Product Code: BHR0604SD
“Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market to Reach $55,716.7 million by 2031.”
Market Report Coverage - Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems
Market Segmentation
- Product - Conventional Technologies (Endoscopes and Endoscopic Systems, Video and Visualization Systems, Capsule Endoscopy, Instruments and Accessories, Others), Surgical Robotics (Robotic Systems, Instruments and Accessories, Services)
- Application - General Surgery, Urology Surgery, Gynecology Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Cardiovascular Surgery, Neurosurgery, Others
- End User - Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs), Specialty Clinics
- Region - North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa
Regional Segmentation
- North America - U.S., Canada
- Europe - Germany, France, Spain, U.K., Italy, Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Rest-of-Europe
- Asia-Pacific - Japan, South Korea, India, China, Australia and New Zealand, Malaysia, Singapore, Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
- Latin America - Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Rest-of-Latin America
- Middle East and Africa - Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (K.S.A.), United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.), Israel, Rest-of-Middle East and Africa
Market Growth Drivers
- Rising Incidence of Chronic Diseases
- Advantages Over Open Surgeries
- Increase in Global Geriatric Population
- Increasing Healthcare Costs
- Technological Advancement in Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures and Technologies
Market Challenges
- High Cost of Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotic Systems
- Shortage of Skilled Professionals
- Restrictive Reimbursement Landscape
Market Opportunities
- Engage in Mergers and Acquisitions to Diversify Endoscopic Portfolio
- Development of Surgical Simulators for Training Professionals
- Development of Low-Cost Surgical Robotic Systems
Key Companies Profiled
Arthrex Inc., Asensus Surgical, Inc., Boston Scientific Corporation, Conmed Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Karl Storz SE & Co. KG, Medtronic plc, Olympus Corporation, Hoya Corporation (Pentax Medical), Siemens Healthineers AG, Smith & Nephew plc, Sony Corporation, Stryker Corporation, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
How This Report Can Add Value
Who should buy this report?
- Surgical Instruments and Accessories (both Conventional MISS and Surgical Robotics) OEMs to gain a holistic view about the market potential of various systems and the developing economies for business expansions.
- Surgical Robotics Manufacturers
- Established healthcare companies that are integrating software, machine learning, and AI into the surgical robotic platform
- Endoscopes, Endoscopic Systems, Capsule Endoscopy Manufacturers
- Established medical technology companies to gain insights about the market potential, market entry strategies, new technologies in the market, and key competitors.
- Medical Research Institutions
Key questions answered in the Report:
- What are the key regulations governing the minimally invasive surgical systems market, across the globe?
- What are the key technological developments on which the current industry leaders are spending their major share of research and development (R&D) investment?
- How is the role of minimally invasive surgery technologies expected to evolve in the future?
- Who are the leading players who hold significant dominance on the global minimally invasive surgical systems market, currently?
- How likely are current business models to persist in the future?
- What are the key market drivers, challenges, growth opportunities, and trends?
- How do minimally invasive procedures function as compared to each other?
- How is the expiration of patents likely to disrupt the market dynamics?
- What are the key strategies incorporated by the leading players in the minimally invasive surgical systems landscape?
- What is the likelihood of new players entering the market in near term?
- What is the current revenue contribution for different endoscopes and endoscopy systems, and what are the expected modifications in the forecast period?
- What is the current revenue contribution for the different types of conventional minimally invasive surgical systems, and what are expected modifications in the same forecast period?
- What is the current revenue contribution for the different types of surgical robotic systems, and what are the expected modifications in the same forecast period?
- Which countries contribute to the major share of current demand and which countries hold significant scope for business expansion activities, by the key players?
Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market Overview
As per the National Cancer Institute, minimally invasive surgery is defined as, "surgery that is done using small incisions (cuts) and few stitches. During minimally invasive surgery, one or more small incisions may be made in the body. A laparoscope (thin, tube-like instrument with a light and a lens for viewing) is inserted through one opening to guide the surgery. Tiny surgical instruments are inserted through other openings to do the surgery. Minimally invasive surgery may cause less pain, scarring, and damage to healthy tissue, and the patient may have a faster recovery than with traditional surgery."
