|
|
|
市場調查報告書
全球的E郵件歸檔市場：2010-2014年
E-Mail Archiving Market, 2010-2014
|
全球的E郵件歸檔市場：2010-2014年 是由出版商Radicati Group, Inc.在2010年08月所出版的。
這份英文市場調查報告書價格從美金3000起跳。
本報告，針對全球的E郵件歸檔市場(用戶端歸檔解決方案・主機端歸檔服務)進行調查，並分析市場規模、廠商別的設置基礎・收益的市佔率、4年預測、區域別分析、法規相關資訊以及企業調查結果等，由下列摘要形式闡述。
調查範圍
調查方式
報告摘要
第1章 市場分析
- 市場定義
- E郵件的傳輸量・規模的成長預測
- 市場區分
- 市場分析
- E郵件歸檔解決方案：主要動向・分析
- 主機端E郵件歸檔服務：主要動向・分析
- 費用模式
- 典型的歸檔解決方案的追加
- 企業IT調查結果
- E郵件歸檔的導入
- 公司全面性導入 vs 部分導入
- 用戶端 vs 主機端
- 歸檔解決方案導入的主要動機
- 歸檔解決方案選定上的最重要功能
- 主要的歸檔的優先順序
- 電子紀錄維持的相關規定・規範
第2章 主要企業
- AUTONOMY
- C2C SYSTEMS, INC
- EMC CORPORATION
- FORENSIC AND COMPLIANCE SYSTEMS, LTD
- GOOGLR, INC
- GWAVA
- HP
- IBM
- IRON MOUNTAIN, INC
- LIVEOFFICE
- MESSAGING ARCHITECTS
- MICROSOFT
- PROOFPOINT
- SMARSH, INC.
- SYMANTEC CORPORATION
- UNIFY/AXS-ONE
- USA.NET
圖表
Abstract
The report provides a comprehensive analysis of the E-Mail Archiving Market,
including:
- Market Size, Installed Base & Revenue Market Share by Vendor, Four-Year
Forecasts, Breakouts by Region, Detailed Market Analysis, Information on Key
Regulations, and Corporate Survey Results.
- The study covers two key market segments:
- On-Premises Archiving Solutions
- Hosted Archiving Services
- In-depth analysis of leading market players: Autonomy, C2C, EMC, Forensic
and Compliance Systems, Google, GWAVA, HP, IBM, Iron Mountain, LiveOffice,
Messaging Architects, Microsoft, Proofpoint, Smarsh, Symantec, Unify/AXS-One,
USA.NET, and others.
This report is intended for Organizations, Vendors, and Investors who need to
make informed decisions about the E-Mail Archiving market.
Table of Contents
SCOPE
METHODOLOGY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER I: MARKET ANALYSIS
- 1.1 MARKET DEFINITION
- 1.2 E-MAIL TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SIZE GROWTH FORECAST
- 1.3 MARKET SEGMENTATION
- 1.4 MARKET ANALYSIS
- 1.5 E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS KEY TRENDS AND ANALYSIS
- 1.6 HOSTED E-MAIL ARCHIVING SERVICES KEY TRENDS AND ANALYSIS
- 1.7 PRICING MODELS
- 1.8 TYPICAL ADD-ONS TO ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS
- 1.8.1 eDiscovery
- 1.8.2 Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
- 1.9 CORPORATE IT SURVEY RESULTS
- 1.9.1 E-mail Archiving Deployment
- 1.9.1.1 Company-wide vs. Partial Deployment
- 1.9.1.2 On-Premises vs. Hosted Deployment
- 1.9.1.3 Main Motivation for Deploying an Archiving Solution
- 1.9.1.4 Most Important Capabilities in Selecting an Archiving Solution
- 1.9.1.5 Main Archiving Priority
- 1.10 ELECTRONIC RECORDS RETENTION RULES AND REGULATIONS
- 1.10.1 US Regulations - Financial and Insurance Institutions
- 1.10.2 US Regulations - Health Care and Pharmaceutical Companies
- 1.10.3 US Regulations - Government and Military Organizations
- 1.10.4 US Regulations - Telecommunications Companies
- 1.10.5 US Regulations - Service Providers
- 1.10.6 US Regulations - Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP)
- 1.10.7 US Regulations - Legal Guidelines
- 1.10.8 UK Regulations - Financial Companies
- 1.10.9 UK Regulations - Service Providers
- 1.10.10 UK Regulations - Government Organizations
- 1.10.11 Australian Regulations
CHAPTER II: KEY PLAYERS
- AUTONOMY
- C2C SYSTEMS, INC.
