全球電子郵件儲存市場：2009年-2013年

Abstract

A comprehensive analysis of the On-Premises and Hosted E-Mail Archiving Market, including:

• Market Size, Market Share by Vendor, Four-Year Forecasts, Breakouts by Region, and Business
• Size.
• Includes E-mail volume and storage growth statistics
• In-depth Corporate survey of deployment attitudes and procurement plans for E-Mail Archiving.
• In-depth analysis of leading market players: Autonomy ZANTAZ, AXS-One, CA, C2C, Cryoserver, EMC, Forensic and Compliance Systems, Global Relay, HP, IBM, Iron Mountain, LiveOffice, Messaging Architects, Microsoft, Mimosa, OpenText, Smarsh, Symantec, USA.NET, Waterford Technologies, ZL Technologies, and others.

This report is intended for Organizations, Vendors, and Investors who need to make informed decisions about the E-Mail Archiving market.

Table of Contents

SCOPE

METHODOLOGY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CHAPTER I: MARKET ANALYSIS

• 1.1 MARKET DEFINITION
• 1.2 E-MAIL TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SIZE GROWTH FORECAST
• 1.3 MARKET SEGMENTATION
• 1.4 MARKET ANALYSIS
• 1.5 E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS KEY TRENDS AND ANALYSIS
• 1.6 HOSTED E-MAIL ARCHIVING SERVICES KEY TRENDS AND ANALYSIS
• 1.7 PRICING MODELS
• 1.8 STORAGE, GOVERNMENT AND INTERNAL EDISCOVERY REQUIREMENTS
• 1.9 TYPICAL ADD-ONS TO ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS
  • 1.9.1 eDiscovery
  • 1.9.2 Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
• 1.10 CORPORATE IT SURVEY RESULTS
  • 1.10.1 E-mail Archiving Deployment
    • 1.10.1.1 Company-wide vs. Partial Deployment
    • 1.10.1.2 On-Premises vs. Hosted Deployment
    • 1.10.1.3 Main Motivation for Deploying an Archiving Solution
    • 1.10.1.4 Future Archiving Deployment Plans
    • 1.10.1.5 Future Archiving Solution Choice
    • 1.10.1.6 Most Important Capabilities in Selecting an Archiving Solution
    • 1.10.1.7 Main Archiving Priority
    • 1.10.1.8 Cost Tolerance 64
    • 1.10.1.9 Driving the Selection Process
    • 1.10.1.10 Final Decision Maker
  • 1.10.2 eDiscovery Deployment
  • 1.10.3 Data Loss Prevention Deployment
  • 1.10.4 Conclusions - E-mail Archiving, eDiscovery and Data Loss Prevention
• 1.11 ELECTRONIC RECORDS RETENTION RULES AND REGULATIONS
  • 1.11.1 US Regulations - Financial and Insurance Institutions
  • 1.11.2 US Regulations - Health Care and Pharmaceutical Companies
  • 1.11.3 US Regulations - Government and Military Organizations
  • 1.11.4 US Regulations - Telecommunications Companies
  • 1.11.5 US Regulations - Service Providers
  • 1.11.6 US Regulations - Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP)
  • 1.11.7 US Regulations - Legal Guidelines
  • 1.11.8 UK Regulations - Financial Companies
  • 1.11.9 UK Regulations - Service Providers
  • 1.11.10 UK Regulations - Government Organizations
  • 1.11.11 Australian Regulations

CHAPTER II: KEY PLAYERS

• AUTONOMY ZANTAZ
• AXS-ONE
• C2C SYSTEMS, INC.
• CA
• EMC CORPORATION
• FORENSIC AND COMPLIANCE SYSTEMS, LTD.
• GLOBAL RELAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC
• HP
• IBM
• IRON MOUNTAIN, INC.
• LIVEOFFICE
• MESSAGING ARCHITECTS
• MICROSOFT
• MIMOSA SYSTEMS, INC.
• OPEN TEXT
• PROOFPOINT
• SMARSH, INC.
• SYMANTEC CORPORATION
• USA.NET
• WATERFORD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
• ZL TECHNOLOGIES

