NEWS: 公告在東京證券交易所JASDAQ標準市場新上市

表紙
市場調查報告書

ATaaS(農業技術即服務)全球市場(2020-2025):市場預測(服務類型(SaaS / EaaS)/技術/應用)/定價模型/收支平衡點分析

Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market-A Global & Regional Analysis: Focus on Service Type (Software-as-a-Service, Equipment-as-a Service),Technology, Application, Pricing Models, Break-Even Analysis-Analysis & Forecast, 2020-2025

出版商 BIS Research Inc. 商品編碼 1000072
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 255 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
ATaaS(農業技術即服務)全球市場(2020-2025):市場預測(服務類型(SaaS / EaaS)/技術/應用)/定價模型/收支平衡點分析 Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market-A Global & Regional Analysis: Focus on Service Type (Software-as-a-Service, Equipment-as-a Service),Technology, Application, Pricing Models, Break-Even Analysis-Analysis & Forecast, 2020-2025
出版日期: 2021年04月07日內容資訊: 英文 255 Pages
簡介
<預測> ATaaS(農業技術即服務)市場規模在預測期內將保持22.91%的複合年增長率,從2020年的11.16億美元增長到2025年的30億美元。預計將增長到8980萬美元。

將先進技術引入農業的必要性以及政府的舉措,政策和支持等因素正在推動市場的增長。由於對全球糧食安全和可持續性的興趣與日俱增,世界各國政府也在進行大量投資。 ATaaS具有成本低,可伸縮性,集成性和可訪問性的優勢,因此該業務模型有望發展。

本報告調查了全球ATaaS(農業技術即服務)市場,定義並概述了市場,分析了對市場增長,政府計劃,價格趨勢和市場的各種影響因素,並總結了規模變化/預測,按用途/作物/服務類型/技術/主要國家/地區,競爭環境,主要公司概況等各種類別細分。

執行摘要

第1章市場

  • 行業前景
    • 定價模型
    • 收支平衡點分析
    • 高級解決方案
    • 政府倡議
  • 業務動態
    • 業務增長因素
    • 業務問題
    • 經營策略
    • 企業戰略
    • 商機

第2章市場分析/預測:按應用

  • 按應用
    • 市場概況
    • 收益圖/監控
    • 土壤管理
    • 作物健康管理
    • 導航定位
    • 其他
  • 按作物
    • 市場概況
    • 穀物
    • 油料作物
    • 紡織作物
    • 水果
    • 蔬菜
    • 堅果
    • 塊根/塊莖

第3章市場分析/預測:按產品分類

  • 按服務類型
    • 市場概況
    • SaaS(軟件即服務)
    • EaaS(設備即服務)
  • 技術
    • 市場概況
    • 數據分析智能
    • 制導技術
    • 傳感技術
    • 可變噴塗技術
    • 其他

第4章市場分析/預測:按地區/主要國家/地區

  • 北美
  • 南美洲
  • 歐洲
  • 英國
  • 中東/非洲
  • 中國
  • 亞太/日本

第5章競爭基準/公司簡介

  • 競爭基準
  • 公司簡介
    • 概述
    • AGCO Corporation
    • CLAAS Group
    • CNH Industrial N.V.
    • Deere & Company
    • Kubota Corporation
    • Yanmar Co. Ltd.
    • 365FarmNet GmbH
    • Agrivi
    • CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd.
    • Fujitsu Limited
    • IBM Corporation
    • Microsoft Corporation
    • Robert Bosch GmbH
    • Trimble Inc.
    • Parrot SA
    • Pixhawk
    • Precision Hawk Inc.
    • SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
    • Harvest Automation Inc.
    • Naio Technologies
    • Small Robot Company
    • Syngenta AG
    • Business Strategies
    • Accenture plc
    • Airbus S.A.S
    • AT&T Inc.
    • Ceres Imaging Inc.
    • Hexagon Agriculture
    • Intertek Group plc
    • Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
    • Raven Industries Inc.
    • SGS S.A.
    • Taranis
    • Teejet Technologies
    • Topcon Corporation

第6章 調查方法

目錄
Product Code: AGA0739SB

Title:
Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
A Global and Regional Analysis: Focus on Service Type (Software-as-a-Service, Equipment-as-a Service),Technology (Data Analytics, Guidance, Sensing, Variable Rate), Application (Yield Mapping, Soil Management, Crop Health), Pricing Models, Break-Even Analysis -- Analysis and Forecast, 2020-2025.

"Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market to Reach $3,089.8 Million by 2025."

Market Report Coverage - Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service

Market Segmentation

  • Service Type - Software-as-a-Service, Equipment-as-a-Service
  • Technology - Data Analytics and Intelligence, Guidance Technology, Sensing Technology, and Variable Rate Application Technology, and Others
  • Applications - Yield Mapping and Monitoring, Soil Management, Crop Health Management, Navigation and Positioning, and Others
  • Farm Produce - Cereals, Fiber Crops, Oil Crops, Pulses, Vegetables, Fruits, Roots and Tubers, and Tree Nuts
  • Region - North America, South America, Europe, U.K., China, Asia-Pacific and Japan, and Middle East and Africa

Regional Segmentation

  • North America - U.S., Canada, and Mexico
  • South America - Brazil, Argentina, and Rest-of-South America
  • Europe - Germany, France, Italy, and Rest-of-Europe
  • U.K.
  • China
  • Asia-Pacific and Japan - Australia, Japan, India, and Rest-of-Asia-Pacific and Japan
  • Middle East and Africa - Israel, Saudi Arabia, South Africa

Business Drivers

  • Increasing Demand for Global Food Production
  • Economic Need for Precision Agriculture
  • Low Capital Investment for Customers

Business Challenges

  • Price Inflation of Agricultural Produce
  • Lack of Technical Awareness Amongst Farmers

Business Opportunities

  • Growth of Agriculture Service Economy
  • Increasing Investments for Agriculture Technology
  • Rising Trend of Farming-as-a-Service in India

Key Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Companies Profiled:

AGCO Corporation, CLAAS Group, CNH Industrial N.V., Deere & Company, Kubota Corporation, Yanmar Co. Ltd., 365FarmNet GmbH, Agrivi, CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Fujitsu Limited, IBM Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Robert Bosch GmbH, Trimble Inc., Parrot SA, Pixhawk, Precision Hawk Inc., SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd., Harvest Automation Inc., Naio Technologies, Small Robot Company, Syngenta AG, Accenture plc, Airbus S.A.S, AT&T Inc., Ceres Imaging Inc., Hexagon Agriculture, Intertek Group plc, Nutrien AgSolutions Inc., Raven Industries Inc., SGS S.A., Taranis, Teejet Technologies, Topcon Corporation

Key Questions Answered in this Report:

  • What is the expected global agriculture technology-as-a-service market size in terms of value during the period 2020-2025?
  • What is the expected future scenario and revenue generation by the different types of service, including software-as-a-service (SaaS) and equipment-as-a-service (EaaS)?
  • What is the expected future scenario and revenue generation by different types of agriculture technologies offered as services, including data analytics and intelligence, guidance technology, sensing technology, and variable rate application technology, among others?
  • What is the expected future scenario and revenue generation by the application segments for which agriculture technologies are offered as services, including yield mapping and monitoring, soil management, crop health management, and navigation and positioning, among others?
  • Which region is the largest market for global agriculture technology-as-a-service market?
  • What is the expected future scenario and the revenue generation by different regions and countries in the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Rest-of-the-World?
  • What is the competitive strength of the key players in the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market on the basis of the analysis of their recent developments, product offerings, and regional presence?
  • What are the different pricing models available in the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market?
  • How are the adoption scenario, related opportunities, and challenges associated with agriculture technology-as-a-service?
  • What are the market dynamics of the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market, including market drivers, restraints, and opportunities?

Market Overview

The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market is projected to grow from $1,101.6 million in 2020 to $3,089.8 million by 2025, at a CAGR of 22.91% from 2020 to 2025. High growth in the market is expected to be driven by the growing need to adopt agriculture technologies across the industry, conversion of capital expenditure into operational expenditure for customers, and greater customer retention for service providers. The added benefits of lower costs, scalability, integration, and accessibility associated with ATaaS are also expected to be responsible for the reported growth of the business model.