As per the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), "Different types of computer-assisted surgical systems can be used for pre-operative planning, surgical navigation, and to assist in performing surgical procedures. Robotically assisted surgical (RAS) devices are one type of computer-assisted surgical system. Sometimes referred to as robotic surgery, RAS devices enable the surgeon to use computer and software technology to control and move surgical instruments through one or more tiny incisions in the patient's body (minimally invasive) for a variety of surgical procedures."
The global minimally invasive surgical systems market is estimated to be valued at $27,882.8 million in 2020 and is anticipated to reach $55,716.7 million by the end of 2031, growing at a CAGR of 6.3% during 2021-2031.
Market Drivers
Presently, the factors driving the growth of the market as per the minimally invasive surgical systems report include rising incidence of chronic diseases, increase in global geriatric population, advantages of MIS over open surgeries, increasing healthcare costs, technological advancements in surgical procedures and technologies.
Market Challenges
The challenges that are restricting the growth of the market include high cost of surgical robotics systems, shortage of skilled professionals, and restrictive reimbursement landscape.
High cost of the surgical robotic system is among the most challenging factors for the end-user to buy and treatment for patients. It has been observed that many patients prefer international travel for their surgeries to take the advantage of currency rate. Also, due to the shortage of skilled professionals have led a slight increasing the expense of the robotic surgery. Restrictive reimbursement landscape is another factor affecting the growth of the global minimally invasive surgical systems market.
Market Opportunities
Potential opportunities that is likely to boost the growth of the market include development of low-cost surgical robotic systems, development of surgical simulators for the training of professionals, and engagement in mergers and acquisitions to diversify the endoscopic portfolio.
The current radiation therapy systems have a price of around $2 million, therefore many companies are working in developing cost-effective system and even working towards the development of a low-cost surgical robotic platform. And with time, technologically advanced products are being working, researched to get an upgraded product.
Impact of COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic had a huge impact on elective surgical procedures in the first half of 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically impacted the daily hospital routine services on the global level. During the initial phase of the pandemic, hospitals greatly reduced or cancelled conducting elective surgical procedures for patient safety and to prioritize the care treatments for patients with COVID?19.
The reduction in the volume of elective surgical procedures on a large scale had a substantial impact on patients as well as a financial impact on the medical device manufacturers. This resulted in the decreased sales of the minimally invasive surgical systems.
Market Segmentation
Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
Under this segmentation, the market in divided into conventional technologies and surgical robotics.
The conventional technologies segment dominates the market with a share of 80.4% of global minimally invasive surgical systems market mainly due to the increase in the number of minimally invasive surgical procedures.
Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Application)
Under this segmentation, the market in divided into general surgery, urology surgery, orthopedic surgery, cardiovascular surgery, neurosurgery, others (cosmetic and bariatric surgery)
These above-mentioned applications are based on conventional technologies and surgical robotics segment.
Orthopedic surgery under the conventional technology segment is expected to register the highest CAGR of 7.0% during the forecast period.
Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by End-User)
Under this segmentation, the market in divided into hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers (ABCs), specialty clinics.
The hospitals segment dominates the minimally invasive surgical systems market with a share of 73.3% of global market mainly due to the number of hospitals providing access to the surgical treatments for the patients.
Ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) segment is expected to register the highest CAGR of 8.0% during the forecast period.
Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Region)
The different regions covered under the market report includes North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East and Africa.
North America dominates the market in 2020 and is anticipated to uphold its dominance throughout the forecast period. The growth in the market is majorly driven by the increasing research and development activities and many companies being located in the U.S.
Latin America, and Middle East and Africa market is expected to grow with the highest CAGR of 7.8% during the forecast period.
