Cover Image
市場調查報告書

微電網控制:15家控制平台持有計劃開發業者/整合商公司的策略及實行評估

Microgrid Controls: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 15 Project Developers/Integrators with Controls Platforms

出版商 Navigant Research 商品編碼 336970
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 55 Pages; 22 Tables, Charts & Figures
訂單完成後即時交付
價格
Back to Top
微電網控制:15家控制平台持有計劃開發業者/整合商公司的策略及實行評估 Microgrid Controls: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 15 Project Developers/Integrators with Controls Platforms
出版日期: 2015年08月07日 內容資訊: 英文 55 Pages; 22 Tables, Charts & Figures
簡介

微電網市場對參與企業來說,以及未來方面的市場機會及成熟化問題,依然是個具有莫大可能性的市場。過去六年Navigant Research列出的企業數超過了50家公司,加入微電網領域的企業數正在持續增加。與此同時,公共事業企業也開始一反過去頑固排斥的微電網概念,而開始關注其商務模式及技術動向,並摸索改變傳統商務樣式的方法。連接電力網的微電網最大的特徵之一,是在停電及電壓低落時可由公共配電切換到私人電網。此外,還有一個特徵是整合分散型能源資源(DER),創違出更大的價值。

本報告涵蓋全球微電網控制市場,提供您15家保有控制平台的計劃開發業者/整合商相關資料,以Navigant Research獨家的Leaderboard手法來評估其策略和實行情形,排行榜,並介紹這些主要企業概要。

第1章 摘要整理

  • 市場簡介
  • Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid

第2章 市場概要

  • 市場定義
  • 市場發展推動因素
    • 電網的可靠性隱憂
    • 電網彈性主張
    • 柴油燃料成本的上升
    • 分散式再生能源整合的必要性的擴大
    • 智慧變頻器的發展
  • 市場發展阻礙因素
    • 對DER的意圖性孤島化現狀的排斥
    • 公共事業分離負載相關疑慮
    • 末數值化的微電網之可靠性和系統的優點
    • 未定義的公共事業商務案例
    • 資金籌措上的課題
  • 市場趨勢
    • 公共事業的微電網接收度的擴大
    • 微電網價值的收益化
    • 能源儲存技術的發展
    • 微電網控制設備的發展

第3章 Navigant Research Leaderboard

  • Navigant Research Leaderboard類別
    • 領導者
    • 競爭者 (競爭者)
    • 挑戰者 (挑戰者)
    • 追隨者 (追隨者)
  • Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid

第4章 企業排行榜

  • 企業排行榜相關注意事項
  • 領導者
    • Schneider Electric
    • Optimal Power Solutions
    • Princeton Power Systems
  • 競爭者
    • Siemens
    • Tecogen
    • Green Energy Corporation
    • ABB
    • Alstom Grid
    • GE Digital Energy
    • Blue Pillar
    • Emerson Network Power
    • Eaton
    • Lockheed Martin
    • 東芝
    • PowerSecure
  • 挑戰者
  • 追隨者

第5章 企業目錄

第6章 縮寫·簡稱清單

第7章 目錄

第8章 圖表清單

第9章 調查範圍·調查手法

  • 調查範圍
  • 資訊來源·調查手法
    • 供應商的選擇方法
    • 評級的標準
      • 批點的計算方法
    • 標準定義
      • 策略
      • 實行
目錄
Product Code: LB-MGC-15

Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 15 Project Developers/Integrators with Controls Platforms

The microgrid market is still wide open when it comes to market players and future opportunities for growth and maturation. Navigant Research has profiled more than 50 companies over the last 6 years, and the list of companies entering the microgrid space continues to grow. Meanwhile, utilities are shifting from staunch opposition to the concept of microgrids to curious investigations of business models and technology trends that portend to change the way they have traditionally done business.

One of the key compelling features of a grid-tied microgrid is its ability to separate and isolate itself from a utility's distribution system during brownouts or blackouts (its islanding ability). Another is its ability to integrate diverse distributed energy resources (DER) into clusters that can then provide greater value, such as integrating microgrid services into market operations. This is the focus of private investments in microgrids in mature economies. Under today's grid protocols, the vast majority of distributed generation (DG), whether renewable or fossil-fueled, must typically shut down during power outages, unless integrated with a transfer switch and/or energy storage device. As diverse DER make up a larger and larger percentage of the overall system's resource base, including this new functionality is emerging as a major selling point.