Agriculture is the source of livelihood and sustenance of the economy in several regions of the world. Hence, the need to adopt advanced technologies in the agriculture industry has driven favorable initiatives, policies, and support shown by governments in countries such as the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany, France, Australia, India, and China. In emerging countries, the growth of the market is expected to be driven by rising awareness among governments and manufacturers-turned-service providers about the need to elevate farm produce while evaluating the farm expenditure of their growers. Furthermore, rising concerns over global food security and sustainability have led to extensive investments by governments across the world.

Competitive Landscape

The competitive landscape for the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market demonstrates an inclination toward companies adopting strategies such as product launch and development and partnerships, collaborations, and joint ventures. The major established players in the market are focusing on product launches and developments to introduce new technologies or developing further on the existing service portfolio. Deere and Co., Trimble Inc., AGCO Corporation, 365FarmNet, Agrivi, PrecisionHawk., Accenture plc, SGS SA, Intertek plc, Small Robot Company, Ceres Imaging Inc., Naio Technologies, and Airbus S.A.S among others, are some of the prominent players in the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market. The market is highly fragmented with the presence of a large number of small- to medium-sized companies that compete with each other and the large enterprises.

Regional Market Dynamics

North America is expected to generate the largest market share of the region during the forecast period due to the increased application of automation and control systems in most of the countries and the rising adoption rate of smart farming practices leading to increased adoption of agriculture technology-as-a-service. Constantly increasing farm sizes and the rise in global food demand from limited arable land shall ensure future market growth.

Asia-Pacific and Japan, in 2020, are expected to hold a smaller market share as compared to that of North America and Europe due to a late introduction of agriculture technologies and practices. However, Asia-Pacific and Japan are expected to have the fastest market growth with a CAGR of 28.20% during 2020 to 2025, owing to the amount of arable land available, dependence of agriculture on the countries for their economic and social growth along with the support by the government in terms of subsidy, regulations, or research. Smaller farm size in the larger part of the region is also expected to be a major driving force for exceeding the wide adoption of agriculture technology-as-a-service.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Scope of the Study

1 Markets

  • 1.1 Industry Outlook
    • 1.1.1 Pricing Models
      • 1.1.1.1 Bundled Per Acre
      • 1.1.1.2 Per Pass/Service
      • 1.1.1.3 Percentage of Yield Bump/Gain
      • 1.1.1.4 Per Unit of Product Sold
    • 1.1.2 Break-Even Analysis
      • 1.1.2.1 Introduction
      • 1.1.2.2 Components of Break-Even Analysis
      • 1.1.2.3 Calculation of Break-Even Analysis
      • 1.1.2.4 Case Studies
    • 1.1.3 Advanced Solutions
      • 1.1.3.1 Agriculture Robot-as-a-Service (ARaaS)
      • 1.1.3.2 Agriculture Drone-as-a-Service (ADaaS)
    • 1.1.4 Government Initiatives Landscape
      • 1.1.4.1 North America
      • 1.1.4.2 Europe
      • 1.1.4.3 U.K.
      • 1.1.4.4 Asia-Pacific and Japan
      • 1.1.4.5 China
      • 1.1.4.6 Rest-of-the-World
  • 1.2 Business Dynamics
    • 1.2.1 Business Drivers
      • 1.2.1.1 Increasing Demand for Global Food Production
      • 1.2.1.2 Economic Need for Precision Agriculture
      • 1.2.1.3 Low Capital Investment for Customers
    • 1.2.2 Business Challenges
      • 1.2.2.1 Price Inflation of Agricultural Produce
      • 1.2.2.2 Lack of Technical Awareness Amongst Farmers
    • 1.2.3 Business Strategies
      • 1.2.3.1 Product Developments
      • 1.2.3.2 Market Developments
    • 1.2.4 Corporate Strategies
      • 1.2.4.1 Mergers & Acquisitions
      • 1.2.4.2 Partnerships, Collaboration, and Joint Ventures
    • 1.2.5 Business Opportunities
      • 1.2.5.1 Growth of Agriculture Service Economy
      • 1.2.5.2 Increasing Investments for Agriculture Technology
      • 1.2.5.3 Rising Trend of Farming-as-a-Service in India