List of Figures

• FIGURE 1: CORPORATE MESSAGES SENT/RECEIVED PER USER PER DAY, 2009-2013
• FIGURE 2: CORPORATE EMAIL STORAGE REQUIREMENTS PER USER PER DAY, 2009 - 2013
• FIGURE 3: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS REVENUE MARKET SHARE, 2009
• FIGURE 4: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS INSTALLED BASE MARKET SHARE, 2009
• FIGURE 5: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS INSTALLED BASE FORECAST, 2009-2013
• FIGURE 6: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS REVENUE FORECAST, 2009-2013
• FIGURE 7: E-MAIL ARCHIVING REVENUE BY REGION, 2009-2013
• FIGURE 8: E-MAIL ARCHIVING HOSTED SERVICES REVENUE MARKET SHARE, 2009
• FIGURE 9: E-MAIL ARCHIVING HOSTED SERVICES INSTALLED BASE MARKET SHARE, 2009
• FIGURE 10: HOSTED E-MAIL ARCHIVING SERVICES INSTALLED BASE FORECAST, 2009-2013
• FIGURE 11: HOSTED E-MAIL ARCHIVING SERVICES REVENUE FORECAST, 2009-2013
• FIGURE 12: HOSTED E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS REV. FORECAST BY REGION, 2009-2013
• FIGURE 13: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTION DEPLOYED
• FIGURE 14: COMPANY-WIDE VS. PARTIAL DEPLOYMENT
• FIGURE 15: ON-PREMISES VS. HOSTED ARCHIVING SOLUTION
• FIGURE 16: ON-PREMISES VS. HOSTED ARCHIVING PREFERENCE
• FIGURE 17: MAIN MOTIVATIONS FOR DEPLOYING AN E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTION
• FIGURE 18: FUTURE ARCHIVING PLANS
• FIGURE 19: WHAT SOLUTION IS YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANNING TO DEPLOY
• FIGURE 20: TOP CAPABILITIES OF AN ARCHIVING SOLUTION
• FIGURE 21: PRIORITY OF WHAT TO ARCHIVE
• FIGURE 22: WHO IS DRIVING THE DECISION PROCESS
• FIGURE 23: WHO IS THE FINAL DECISION MAKER
• FIGURE 24: EDISCOVERY DEPLOYMENT
• FIGURE 25: EDISCOVERY PLANS IN THE NEXT 12-18 MONTHS
• FIGURE 26: DATA LOSS PREVENTION DEPLOYMENT
• FIGURE 27: DLP PLANS IN THE NEXT 12-18 MONTHS

List of Tables

• TABLE 1: CORPORATE EMAIL STORAGE REQUIREMENTS PER USER PER DAY, 2009-2013
• TABLE 2: E-MAIL ARCHIVING IB AND REVENUE FORECAST, 2009-2013
• TABLE 3: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS MARKET SHARE, 2009
• TABLE 4: E-MAIL ARCHIVING SOLUTIONS REVENUE AND IB GROWTH FORECAST, 2009-2013
• TABLE 5: E-MAIL ARCHIVING HOSTED SERVICES MARKET SHARE, 2009
• TABLE 6: HOSTED E-MAIL ARCHIVING SERVICES FORECAST, 2009-2013
• TABLE 7: COMPARISON OF PRICING MODELS FOR E-MAIL ARCHIVING VENDORS
• TABLE 8: COMPARISON OF PRICING MODELS FOR E-MAIL ARCHIVING SERVICE PROVIDERS
• TABLE 9: ARCHIVING FOR STORAGE VS. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PURPOSES
• TABLE 10: KEY FEATURES OF AN EDISCOVERY SOLUTION
• TABLE 11: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COMPLIANCE AND LEGAL EDISCOVERY SOLUTIONS
• TABLE 12: ARCHIVING COST TOLERANCE
• TABLE 13: ARCHIVING FOR STORAGE VS. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PURPOSES......