NEWS: 公告在東京證券交易所JASDAQ標準市場新上市

表紙
市場調查報告書

觸覺反饋手術的全球市場:2021-2031年

Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market - Analysis and Forecast, 2021-2031

出版商 BIS Research Inc. 商品編碼 1004969
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 131 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
觸覺反饋手術的全球市場:2021-2031年 Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market - Analysis and Forecast, 2021-2031
出版日期: 2021年05月10日內容資訊: 英文 131 Pages
簡介

全球外科手術觸覺反饋技術的市場在預測期間內預計以14.6%的年複合成長率發展,從2020年的2280萬美元,成長到2031年1億140萬美元的規模。

由於先進技術的手術用機器人系統和醫療訓練用途的模擬器的需求高漲,促進該市場的成長。

本報告提供全球外科手術觸覺反饋技術的市場調查,市場定義和概要,新型冠狀病毒感染疾病 (COVID-19) 以及其他的市場影響因素分析,主要的實行技術,實行的案例研究,專利趨勢,市場規模的變化、預測,用途、地區/主要國家等各種區分的明細,競爭環境,主要企業簡介等資訊彙整。

第1章 摘要整理

第2章 調查手法

第3章 市場概要

第4章 產業考察

  • 母體市場預測
  • 產品基準、價格分析
  • 供應商分析
  • 主要的實行技術
  • 市場機會分析:微創手術
  • 技術分析
  • 醫療部門的實行:案例研究
  • 醫療保健領域的觸覺技術:未來展望
  • 分析師的觀點

第5章 專利形勢

第6章 市場動態

  • 概要
  • 市場推動因素
  • 市場抑制因素
  • 市場機會
  • 市場趨勢

第7章 市場分析、預測:各用途

  • 市場概要
  • 增量商機分析
  • 市場魅力
  • 外科用機器人系統
  • 醫療模擬器

第8章 市場分析、預測:各地區、主要國家

  • 市場概要
  • 增量商機分析
  • 市場魅力
  • 北美
  • 歐洲
  • 亞太地區
  • 其他地區

第9章 企業簡介

  • Competitors Snapshot
  • 3D Systems Corporation
  • Force Dimension
  • Forsslund Systems AB
  • Haption S.A.
  • Moog, Inc.
  • OrbSurgical Limited
目錄
Product Code: BHR0857SA

Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market to Reach $101.4 Million by 2031

Market Report Coverage - Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment

Market Segmentation

  • Application
    • Surgical Robotics
    • Medical Simulators

Regional Segmentation

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Rest-of-the-World

Growth Drivers

  • Advancement in Raw Materials for Haptic Technology
  • Growing Adoption of Haptic Technology in Surgical Environment

Market Restraints

  • Technical Challenges Associated in Implementing Haptic Technology in Medical Devices
  • Limitation of Haptic Technology in VR-Based Simulator Systems

Market Opportunities

  • Adoption of Vibrotactile Feedback Mechanism in Medical Simulators
  • Increasing Research and Development Activities for Wearable Haptic Feedback Devices

Key Companies Profiled

  • 3D Systems Corporation, Force Dimension, Forsslund Systems AB, Haption S.A., Orb Surgical Ltd., and Moog, Inc.

Key Questions Answered in this Report:

  • What is the current scenario of the global haptic feedback surgical environment market?
  • What is the total market size and forecast (until 2031) for the global haptic feedback surgical environment market?
  • What is the addressable market size and forecast based on region?
  • What is the future of haptic technology in the healthcare domain?
  • What is the analyst's perspective on the importance of haptic technology?
  • What is the technology used for the haptic devices?
  • What is the pre-and post-COVID-19 scenario for the minimally invasive surgeries?
  • What is the patent filling trend in the last five years for haptic technology?
  • What are the key market dynamics (drivers, restraints, and opportunities) for the haptic feedback surgical environment market?
  • What is the current total market size and forecast for different application categories available in the global haptic feedback surgical environment market?
  • Which application category is anticipated to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period?
  • What is the current total market size and forecast for the global haptic feedback surgical environment market across different regions?
  • What is the role of each company in the global haptic feedback surgical environment market?
  • What are the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for each company in the global haptic feedback surgical environment market?

Overview on the Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market

The global haptic feedback surgical environment market is expected to grow with a CAGR of 14.6% in terms of market value, during the forecast period 2021-2031. Factors such as growing demand for technological advanced surgical robotic systems and simulators for medical training applications are fueling the growth of the market. The implementation of haptic devices in the healthcare domain is at the nascent stage and it is anticipated that this technology will be significantly adopted in the healthcare domain, especially in minimally invasive surgeries, during the forecast period 2021-2031.

Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market Forecast

The global haptic feedback surgical environment market was valued at $22.8 million in 2020 and is anticipated to reach $101.4 million by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 14.6%, during the forecast period 2021-2031. Factors such as growing demand for technological advanced surgical robotic systems and simulators for medical training applications are fueling the growth of the market. However, the factors such as low dexterity and a limited workspace of a haptic device can restrict the growth of this market and, implementation of this technology within a medical device is a very complex and technical process.

Competitive Landscape

The global haptic feedback surgical environment market consists of large-scale as well as small-scale manufacturers and vendors. Presently, the manufacturers in the market have ample number of opportunities to expand their offerings and to establish a strong foothold in the market.

There are many companies in the global haptic feedback surgical environment market some which are 3D Systems Corporation, Force Dimension, Forsslund Systems AB, Haption S.A., Orb Surgical Ltd., and Moog, Inc.

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Research Methodology

  • 2.1 Overview
  • 2.2 Primary Data Sources
  • 2.3 Secondary Data Sources
  • 2.4 Data Triangulation
  • 2.5 Market Estimation and Forecast
  • 2.6 Limitations and Assumptions

3 Market Overview

  • 3.1 Technological Evolution in Haptic Technology
  • 3.2 Haptic Technology in Healthcare Space
  • 3.3 Working Principle of Haptic Device
  • 3.4 Medical Applications of Haptic Device

4 Industry Insights

  • 4.1 Parent Market Outlook
    • 4.1.1 Market Size and Forecast
    • 4.1.2 Market Segmentation
    • 4.1.3 Key players in the Global Haptic Technologies Market
  • 4.2 Product Benchmarking and Pricing Analysis
  • 4.3 Vendor Analysis
  • 4.4 Key Enabling Technologies
  • 4.5 Opportunity Assessment: Minimally Invasive Surgeries
    • 4.5.1 Pre-COVID-19 Scenario
    • 4.5.2 Post-COVID-19 Scenario
  • 4.6 Technological Analysis of Haptic Device
    • 4.6.1 Overview
    • 4.5.2 General Properties of Haptic Interfaces
    • 4.5.2 Types
  • 4.7 Use Cases of Implementing Haptic Technology in the Healthcare Domain
    • 4.7.1 Case Study I: A Review of Simulators with Haptic Devices for Medical Training
    • 4.7.2 Case Study II: Performance and Perception of Haptic Feedback in a Laparoscopic 3D Virtual Reality Simulator
    • 4.7.3 Case Study III: Multi-Modal Haptic Feedback for Grip Force Reduction in Robotic Surgery
  • 4.8 Future Assessment of Haptic Technology in the Healthcare Domain
  • 4.9 Analyst's Perspective: Importance of Haptic Technology in the Healthcare Domain

5 Patent Landscape

  • 5.1 Patent Filing Trend
    • 5.1.1 by Country
    • 5.1.2 by CPC Codes
  • 5.2 Surgical Robotics: Patent Filing Trends
  • 5.3 Simulators: Patent Filing Trends
  • 5.4 Key Innovative Patents

6 Market Dynamics

  • 6.1 Overview
  • 6.2 Market Drivers
    • 6.2.1 Advancement in Raw Materials for Haptic Technology
    • 6.2.2 Growing Adoption of Haptic Technology in Surgical Environment
  • 6.3 Market Restraints
    • 6.3.1 Technical Challenges Associated in Implementing Haptic Technology in Medical Devices
    • 6.3.2 Limitation of Haptic Technology in VR-Based Simulation Systems
  • 6.4 Market Opportunities
    • 6.4.1 Adoption of Vibrotactile Feedback Mechanism in Medical Simulators
    • 6.4.2 Increasing Research and Development Activities for Wearable Haptic Feedback Devices
  • 6.5 Market Trends
    • 6.5.1 Integration of Haptic Technology in Simulation Systems and Surgical Robotic Systems

7 Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (by Application)

  • 7.1 Market Overview
  • 7.2 Incremental Revenue Opportunity Analysis
  • 7.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis
  • 7.4 Surgical Robotic Systems
    • 7.4.1 Market Size and Forecast
    • 7.4.2 Advent of Surgical Robotic Systems
    • 7.4.3 Haptic-Enabled Surgical Robotic Systems
  • 7.5 Medical Simulators
    • 7.5.1 Market Size and Forecast
    • 7.5.2 Advent of Medical Simulators
    • 7.5.3 Haptic-Enabled Medical Simulators

8 Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (by Region)