2 Application

  • 2.1 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million
    • 2.1.1 Market Overview
    • 2.1.2 Yield Mapping and Monitoring
    • 2.1.3 Soil Management
    • 2.1.4 Crop Health Management
    • 2.1.5 Navigation and Positioning
    • 2.1.6 Others
  • 2.2 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million
    • 2.2.1 Market Overview
    • 2.2.2 Cereals
    • 2.2.3 Oil Crops
    • 2.2.4 Fiber Crops
    • 2.2.5 Pulses
    • 2.2.6 Fruits
    • 2.2.7 Vegetables
    • 2.2.8 Tree Nuts
    • 2.2.9 Roots and Tubers

3 Products

  • 3.1 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million
    • 3.1.1 Assumptions and Limitations for Analysis and Forecast of the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
    • 3.1.2 Market Overview
    • 3.1.3 Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)
    • 3.1.4 Equipment-as-a-Service (EaaS)
  • 3.2 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million
    • 3.2.1 Market Overview
    • 3.2.2 Data Analytics and Intelligence
    • 3.2.3 Guidance Technology
    • 3.2.4 Sensing Technology
    • 3.2.5 Variable Rate Application Technology
    • 3.2.6 Others

4 Region

  • 4.1 North America
    • 4.1.1 Markets
      • 4.1.1.1 Business Drivers
      • 4.1.1.2 Business Challenges
    • 4.1.2 North America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
      • 4.1.2.1 U.S.
        • 4.1.2.1.1 Markets
          • 4.1.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.1.2.1.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.1.2.1.1.3 Business Drivers
      • 4.1.2.2 Canada
        • 4.1.2.2.1 Markets
          • 4.1.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.1.2.2.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.1.2.2.1.3 Business Drivers
      • 4.1.2.3 Mexico
        • 4.1.2.3.1 Markets
          • 4.1.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.1.2.3.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.1.2.3.1.3 Business Drivers
  • 4.2 South America
    • 4.2.1 Markets
      • 4.2.1.1 Business Drivers
      • 4.2.1.2 Business Challenges
    • 4.2.2 South America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
      • 4.2.2.1 Brazil
        • 4.2.2.1.1 Markets
          • 4.2.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.2.2.1.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.2.2.1.1.3 Business Drivers
      • 4.2.2.2 Argentina
        • 4.2.2.2.1 Markets
          • 4.2.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.2.2.2.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.2.2.2.1.3 Business Drivers
      • 4.2.2.3 Rest-of-South America
        • 4.2.2.3.1 Markets
          • 4.2.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.2.2.3.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.2.2.3.1.3 Business Drivers
  • 4.3 Europe
    • 4.3.1 Markets
      • 4.3.1.1 Business Drivers
      • 4.3.1.2 Business Challenges
    • 4.3.2 Europe Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
      • 4.3.2.1 Germany
        • 4.3.2.1.1 Markets
          • 4.3.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.3.2.1.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.3.2.1.1.3 Business Drivers
      • 4.3.2.2 France
        • 4.3.2.2.1 Markets
          • 4.3.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.3.2.2.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.3.2.2.1.3 Business Drivers
      • 4.3.2.3 Italy
        • 4.3.2.3.1 Markets
          • 4.3.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.3.2.3.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.3.2.3.1.3 Business Drivers
      • 4.3.2.4 Rest-of-Europe
        • 4.3.2.4.1 Markets
          • 4.3.2.4.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.3.2.4.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.3.2.4.1.3 Business Drivers
  • 4.4 U.K.
    • 4.4.1 Markets
      • 4.4.1.1 Buyer Attributes
      • 4.4.1.2 Business Challenges
      • 4.4.1.3 Business Drivers
  • 4.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 4.5.1 Markets
      • 4.5.1.1 Business Drivers
      • 4.5.1.2 Business Challenges
    • 4.5.2 Middle East and Africa Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
      • 4.5.2.1 Israel
        • 4.5.2.1.1 Markets
          • 4.5.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.5.2.1.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.5.2.1.1.3 Business Drivers
      • 4.5.2.2 Saudi Arabia
        • 4.5.2.2.1 Markets
          • 4.5.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.5.2.2.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.5.2.2.1.3 Business Drivers
      • 4.5.2.3 South Africa
        • 4.5.2.3.1 Markets
          • 4.5.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.5.2.3.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.5.2.3.1.3 Business Drivers
  • 4.6 China
    • 4.6.1 Markets
      • 4.6.1.1 Buyer Attributes
      • 4.6.1.2 Business Challenges
      • 4.6.1.3 Business Drivers
  • 4.7 Asia-Pacific and Japan
    • 4.7.1 Markets
      • 4.7.1.1 Business Drivers
      • 4.7.1.2 Business Challenges
    • 4.7.2 Asia-Pacific and Japan Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
      • 4.7.2.1 Australia
        • 4.7.2.1.1 Markets
          • 4.7.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.7.2.1.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.7.2.1.1.3 Business Drivers
      • 4.7.2.2 Japan
        • 4.7.2.2.1 Markets
          • 4.7.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.7.2.2.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.7.2.2.1.3 Business Drivers
      • 4.7.2.3 India
        • 4.7.2.3.1 Markets
          • 4.7.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.7.2.3.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.7.2.3.1.3 Business Drivers
      • 4.7.2.4 Rest-of-Asia-Pacific and Japan
        • 4.7.2.4.1 Markets
          • 4.7.2.4.1.1 Buyer Attributes
          • 4.7.2.4.1.2 Business Challenges
          • 4.7.2.4.1.3 Business Drivers

