Cover Image
市場調查報告書

亞太地區的礦業的技術投資的優先順序

Technology Investment Priorities in Mining in Asia-Pacific 2016

出版商 GlobalData 商品編碼 367447
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 70 Pages
訂單完成後即時交付
價格
Back to Top
亞太地區的礦業的技術投資的優先順序 Technology Investment Priorities in Mining in Asia-Pacific 2016
出版日期: 2016年08月22日 內容資訊: 英文 70 Pages
簡介

本報告提供亞太地區的礦業的技術投資的優先順序調查分析,以礦山管理者、採購管理者、其他決策者的採訪為基礎,提供重機的評估,礦業軟體、技術、維護等領域的慣行和偏好等相關的系統性資訊。

第1章 摘要整理

第2章 亞太地區的技術投資趨勢

  • 技術投資比較與趨勢
  • 調度、轉移最佳化
    • 礦山各類型
    • 商品各群組
    • 各國
    • ROM各規模
    • 企業各收益
    • 資料
  • 車隊管理、車輛監測
  • 輪胎監測
  • 環境監測、排放管理
  • 避免碰撞、接近偵測
  • 疲勞管理
  • 即時視訊訓練
  • 遠隔控制設備、機器自動化
  • UAV/無人機
  • 預知保全
  • 能源管理、最佳化

第3章 軟體平台的偏好

  • 主要軟體:各商品群組

第4章 未來技術投資的優先順序

  • 技術投資的優先順序:各商品群組
  • 印度、印尼、菲律賓的技術投資的優先順序

第5章 摘要

第6章 附錄1

第7章 附錄2

圖表

目錄
Product Code: MMIN0031MR

Overall trends in the data revealed:

  • Over 60% of mines have already invested in tire monitoring fleet management shift optimization energy management predictive maintenance and environmental monitoring technologies.
  • The greatest increases in penetration over the last two years have been in real-time video training and environmental monitoring technologies.
  • UAVs/drones currently have the lowest penetration of the technologies examined with only 17% of mines having invested to date however a significant increase is expected over the next two years.
  • The commodity sector expected to have the greatest increase in technology penetration over the next 2 years is the precious metals sector whilst India offers the best opportunities for vendors as does the largest company segment with revenues greater than US$10 billion.
  • Surpac is by far the most used software nominated by 29% of the mines. This was followed by Minex with 15% and MineScape with 10%.

Summary

This report provides a detailed analysis of investment intentions across different areas of technology in the Asia-pacific industry. The analysis is based upon Timetric's survey of over 110 mine general maintenance and procurement managers including other mine-site and corporate decision-makers. The focus is on what technologies mines currently have and in which technologies they are planning to invest over the next two years.

Areas of analysis include:

  • Mining companies' intentions for investments in the coming two years across a range of mine-site technologies including UAVs/drones remote control/machine automation tire monitoring collision avoidance/proximity detection energy management and predictive maintenance.
  • Comparisons of investment intentions across segments including four commodity groups three mine types five mine-size categories and company revenues.
  • Comparison of the penetration of technologies in 2014 with current investment levels.
  • Specific insight into the software platforms each mine site is using across five different mine departments outlining details of market leaders and their software products.

Scope

The report is based on responses from a survey of over 110 senior decision makers at operating mines in Asia-Pacific, responsible for the purchase of equipment for plant and mine operations, along with its consumables and services. Survey respondents came from 8 different countries including: India, Indonesia and the Philippines. This included four different commodity groups and a range of surface and underground mining operations.

Reasons To Buy

  • Understand which technologies have and are attracting the most investment and how this varies by commodity group mine type and size global company revenue and country.
  • Target the segments with the greatest opportunity for your technology products and services.
  • Segment the market according to those fully invested and those planning to make new investments into each technology.

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

2. Technology Investment Trends in Asia-Pacific

  • 2.1. Technology Investment Comparison and Trends
  • 2.2. Scheduling and Shift Optimization (Including Haulage and Dynamic Dispatching)
    • 2.2.1. Mine type
    • 2.2.2. Commodity group
    • 2.2.3. Country
    • 2.2.4. ROM size
    • 2.2.5. Company revenue
    • 2.2.6. Raw data table
  • 2.3. Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring
    • 2.3.1. Mine type
    • 2.3.2. Commodity group
    • 2.3.3. Country
    • 2.3.4. ROM size
    • 2.3.5. Company revenue
    • 2.3.6. Raw data table
  • 2.4. Tire Monitoring
    • 2.4.1. Mine type
    • 2.4.2. Commodity group
    • 2.4.3. Country
    • 2.4.4. ROM size
    • 2.4.5. Company revenue
    • 2.4.6. Raw data table
  • 2.5. Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management
    • 2.5.1. Mine type
    • 2.5.2. Commodity group
    • 2.5.3. Country
    • 2.5.4. ROM size
    • 2.5.5. Company revenue
    • 2.5.6. Raw data table
  • 2.6. Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection
    • 2.6.1. Mine type
    • 2.6.2. Commodity group
    • 2.6.3. Country
    • 2.6.4. ROM size
    • 2.6.5. Company revenue
    • 2.6.6. Raw data table
  • 2.7. Fatigue Management
    • 2.7.1. Mine type
    • 2.7.2. Commodity group
    • 2.7.3. Country
    • 2.7.4. ROM size
    • 2.7.5. Company revenue
    • 2.7.6. Raw data table
  • 2.8. Real-Time Video Training
    • 2.8.1. Mine type
    • 2.8.2. Commodity group
    • 2.8.3. Country
    • 2.8.4. ROM size
    • 2.8.5. Company revenue
    • 2.8.6. Raw data table
  • 2.9. Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation
    • 2.9.1. Mine type
    • 2.9.2. Commodity group
    • 2.9.3. Country
    • 2.9.4. ROM size
    • 2.9.5. Company revenue
    • 2.9.6. Raw data table
  • 2.10. UAVs/Drones
    • 2.10.1. Mine type
    • 2.10.2. Commodity group
    • 2.10.3. Country
    • 2.10.4. ROM size
    • 2.10.5. Company revenue
    • 2.10.6. Raw data table
  • 2.11. Predictive Maintenance
    • 2.11.1. Mine type
    • 2.11.2. Commodity group
    • 2.11.3. Country
    • 2.11.4. ROM size
    • 2.11.5. Company revenue
    • 2.11.6. Raw data table
  • 2.12. Energy Management and Optimization
    • 2.12.1. Mine type
    • 2.12.2. Commodity group
    • 2.12.3. Country
    • 2.12.4. ROM size
    • 2.12.5. Company revenue
    • 2.12.6. Raw data table

