首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
- English Japanese Korean
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 通訊 > WLAN/WiMAX > 微波無線與FSO:競爭還是共存?
產業/市場分類
通訊 (11616)
企業概況 (774)
光纖網路 (265)
次世代無線通信 (543)
行動用戶 (129)
行動設備 (764)
軟體 (1034)
電子商務 (209)
網路 (677)
網路與進入設備 (268)
數位廣播 (305)
數據中心 (345)
寬頻 (392)
衛星遠程通信 (141)
線上廣告 (144)
整合 (177)
整合通訊 (305)
機上盒 (63)
聯繫中心 (135)
Contents (627)
IT安全性 (503)
IT委外 (323)
LBS (160)
NFC (152)
RFID (215)
Web服務 (554)
WLAN/WiMAX (568)
市場調查報告書

微波無線與FSO:競爭還是共存?

Millimeter-wave Radio and Free Space Optics-Rivals or Friends?

出版商 Practel, Inc.
出版日期 2008年11月 商品編碼 76123
內容資訊 英文  
價格
US $ 3950 Read Only PDF By E-mail (Single User License)
US $ 4150 Printable PDF by E-mail (Single User License)
US $ 5990 PDF by E-mail (Enterprise License)


微波無線與FSO:競爭還是共存? 是由出版商Practel, Inc.在2008年11月所出版的。 這份英文市場調查報告書價格從美金3950起跳。

簡介

本報告書內容包括:微波無線與FSO相關技術、市場調查、60GHz無線技術、規格、主要應用、FSO技術、優點與限制、競爭情況、雙方比較、主要供應商等,內容綱要摘記如下:

第1章 前言

第2章 60GHz 無線技術

  • 概要
  • 頻率特性
  • 天線
  • 以60GHz為限的發射
  • 複合作用
  • 微波無線晶片技術的進步
  • Wi-Fi與60GHz無線
  • 總括

第3章 60GHz固定無線的最後一哩

  • 詳細
  • 場所
  • 可定址市場
  • 市場

第4章 60GHz無線-IEEE802.15.3c 與競爭

  • 概要
  • 規格
    • WPAN的好處
    • 應用
    • 課題
  • 規格與研發:無線HD、IEEE802.15.3c與其他
    • 無線HD
    • IEEE802.15.3c
    • ECMA
  • 市場
  • 企業與計畫
  • 比較
  • 60GHz WPAN:例子
  • 優點與課題

第5章 E Band無線

  • 概要
  • 規範
  • 主要應用
  • 市場預測
  • 供應商

第6章 FSO:技術

  • 概要
  • 主要特徵
    • 混合系統保護
  • 應用
    • 混合系統要項
    • 衛星間連結
    • 室內通訊
  • FSO的優點與限制
    • 天候要項
    • 建築的搖動
  • 設計問題
  • 顧客

第7章 FSO市場

  • 概要
  • 市場促進要素
  • 競爭
    • 光纖
    • 微波
    • PON
  • 預測

第8章 FSO供應商

第9章 比較

第10章 結論

圖表

目錄

Abstract

This report addresses technologies, applications and markets for:

  • Millimeter-wave radio: this includes communications links in the 60 GHz band as well as in the E-band (70 GHz, 80 GHz and 90 GHz)
  • Free Space Optics.

The goal was to analyze the current status of these communications types and to emphasize their inter-dependence - hybrid systems, which combine FSO and 60 GHz radio in one system, allow reliable communications through longer channels than each technology may allow separately.

There are several motives for wanting to use millimeter-wave radio and/or FSO links; among them the most attractive are:

  • The spectrum at very high frequencies is still rather undeveloped, and therefore more radio spectrum with wider bandwidths is available
  • FSO system do not need any licensing
  • The system capacity is higher at very high frequencies because the range of radio signals is limited, resulting in smaller cells. Therefore the same frequency can be reused at shorter distances
  • FSO allows to transmit multi-gigabit per second signals
  • The inherent security and privacy is better in FSO systems and at very high radio frequencies because of the limited range and the relatively narrow beam widths that can be achieved
  • The spatial resolution is better at very high frequencies
  • It is easy to realize Gb/s transmission
  • The physical size of antennas at very high frequencies is small and it becomes practical to build complex antenna arrays and/or further integrate them.

The interest in mm-wave technologies was also sparked by decisions of regulatory agencies around the globe to release and regulate vast volumes of spectrum; and the progress in the chips design that made it possible to produce high-frequency IC with relatively low cost.

The report shows that 60 GHz radio can be useful in the design of high-speed (up to several Gb/s) wireless links as well as in the development of WPAN.

Particular properties of this technology combine:

  • High-level of frequency re-use
  • Unlicensed wide-open spectrum
  • Security.