Key Market Players and Competition Synopsis
Some of the key players operating in the market include: Arthrex Inc., Asensus Surgical Inc. (formerly TransEnterix Inc.), Boston Scientific Corporation, Conmed Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Karl Storz SE & Co. KG, Medtronic plc, Olympus Corporation, Hoya Corporation (Pentax Medical), Siemens Healthineers AG, Smith & Nephew plc, Sony Corporation, Stryker Corporation, Zimmer Biomed Holdings Inc.
The minimally invasive surgical systems market market has witnessed several strategic and technological developments from January 2017- July 2021, undertaken by the different market players to attain their respective market shares in this emerging domain. Some of the strategies covered in this segment are product development and upgradations, partnerships, collaborations, business expansions, funding activities, regulatory approvals, mergers, and acquisitions. The preferred strategy for companies has been partnerships, collaborations, and business expansions.
Table of Contents
1 Market Definition and Scope of Study
- 1.1 Market Definition
- 1.2 Scope of Study
- 1.3 Market Segmentation
- 1.4 Key Questions Answered
- 1.5 Forecast Period Selection Criteria
2 Markets
- 2.1 Global Market Outlook
- 2.1.1 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
- 2.1.2 Assumptions and Limitations
- 2.1.3 Key Vendors
- 2.2 Key Enabling Technologies
- 2.2.1 Rising Adoption of 4K Imaging Technologies
- 2.2.2 Haptics in Minimally Invasive Surgical Technologies
- 2.2.3 Artificial Intelligence in Minimally Invasive Surgical Technologies
- 2.2.4 The Advent of Miniature Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments
- 2.3 Business Model Analysis
- 2.4 Patent Landscape
- 2.4.1 Minimally Invasive Conventional Technologies
- 2.4.2 Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotics
- 2.4.3 Patent Expiration Impact
- 2.5 Market Dynamics
- 2.5.1 Overview
- 2.5.2 Impact Analysis
- 2.5.2.1 Short-Term
- 2.5.2.2 Long-Term
- 2.5.3 Market Drivers
- 2.5.3.1 Rising Incidence of Chronic Diseases
- 2.5.3.2 Advantages Over Open Surgeries
- 2.5.3.3 Increase in Global Geriatric Population
- 2.5.3.4 Increasing Healthcare Costs
- 2.5.3.5 Technological Advancement in Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures and Technologies
- 2.5.4 Market Restraints
- 2.5.4.1 High Cost of Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotic Systems
- 2.5.4.2 Shortage of Skilled Professionals
- 2.5.4.3 Restrictive Reimbursement Landscape
- 2.5.5 Market Opportunities
- 2.5.5.1 Engage in Mergers and Acquisitions to Diversify Endoscopic Portfolio
- 2.5.5.2 Development of Surgical Simulators for Training Professionals
- 2.5.5.3 Development of Low-Cost Surgical Robotic Systems
- 2.5.6 Market Trends
- 2.5.6.1 Operating Lease Programs Implemented by Surgical Robotic Manufacturers
- 2.6 Industry Opportunity Analysis
- 2.7 Analyst Perspective
3 Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems
- 3.1 Pre-COVID-19 Scenario
- 3.1.1 Market Size and Growth Scenarios
- 3.1.1.1 Global and Regional Analysis
- 3.1.2 Procedure Volume
- 3.1.3 Demand and Supply
- 3.1.4 Opportunities
- 3.1.5 Business Model
- 3.2 During COVID-19 Scenario
- 3.2.1 Market Size and Growth Scenarios
- 3.2.1.1 Global and Regional Analysis
- 3.2.2 Procedure Volume
- 3.2.2.1 Case Study -Various Phases of Elective Surgeries During COVID-19
- 3.2.3 Demand and Supply
- 3.2.4 Opportunities
- 3.2.5 Business Model
