Cover Image
市場調查報告書

北美的礦業的採購趨勢、意圖 (2015年)

Purchasing Trends and Intentions in Mining in North America, 2015

出版商 GlobalData 商品編碼 332112
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 38 Pages
訂單完成後即時交付
價格
Back to Top
北美的礦業的採購趨勢、意圖 (2015年) Purchasing Trends and Intentions in Mining in North America, 2015
出版日期: 2015年06月12日 內容資訊: 英文 38 Pages
簡介

本報告以北美各國(美國、加拿大)的101家礦業企業的問卷調查為基礎,提供礦業用機器、零件 (重機、重機零件、爆炸物、整備服務等) 的目前採購途徑、金額,及今後12個月的投資預定、採購金額、途徑的變更預測調查、考察。

第1章 摘要整理

第2章 未來支出額的預測

  • 支出額的變化預測
  • 支出額的變化預測:各國
  • 供應商的關聯性的變化預測

第3章 目前的採購相關偏好

  • 重機的採購方法
  • 出租契約

第4章 產品採購相關課題

第5章 採購途徑的集中化與受歡迎的供應商

  • 目前意志決策方法
  • 集中化趨勢的變化
  • 受歡迎的供應商契約方法
  • 單一供應商壟斷供給的比例

第6章 結論

第7章 附錄I

第8章 附錄II

  • 背景調查情況
  • 調查樣品分析

第9章 附錄III

目錄
Product Code: MMIN0017MR

This report provides a detailed analysis of purchasing methods and spending trends in North American mining. Areas of analysis include:

  • Future trends in expenditure and expectations for increased or decreased spend in four areas: plant and heavy equipment, equipment parts and components, explosives materials, and maintenance services.
  • Current methods for acquiring equipment, with a review of outright purchasing, rental, leasing and other types of financing arrangements.
  • An analysis of future changes to the number of supplier relationships, and whether respondents expect greater or fewer supplier relationships over the next 12 months.
  • Investigation into the biggest challenges facing buyers and decision makers in sourcing the right products.
  • Analysis of current decision making practices at North American mines
  • The extent to which preferred supplier arrangements are in place and predictions for increased centralisation of procurement.

Summary

Overall trends in the data revealed:

  • Respondents from mines in North America expect stability in their expenditure. The majority of respondents expect spending to be flat, for instance 56% for 'plant and heavy equipment'
  • Outright purchase is the most common purchasing method. Some 69% of respondents nominated outright purchase as the method they use for heavy mining equipment. This was the dominant method of procurement, with all other methods being used by fewer than 27% of respondents in each case.
  • 67% of respondents identified that their biggest challenge when sourcing products were factors related to supplier attributes and capabilities, such as the availability of spare parts and dealing with remote locations.
  • In North America, the majority of decisions are still made at the mine site, accounting for around 65% of all final decisions.
  • Over 28% of respondents expected more centralization of purchasing decisions over the next two years.
  • Some 55% of respondents indicated they had a preferred global supply agreement, and when responses were broken down by type of purchase covered by the preferred supplier, trucks dominated.

Scope

The survey is based on responses from 101 senior managers and decision makers at North American mines, responsible for the purchase of equipment for plant within mine operations, along with its consumables. Survey respondents came from either Canada or the United States. This included 4 different commodity groups and a range of surface and underground mining operations.

Reasons To Buy

  • Compare the methods miners in North America use to acquire equipment, and how this is expected to change
  • Plan ahead based on general expectations within the North American mining industry for future expenditure, and how this varies by segment, such as mine type, commodity, company size and region.
  • Understand how different customer segments in the North American mining industries Plan to rationalise or extend their supplier networks.
  • Understand where decision making is made, be that at either the mine site or corporate head office.
  • Identify the major challenges miners in North America face when sourcing equipment, and incorporate solutions to these in your sales, marketing and product strategies

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

2. Future Spending Predictions

  • 2.1. Expected Changes in Expenditure
  • 2.2. Expected Changes in Expenditure by Country
  • 2.3. Anticipated Changes to the Number of Supplier Relationships

3. Current Purchasing preferences

  • 3.1. Purchasing Methods for Heavy Mobile Equipment
  • 3.2. Rental Agreements

4. Challenges In Sourcing Products

5. Centralization and Preferred Suppliers

  • 5.1. Current Decision Making
  • 5.2. Changes in Centralization
  • 5.3. Preferred Supplier Arrangements
  • 5.4. Prevalence of Dominant Single Suppliers

