3 Rest-of-Latin America
  • 9.6 Rest-of-the-World

10 Company Profiles

  • 10.1 Competitor Snapshot
  • 10.2 3M Company
    • 10.2.1 Company Overview
    • 10.2.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.2.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.2.4 Financial Information
    • 10.2.5 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.2.6 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.3 Becton, Dickinson and Company
    • 10.3.1 Company Overview
    • 10.3.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.3.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.3.4 Financial Information
    • 10.3.5 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.3.6 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.4 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
    • 10.4.1 Company Overview
    • 10.4.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.4.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.4.4 Financial Information
    • 10.4.5 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.4.6 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.5 Biolog, Inc.
    • 10.5.1 Company Overview
    • 10.5.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.5.3 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.6 bioMérieux SA
    • 10.6.1 Company Overview
    • 10.6.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.6.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.6.4 Financial Information
    • 10.6.5 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.6.6 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.7 BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH
    • 10.7.1 Company Overview
    • 10.7.2 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.7.3 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.8 Bruker Corporation
    • 10.8.1 Company Overview
    • 10.8.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.8.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.8.4 Financial Information
    • 10.8.5 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.8.6 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.9 Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
    • 10.9.1 Company Overview
    • 10.9.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.9.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.9.4 Financial Information
    • 10.9.5 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.9.6 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.10 Danaher Corporation
    • 10.10.1 Company Overview
    • 10.10.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.10.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.10.4 Financial Information
    • 10.10.5 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.10.6 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.11 Merck KGaA
    • 10.11.1 Company Overview
    • 10.11.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.11.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.11.4 Financial Information
    • 10.11.5 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.11.6 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.12 Novacyt S.A. (Primerdesign Ltd.)
    • 10.12.1 Company Overview
    • 10.12.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.12.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.12.4 Financial Information
    • 10.12.5 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.12.6 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.13 QIAGEN N.V.
    • 10.13.1 Company Overview
    • 10.13.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.13.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.13.4 Financial Information
    • 10.13.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.14 R-Biopharm AG
    • 10.14.1 Company Overview
    • 10.14.2 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.14.3 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.15 Sartorius AG
    • 10.15.1 Company Overview
    • 10.15.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.15.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.15.4 Financial Information
    • 10.15.5 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.15.6 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.16 Shimadzu Corporation
    • 10.16.1 Company Overview
    • 10.16.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.16.3 Segmental Information
    • 10.16.4 Geographical Information
    • 10.16.5 Financial Information
    • 10.16.6 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.16.7 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.17 Sysmex Corporation
    • 10.17.1 Company Overview
    • 10.17.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.17.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.17.4 Financial Information
    • 10.17.5 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.17.6 SWOT Analysis
  • 10.18 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
    • 10.18.1 Company Overview
    • 10.18.2 Segmental Information
    • 10.18.3 Geographical Information
    • 10.18.4 Financial Information
    • 10.18.5 Company's Operating Segments
    • 10.18.6 SWOT Analysis

11 Report scope and methodology

  • 11.1 Scope of the Report
  • 11.2 Research Methodology
  • 11.3 Data Triangulation
    • 11.3.1 Key Data Points from Primary Sources
    • 11.3.2 Key Data Points from Secondary Sources
  • 11.4 Bottom-Up Approach (Segmental Analysis)
  • 11.5 Top-Down Approach (Segmental Analysis)
  • 11.6 Assumptions and Limitations
  • 11.7 Data and Prediction Modelling

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Industrial Microbiological QC Market Dynamics: Impact Analysis
  • Table 1.1: Identity of Objectionable Organisms Cited in Recalls for "Objectionable Organisms" 2004 - 2011
  • Table 2.1: Examples of Permissible Limits for Non-Sterile Dosage Forms
  • Table 2.2: Difference Between HACCP Plan and FSP
  • Table 2.3: Examples of Permissible Limits for Foods
  • Table 2.4: Examples of Permissible Limits for Dairy Products
  • Table 2.5: Examples of Permissible Limits for Agriculture and Fermentation Products
  • Table 2.6: Maximum Containment Level for Drinking Water by the EPA
  • Table 2.7: Microbiological Parameters for Drinking Water by the European Council Directive
  • Table 3.1: Reagent Cost Comparison Between Traditional and MALDI-TOF MS Methods
  • Table 3.2: Direct Cost Comparison Between Traditional and MALDI-TOF MS Methods
  • Table 3.3: Total Cost Comparison Between Traditional and MALDI-TOF MS Methods, including Maintenance Agreement Costs
  • Table 4.1: Impact Analysis of Market Navigating Factors
  • Table 4.2: Impact Analysis of Market Restraining Factors
  • Table 4.3: Impact Analysis of Market Opportunities
  • Table 5.1: Key Manufacturers by Targeted Industrial Areas
  • Table 5.2: Market Share Analysis, by Company (2015 - 2017) ($Million)
  • Table 5.3: Ranking of Key Players by Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.4: bioMérieux SA Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.5: Merck KGaA Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.6: Becton, Dickinson and Company Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.7: 3M Company Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.8: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.9: Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.10: Danaher Corporation Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.11: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.12: Sartorius AG Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.13: Hygiena, LLC Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.14: Bruker Corporation Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.15: Qiagen N.V. Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 5.16: Shimadzu Corporation Market Share (2015 - 2017)
