首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
- English Japanese Korean
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 消費品 > PreK-12(12年級生以下)的學習管理系統(LMS):市場概要
產業/市場分類
消費品 (4293)
化妝品 (446)
生活家電 (108)
衣服 (286)
印表機 (121)
香料/香水 (53)
旅遊 (257)
消費者行為 (672)
娛樂 (102)
珠寶與手錶 (25)
遊戲 (107)
零售業 (818)
數位家電 (370)
嬰兒產品 (52)
寵物產品 (90)
PC (275)
市場調查報告書

PreK-12(12年級生以下)的學習管理系統(LMS):市場概要

PreK-12 Learning Management Systems: A Market Overview

出版商 SIMBA Information, Inc.
出版日期 2011年11月 商品編碼 225440
內容資訊 英文 81 Pages
價格
US $ 3250 PDF by E-mail (Single User License)


PreK-12(12年級生以下)的學習管理系統(LMS):市場概要 是由出版商SIMBA Information, Inc.在2011年11月所出版的。 這份英文市場調查報告書包含81 Pages 價格從美金3250起跳。

簡介

本報告,調查分析12年級生以下學年的學習管理系統(LMS:Learning Management System)市場,彙整系統的分類・功能・能力、LMS使用的主要理由・目的、學校的導入事例、導入的各種影響、教育者今後的導入計劃相關見解、LMS的銷售預測(∼2015年)、主要廠商的市佔率、主要廠商的檔案資料等,由下列摘要形式闡述。

報告摘要

第1章 導入・方針:動向

  • 簡介・定義
  • 系統的大分類:4項區分
  • 受到廣泛導入的LMS功能
  • 做為LMS能力所追求的當責・數位對焦・個人化

第2章 市場需求・競爭環境

  • 簡介
  • 學生的進步監控:LMS使用的主要理由
  • Roseville Joint Union High School Districts:朝混合學習的轉移
  • Volusia County Schools:專業的開發推動LMS使用
  • Forsyth County Schools:投資與Houghton Mifflin Harcourt的創新
  • 在大部分的地區的LMS相關方面使用外部來源
  • Moodle:PreK-12 LMS市場上獲得18.5%的市佔率
  • Renaissance Place:類似主要使用於LMS的工具

第3章 結論・展望

  • 簡介
  • 教育者:顯示LMS的強力影響
  • 新模型:混合式學習與虛擬學校
  • 社群網路與協同合作的擴大
  • 開放來源材料的使用擴大
  • 預算上的擔憂:主要的導入阻礙
  • 簡易性的維持:單一登入・互用性
  • 依地區而有所不同的需求與「LMS Lite」
  • 學校所追求的使用者友善性與互動性
  • 學校的採購:並非產品種類而是從功能性需求來選擇
  • 廠商:確認成長
  • LMS區分:2013年將成長7%

第4章 主要企業

  • Blackboard
  • CompassLearning
  • Desire2Learn
  • Edmodo
  • GlobalScholar
  • Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  • It's Learning
  • Learning.com
  • McGraw-Hill
  • Moodlerooms
  • Pearson
  • Plato Learning
  • Renaissance Learning
  • Schoology
  • Sophia Learning
  • STI

附錄:調查回覆的詳細內容

目錄

Abstract

As schools advance in the creation of digital learning environments, Simba Information brings its established analytics to this still-emerging technology area in the brand new report PreK-12 Learning Management Systems: A Market Overview.

The report examines the role of Learning Management Systems (LMSs), which already are beginning to reshape the delivery, management, and administration of educational content in the U.S. PreK-12 sector, enabling cost-savings, convenience, new more personalized pedagogical models, and new opportunities for system and content providers. To provide crucial market intelligence on this developing segment, Simba Information is partnering with leading education market research firm MCH Strategic Data to conduct a survey of public school- and district-level educators on their current use of and future plans for learning management systems.

Simba defines learning management systems as organizational software enabling the administration, tracking and reporting of student information across all types of educational activities; the delivery of courses; and the facilitation of collaboration and communication.