5 Markets - Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles

  • 5.1 Competitive Benchmarking
  • 5.2 Company Profiles
    • 5.2.1 Overview
    • 5.2.2 AGCO Corporation
      • 5.2.2.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.2.1.1 Role of AGCO Corporation in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.2.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.2.1.3 Production Sites and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.2.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.2.2.1 Product Development
        • 5.2.2.2.2 Market Developments
      • 5.2.2.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.2.3.1 Mergers and Acquisitions
        • 5.2.2.3.2 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.2.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of AGCO Corporation
    • 5.2.3 CLAAS Group
      • 5.2.3.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.3.1.1 Role of CLAAS Group in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.3.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.3.1.3 Production Sites and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.3.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.3.2.1 Product Developments
        • 5.2.3.2.2 Market Developments
      • 5.2.3.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.3.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.3.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of CLAAS Group
    • 5.2.4 CNH Industrial N.V.
      • 5.2.4.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.4.1.1 Role of CNH Industrial N.V. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.4.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.4.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.4.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.4.2.1 Product Developments
        • 5.2.4.2.2 Market Developments
      • 5.2.4.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.4.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
        • 5.2.4.3.2 Mergers and Acquisitions
      • 5.2.4.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of CNH Industrial N.V.
    • 5.2.5 Deere & Company
      • 5.2.5.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.5.1.1 Role of Deere & Company in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.5.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.5.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.5.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.5.2.1 Product Developments
        • 5.2.5.2.2 Market Developments
      • 5.2.5.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.5.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.5.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Deere & Company
    • 5.2.6 Kubota Corporation
      • 5.2.6.1 Company Overview
      • 5.2.6.2 Role of Kubota Corporation in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.6.2.1 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.6.2.2 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.6.3 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.6.3.1 Market Developments
      • 5.2.6.4 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.6.4.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.6.5 Strengths and Weaknesses of Kubota Corporation
    • 5.2.7 Yanmar Co. Ltd.
      • 5.2.7.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.7.1.1 Role of Yanmar Co. Ltd in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.7.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.7.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.7.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.7.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.7.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Yanmar Co. Ltd.
    • 5.2.8 365FarmNet GmbH
      • 5.2.8.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.8.1.1 Role of 365FarmNet GmbH in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.8.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.8.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.8.2 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.8.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.8.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of 365FarmNet GmbH
    • 5.2.9 Agrivi
      • 5.2.9.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.9.1.1 Role of Agrivi in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.9.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.9.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.9.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.9.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.9.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.9.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.9.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Agrivi
    • 5.2.10 CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd.
      • 5.2.10.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.10.1.1 Role of CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd. in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.10.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.10.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.10.2 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.10.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.10.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd
    • 5.2.11 Fujitsu Limited
      • 5.2.11.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.11.1.1 Role of Fujitsu Limited in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.11.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.11.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.11.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Fujitsu Limited
    • 5.2.12 IBM Corporation
      • 5.2.12.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.12.1.1 Role of IBM Corporation in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.12.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.12.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.12.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.12.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.12.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.12.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.12.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of IBM Corporation
    • 5.2.13 Microsoft Corporation
      • 5.2.13.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.13.1.1 Role of Microsoft Corporation in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.13.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.13.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.13.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.13.2.1 Market Developments
      • 5.2.13.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.13.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.13.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Microsoft Corporation
    • 5.2.14 Robert Bosch GmbH
      • 5.2.14.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.14.1.1 Role of Robert Bosch GmbH in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.14.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.14.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.14.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.14.2.1 Market Developments
      • 5.2.14.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Robert Bosch GmbH
    • 5.2.15 Trimble Inc.
      • 5.2.15.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.15.1.1 Role of Trimble Inc. in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.15.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.15.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.15.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.15.2.1 Product Developments
        • 5.2.15.2.2 Market Developments
      • 5.2.15.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.15.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
        • 5.2.15.3.2 Mergers and Acquisitions
      • 5.2.15.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Trimble Inc.
    • 5.2.16 Parrot SA
