Cover Image
市場調查報告書

有線寬頻接取網路的開發的進步

Progress in Development Broadband Networks: Wired Access-Technologies, Markets and Applications

出版商 Practel, Inc. 商品編碼 369020
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 157 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
Back to Top
有線寬頻接取網路的開發的進步 Progress in Development Broadband Networks: Wired Access-Technologies, Markets and Applications
出版日期: 2017年09月01日 內容資訊: 英文 157 Pages
簡介

本報告提供有線寬頻上網網路現況及短期性的進步的相關調查,尤其是以被動式光纖網路 (PON) 及新世代DSL的技術、市場為中心的分析,寬頻有線存取的重要趨勢,及標準化流程分析,為您概述為以下內容。

第1章 簡介

第2章 PON:現在與未來

  • 概念
    • PON的優點
    • PON的提案
    • 詳細內容
    • PON的分類
    • PON的要素
  • PON:ITU-FSAN 家庭
    • A/B-PON - G.983.x
    • G-PON - G.984.x
    • G.987x -XG-PON
    • G.989x-NG-PON2
    • XGS-PON
  • PON:IEEE家庭
    • 802.3ah - GE - PON
    • 802.3av- 10GE-PON
    • IEEE P802.3ca PON
  • PON市場
    • PON的商業化
    • 要素
    • 服務
    • 市場估計
  • 產業
    • Ad-Net
    • Adtran
    • Alphion
    • Broadcom
    • Calix
    • Cisco
    • Corecess
    • Dasan Networks
    • GigaLight
    • Hisense
    • 日立
    • Huawei
    • Marvell
    • 三菱電機
    • NeoPhotonics
    • NEC (日本電氣)
    • Nokia
    • OBN
    • PBN
    • Qualcomm Atheros
    • Raisecom
    • Source Photonics
    • Sun Telecom
    • 住友電氣工業
    • Tainet
    • Zhone
    • ZTE

第3章 DSL的演進

  • 發展
  • DSL家庭
    • ADSL
    • R-ADSL
    • HDSL
    • IDSL
    • VDSL
    • SDSL
    • 摘要
  • 載體DSL - G.993.5-2010
    • 範圍
    • 詳細內容
    • 主要市場
    • 供應商
      • Adtran
      • Assia
      • Broadcom
      • Calix
      • Huawei
      • Lantiq
      • Nokia
      • Siligence
      • Zhone
      • Zyxel
      • ZTE
  • G.fast
    • 標準
    • 超過載體化的改善
    • 模式
    • 主要的特徵
    • 試驗、訓練
    • FTTdp
    • 產業
      • Adtran
      • Alcatel-Lucent (Nokia)
      • Broadcom
      • Calix
      • Huawei
      • Qualcomm/Ikonos
      • Sagemcom
      • Sckipio
      • XAVi
      • Zinwell
    • 市場

第4章 結論

附錄I:載體化DSL - 相關專利調查 (2015-2016年)

附錄II:NG-PON2 - 相關專利調查 (2015-2016年)

圖表

本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

目錄

This report updates the status on wired broadband access technologies, their markets, applications and industries.

Wired broadband access technologies are playing an important role in today networks. However, until recently, technical and economic problems with such access did not allow effective use of a broadband pipe from a core to a subscriber side, minimizing a value of broadband communications.

The problems have been known for a long time, but absence of a cost-effective technology in the distribution plant prevented making any practical improvements. The specifics of access, such as the necessity to create highly distributed infrastructure and the price to support access service always contradicted each other. The situation changed with appearance Passive Optical Networks (PONs), their various modifications and progress in architecting of high-speed DSL, such as vectoring DSL.

The goal of this report is to address current and near-term advances in wired broadband access networks that are transforming them into broadband pipes with characteristics similar to characteristics of the core networks. Particular, the report concentrates on the analysis technologies and markets for the following access architectures:

  • Passive Optical Networks - standardized or planning to be standardized by the IEEE and ITU-FSAN. Evolving PONs will allow transmission up to 100 Gb/s (shared).
  • New generations DSL - in the development and standardization by the ITU and the industry, including vectoring and G.fast. The technology may support short reaches connectivity on the existing copper structures with speeds near 1 Gb/s (non-shared).
  • RFoG - technology that allows efficient use of fiber combined with a short coaxial path to the user, allowing to reach gigabit per second speed and improving the economics of broadband access. Note that cable accounts for 60% of the U.S. fixed broadband market.

The report shows that the copper infrastructure continues to play an important role for connecting last hundreds meters from/to a subscriber equipment (with the rest of network). Advanced gigabit speed access technologies, such as DSL (G.fast, VDSL2-vec), are key in creating a homogenous and cost efficient core-access infrastructure. For example, in 2017, AT&T has begun rolling out G.fast-based services in 22 metro markets across the United States, signaling the service provider's desire to extend higher speed wireline broadband services in premises where it can't make a business case for all fiber.