It serves the needs of three constituencies:

  • Teachers and administrators, who may use an LMS to monitor individual student progress, deliver online and distance-learning courses to students and provide professional development to teachers
  • Students, who may use an LMS to access courses and course materials, work collaboratively and communicate with teachers
  • Parents, who may use an LMS to receive school information, access student work and communicate with the school

Table of Contents

Methodology

Executive Summary

Chapter 1: Implementation and Policy Trends

  • Introduction and Definition
  • Four Broad Classifications for Systems
  • LMS Functions Widely Implemented
    • Implementation Continues in 2011-2012
  • Accountability, Digital Focus, Personalization Call for LMS Capabilities
    • Looking Ahead with ESEA Reauthorization, Common Core State Standards
    • States Step up with Digital Initiatives
  • Table 1.1: Grade Level Implementation of Learning Management Systems
  • Table 1.2: Duration of LMS Availability in Years

Chapter 2: Market Demand & Competitive Landscape

  • Introduction
  • Monitoring Student Progress Tops Uses of LMS
    • Collaboration Tools Ranks High for Fewer Educators
  • Roseville (Calif.) Joint Union High School Districts: Move to Blended Learning
    • Creating Courses, Finding Materials
  • Volusia (Fla.) County Schools: Professional Development Drives LMS Use
    • Seeking Expertise, Compatible Course Materials
  • Forsyth County (Ga.) Schools: Investing in Innovation with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
    • Moving Materials Online
  • Majority of Districts Choose Outside Source for LMS
  • Moodle Captures 18.5% Share of PreK-12 LMS Market
  • Renaissance Place Is Top-Used Tool Similar to LMS
  • Table 2.1: Percentage of Districts with a Policy Promoting Use of an LMS
  • Table 2.2: Importance of Individual Features of a Learning Management System
  • Table 2.3: How Districts Acquired Their LMS
  • Table 2.4: PreK-12 Market Share of LMS Vendors, Fall 2011
  • Table 2.5: Districts' Implementation of Tools with Functions Similar to an LMS

Chapter 3: Conclusions & Outlook

  • Introduction
  • Educators Show Strong Impact of LMS
  • Policy in the Driver's Seat
  • New Models: Blended Learning and Virtual Schools
    • Broader Integration of Online Resources
  • Increase in Social Networking and Collaboration
  • Use of Open-Source Materials Increases
    • Moodle: Open Source and Fast Growing
  • Budget Concerns Lead Hurdles to Adoption
    • Support is Another Barrier
  • Keep it Simple: Single Sign-On, Interoperability Prized
    • Desire2Learn Works on Single Sign-On
    • Plato Learning Launches API to Expand Community
    • Single Sign-On Remains a Goal
  • Varied District Needs Open Doors for " LMS Lite"
  • Schools Look for User-Friendliness and Interactivity
  • Schools Shop by Function Needs, Not Product Type
  • Vendors See Faster Growth Than Schools Do
  • LMS Segment Expected to Grow 7% in 2013
  • Table 3.1: Impact of Use of Digital Materials on Decision to Implement an LMS
  • Table 3.2: Impact of Implementation of Learning Management System on Use of Digital Materials, Tools and Courses
  • Table 3.3: Educators' Views on Impact of LMS on Teaching and Learning
  • Table 3.4: Integration of Online Tools or Instructional Materials into Classroom Instruction
  • Table 3.5: Use of Online Classroom Assessment s and Quizzes
  • Table 3.6: Primary Reasons for Not Implementing an LMS
  • Table 3.7: Educators' Views on Future LMS Implementation Plans
  • Table 3.8: LMS Sales in U.S. PreK-12 Market, 2011-2012 through 2014-2015

Chapter 4: Who's Who

  • Blackboard
  • CompassLearning
  • Desire2Learn
  • Edmodo
  • GlobalScholar
  • Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  • It's Learning
  • Learning.com
  • McGraw-Hill
  • Moodlerooms
  • Pearson
  • Plato Learning
  • Renaissance Learning
  • Schoology
  • Sophia Learning
  • STI

Appendix: Survey Response Detail

Back to Top