- 3.3 Future Impact of COVID-19
- 3.3.1 Market Size and Growth Potential
- 3.3.1.1 Global and Regional Markets
- 3.3.2 Impact on Demand and Supply
- 3.3.3 Impact on Supply Chain and Logistics
- 3.3.4 Impact on Procedure Volume
- 3.3.5 Impact on Hospital Procurement
- 3.3.5.1 Case Study - Navigating Through the Pandemic: An Assessment of Weill Cornell Medicine
- 3.3.6 Impact on Technology Diffusion
- 3.3.7 Impact on Export and Import
- 3.3.8 Impact on Competitive Landscape
- 3.3.9 Impact on Entry Barriers and Opportunities for New Companies
- 3.4 Market Scenarios
- 3.4.1 Optimistic Scenario
- 3.4.2 Realistic Scenario
- 3.4.3 Pessimistic Scenario
4 Supply Chain
- 4.1 Key Entities of the Supply Chain
- 4.1.1 Manufacturers/Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs)
- 4.1.1.1 Manufacturers' Disruptions
- 4.1.1.1.1 Electronic Parts
- 4.1.1.1.2 Chips
- 4.1.1.1.3 Sensors
- 4.1.1.1.4 Other Parts
- 4.1.2 Contract Manufacturers
- 4.1.2.1 Contract Manufacturers' Disruptions
- 4.1.2.1.1 Electronic Parts
- 4.1.2.1.2 Chips
- 4.1.2.1.3 Sensors
- 4.1.2.1.4 Other Parts
- 4.2 Distribution Challenges
- 4.3 End Users' Access Limitations of Regular Supplies
- 4.4 Supply Chain Analysis
- 4.4.1 Pre-COVID
- 4.4.2 During COVID-19
- 4.4.3 Post-COVID-19
- 4.5 Post-COVID-19 Scenarios of Supply Chain
- 4.5.1 Optimistic
- 4.5.2 Realistic
- 4.5.3 Pessimistic
5 Application
- 5.1 Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Application)
- 5.1.1 Overview
- 5.1.2 Opportunity Assessment
- 5.1.2.1 During COVID-19
- 5.1.2.2 Post-COVID-19
- 5.1.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis
- 5.1.3.1 During COVID-19
- 5.1.3.2 Post-COVID-19
- 5.1.4 Market Size and Forecast
- 5.1.4.1 Minimally Invasive Conventional Technologies (Optimistic and Realistic Scenarios)
- 5.1.4.1.1 General Surgery
- 5.1.4.1.2 Urology Surgery
- 5.1.4.1.3 Gynecology Surgery
- 5.1.4.1.4 Orthopedic Surgery
- 5.1.4.1.5 Cardiovascular Surgery
- 5.1.4.1.6 Neurosurgery
- 5.1.4.1.7 Others
- 5.1.4.2 Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotics
- 5.1.4.2.1 General Surgery
- 5.1.4.2.2 Urology Surgery
- 5.1.4.2.3 Gynecology Surgery
- 5.1.4.2.4 Orthopedic Surgery
- 5.1.4.2.5 Cardiovascular Surgery
- 5.1.4.2.6 Neurosurgery
- 5.1.4.2.7 Others
- 5.2 Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by End User)
- 5.2.1 Overview
- 5.2.2 Opportunity Assessment
- 5.2.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis
- 5.2.4 Market Size and Forecast
- 5.2.4.1 Minimally Invasive Conventional Technologies
- 5.2.4.1.1 Hospitals
- 5.2.4.1.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs)
- 5.2.4.1.3 Specialty Clinics
- 5.2.4.2 Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotics
- 5.2.4.2.1 Hospitals
- 5.2.4.2.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs)
- 5.2.4.2.3 Specialty Clinics
6 Product
- 6.1 Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 6.1.1 Overview
- 6.1.2 Opportunity Assessment
- 6.1.2.1 During COVID-19
- 6.1.2.2 Post-COVID-19
- 6.1.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis
- 6.1.3.1 During COVID-19
- 6.1.3.2 Post-COVID-19
- 6.1.4 Market Size and Forecast
- 6.1.4.1 Minimally Invasive Conventional Technologies
- 6.1.4.1.1 Endoscopes and Endoscopic Systems
- 6.1.4.1.1.1 Rigid Endoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.1.1 Market Size and Growth Potential