Cost was the main obstacle in creating 60 GHz radio applications. Off-the-shelf GaAs and indium phosphide (InP) discrete devices are available today to create 60 GHz radios, but they drive the cost of WPAN devices up to more than $10,000. However, by switching to metal-insulator electronics, which can be fabricated on standard CMOS lines atop ultra cheap plastic substrates, Motorola and other companies report being able to drive the cost down to rival that of semiconductors. By way of comparison, IBM estimates that its SiGe BiCMOS 60 GHz radio chips will enable WPAN devices to be priced as low as $100. With the progress in these developments, we expect that the 60 GHz radio WPAN and Fixed Wireless markets will be getting stronger in 2008-2009.

Designed for transmission of uncompressed video in the HD-format, 60 GHz WPAN very soon will compete with wired technologies and may reduce or even eliminate use of such expensive techniques as HDMI. In Fixed Wireless application, 60 GHz radio will deal with short (up to several hundred meters) indoor and outdoor channels.

Extending the analysis to the E-band, we provide reasons why this radio technology is becoming so popular-the FCC regulated 13 GHz of spectrum for the licensed use of these frequencies. Licensing in this band does not require going through a labyrinth of paperwork, or spending any significant amounts of money. This band allows creation of multi-gigabit data paths for distances of several kilometers. One of the main applications of these radios is replacement of fiber at the last mile.

Report provides marketing prospectus on E-band radio-with rapidly improving IC technologies and growing demand for fast-deployed and cost-effective high-speed data links these radios are in the winning position.

The commercial future of free-space optical communications remains uncertain. On the one hand, the push for ever-greater bandwidth could eventually outrun any RF capacity, forcing a shift to free-space optical. On the other, RF techniques have a long head start in inside-building applications, and the weather problem remains a severe one for optical inter-building links. Perhaps the best overall prospects are in space, where progress is being made in improving acquisition and tracking. Once these are perfected, the bandwidth advantages of optical free-space communications should open up a substantial market niche. Another application, which shows some strength, is FSO utilization in the hybrid systems. Such systems, built as a combination of mm-wave radio and FSO, provide necessary resistance to the environmental conditions and still support high-speed transmission.

The report summarizes recent trends in the FSO development and shows benefits of its use in some applications. The technology is perfecting, using multiple lasers and optical-microwave protection as well as advances in optics; it is also shifting from the 800 nm widow to the 1500 nm window, allowing more transmit power.

The report also analyzes the FSO market and provides its characteristics.

Research Methodology

Considerable research was performed using the Internet. Information from various Web sites was studied and analyzed; evaluation of publicly available marketing and technical publications was also conducted. Telephone conversations and interviews were held with industry analysts, technical experts and executives. In addition to these interviews and primary research, secondary sources were used to develop a more complete mosaic of the market landscape, including industry and trade publications, conferences and seminars.

The overriding objective throughout the work has been to provide valid and relevant information. This has led to a continual review and update of the information content.

Target Audience

This report provides the millimeter-wave radio and FSO technologies and market analysis and assessments. These materials are useful for service providers, vendors, network operators and managers, Enterprise IT staff, investors and end users seeking to gain a deeper understanding of millimeter-wave radio and FSO opportunities and barriers in the market growth.

The end users can gain thorough understanding of product' s market and capabilities as well as the economics of using these technologies products to improve cost efficiency.

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction

  • 1.1 General
  • 1.2 Factors: 60 GHz Radio
    • 1.2.1 Regulatory Climate
  • 1.3 E-band
  • 1.4 FSO
  • 1.5 Goals
  • 1.6 Report Structure
  • 1.7 Research Methodology
  • 1.8 Target Audience

2.0 60 GHz Radio Technology

  • 2.1 General
  • 2.2 Spectrum Specifics
    • 2.2.1 Oxygen Absorption
  • 2.3 Antenna
  • 2.4 Radiation Limiting at 60 GHz
  • 2.5 Combined Effect
  • 2.6 Progress in the Chip Technology for mmWave Radio
    • 2.6.1 Modulation
    • 2.6.2 Specifics: Indoor
  • 2.7 Wi-Fi and 60 GHz Radio
  • 2.8 Summary

3.0 60 GHz Fixed Wireless-Last Mile

  • 3.1 Details
  • 3.2 Place
  • 3.3 Addressable Market
    • 3.3.1 General
    • 3.3.2 Drivers
    • 3.3.3 Forecast
  • 3.4 Industry
    • BridgeWave
    • CableFree Solutions
    • Comotech
    • Proxim
    • Rayawave
    • Vubiq