  • Table 6.1: Microbiological QC Cost (Operating Cost) using Conventional Methods (CM)
  • Table 6.2: Microbiological QC Cost (Operating Cost) using Rapid Microbiology Methods (RMMs)
  • Table 6.3: Comparison between Rapid Microbial Methods and Conventional Methods
  • Table 6.4: Initial Investment for qualification and implementation of RMM Technologies
  • Table 8.1: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Application, 2015-2028
  • Table 9.1: The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.2: The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.3: The U.S Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.4: Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.5: Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.6: Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.7: Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.8: Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.9: Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.10: France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.11: France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.12: France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.13: The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.14: The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.15: The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.16: Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.17: Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.18: Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.19: Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.20: Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.21: Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.22: Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.23: Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.24: Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.25: China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.26: China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.27: China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.28: Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.29: Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.30: Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.31: India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.32: India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.33: India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.34: Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.35: Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.36: Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.37: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.38: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.39: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.40: Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.41: Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.42: Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.43: Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.44: Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.45: Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 9.46: Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.47: Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
  • Table 9.48: Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
  • Table 10.1: 3M Company: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.2: 3M Company: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.3: 3M Company: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.4: Key Figures: by Segments (2017)
  • Table 10.5: Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Segment (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.6: Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, by Life Sciences Segment (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.7: Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, by Life Interventional Segment (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.8: Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, by Medical Segment (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.9: Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Geography (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.10: Becton, Dickinson and Company: Overall Financials (2015-2018)
  • Table 10.11: Bio-Rad Laboratories: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.12: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.13: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.14: Key Figures: by Segments (2017)
  • Table 10.15: bioMérieux SA: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.16: bioMérieux SA : Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.17: bioMérieux SA : Overall Financials (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.18: Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.19: Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Category (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.20: Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Category (BSI) (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.21: Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Category (BEST) (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.22: Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.23: Bruker Corporation: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.24: Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.25: Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.26: Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.27: Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Reportable Segments
  • Table 10.28: Key Figures: by Segments (2017)
  • Table 10.29: Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.30: Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.31: Danaher Corporation: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.32: Danaher Corporation: R&D Expenditure, by Segment (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.33: Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Product Group (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.34: Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.35: Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.36: Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography, Healthcare (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.37: Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography, Life Science (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.38: Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography, Performance Materials (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.39: Merck KGaA: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.40: Key Figures: by Segments (2017)
  • Table 10.41: Novacyt S.A.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.42: Novacyt S.A.: Segment Revenue, by Region (2017)
  • Table 10.43: Novacyt S.A.: Segment Revenue, by Region (2016)
  • Table 10.44: Novacyt S.A.: Segment Revenue, by Region (2015)
  • Table 10.45: Novacyt S.A.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Table 10.46: Novacyt S.A.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.47: QIAGEN N.V.: Net Revenue, by Product Category (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.48: QIAGEN N. V.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.49: QIAGEN N.V.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.50: Sartorius AG: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.51: Sartorius AG: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.52: Sartorius AG: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.53: Key Figures (Bioprocess Solutions)