      • 5.2.16.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.16.1.1 Role of Parrot SA in the Global Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.16.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.16.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.16.2 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.16.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.16.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Parrot SA
    • 5.2.17 Pixhawk
      • 5.2.17.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.17.1.1 Role of Pixhawk in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.17.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.17.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.17.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Pixhawk
    • 5.2.18 Precision Hawk Inc.
      • 5.2.18.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.18.1.1 Role of PrecisionHawk Inc. in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.18.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.18.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.18.2 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.18.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.18.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of PrecisionHawk Inc.
    • 5.2.19 SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
      • 5.2.19.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.19.1.1 Role of SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.19.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.19.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.19.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.19.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.19.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.19.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.19.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
    • 5.2.20 Harvest Automation Inc.
      • 5.2.20.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.20.1.1 Role of Harvest Automation Inc. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.20.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.20.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.20.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Harvest Automation Inc.
    • 5.2.21 Naio Technologies
      • 5.2.21.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.21.1.1 Role of Naio Technologies in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.21.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.21.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.21.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Naio Technologies
    • 5.2.22 Small Robot Company
      • 5.2.22.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.22.1.1 Role of Small Robot Company in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.22.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.22.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.22.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Small Robot Company
    • 5.2.23 Syngenta AG
      • 5.2.23.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.23.1.1 Role of Syngenta AG in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.23.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.23.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.23.2 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.23.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
    • 5.2.24 Business Strategies
      • 5.2.24.1 Market Developments
      • 5.2.24.2 Strength and Weakness of Syngenta AG
    • 5.2.25 Accenture plc
      • 5.2.25.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.25.1.1 Role of Accenture plc in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.25.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.25.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.25.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Accenture plc
    • 5.2.26 Airbus S.A.S
      • 5.2.26.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.26.1.1 Role of Airbus S.A.S in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
        • 5.2.26.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.26.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.26.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Airbus S.A.S
    • 5.2.27 AT&T Inc.
      • 5.2.27.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.27.1.1 Role of AT&T Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.27.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.27.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of AT&T Inc. Corporation
    • 5.2.28 Ceres Imaging Inc.
      • 5.2.28.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.28.1.1 Role of Ceres Imaging Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.28.1.2 Service Portfolio
      • 5.2.28.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.28.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.28.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Ceres Imaging Inc.
    • 5.2.29 Hexagon Agriculture
      • 5.2.29.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.29.1.1 Role of Hexagon Agriculture in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.29.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.29.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.29.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.29.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.29.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.29.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.29.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Hexagon Agriculture
    • 5.2.30 Intertek Group plc
      • 5.2.30.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.30.1.1 Role of Intertek Group plc in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.30.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.30.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Intertek Group plc
    • 5.2.31 Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
      • 5.2.31.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.31.1.1 Role of Nutrien AgSolution, Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.31.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.31.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.31.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.31.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.31.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.31.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
    • 5.2.32 Raven Industries Inc.
      • 5.2.32.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.32.1.1 Role of Raven Industries Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.32.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.32.2 Business Strategies
        • 5.2.32.2.1 Product Developments
      • 5.2.32.3 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.32.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.32.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Raven Industries Inc.
    • 5.2.33 SGS S.A.
      • 5.2.33.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.33.1.1 Role of SGS S.A. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.33.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.33.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of SGS S.A.
    • 5.2.34 Taranis
      • 5.2.34.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.34.1.1 Role of Taranis in Agriculture Technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.34.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.34.2 Corporate Strategies
        • 5.2.34.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
      • 5.2.34.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Taranis
    • 5.2.35 Teejet Technologies
      • 5.2.35.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.35.1.1 Role of Teejet Technologies in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.35.1.2 Service portfolio
      • 5.2.35.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Teejet Technologies
    • 5.2.36 Topcon Corporation
      • 5.2.36.1 Company Overview
        • 5.2.36.1.1 Role of Topcon Corporation in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
        • 5.2.36.1.2 Service portfolio
        • 5.2.36.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
      • 5.2.36.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Topcon Corporation