4.0 60 GHz Radio-IEEE 802.15.3c and Competition

  • 4.1 General
  • 4.2 Specifics
    • 4.2.1 Benefits for WPAN
    • 4.2.2 Applications
    • 4.2.3 Challenges
  • 4.3 Standardization and Development: WirelessHD, IEEE 802.15.3c and Other
    • 4.3.1 WirelessHD
      • 4.3.1.1 Details: WirelessHD Technology
      • 4.3.1.2 Completion
      • 4.3.1.3 Amimon
      • 4.3.1.4 Issues and Progress
    • 4.3.2 IEEE 802.15.3c
      • 4.3.2.1 Current Status
      • 4.3.2.2 Benefits
      • 4.3.2.3 Very High Throughput Group
      • 4.3.2.4 Diversity
    • 4.3.3 ECMA
  • 4.4 Market
    • 4.4.1 General: Applications
    • 4.4.2 Market Obstacles: Specifics
    • 4.4.3 Forecast
  • 4.5 Players and Projects
    • Endwave
    • IBM
    • NEC
    • Panasonic
    • Phiar-Motorola
    • Phiar
    • Radiospire
    • SiBeam
  • 4.6 Comparison
  • 4.7 60 GHz WPAN: Example
  • 4.8 Advantages and Challenges

5.0 E-band Radio

  • 5.1 General
    • 5.1.1 Benefits
  • 5.2 Regulations
    • 5.2.1 Frequency Plan
    • 5.2.2 Additional Characteristics
  • 5.3 Major Applications
  • 5.4 Market Prospective
    • 5.4.1 Last Mile
    • 5.4.2 Estimate
  • 5.5 Vendors
    • ADC
    • Airlinx
    • Asyrmatos
    • Bridgewave
    • Comotech
    • E-band Communications
    • ElvaLink
    • Endwave
    • G4 Networks
    • GigaBeam
    • Fujitsu
    • Loea Corporation
    • mmWave
    • Proxim
    • Rayawave
    • Sophia Wireless

6.0 Free Space Optics: Technology

  • 6.1 General
    • 6.1.1 Specifics
  • 6.2 Major Characteristics
    • 6.2.1 Protection-Hybrid System
  • 6.3 Applications
    • 6.3.1 Requirements-Hybrid System
    • 6.3.2 Inter-satellite Links
    • 6.3.3 Intra-building Communications
  • 6.4 FSO Benefits and Limitations
    • 6.4.1 Weather Factor
    • 6.4.2 Building Swaying
  • 6.5 Design Issues
  • 6.6 Customers

7.0 FSO Market

  • 7.1 General
  • 7.2 Market Drivers
  • 7.3 Competition
    • 7.3.1 Fiber Optics Cable
    • 7.3.2 Microwave
    • 7.3.3 PONs
  • 7.4 Forecast
    • 7.4.1 General
      • 7.4.1.1 Model Assumptions
      • 7.4.1.2 Structure
    • 7.4.2 Forecast

8.0 FSO Vendors

  • Airlinx
  • AOptix
  • Canon
  • CableFree
  • CBL
  • Dominion Lasercom
  • IRLan Ltd.
  • fSONA
  • LightPointe (Closed doors in May and opened it in August of 2006)
  • LaserBit
  • MRV
  • Optel
  • PAV
  • Plaintree
  • Proxim

9.0 Comparison

10.0 Conclusions

FIGURES:

  • Figure 1: Unlicensed Bands
  • Figure 2: 60 GHz Connections
  • Figure 3: Global Frequencies
  • Figure 4: Spectrum Details
  • Figure 5: Attenuation in 60 GHz Band
  • Figure 6: Absorption Details
  • Figure 7: Bands Features Comparison
  • Figure 8: Addressable Market Estimate: 60 GHz Radio - Fixed Wireless ($M)
  • Figure 9: Addressable Market Estimate: 60 GHz Radio-Fixed Wireless (Units)
  • Figure 10: 60 GHz “Open” Spectrum
  • Figure 11: IEEE802.15 Structure
  • Figure 12: Market Estimate- WPAN 60 GHz Radio ($M US)
  • Figure 13: 60 GHz WPAN Example
  • Figure 14: Frequency Allocation
  • Figure 15: Addressable Market-E-band radio-Last Mile Access ($M)
  • Figure 16: Simplified FSO Diagram
  • Figure 17: FSO Market Segments
  • Figure 18: FSO: Equipment Sales-Addressable Market Estimate ($US M)
  • Figure 19: FSO: Equipment Sales-Addressable Market Estimate (Systems 000)
  • Figure 20: FSO Market Geography 1

TABLES:

  • Table 1: Directivity
  • Table 2: 60 GHz Links Characteristics
  • Table 3: Performance Characteristics
  • Table 4: Bandwidth Utilization Details
  • Table 5: Attenuation
  • Table 6: Properties
  • Table 7: Required Speed
  • Table 8: Competition
  • Table 9: WPAN Technologies
  • Table 10: FCC Regulation
Back to Top