6. Conclusion

7. Appendix I

8. Appendix II

  • 8.1. Survey Background
  • 8.2. Analysis of the Survey Sample

9. Appendix III

  • 9.1. What is This Report About?
  • 9.2. Methodology
  • 9.3. Secondary Research
  • 9.4. Primary Research
  • 9.5. Definitions
  • 9.6. Contact Timetric
  • 9.7. About Timetric
  • 9.8. Timetric's Services
  • 9.9. Disclaimer

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Expected Change in Expenditure by Area in the Next 12 Months (%), 2015
  • Table 2: Expected Change in Expenditure by Area in Next 12 Months by Country (%), 2015
  • Table 3: Share of Respondents Expecting an Increase in Expenditure by Company Size (%), 2015
  • Table 4: Share of Respondents Expecting an Increase in Expenditure by Commodity (%), 2015
  • Table 5: Changes in the Number of Supplier Relationships Expected in the Next 12 Months (%), 2015
  • Table 6: Changes in the Number of Supplier Relationships by Country (%), 2015
  • Table 7: Changes in the Number of Supplier Relationships by Commodity, 2015
  • Table 8: Changes in the Number of Supplier Relationships by Commodity, 2015
  • Table 9: Expected Change in Purchase Method in the Next Two Years (%), 2015
  • Table 10: Purchasing Method by Category (%), 2015
  • Table 11: Biggest Challenges in Sourcing Products, 2015
  • Table 12: Biggest Challenges in Sourcing Equipment by Company Size (%), 2015
  • Table 13: Current Location of Decision-Making, 2015
  • Table 14: Current Location of Decision-Making for Heavy Mobile Equipment by Company Size, 2015
  • Table 15: Current Location of Decision-Making for Heavy Mobile Equipment by Commodity, 2015
  • Table 16: Changes Expected in Level of Centralization Over the Next Two Years, 2015

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Operating Mines in the US and Canada, 2015
  • Figure 2: Changes in Expenditure by Category over the Next 12 Months, 2015
  • Figure 3: Changes in Expenditure by Category over the Next 12 Months by Country, 2015
  • Figure 4: Increase vs Decrease in Expenditure by Category (%), 2015
  • Figure 5: Expected Increase in Expenditure by Company Size (%), 2015
  • Figure 6: Expected Increase in Expenditure by Commodity (%), 2015
  • Figure 7: Key Commodity Prices, 2010-2015 (Indexed)
  • Figure 8: Changes in the Number of Supplier Relationships Expected Over the Next 12 Months, 2015
  • Figure 9: Changes in the Number of Supplier Relationships by Country, 2015
  • Figure 10: Changes in the Number of Supplier Relationships Expected Over the Next 12 Months by Commodity, 2015
  • Figure 11: Changes in the Number of Supplier Relationships Expected Over the Next 12 Months by Region, 2015
  • Figure 12: Purchasing Methods Used (%), 2015
  • Figure 13: Other Purchasing Methods in Combination with Outright Purchase (%), 2015
  • Figure 14: Other Purchasing Methods in Combination with Rental (%), 2015
  • Figure 15: Purchasing Method by Mine Type (%), 2015
  • Figure 16: Purchasing Method Type by Company Size (%), 2015
  • Figure 17: Purchasing Method Type by Commodity Type (%), 2015
  • Figure 18: Purchasing Method Type by Country (%), 2015
  • Figure 19: Share of Use of Rental Agreements by Company Size (%), 2015
  • Figure 20: Biggest Challenges in Sourcing Products, 2015
  • Figure 21: Biggest Challenges in Sourcing Equipment by Company Size (%), 2015
  • Figure 22: Current Location of Decision Making, 2015
  • Figure 23: Current Location of Decision Making for Heavy Mobile Equipment by Company Size, 2015
  • Figure 24: Current Location of Decision Making for Heavy Mobile Equipment by Commodity, 2015
  • Figure 25: Changes Expected in Levels of Centralization Over the Next Two Years, 2015
  • Figure 26: Preferred Supplier Arrangement, 2015
  • Figure 27: Preferred Supplier Arrangement by Type of Purchase, 2015
  • Figure 28: Preference for Dominant Single Supplier, 2015
  • Figure 29: Preference for Dominant Single Supplier by Company Size (%), 2015
  • Figure 30: Use of Dominant Single Supplier by Commodity (%), 2015
  • Figure 31: Survey Respondents by Country (%), 2015
  • Figure 32: Survey Respondents by Mine Type (%), 2015
  • Figure 33: Survey Respondents by Commodity (%), 2015
Back to Top