PONs provide cost-efficient connectivity of the core with subscriber's equipment, supporting required by users characteristics, such as speed of transmission and other. Currently, service providers have three major next-generation FSAN PON paths: 10G-PON, XGS-PON and NG-PON2. Verizon, for example, plans to move directly to NG-PON2.

The IEEE NG-EPON standard 802.3ca, which promises the 100 Gb/s speed, planned to be finalized in 2018.

The report also stresses an important trend in the broadband wired access: utilization of multi-functional platforms that allow flexibility and cost efficiency to serve a diversified group of users required different technologies.

The standardization processes are analyzed in details. Marketing statistics have been developed (2017-2021). The report also presents detailed surveys of companies that are working in the related industries and their products portfolios. Attachments contain the survey of recently approved patents related to the report subject.

The report is written for a wide audience of technical, managerial and sales staff involved in the development wired broadband access networks.

Table of Contents

1.0. Introduction

  • 1.1. Issue
  • 1.2. Changes
  • 1.3. PON Appearance
  • 1.4. DSL Developments
  • 1.5. RFoG
  • 1.6. Scope
  • 1.7. Research Methodology
  • 1.8. Target Audience

2.0. PON: Today and Tomorrow

  • 2.1. Concept
    • 2.1.1. PON Benefits
    • 2.1.2. The PON Proposition
    • 2.1.3. Details
    • 2.1.4. PON Classification
    • 2.1.5. PON Elements
      • 2.1.5.1. Optical Line Termination (OLT)
        • 2.1.5.1.1. PON Core Shell
        • 2.1.5.1.2. Cross-connect Shell
        • 2.1.5.1.3. Service Shell
        • 2.1.5.1.4. OLT Responsibilities
          • 2.1.5.1.4.1. Bandwidth Allocation
          • 2.1.5.1.4.2. Grant Mechanism
          • 2.1.5.1.4.3. Capture Effect
          • 2.1.5.1.4.4. Ranging
          • 2.1.5.1.4.5. Burst Mode Transceiver
      • 2.1.5.2. Optical Network Unit (ONU)
      • 2.1.5.3. Optical Distribution Network (ODN)
  • 2.2. PON: ITU-FSAN Family
    • 2.2.1. A/B-PON-G.983.x
    • 2.2.2. G-PON-G.984.x
    • 2.2.3. G.987x -XG-PON
    • 2.2.4. G.989x-NG-PON2
      • 2.2.4.1. Project
      • 2.2.4.2. NG-PON2-General
      • 2.2.4.3. Major Properties
      • 2.2.4.4. Characteristics
        • 2.2.4.4.1. Support
        • 2.2.4.4.2. Rates and Reaches
        • 2.2.4.4.3. Combinations
      • 2.2.4.5. Services
      • 2.2.4.6. Capacity
      • 2.2.4.7. Spectrum Allocation
      • 2.2.4.8. Line Rate Summary
    • 2.2.5. XGS-PON
    • 2.2.6. Plans
  • 2.3. PON: IEEE Family
    • 2.3.1. 802.3ah-GE-PON
    • 2.3.2. 802.3av- 10GE-PON
      • 2.3.2.1. Goal
      • 2.3.2.2. Status
      • 2.3.2.3. Standard's Scope and Objectives
      • 2.3.2.4. 10GE-PON Technology Specifics
        • 2.3.2.4.1. Inheritance
        • 2.3.2.4.2. Properties
        • 2.3.2.4.3. Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation
      • 2.3.2.5. 10GE-PON: Drivers and Target Applications
    • 2.3.3. IEEE P802.3ca PON
  • 2.4. PON Market
    • 2.4.1. PON Commercialized
    • 2.4.2. Factor
    • 2.4.3. Services
    • 2.4.4. Market Estimate
      • 2.4.4.1. Equipment Sales
      • 2.4.4.2. Market Geography
      • 2.4.4.3. Service Providers Revenue
  • 2.5. Industry
    • Ad-Net
    • Adtran
    • Alphion
    • Broadcom
    • Calix
    • Cisco
    • Corecess
    • Dasan Networks (merged with Zhone in 2016)
    • GigaLight
    • Hisense
    • Huawei
    • Marvell
    • Mitsubishi Electric
    • NEC
    • Nokia
    • OBN
    • PBN
    • Qualcomm Atheros
    • Raisecom
    • Source Photonics
    • Sun Telecom
    • Sumitomo Electric Networks
    • Tainet
    • ZTE