6 Research Methodology

  • 6.1 Data Sources
    • 6.1.1 Primary Data Sources
    • 6.1.2 Secondary Data Sources
  • 6.2 Market Research Methodology
    • 6.2.1 Data Triangulation
      • 6.2.1.1 Market Estimation and Forecast
    • 6.2.2 Assumptions
    • 6.2.3 Limitations

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Macroeconomic Trends Impacting the Farming Industry Growth
  • Figure 2: Future Agriculture Field Scenario with Smart Farm Technologies
  • Figure 3: Drivers and Restraints: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Figure 4: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 5: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service, by Service Type, 2020 and 2025
  • Figure 6: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million 2020 and 2025
  • Figure 7: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million 2020 and 2025
  • Figure 8: Regional Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, Market Share & CAGR, $Million
  • Figure 9: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market Coverage
  • Figure 10: Advantages-Disadvantages of Bundled Per Acre Model
  • Figure 11: Advantages-Disadvantages of Per Pass/Service Model
  • Figure 12: Advantages-Disadvantages of Percentage of Yield Bump/Gain Model
  • Figure 13: Advantages-Disadvantages of Per Unit of Product Sold Model
  • Figure 14: Graphical Representation of Break-Even Analysis
  • Figure 15: Mathematical Representation of Break-Even Analysis
  • Figure 16: Break-Even Point of Satellite Images (ha)
  • Figure 17: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, Business Dynamics
  • Figure 18: Global Agricultural Productivity Index, 2004-2050
  • Figure 19: U.S. Farm Expenditure Vs. Income Statistics, 2011-2017
  • Figure 20: Key Business Strategies
  • Figure 21: Product Developments (by Company)
  • Figure 22: Market Developments (by Company)
  • Figure 23: Key Corporate Strategies
  • Figure 24: Mergers & Acquisitions (by Company)
  • Figure 25: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures (by Company)
  • Figure 26: Applications in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Figure 27: Yield Mapping and Monitoring in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 28: Soil Management in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 29: Crop Health Management in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 30: Navigation and Positioning in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 31: Other Applications in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 32: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce)
  • Figure 33: Cereals in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 34: Oil Crops Applications in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 35: Fiber Crops in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 36: Pulses in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 37: Fruits in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 38: Vegetables in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 39: Tree Nuts in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 40: Roots and Tubers in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 41: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type)
  • Figure 42: Advantages of Agriculture Software-as-a-Service (by Service Type)
  • Figure 43: Software-as-a-Service in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 44: Key Applications of AI & ML in Agriculture
  • Figure 45: Growth of Equipment-as-a-Service with Agriculture Technology
  • Figure 46: Equipment-as-a-Service in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 47: Advantages of Equipment-as-a-Service
  • Figure 48: Applications in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Figure 49: Advantages of Data Analytics for Agriculture Industry
  • Figure 50: Data Analytics & Intelligence in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 51: Guidance Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 52: Sensing Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 53: Variable Rate Application Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 54: Other Technologies in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Figure 55: Use of Guidance Technologies by Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Retailers in the U.S., $ Million, 2005-2020
  • Figure 56: Use of Sensing Technologies by Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Retailers in the U.S., $ Million, 2005-2020
  • Figure 57: Competitive Benchmarking Matrix
  • Figure 58: Share of Key Companies
  • Figure 59: Primary Interviews' Breakdown, by Company, Designation, and Region
  • Figure 60: Sources of Secondary Research
  • Figure 61: Report Methodology
  • Figure 62: Data Triangulation
  • Figure 63: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approach for Market Estimation