- 6.1.4.1.1.1.2 Laparoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.1.3 Urology Endoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.1.4 Gynecology Endoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.1.5 ENT Endoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.1.6 Arthroscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.1.7 Neuroendoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.1.8 Other Rigid Endoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.2 Flexible Endoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.2.1 Market Size and Growth Potential
- 6.1.4.1.1.2.2 Gastrointestinal Flexible Endoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.2.3 Urology Flexible Endoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.2.4 Gynecology Flexible Endoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.2.5 Bronchoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.2.6 Laryngoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.2.7 Pharyngoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.1.2.8 ENT Endoscopes
- 6.1.4.1.2 Video and Visualization Systems
- 6.1.4.1.2.1 Displays and Monitors
- 6.1.4.1.2.1.1 Market Size and Growth Potential
- 6.1.4.1.2.1.2 Wireless Displays and Monitors
- 6.1.4.1.2.1.3 Wired Displays and Monitors
- 6.1.4.1.2.2.1 Market Size and Growth Potential
- 6.1.4.1.2.2.2 Single-Chip Cameras
- 6.1.4.1.2.2.3 3-Chip Cameras
- 6.1.4.1.2.3 Light Sources
- 6.1.4.1.2.3.1 Market Size and Growth Potential
- 6.1.4.1.2.3.2 Xenon
- 6.1.4.1.2.3.3 Halogen
- 6.1.4.1.2.3.4 LED
- 6.1.4.1.2.3.5 Laser
- 6.1.4.1.2.4 Video Recorders
- 6.1.4.1.2.4.1 Market Size and Growth Potential
- 6.1.4.1.2.4.2 Inbuilt
- 6.1.4.1.2.4.3 Standalone
- 6.1.4.1.2.5.1 Market Size and Growth Potential
- 6.1.4.1.2.5.2 Charged Couple Device (CCD)
- 6.1.4.1.2.5.3 Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS)
- 6.1.4.1.2.6 Video Processors
- 6.1.4.1.2.6.1 Optimistic
- 6.1.4.1.2.6.2 Realistic
- 6.1.4.1.2.6.3 Pessimistic
- 6.1.4.1.2.7 Printers
- 6.1.4.1.2.8 Video Converters
- 6.1.4.1.3 Instruments and Accessories
- 6.1.4.1.3.1 Insufflators
- 6.1.4.1.3.2 Energy Devices
- 6.1.4.1.3.3 Closure Devices
- 6.1.4.1.3.4 Irrigation Systems
- 6.1.4.1.3.5 Access Devices
- 6.1.4.1.3.6 Hand Instruments
- 6.1.4.1.3.7 Procedure Kits
- 6.1.4.1.3.8 Endoscope Tip Protectors, Tubing, and Water Systems
- 6.1.4.1.3.9 Forceps
- 6.1.4.1.3.10 Retrieval Kits
- 6.1.4.1.3.11 Injection Needles
- 6.1.4.1.3.12 Other Instruments and Accessories
- 6.1.4.1.4 Others (Reprocessing and Sterilization)
- 6.1.4.1.5 Capsule Endoscopy
- 6.1.4.1.5.1 Workstations and Data Recorders
- 6.1.4.1.5.2 Capsules
- 6.1.4.1.5.3 Others (Services and Patency System)
- 6.1.4.2 Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotics
- 6.1.4.2.1 Robotic Systems
- 6.1.4.2.1.1 Optimistic Scenario
- 6.1.4.2.1.2 Realistic Scenario
- 6.1.4.2.1.3 Pessimistic Scenario
- 6.1.4.2.2 Instruments and Accessories (Robotic Surgery)
- 6.1.4.2.2.1 Optimistic Scenario
- 6.1.4.2.2.2 Realistic Scenario
- 6.1.4.2.2.3 Pessimistic Scenario
- 6.1.4.2.3 Services
- 6.1.4.2.3.1 Optimistic Scenario
- 6.1.4.2.3.2 Realistic Scenario
- 6.1.4.2.3.3 Pessimistic Scenario
7 Region
- 7.1 Overview
- 7.2 Opportunity Assessment
- 7.2.1.1 During COVID-19
- 7.2.1.2 Post-COVID-19
- 7.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis
- 7.3.1.1 During COVID-19
- 7.3.1.2 Post-COVID-19
- 7.4 Supply Chain Disruption
- 7.4.1 North America
- 7.4.2 Europe
- 7.4.3 Asia-Pacific
- 7.4.4 Rest-of-the-World
- 7.5 North America
- 7.5.1 Overview
- 7.5.2 Regulatory Framework (U.S.)