3.0. DSL Evolution

  • 3.1. Developments
  • 3.2. DSL Family
    • 3.2.1. ADSL
    • 3.2.2. R-ADSL
    • 3.2.3. HDSL
    • 3.2.4. IDSL
    • 3.2.5. VDSL
    • 3.2.6. SDSL
    • 3.2.7. Summary
  • 3.3. Vectored DSL-G.993.5-2010
    • 3.3.1. Scope
    • 3.3.2. Details
      • 3.3.2.1. Summary
      • 3.3.2.2. Broadband Forum Efforts
    • 3.3.3. Market
    • 3.3.4. Vendors
      • Adtran
      • Assia
      • Broadcom
      • Calix
      • Huawei
      • Intel/Lantiq
      • Nokia
      • Siligence
      • Zyxel
      • ZTE
  • 3.4. G.fast
    • 3.4.1. Standards
    • 3.4.2. Improvements over Vectoring
    • 3.4.3. Models-FTTdp
    • 3.4.4. Major Characteristics
    • 3.4.5. Testing and Trialing
    • 3.4.6. Market Considerations
    • 3.4.7. Industry
      • Adtran
      • Broadcom
      • Calix
      • Dasan Networks
      • Huawei
      • Metanoia
      • Nokia
      • Qualcomm/Ikonos
      • Sagemcom
      • Sckipio
      • XAVi
      • Zinwell
    • 3.4.8. Market

4.0. RFoG Technology Development

  • 4.1. Hybrid Fiber Coaxial (HFC) Technology
  • 4.2. RFoG Solution
    • 4.2.1. General
    • 4.2.2. Standardization
      • 4.2.2.1. Process
      • 4.2.2.2. Details
        • 4.2.2.2.1. ANSI/SCTE 174KKKKK 2010
        • 4.2.2.2.2. IEC
      • 4.2.2.3. Industry Needs
      • 4.2.2.4. Target
  • 4.3. Similarities and Differences (HFC and RFoG)
  • 4.4. RFoG Major Benefits and Issues
  • 4.5. Future Extensions-RF-PON
  • 4.6. Market Estimate
    • 4.6.1. Need
    • 4.6.2. Forecast
  • 4.7. RFoG Industry
    • Adtran
    • Arris
    • BKtel
    • Calix
    • Cisco
    • CTDI
    • Electroline
    • Emcore
    • PBN
    • Titan Photonics

5.0. Conclusions

  • Attachment 1: Vectoring DSL-related Patents Survey (2015-2017)
  • Attachment 2: NG-PON2-related Patents Survey (2015-2017)

List of Figures:

  • Figure 1: PON Reference Model
  • Figure 2: PON Details
  • Figure 3: PON Architecture Illustration
  • Figure 4: OLT Functional Block Diagram
  • Figure 5: ONU Functional Block Diagram
  • Figure 6: FSAN Roadmap
  • Figure 7: B-PON Frequency Arrangements
  • Figure 8: ITU Process
  • Figure 9: Functional Diagram-G.989 System
  • Figure 10: NG-PON2 Frequency Plan
  • Figure 11: GE-PON- 10GE-PON Scenario
  • Figure 12: 10GE-PON Spectrum Allocation
  • Figure 13: 802.3ca Time Schedule (as of June, 2017)
  • Figure 14: Price vs Wired Houses %
  • Figure 15: Estimate-PON Equipment Global Sales ($B)
  • Figure 16: Estimate-PON ONUs Global Sales ($B)
  • Figure 17: Estimate-xGPON Equipment Global Sales ($B)
  • Figure 18: PON Technology Geography-Major Regions (2017)
  • Figure 19: PON U.S. Providers (2017)
  • Figure 20: Estimate: U.S. PON Service Providers Revenue ($B)
  • Figure 21: Market Share (%)-Major Broadband Access Technologies (2017)
  • Figure 22: FEXT Illustration
  • Figure 23: Reference Model-Vectored System (ITU Rec. G.993.5)
  • Figure 24: Vectored DSL-Characteristics Improvement
  • Figure 25: Vectored DSL Channel
  • Figure 26: Estimate: Premises Passed -VDSL2-Global (Mil.)
  • Figure 27: Estimate: Global Shipments of Vectored VDSL2 Ports (Mil. units)
  • Figure 28: DPU-Illustration
  • Figure 29: G.fast Illustration
  • Figure 30: Illustration-G.fast Link Arrangements
  • Figure 31: Estimate: G.fast Chips Global Market (Bil. Units)
  • Figure 32: Estimate: G.fast Chips Market Size-Global (Bil. Units)
  • Figure 33: HFC Frequencies Assignment Illustration
  • Figure 34: RFoG Reference Architecture
  • Figure 35: ONU-R Block Diagrams
  • Figure 36: HFC and RFoG Illustration
  • Figure 37: RFoG and GE-PON Frequencies Allocation
  • Figure 38: Illustration: PON Overlay
  • Figure 39: Comparative Characteristics
  • Figure 40: Estimate: U.S. RFoG Equipment Sales ($B)
  • Figure 41: Estimate: U.S. RFoG Service Providers Revenue ($B)

List of Tables:

  • Table 1: G-PON Transmission Rates
  • Table 2: G.987 Family
  • Table 3: NG-PON2-Line Rates
  • Table 4: EFM Signaling Schemes
  • Table 5: Interfaces-10GE PON
  • Table 6: PONs Compared
  • Table 7: PON Service Scenarios
  • Table 8: DSL Family Evolution
  • Table 9: ADSL Characteristics
  • Table 10: Parameters
  • Table 11: Profiles
Back to Top