  • 8.1 Market Overview
  • 8.2 Incremental Revenue Opportunity Analysis
  • 8.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis
  • 8.4 North America
  • 8.4 Europe
  • 8.4 Asia-Pacific
  • 8.4 Rest-of-the-World

9 Company Profiles

  • 9.1 Competitors Snapshot
  • 9.2 3D Systems Corporation
    • 9.2.1 Company Overview
    • 9.2.2 Role of the Company
    • 9.2.3 Product Portfolio
    • 9.2.4 Financial Analysis
      • 9.2.4.1 Overall Financials
      • 9.2.4.2 Segmental Revenue
      • 9.2.4.3 Regional Revenue
      • 9.2.4.4 R&D Expenditure
    • 9.2.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 9.3 Force Dimension
    • 9.3.1 Company Overview
    • 9.3.2 Role of the Company
    • 9.3.3 Product Portfolio
    • 9.2.4 SWOT Analysis
  • 9.4 Forsslund Systems AB
    • 9.4.1 Company Overview
    • 9.4.2 Role of the Company
    • 9.4.3 Product Portfolio
    • 9.4.4 SWOT Analysis
  • 9.5 Haption S.A.
    • 9.5.1 Company Overview
    • 9.5.2 Role of the Company
    • 9.5.3 Product Portfolio
    • 9.5.4 SWOT Analysis
  • 9.6 Moog, Inc.
    • 9.6.1 Company Overview
    • 9.6.2 Role of the Company
    • 9.6.3 Product Portfolio
    • 9.6.4 Financial Analysis
      • 9.2.4.1 Overall Financials
      • 9.2.4.2 Segmental Revenue
      • 9.2.4.3 Regional Revenue
      • 9.2.4.4 R&D Expenditure
    • 9.6.5 SWOT Analysis
  • 9.7 OrbSurgical Limited
    • 9.7.1 Company Overview
    • 9.7.2 Role of the Company
    • 9.7.3 Product Portfolio
    • 9.7.4 SWOT Analysis

List of Tables

  • 1.Table: Market Dynamics: Impact Analysis
  • 2.Table: Some of the Teleoperated Robotic Platforms for Industrial Applications
  • 3.Table: Patent Landscape (by Country), January 2016-April 2021
  • 4.Table: Patent Landscape, CPC Code Description
  • 5.Table: Patent Landscape (Surgical Robotics, by Company), January 2016-April 2021
  • 6.Table: Patent Landscape (Medical Simulators, by Country), January 2016-April 2021
  • 7.Table: Details of CN105264459A; CN105264459B
  • 8.Table: Details of WO2016014385A2; WO2016014385A3
  • 9.Table: Details of US2020246093A1
  • 10.Table: Details of US2020078123A1
  • 11.Table: Details of WO2019204615A1
  • 12. Table: Details of US2021059780A1
  • 13.Table: Impact Analysis of Market Dynamics
  • 14.Table: Active Material Based Sensors for Tactile Sensing
  • 15.Table: Active Material Based Actuators for Tactile Feedback
  • 16.Table: Some of the Haptic-Enabled Surgical Robotic Systems
  • 17.Table: Some of the Haptic-Enabled Medical Simulators
  • 18.Table: Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (by Region), $Million, 2020-2031
  • 19.Table: Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (by Region), Percentage Share, 2020-2031
  • 20.Table: 3D Systems Corporation: Overall Financials, $Million, 2016-2020
  • 21.Table: Moog, Inc.: Overall Financials, $Million, 2016-Q1 2021