3. Preferences for Software Platforms

  • 3.1. Top Software by Commodity Group

4. Priorities For Future Technology Investments

  • 4.1. Priorities for Technology Investments by Commodity Group
  • 4.2. Priorities for Technology Investments in India, Indonesia and the Philippines

5. Summary

6. Appendix I

  • 6.1. Selected Data Tables

7. Appendix II

  • 7.1. Survey Background
  • 7.2. Analysis of the Survey Sample

8. Appendix III

  • 8.1. What is This Report About?
  • 8.2. Methodology
  • 8.3. Definitions
  • 8.4. Contact Timetric
  • 8.5. About Timetric
  • 8.6. Disclaimer

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Scheduling and Shift Optimization Investments and Intentions by Segment (%), Q2 2016
  • Table 2: Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Segment (%), Q2 2016
  • Table 3: Tire Monitoring Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q2 2016
  • Table 4: Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q2 2016
  • Table 5: Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q2 2016
  • Table 6: Fatigue Management Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q2 2016
  • Table 7: Real-Time Video Training Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q2 2016
  • Table 8: Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q2 2016
  • Table 9: UAVs and Drones Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q2 2016
  • Table 10: Predictive Maintenance Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q2 2016
  • Table 11: Energy Management and Optimization Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q2 2016
  • Table 12: Main Technology Categories with Responses, Q2 2016
  • Table 13: Top Software Platforms in Use in Different Departments (%), Q2 2016
  • Table 14: Priorities for Technology Investments by Commodity Group, Q2 2016 (number of mentions)
  • Table 15: Priorities for Technology Investments in South Africa and Zambia, Q2 2016 (number of mentions)

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Investment Trends and Intentions in a Range of Technologies Over the Next Two Years (%), 2016
  • Figure 2: Comparisons of Penetration of Four Technologies (%), 2014-2016
  • Figure 3: Scheduling and Shift Optimization Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 4: Scheduling and Shift Optimization Investments and Intentions by Commodity (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 5: Scheduling and Shift Optimization Investments and Intentions by Country (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 7: Scheduling and Shift Optimization Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 8: Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 9: Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 10: Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Country (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 12: Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 13: Tire Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 14: Tire Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 15: Tire Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Country(%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 16: Tire Monitoring Investments and Intentions by ROM Size (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 17: Tire Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 18: Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 19: Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 20: Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management Investments and Intentions by Country(%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 21: Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management Investments and Intentions by ROM Size (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 22: Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 23: Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 24: Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 25: Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection Investments and Intentions by Country(%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 26: Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection Investments and Intentions by ROM Size (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 27: Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 28: Fatigue Management Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 29: Fatigue Management Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 30: Fatigue Management Investments and Intentions by Country (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 31: Fatigue Management Investments and Intentions by ROM Size (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 32: Fatigue Management Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 33: Real-Time Video Training Investments and Intentions by Mine Type, Q2 2016
  • Figure 34: Real-Time Video Training Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group, Q2 2016
  • Figure 35: Real-Time Video Training Investments and Intentions by Country(%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 36: Real-Time Video Training Investments and Intentions by ROM Size (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 37: Real-Time Video Training Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 38: Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 39: Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 40: Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation Investments and Intentions by Country(%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 41: Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation Investments and Intentions by ROM Size (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 42: Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 43: UAVs/Drones Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 44: UAVs/ Drones Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 45: UAVs/ Drones Investments and Intentions by Country(%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 46: UAVs/ Drones Investments and Intentions by ROM Size (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 47: UAVs/ Drones Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 48: Predictive Maintenance Investments and Intentions by Mine Type, Q2 2016
  • Figure 49: Predictive Maintenance Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 50: Predictive Maintenance Investments and Intentions by Country(%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 51: Predictive Maintenance Investments and Intentions by ROM Size (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 52: Predictive Maintenance Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 53: Energy Management and Optimization Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 54: Energy Management and Optimization Investments and Intentions by Commodity Type (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 55: Energy Management and Optimization Investments and Intentions by Country(%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 56: Energy Management and Optimization Investments and Intentions by ROM Size (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 57: Energy Management and Optimization Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 58: Top Software Platforms in Use in Different Mine Site Departments (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 59: Top Software Platforms in Use Across Different Commodity Categorys (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 60: Priorities for Technology Investments (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 61: Priorities for Technology Investments by Commodity Group (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 62: Priorities for Technology Investments by Country(%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 63: Asia-Pacific Mines by Major Country (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 64: Asia-Pacific Mines by Type (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 65: Asia-Pacific Mines by Commodity (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 66: Asia-Pacific Mines by Company Revenue (%), Q2 2016
  • Figure 67: Asia-Pacific Mines by Mine Size (%), Q2 2016
Back to Top