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Summary Table of Satellite Sensor Features
  • Table 2: Cost Features of Satellite Sensors
  • Table 3: Key Players with ARaaS Business Model and their Products
  • Table 4: Key Players with ARaaS Business Model and their Products
  • Table 5: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Table 6: Key Yield Mapping and Monitoring Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 7: Key Soil Management Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 8: Key Crop Health Management Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 9: Key Navigation and Positioning Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 10: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Table 11: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Table 12: Key Players with Software-as-a-Service Service Type
  • Table 13: Key Players with Equipment-as-a-Service Service Type
  • Table 14: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Table 15: Key Data Analytics & Intelligence Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 16: Key Guidance Technology Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 17: Key Sensing Technology Services in Global ATaaS Market
  • Table 18: Key Variable Rate Application Technology Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
  • Table 19: Global Agriculture Technology as a Service Market (by Region), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Table 20: North America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Table 21: South America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Table 22: Europe Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Table 23: U.K. Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2019-2025
  • Table 24: Middle East and Africa Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Countries), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Table 25: China Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2019-2025
  • Table 26: Asia-Pacific and Japan Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2019-2025
  • Table 27: AGCO Corporation: Solution Service Portfolio
  • Table 28: Product Development
  • Table 29: Market Developments
  • Table 30: Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Table 31: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 32: CLAAS Group: Service Portfolio
  • Table 33: Product Developments
  • Table 34: Market Developments
  • Table 35: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 36: CNH Industrial N.V.: Service Portfolio
  • Table 37: Product Developments
  • Table 38: Market Developments
  • Table 39: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 40: Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Table 41: Deere & Company: Service Portfolio
  • Table 42: Product Developments
  • Table 43: Market Developments
  • Table 44: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 45: Kubota Corporation: Service portfolio
  • Table 46: Market Developments
  • Table 47: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 48: Yanmar Co. Ltd.: Service portfolio
  • Table 49: Product Developments
  • Table 50: 365FarmNet GmbH: Service portfolio
  • Table 51: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 52: Agrivi: Service portfolio
  • Table 53: Product Developments
  • Table 54: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 55: CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd.: Service Portfolio
  • Table 56: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 57: Fujitsu Limited: Service Portfolio
  • Table 58: IBM Corporation: Service Portfolio
  • Table 59: Product Developments
  • Table 60: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 61: Microsoft Corporation: Service portfolio
  • Table 62: Market Developments
  • Table 63: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 64: Robert Bosch GmbH: Service portfolio
  • Table 65: Market Developments
  • Table 66: Trimble Inc: Service portfolio
  • Table 67: Product Developments
  • Table 68: Market Developments
  • Table 69: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 70: Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Table 71: Parrot SA: Service portfolio
  • Table 72: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 73: Pixhawk: Service portfolio
  • Table 74: PrecisionHawk Inc.: Service portfolio
  • Table 75: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 76: SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd: Service portfolio
  • Table 77: Product Developments
  • Table 78: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 79: Harvest Automation Inc.: Service portfolio
  • Table 80: Naio Technologies: Service portfolio
  • Table 81: Small Robot Company: Service portfolio
  • Table 82: Syngenta AG: Service Portfolio
  • Table 83: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 84: Market Developments
  • Table 85: Accenture plc: Service portfolio
  • Table 86: Airbus S.A.S: Service portfolio
  • Table 87: AT&T Inc.: Service portfolio
  • Table 88: Ceres Imaging Inc.: Service portfolio
  • Table 89: Product Developments
  • Table 90: Hexagon Agriculture: Service portfolio
  • Table 91: Product Developments
  • Table 92: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 93: Intertek Group plc: Service portfolio
  • Table 94: Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.: Service portfolio
  • Table 95: Product Developments
  • Table 96: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 97: Raven Industries Inc.: Service portfolio
  • Table 98: Product Developments
  • Table 99: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 100: SGS S.A.: Service portfolio
  • Table 101: Taranis: Service portfolio
  • Table 102: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
  • Table 103: Teejet Technologies: Service portfolio
  • Table 104: Topcon Corporation: Service portfolio