List of Figures

  • 1.Figure: General Workflow of Haptic Device
  • 2.Figure: Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market, $Million, 2020, 2024, 2027, and 2031
  • 3.Figure: Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (by Region), 2020, 2024, 2027, and 2031
  • 4.Figure: Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (by Application), $Million, 2020, 2024, 2027, and 2031
  • 5.Figure: Data Triangulation
  • 6.Figure: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approach
  • 7.Figure: Evolution of Haptic Technology
  • 8.Figure: Components of Teleoperated Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotic System with Multimodal Haptic Feedback Mechanism
  • 9.Figure: Medical Simulator Applications and their Associated Haptic Device
  • 10.Figure: Global Haptic Technologies Market Size, $Billion, 2020-2031
  • 11.Figure: Product Benchmarking and Pricing Analysis
  • 12.Figure: Vendor Analysis
  • 13.Figure: Block Diagram for Sensation Required by a Surgeon
  • 14.Figure: Haptic Technology, Degree of Sensation
  • 15.Figure: Minimally Invasive Surgeries - Pre-COVID-19 Scenario
  • 16.Figure: Number of Elective Surgical Procedures Cancelled due to COVID?19 (by Region)
  • 17.Figure: Technological Analysis of Haptic Device
  • 18.Figure: Overview of Haptic Interfaces
  • 19.Figure: Subjective Rating of Sense of Touch (Haptic Feedback) in VR Laparoscopic Suturing Tasks
  • 20.Figure: Subjective Rating of the Graphic Aspects in a VR Laparoscopic Suturing Tasks
  • 21.Figure: Evaluation of Performance under Different Feedback Conditions
  • 22.Figure: Potential Benefits for Healthcare Stakeholders of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery Powered by Haptic Feedback
  • 23.Figure: Patent Landscape, January 2016-April 2021
  • 24.Figure: Patent Landscape (CPC Main Groups), January 2016-April 2021
  • 25.Figure: Patent Filing Trends (Surgical Robotic Systems), January 2016-April 2021
  • 26.Figure: Patent Landscape (Surgical Robotic Systems), January 2016-April 2021
  • 27.Figure: Patent Filing Trends (Medical Simulators), January 2016-April 2021
  • 28.Figure: Market Dynamics
  • 29.Figure: Piezoresistive Tactile Sensor
  • 30.Figure: Haptic Technology in Surgical Environment (by Application)
  • 31.Figure: Clinical Benefits offered by Haptic Technology in Surgical Environment
  • 32.Figure: Common Characteristics Required for Tactile Sensations
  • 33.Figure: Sensory Stimuli (Decreasing Order of Sensation)
  • 34.Figure: Technical Requirements for Developing Haptic-Enabled VR-Based Simulation Systems
  • 35.Figure: Limitations of Haptic Technology in VR-Based Simulation Systems
  • 36.Figure: Benefits of Haptic Technology
  • 37.Figure: Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (by Application), $Million, 2020, 2025, and 2031
  • 38.Figure: Incremental Revenue Opportunity Analysis (by Application), 2020-2031
  • 39.Figure: Market Attractiveness Analysis (by Application), 2020-2031
  • 40.Figure: Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (Surgical Robotic Systems), $Million, 2020-2031
  • 41.Figure: Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (Medical Simulators), $Million, 2020-2031
  • 42.Figure: Clinical Impact of VR Surgical Simulation Systems
  • 43.Figure: Global Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (by Region), $Million, 2020 and 2031
  • 44.Figure: Incremental Revenue Opportunity Analysis (by Region), 2020-2031
  • 45.Figure: Market Attractiveness Analysis (by Region), 2020-2031
  • 46.Figure: North America Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (by Region), $Million, 2020-2031
  • 47.Figure: Europe Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (by Region), $Million, 2020-2031
  • 48.Figure: Asia-Pacific Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (by Region), $Million, 2020-2031
  • 49.Figure: Rest-of-the-World Haptic Feedback Surgical Environment Market (by Region), $Million, 2020-2031
  • 50.Figure: 3D Systems Corporation: Company Revenue and Y-o-Y, $Million, 2016-2020
  • 51.Figure: 3D Systems Corporation: Quarterly Company Revenue and Y-o-Y, $Million, Q1 2020-Q4 2020
  • 52.Figure: 3D Systems Corporation: Segmental Revenue, $Million, 2016-2020
  • 53.Figure: 3D Systems Corporation: Segmental Revenue, $Million, Q1 2020-Q4 2020
  • 54.Figure: 3D Systems Corporation: Regional Revenue, $Million, 2016-2020
  • 55.Figure: 3D Systems Corporation: R&D Expenditure and Y-o-Y, $Million, 2016-2020
  • 56.Figure: 3D Systems Corporation: R&D Expenditure and Y-o-Y, $Million, Q1 2020-Q4 2020
  • 57.Figure: 3D Systems Corporation: SWOT Analysis
  • 58.Figure: Force Dimension: SWOT Analysis
  • 59.Figure: Forsslund Systems AB: SWOT Analysis
  • 60.Figure: Haption S.A.: SWOT Analysis
  • 61.Figure: Moog, Inc.: Company Revenue and Y-o-Y, $Million, 2016-2020
  • 62.Figure: Moog, Inc.: Segmental Revenue, $Million, 2016-2020
  • 63.Figure: Moog, Inc.: Segmental Revenue (Industrial Systems), $Million, 2017-2020
  • 64.Figure: Moog, Inc.: Regional Revenue, $Million, 2016-2020
  • 65.Figure: Moog, Inc.: R&D Expenditure and Y-o-Y, $Million, 2016-2020
  • 66.Figure: Moog, Inc.: SWOT Analysis
  • 67.Figure: OrbSurgical Limited: SWOT Analysis