  • Table 10.54: Key Figures (Lab Products & Services)
  • Table 10.55: Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.56: Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, Analytical & Measuring Instruments (2017)
  • Table 10.57: Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, Medical Systems (2017)
  • Table 10.58: Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, Industrial Machinery (2017)
  • Table 10.59: Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, Aircraft Equipment (2017)
  • Table 10.60: Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.61: Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography, Analytical & Measuring Instruments (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.62: Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography, Medical Systems (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.63: Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography, Industrial Machinery (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.64: Shimadzu Corporation: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.65: Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.66: Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by Americas (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.67: Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by EMEA (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.68: Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by Asia-Pacific (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.69: Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by China (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.70: Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by Japan (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.71: Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.72: Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Region, by Americas (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.73: Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Region, by EMEA (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.74: Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Region, by Asia-Pacific (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.75: Sysmex Corporation: Overall Financials (2016-2018)
  • Table 10.76: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.77: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
  • Table 10.78: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
  • Table 11.1: Currency Conversion Rates

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Product Revenue (Overview)
  • Figure 2: Promoting and Inhibiting Factors
  • Figure 3: Market Share Analysis (2017)
  • Figure 4: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Product Revenue (Region) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 5: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Product Revenue (Conventional Methods and RMM Technologies) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 6: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Rapid Microbiological Methods (Technology) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 7: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by PCR - RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 8: Market Penetration Forecast
  • Figure 9: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by ELFA - RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 10: Market Penetration Forecast
  • Figure 11: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Colorimetric Technology - RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 12: Market Penetration Forecast
  • Figure 13: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Flow Cytometry - RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 14: Market Penetration Forecast
  • Figure 15: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by MALDI-TOF/Mass Spectrometry - RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 16: Market Penetration Forecast
  • Figure 17: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Sandwich Hybridization - RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 18: Market Penetration Forecast
  • Figure 19: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Fluorescent-Based Technology - RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 20: Market Penetration Forecast
  • Figure 21: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Bioluminescence Technology - RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 22: Market Penetration Forecast
  • Figure 23: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Membrane Filtration - RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 24: Market Penetration Forecast
  • Figure 25: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Others - RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 26: Market Penetration Forecast
  • Figure 27: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Test Revenue (Overview)
  • Figure 28: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Test Revenue (Region) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 29: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Test Volume
  • Figure 30: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Test Volume (Region) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 31: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Application (Test Revenue) (2018 and 2028)
  • Figure 32: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Application (Test Volume) (2018 and 2028)
  • Figure 33: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumers (Product Revenue) (2018 and 2028)
  • Figure 34: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumers (Test Revenue) (2018 and 2028)
  • Figure 35: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumers (Test Volume) (2018 and 2028)
  • Figure 1.1: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market Segmentation
  • Figure 1.2: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 1.3: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028
  • Figure 1.4: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028
  • Figure 1.5: Global Industrial Microbiology, by Product Revenue (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 1.6: Global Industrial Microbiology, by Test Revenue (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 1.7: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028
  • Figure 1.8: Global Industrial Microbiology QC, by Test Volume (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 1.9: Economic Burden to the Company
  • Figure 1.10: Recall Cost to the Business
  • Figure 1.11: Total recalled products by FDA due to microbial contamination, 2012-2017
  • Figure 1.12: Common Causes of Food Products Recalls
  • Figure 1.13: Types of Food Product Recalled (U.S. and U.K.)
  • Figure 1.14: Number of Recalled Products by U.S. FDA due to Microbial Contamination (2017 and 2018)
  • Figure 1.15: Economic Burden of Failed Microbiological QC on Food Industry
  • Figure 1.16: U.S. FDA Recalls of Cosmetic and Personal Care Products due to Bacterial Contamination, 2002-2016
  • Figure 1.17: Number of Recalled Cosmetic Products due to Microbial Contamination in Europe, 2012-2016
  • Figure 1.18: Etiological Agents in Waterborne Outbreaks (Number of Outbreaks/Cause), 1998-2017 (U.S.)