- EMC CORPORATION
- FORENSIC AND COMPLIANCE SYSTEMS, LTD.
- GOOGLE, INC.
- GWAVA
- HP
- IBM
- IRON MOUNTAIN, INC.
- LIVEOFFICE
- MESSAGING ARCHITECTS
- MICROSOFT
- PROOFPOINT
- SMARSH, INC.
- SYMANTEC CORPORATION
- UNIFY/AXS-ONE
- USA.NET
Additional Archiving Vendors
LIST OF FIGURES
- FIGURE 1: AVERAGE NUMBER OF CORPORATE MESSAGES SENT/RECEIVED PER
USER PER DAY, 2010-2014
- FIGURE 2: E-MAIL ARCHIVING IB AND REVENUE FORECAST, 2010-2014
- FIGURE 3: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS REVENUE MARKET SHARE, 2010
- FIGURE 4: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS INSTALLED BASE MARKET SHARE,
2010
- FIGURE 5: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS INSTALLED BASE FORECAST,
2010-2014
- FIGURE 6: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS REVENUE FORECAST, 2010-2014
- FIGURE 7: E-MAIL ARCHIVING REVENUE BY REGION, 2010-2014
- FIGURE 8: E-MAIL ARCHIVING HOSTED SERVICES REVENUE MARKET SHARE,
2010
- FIGURE 9: E-MAIL ARCHIVING HOSTED SERVICES INSTALLED BASE MARKET
SHARE, 2010
- FIGURE 10: HOSTED E-MAIL ARCHIVING SERVICES INSTALLED BASE
FORECAST, 2010-2014
- FIGURE 11: HOSTED E-MAIL ARCHIVING SERVICES REVENUE FORECAST,
2010-2014
- FIGURE 12: HOSTED E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS REVENUE FORECAST BY
REGION, 2010-2014
- FIGURE 13: EDISCOVERY' S EDRM MODEL
- FIGURE 14: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTION DEPLOYED
- FIGURE 15: WOULD YOU CONSIDER DEPLOYING AN ARCHIVING SOLUTION?
- FIGURE 16: COMPANY-WIDE VS. PARTIAL DEPLOYMENT
- FIGURE 17: ON-PREMISES VS. HOSTED ARCHIVING SOLUTION
- FIGURE 18: ON-PREMISES VS. HOSTED ARCHIVING PREFERENCE
- FIGURE 19: MAIN MOTIVATIONS FOR DEPLOYING AN E-MAIL ARCHIVING
SOLUTION
- FIGURE 20: TOP CAPABILITIES OF AN ARCHIVING SOLUTION
- FIGURE 21: PRIORITY OF WHAT TO ARCHIVE
LIST OF TABLES
- TABLE 1: CORPORATE EMAIL STORAGE REQUIREMENTS PER USER PER DAY,
2010-2014
- TABLE 2: E-MAIL ARCHIVING IB AND REVENUE FORECAST, 2010-2014
- TABLE 3: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS MARKET SHARE, 2010
- TABLE 4: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS REVENUE AND IB GROWTH FORECAST,
2010-2014
- TABLE 5: E-MAIL ARCHIVING HOSTED SERVICES MARKET SHARE, 2010
- TABLE 6: HOSTED E-MAIL ARCHIVING SERVICES FORECAST, 2010-2014
- TABLE 7: COMPARISON OF PRICING MODELS FOR E-MAIL ARCHIVING VENDORS
- TABLE 8: COMPARISON OF PRICING MODELS FOR E-MAIL ARCHIVING SERVICE
PROVIDERS
- TABLE 9: COMPARISON OF PRICING MODELS FOR EDISCOVERY SOLUTIONS
- TABLE 10: COMPARISON OF PRICING MODELS FOR DLP SOLUTIONS
- TABLE 11: KEY FEATURES OF AN EDISCOVERY SOLUTION
- TABLE 12: ARCHIVING FOR STORAGE VS. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PURPOSES
|
 |