- 7.5.3 Opportunity Assessment
- 7.5.4 Key Vendors
- 7.5.5 Market Size and Forecast
- 7.5.5.1 North America Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.5.5.1.1 North America Minimally Invasive Conventional Technologies Market
- 7.5.5.1.1.1 Optimistic
- 7.5.5.1.1.2 Realistic
- 7.5.5.1.1.3 Pessimistic
- 7.5.5.1.2 North America Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotics
- 7.5.5.1.2.1 Optimistic
- 7.5.5.1.2.2 Realistic
- 7.5.5.1.2.3 Pessimistic
- 7.5.5.2 North America Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Country)
- 7.5.5.2.1 U.S.
- 7.5.5.2.1.1 U.S. Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.5.5.2.2 Canada
- 7.5.5.2.2.1 Canada Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.6 Europe
- 7.6.1 Overview
- 7.6.2 Regulatory Framework (Europe)
- 7.6.2.1 Impact of the EU's Medical Device Regulations (MDR)
- 7.6.3 Opportunity Assessment
- 7.6.4 Key Vendors
- 7.6.5 Market Size and Forecast
- 7.6.5.1 Europe Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems (by Product Type)
- 7.6.5.1.1 Europe Minimally Invasive Conventional Technologies Market
- 7.6.5.1.1.1 Optimistic
- 7.6.5.1.1.2 Realistic
- 7.6.5.1.1.3 Pessimistic
- 7.6.5.1.2 Europe Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotics Market
- 7.6.5.1.2.1 Optimistic
- 7.6.5.1.2.2 Realistic
- 7.6.5.1.2.3 Pessimistic
- 7.6.5.2 Europe Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Country)
- 7.6.5.2.1 Germany
- 7.6.5.2.1.1 Germany Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.6.5.2.2 France
- 7.6.5.2.2.1 France Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.6.5.2.3 U.K.
- 7.6.5.2.3.1 U.K. Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.6.5.2.4 Italy
- 7.6.5.2.4.1 Italy Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.6.5.2.5 Spain
- 7.6.5.2.5.1 Spain Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.6.5.2.6 Netherlands
- 7.6.5.2.6.1 Netherlands Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.6.5.2.7 Belgium
- 7.6.5.2.7.1 Belgium Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.6.5.2.8 Switzerland
- 7.6.5.2.8.1 Switzerland Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.6.5.2.9 Sweden
- 7.6.5.2.9.1 Sweden Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.6.5.2.10 Denmark
- 7.6.5.2.10.1 Denmark Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.6.5.2.11 Rest-of-Europe
- 7.6.5.2.11.1 Rest-of-Europe Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.7 Asia-Pacific
- 7.7.1 Overview
- 7.7.2 Regulatory Framework
- 7.7.2.1 China
- 7.7.2.2 Japan
- 7.7.3 Opportunity Assessment
- 7.7.4 Key Vendors
- 7.7.5 Market Size and Forecast
- 7.7.5.1 Asia-Pacific Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.7.5.1.1 Asia-Pacific Minimally Invasive Conventional Technologies Market
- 7.7.5.1.1.1 Optimistic
- 7.7.5.1.1.2 Realistic
- 7.7.5.1.1.3 Pessimistic
- 7.7.5.1.2 Asia-Pacific Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotics Market
- 7.7.5.1.2.1 Optimistic
- 7.7.5.1.2.2 Realistic
- 7.7.5.1.2.3 Pessimistic
- 7.7.5.2 Asia-Pacific Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Country)
- 7.7.5.2.1 Japan
- 7.7.5.2.1.1 Japan Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.7.5.2.2 China
- 7.7.5.2.2.1 China Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.7.5.2.3 India
- 7.7.5.2.3.1 India Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.7.5.2.4 South Korea