  • Figure 1.19: Etiological Agents in Waterborne Outbreaks (Number of Outbreaks/Cause), 1998-2017 (Finland)
  • Figure 1.20: Number of Recalled Products by U.S. FDA due to Microbial Contamination (2017 and 2018)
  • Figure 2.1: Share of Key Developments and Strategies by Company (Jan-2016 - Dec-2018)
  • Figure 2.2: Awards, Recognition, Investments, and Expansions Share by Company
  • Figure 2.3: Product Launches and Approvals Share by Company
  • Figure 2.4: Collaborations, Partnerships, Joint Venture, and Agreements Share by Company
  • Figure 2.5: Mergers and Acquisitions Share by Company
  • Figure 2.6: Patent Analysis, by Country (2010 - 2018)
  • Figure 2.7: Patent Analysis, by Year (2010 - 2018)
  • Figure 3.1: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Conventional Culture Based Methods and Rapid Microbiological Methods, 2015-2028
  • Figure 3.2: Real-Time PCR: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 3.3: Real-Time PCR (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
  • Figure 3.4: MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 3.5: MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
  • Figure 3.6: Bioluminescence Technology: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 3.7: Bioluminescence Technology (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
  • Figure 3.8: Flow Cytometry: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 3.9: Flow Cytometry (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
  • Figure 3.10: Membrane Filtration: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 3.11: Membrane Filtration (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
  • Figure 3.12: Fluorescent-based Technology: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 3.13: Fluorescent-based Technology (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
  • Figure 3.14: Colorimetric Technology: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 3.15: Colorimetric Technology (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
  • Figure 3.16: Sandwich Hybridization: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 3.17: Sandwich Hybridization (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
  • Figure 3.18: ELFA Technology: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 3.19: Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
  • Figure 3.20: Other Technologies: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
  • Figure 4.1: Market Dynamics
  • Figure 4.2: Average Microbiological Quality Control Cost, 2017
  • Figure 5.1: Market Share Analysis, by Company (2015 - 2017)
  • Figure 5.2: Growth Share Matrix for Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Company (2017)
  • Figure 5.3: Growth Share Matrix for Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Technology (2018)
  • Figure 5.4: Growth Share Matrix for Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Region (2018)
  • Figure 5.5: Industry Attractiveness (Porter's Five Forces Analysis)
  • Figure 5.6: Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Overall Impact
  • Figure 5.7: Bargaining Power of Buyers: Overall Impact
  • Figure 5.8: Threat of New Entrants: Overall Impact
  • Figure 5.9: Threat of Substitutes: Overall Impact
  • Figure 5.10: Intensity of Competitive Rivalry: Overall Impact
  • Figure 5.11: Comprehensive Competitive Index for Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Company (2017)
  • Figure 5.12: Key Entities of Value Chain
  • Figure 5.13: Value Chain Analysis
  • Figure 5.14: Cost Margin (Value Chain Analysis)
  • Figure 5.15: Supply Chain
  • Figure 5.16: Key Entities of Supply Chain
  • Figure 5.17: End to End Supply Chain
  • Figure 5.18: Brand-Value Matrix
  • Figure 6.1: Average Production and Microbiological QC Cost Breakdown by Common Industrial Process Requirements
  • Figure 7.1: Industrial Microbiological QC Market Consumer Analysis
  • Figure 7.2: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue), 2015 - 2028
  • Figure 7.3: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue), 2015 - 2028
  • Figure 7.4: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.5: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.6: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.7: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Product Testing Laboratories), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.8: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue, by Product Testing Laboratories) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.9: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Product Testing Laboratories) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.10: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Research & Academic Institutions), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.11: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue, by Research & Academic Institutions) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.12: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Research & Academic Institutions) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.13: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Pharma & Biotech Companies), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.14: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue, by Pharma & Biotech Companies) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.15: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Pharma & Biotech Companies) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.16: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Regulatory & Environment Agencies), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.17: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue, by Regulatory & Environment Agencies) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.18: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Regulatory & Environment Agencies) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.19: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Food & Beverage Companies), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.20: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Food & Beverage Companies) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.21: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Food & Beverage Companies) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.22: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Other Industries), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.23: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue, by Other Industries) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 7.24: Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Other Industries) (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.1: Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Application
  • Figure 8.2: Industrial Microbiological QC Market Share, by Application, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 8.3: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Pharmaceutical Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.4: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Pharmaceutical Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.5: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Food and Beverage Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.6: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Food and Beverage Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.7: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Dairy Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.8: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Dairy Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.9: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Agriculture and Fermentation Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.10: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Agriculture and Fermentation Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.11: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Paper Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.12: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Paper Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.13: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Biotechnology Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.14: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Biotechnology Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.15: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Cosmetic and Personal Care Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.16: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Cosmetic and Personal Care Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.17: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Water and Environmental Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.18: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Water and Environmental Industry), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.19: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Other Industries), 2015-2028