This ‘Navigant Research Leaderboard Report’ examines the strategy and execution of 15 project developers/integrators with microgrid controls platforms and rates them on 12 criteria. Using Navigant Research's proprietary Leaderboard methodology, vendors are profiled, rated, and ranked with the goal of providing industry participants with an objective assessment of these companies' relative strengths and weaknesses in the global microgrid controls market. All of the companies rated are positioned to emerge as market leaders, as no single company dominates this market.

Top 10 Vendors:

  • 1. Schneider Electric
  • 2. Siemens
  • 3. Optimal Power Solutions
  • 4. Princeton Power Systems
  • 5. Tecogen
  • 6. Green Energy Corp.
  • 7. ABB
  • 8. Alstom Grid
  • 9. GE Digital Energy
  • 10. Blue Pillar

Key Questions Addressed:

  • Who are the top 15 microgrid developers and systems integrators operating in global markets?
  • Which of these microgrid companies ranks highest in terms of strategy?
  • Which of these microgrid companies ranks highest in terms of project execution?
  • Who are the true market leaders?
  • Who are the contenders, and how do they differ among each other?

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1. Market Introduction
  • 1.2. The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1. Market Definition
  • 2.2. Market Drivers
    • 2.2.1. Grid Reliability Concerns
    • 2.2.2. Grid Resiliency Initiatives
    • 2.2.3. Rising Cost of Diesel Fuel
    • 2.2.4. Growing Need for Distributed Renewables Integration
    • 2.2.5. Smart Inverter Advances
  • 2.3. Market Barriers
    • 2.3.1. The Status Quo Resistance to Intentional Islanding of DER
    • 2.3.2. Utility Departing Load Concerns
    • 2.3.3. Unquantified Microgrid Reliability and System Benefits
    • 2.3.4. Utility Business Case Is Undefined
    • 2.3.5. Financing Challenges
  • 2.4. Market Trends
    • 2.4.1. Growing Utility Acceptance of Microgrids
    • 2.4.2. Monetizing Microgrid Value Streams
    • 2.4.3. Energy Storage Advances
    • 2.4.4. Microgrid Controller Advances

3. The Navigant Research Leaderboard

  • 3.1. The Navigant Research Leaderboard Categories
    • 3.1.1. Leaders
    • 3.1.2. Contenders
    • 3.1.3. Challengers
    • 3.1.4. Followers
  • 3.2. The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

  • 4.1. Company Rankings Caveats
  • 4.2. Leaders
    • 4.2.1. Schneider Electric
    • 4.2.2. Optimal Power Solutions
    • 4.2.3. Princeton Power Systems
  • 4.3. Contenders
    • 4.3.1. Siemens
    • 4.3.2. Tecogen
    • 4.3.3. Green Energy Corporation
    • 4.3.4. ABB
    • 4.3.5. Alstom Grid
    • 4.3.6. GE Digital Energy
    • 4.3.7. Blue Pillar
    • 4.3.8. Emerson Network Power
    • 4.3.9. Eaton
    • 4.3.10. Lockheed Martin
    • 4.3.11. Toshiba
    • 4.3.12. PowerSecure
  • 4.4. Challengers
  • 4.5. Followers

5. Company Directory

6. Acronym and Abbreviation List

7. Table of Contents

8. Table of Charts and Figures

9. Scope of Study and Methodology

  • 9.1. Scope of Study
  • 9.2. Sources and Methodology
    • 9.2.1. Vendor Selection
    • 9.2.2. Ratings Scale
      • 9.2.2.1. Score Calculations
    • 9.2.3. Criteria Definitions
      • 9.2.3.1. Strategy
      • 9.2.3.2. Execution

List of Charts and Figures

  • The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid
  • Microgrid Implementation Revenue by Region, World Markets: 2015-2024
  • Schneider Electric Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Optimal Power Solutions Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Princeton Power Systems Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Siemens Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Tecogen Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Green Energy Corporation Strategy and Execution Scores
  • ABB Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Alstom Grid Strategy and Execution Scores
  • GE Digital Energy Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Blue Pillar Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Emerson Network Power Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Eaton Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Lockheed Martin Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Toshiba Strategy and Execution Scores
  • PowerSecure Strategy and Execution Scores

List of Tables

  • Microgrid Implementation Revenue by Region, World Markets: 2015-2024
  • The Navigant Research Leaderboard Overall Scores
  • Vendor Scores
  • Vendor Scores on Strategy Criteria
  • Vendor Scores on Execution Criteria
Back to Top