- 7.7.5.2.4.1 South Korea Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.7.5.2.5 Australia and New Zealand
- 7.7.5.2.5.1 Australia and New Zealand Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.7.5.2.6 Malaysia
- 7.7.5.2.6.1 Malaysia Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.7.5.2.7 Singapore
- 7.7.5.2.7.1 Singapore Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.7.5.2.8 Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
- 7.7.5.2.8.1 Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.8 Latin America
- 7.8.1 Overview
- 7.8.2 Opportunity Assessment
- 7.8.3 Key Vendors
- 7.8.4 Market Size and Forecast
- 7.8.4.1 Latin America Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.8.4.1.1 Latin America Minimally Invasive Conventional Technologies Market
- 7.8.4.1.1.1 Optimistic
- 7.8.4.1.1.2 Realistic
- 7.8.4.1.1.3 Pessimistic
- 7.8.4.1.2 Latin America Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotics Market
- 7.8.4.1.2.1 Optimistic
- 7.8.4.1.2.2 Realistic
- 7.8.4.1.2.3 Pessimistic
- 7.8.4.2 Latin America Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Country)
- 7.8.4.2.1 Brazil
- 7.8.4.2.1.1 Brazil Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.8.4.2.2 Mexico
- 7.8.4.2.2.1 Mexico Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.8.4.2.3 Argentina
- 7.8.4.2.3.1 Argentina Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.8.4.2.4 Rest-of-Latin America
- 7.8.4.2.4.1 Rest-of-Latin America Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.9 Middle East and Africa
- 7.9.1 Overview
- 7.9.2 Opportunity Assessment
- 7.9.3 Key Vendors
- 7.9.4 Market Size and Forecast
- 7.9.4.1 Middle East and Africa Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.9.4.1.1 Middle East and Africa Minimally Invasive Conventional Technologies Market
- 7.9.4.1.1.1 Optimistic
- 7.9.4.1.1.2 Realistic
- 7.9.4.1.1.3 Pessimistic
- 7.9.4.1.2 Middle East and Africa Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotics Market
- 7.9.4.1.2.1 Optimistic
- 7.9.4.1.2.2 Realistic
- 7.9.4.1.2.3 Pessimistic
- 7.9.4.2 By Country
- 7.9.4.2.1 K.S.A.
- 7.9.4.2.1.1 K.S.A. Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.9.4.2.2 U.A.E.
- 7.9.4.2.2.1 U.A.E. Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.9.4.2.3 Israel
- 7.9.4.2.3.1 Israel Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
- 7.9.4.2.4 Rest-of-Middle East and Africa
- 7.9.4.2.4.1 Rest-of-Middle East and Africa Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type)
8 Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles
- 8.1 Competitive Benchmarking
- 8.1.1 Market Share Analysis
- 8.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Conventional Technologies
- 8.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotics
- 8.1.2 Key Strategies and Developments (Deal Tracking)
- 8.1.2.1 Minimally Invasive Conventional Technologies
- 8.1.2.1.1 Partnerships, Alliances, and Business Expansion
- 8.1.2.1.2 New Offerings
- 8.1.2.1.3 Mergers and Acquisitions
- 8.1.2.1.4 Regulatory and Legal Activities
- 8.1.2.1.5 Funding Activities
- 8.1.2.2 Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotics
- 8.1.2.2.1 Partnerships, Alliances, and Business Expansions
- 8.1.2.2.2 New Offerings and Upgradations
- 8.1.2.2.3 Mergers and Acquisitions
- 8.1.2.2.4 Regulatory and Legal Activities
- 8.1.2.2.5 Funding Activities
- 8.1.3 Competitor Snapshot
- 8.2 Company Profiles
- 8.2.1 Overview
- 8.2.2 Arthrex Inc.