  • Figure 8.20: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Other Industries), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.1: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.2: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.3: Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Region), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.4: North America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.5: North America Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.6: North America Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.7: The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.8 The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.9: The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.10: Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.11: Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.12: Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.13: Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.14: Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.15: Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.16: Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.17: Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.18: Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.19: France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.20: France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.21: France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.22: The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.23: The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.24: The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.25: Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.26: Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.27: Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.28: Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.29: Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.30: Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.31: Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.32: Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.33: Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.34: Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.35: Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.36: Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.37: China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.38: China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.39: China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.40: Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.41: Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.42: Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.43: India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.44: India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.45: India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.46: Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.47: Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.48: Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.49: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.50: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.51: Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.52: Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.53: Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.54: Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.55: Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.56: Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.57: Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.58: Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.59: Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.60: Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.61: Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.62: Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.63: Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
  • Figure 9.64: Rest-of-the-World Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.65: Rest-of-the-World Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
  • Figure 9.66: Rest-of-the-World Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
  • Figure 10.1: 3M Company: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
  • Figure 10.2: 3M Company: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Figure 10.3: 3M Company: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
  • Figure 10.4: 3M Company: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
  • Figure 10.5: 3M Company: Operating Segments (2017)
  • Figure 10.6: 3M Company: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.7: Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Segment (2018)
  • Figure 10.8: Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Geography (2018)
  • Figure 10.9: Becton, Dickinson and Company: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2015-2018)
  • Figure 10.10: Becton, Dickinson and Company: R&D Expenditure & Y-o-Y (2015-2018)
  • Figure 10.11: Becton, Dickinson and Company: Operating Segments (2017)
  • Figure 10.12: Becton, Dickinson and Company: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.13: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
  • Figure 10.14: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Figure 10.15: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
  • Figure 10.16: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
  • Figure 10.17: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Operating Segments (2017)
  • Figure 10.18: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.19: Biolog, Inc.: Operating Segments
  • Figure 10.20: Biolog, Inc.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.21: bioMérieux SA : Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
  • Figure 10.22: bioMérieux SA: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Figure 10.23: bioMérieux SA: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
  • Figure 10.24: bioMérieux SA: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
  • Figure 10.25: bioMérieux SA: Operating Segments (2017)
  • Figure 10.26: bioMérieux SA: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.27: BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.28: Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
  • Figure 10.29: Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Figure 10.30: Bruker Corporation: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
  • Figure 10.31: Bruker Corporation: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
  • Figure 10.32: Bruker Corporation: Operating Segments (2017)
  • Figure 10.33: Bruker Corporation: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.34: Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
  • Figure 10.35: Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Figure 10.36: Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
  • Figure 10.37: Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Operating Segments (2017)
  • Figure 10.38: Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.39: Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
  • Figure 10.40: Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Figure 10.41: Danaher Corporation: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
  • Figure 10.42: Danaher Corporation: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
  • Figure 10.43: Danaher Corporation: Operating Segments (2017)
  • Figure 10.44: Danaher Corporation: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.45: Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
  • Figure 10.46: Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Figure 10.47: Merck KGaA: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
  • Figure 10.48: Merck KGaA: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
  • Figure 10.49: Merck KGaA: Operating Segments (2017)
  • Figure 10.50: Merck KGaA: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.51: Novacyt S.A.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
  • Figure 10.52: Novacyt S.A.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Figure 10.53: Novacyt S.A.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
  • Figure 10.54: Novacyt S.A.: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
  • Figure 10.55: Novacyt S.A.: Operating Segments (2017)
  • Figure 10.56: Novacyt S.A.: Company Timeline
  • Figure 10.57: Novacyt S.A.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.58: QIAGEN N.V.: Net Revenue, by Product Categories (2017)
  • Figure 10.59: QIAGEN N.V.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Figure 10.60: QIAGEN N.V.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
  • Figure 10.61: QIAGEN N.V.: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
  • Figure 10.62: QIAGEN N.V.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.63: R-Biopharm AG: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.64: Sartorius AG: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
  • Figure 10.65: Sartorius AG: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Figure 10.66: Sartorius AG: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
  • Figure 10.67: Sartorius AG: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
  • Figure 10.68: Sartorius AG: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.69: Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
  • Figure 10.70: Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Figure 10.71: Shimadzu Corporation: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
  • Figure 10.72: Shimadzu Corporation: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
  • Figure 10.73: Shimadzu Corporation: Operating Segments (2017)
  • Figure 10.74: Shimadzu Corporation: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.75: Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2018)
  • Figure 10.76: Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2018)
  • Figure 10.77: Sysmex Corporation: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2015-2018)
  • Figure 10.78: Sysmex Corporation: R&D Expenditure (2016-2018)
  • Figure 10.79: Sysmex Corporation: Operating Segments (2018)
  • Figure 10.80: Sysmex Corporation: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 10.81: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
  • Figure 10.82: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
  • Figure 10.83: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
  • Figure 10.84: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
  • Figure 10.85: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Operating Segments (2017)
  • Figure 10.86: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: SWOT Analysis
  • Figure 11.1: Considered Factors for Data Prediction and Modeling
Back to Top