- 8.2.2.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.2.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.2.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.2.4 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.2.4.1 Strengths of the Company
- 8.2.2.4.2 Weakness of the Company
- 8.2.3 Asensus Surgical, Inc.
- 8.2.3.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.3.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.3.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.3.4 Financials
- 8.2.3.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.3.5.1 Strength of the Company
- 8.2.3.5.2 Weakness of the Company
- 8.2.4 Boston Scientific Corporation
- 8.2.4.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.4.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.4.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.4.4 Financials
- 8.2.4.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.4.5.1 Strengths of the Company
- 8.2.4.5.2 Weakness of the Company
- 8.2.5 Conmed Corporation
- 8.2.5.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.5.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.5.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.5.4 Financials
- 8.2.5.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.5.5.1 Strengths of the Company
- 8.2.5.5.2 Weaknesses of the Company
- 8.2.6 Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
- 8.2.6.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.6.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.6.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.6.4 Financials
- 8.2.6.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.6.5.1 Strengths of the Company
- 8.2.6.5.2 Weakness of the Company
- 8.2.7 Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
- 8.2.7.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.7.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.7.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.7.4 Financials
- 8.2.7.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.7.5.1 Strengths of the Company
- 8.2.7.5.2 Weaknesses of the Company
- 8.2.8 Karl Storz SE & Co. KG
- 8.2.8.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.8.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.8.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.8.4 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.8.4.1 Strength of the Company
- 8.2.8.4.2 Weaknesses of the Company
- 8.2.9 Medtronic plc
- 8.2.9.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.9.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.9.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.9.4 Financials
- 8.2.9.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.9.5.1 Strengths of the Company
- 8.2.9.5.2 Weakness of the Company
- 8.2.10 Olympus Corporation
- 8.2.10.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.10.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.10.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.10.4 Financials
- 8.2.10.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.10.5.1 Strengths of the Company
- 8.2.10.5.2 Weaknesses of the Company
- 8.2.11 Hoya Corporation (Pentax Medical)
- 8.2.11.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.11.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.11.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.11.4 Financials
- 8.2.11.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.11.5.1 Strengths of the Company
- 8.2.11.5.2 Weakness of the Company
- 8.2.12 Siemens Healthineers AG
- 8.2.12.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.12.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.12.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.12.4 Financials
- 8.2.12.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.12.5.1 Strengths of the Company
- 8.2.12.5.2 Weakness of the Company
- 8.2.13 Smith & Nephew plc
- 8.2.13.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.13.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.13.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.13.4 Financials
- 8.2.13.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.13.5.1 Strengths of the Company
- 8.2.13.5.2 Weakness of the Company
- 8.2.14 Sony Corporation
- 8.2.14.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.14.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.14.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.14.4 Financials
- 8.2.14.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.14.5.1 Strengths of the Company
- 8.2.14.5.2 Weakness of the Company
- 8.2.15 Stryker Corporation
- 8.2.15.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.15.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.15.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.15.4 Financials
- 8.2.15.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.15.5.1 Strength of the Company
- 8.2.15.5.2 Weaknesses of the Company
- 8.2.16 Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
- 8.2.16.1 Company Outlook
- 8.2.16.2 Role of the Company
- 8.2.16.3 Product Portfolio
- 8.2.16.4 Financials
- 8.2.16.5 Competitive Analysis
- 8.2.16.5.1 Strengths of the Company
- 8.2.16.5.2 Weakness of the Company
9 Research Methodology
- 9.1 Data Collection and Analysis
- 9.2 Data Sources
- 9.2.1 Primary Data Sources
- 9.2.2 Secondary Data Sources
- 9.3 Data Sources and Categorization
- 9.4 Data Triangulation
- 9.5 Estimation and Forecasting Methodology