首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
- English Japanese Korean
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 能源 > 燃料電池 > 主要電源用定置型燃料電池:17家主要製造業者的策略以及實踐評價
產業/市場分類
能源 (4218)
太陽光發電 (343)
石化燃料 (956)
風力發電 (173)
核能 (85)
智慧電網 (255)
發電設備 (1024)
電力市場 (428)
電池 (205)
綠色能源 (820)
燃料電池 (75)
UPS (61)
市場調查報告書

主要電源用定置型燃料電池:17家主要製造業者的策略以及實踐評價

Pike Pulse Report: Prime Power Fuel Cells - Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 17 Leading Prime Power Fuel Cell System Manufacturers

出版商 Pike Research
出版日期 2011年07月 商品編碼 204740
內容資訊 英文 41 Pages
價格
US $ 2800 PDF by E-mail (Basic License)
US $ 4200 PDF by E-mail (Enterprise License)


主要電源用定置型燃料電池:17家主要製造業者的策略以及實踐評價 是由出版商Pike Research在2011年07月所出版的。 這份英文市場調查報告書包含41 Pages 價格從美金2800起跳。

簡介

主要電源用定置型燃料電池的市場現在急遽成長中。提供住宅以外市場的商用產品的企業逐漸增加之中,商用產品導入者的關注隨之升高。住宅市場也不過晚了數個月,展望將來的數家企業在特定市場已經備好受到認可的產品。

本報告,調查分析主要電源用定置型燃料電池的17家主要製造業者,彙整市場參與策略、產品組合、合作、創新、到達範圍、市佔率、價格、持久力等12區分的評價、各家排名以及勢力圖、市場背景等,由下列摘要形式闡述。

第1章 報告摘要

第2章 市場概要

  • 市場定義
  • 市場動向
  • 市場成長牽引因子・阻礙因子

第3章 Pike Pulse

  • Pike電網
  • 企業排名
    • FuelCell Energy
    • UTC Power
    • Hydrogenics
    • POSCO Power
    • ClearEdge Power
    • Ceramic Fuel Cells
    • 富士電機
    • Panasonic, 東芝燃料電池系統, Eneos Celltech
    • Topsoe Fuel Cell
    • Bloom Energy
    • Intelligent Energy
    • Baxi Innotech
    • Ceres Power
    • Hexis
    • GS Fuel Cells

第4章 製造商檔案資料

  • 領導企業
    • FuelCell Energy(MCFC:美國)
  • 前段排名企業
    • UTC Power(PAFC:美國)
    • Hydrogenics(PEM:加拿大)
    • POSCO Power(MCFC, SOFC:韓國)
    • ClearEdge Power(HTPEM:美國)
    • Ceramic Fuel Cells(SOFC:澳洲/英國)
    • 富士電機(PAFC:日本)
    • Panasonic, 東芝燃料電池系統, Eneos Celltech(PEM:日本)
  • 挑戰企業
    • Topsoe Fuel Cell(SOFC:丹麥)
    • Bloom Energy(SOFC:美國)
    • Intelligent Energy(PEM:英國)
    • Baxi Innotech(PEM:德國)
    • Ceres Power(SOFC:英國)
    • Hexis(SOFC:英國)
    • GS Fuel Cells(PEM:韓國)
  • 追隨企業

第5章 企業名簿

圖表等

目錄

Abstract

The stationary fuel cell prime power market is experiencing rapid growth. With an increasing number of companies offering commercial products to the non-residential market, commercial adopters are demonstrating increased interest. The residential market is only a matter of months behind. In fact, a few forward looking companies already have fully certified products in the market in limited regions.

image1

Within this fluid, vibrant phase of market growth we are starting to see some new market trends appearing. These include the electrons or hardware business model where adopters lease or buy the stationary fuel cell prime power unit. The benefits of both vary depending on the adopter and, interestingly, the country in which the company is operating. In terms of geography, we have seen some companies developing a single country specific product, for example in the Japanese residential market. So although a company may be leading today, in terms of deployment, looking forward it could face significant barriers to entry for its product in other regions.

This Pike Research report evaluates 17 of the leading prime power station fuel cell developers and rates them on 12 criteria for strategy and execution, including go-to-market strategy, product portfolio, partnerships, innovation, reach, market share, pricing, and staying power. Using Pike Research' s proprietary Pike Pulse methodology, developers are profiled, rated, and ranked with the goal of providing industry participants with an objective assessment of these companies' relative strengths and weaknesses in the rapidly growing prime power stationary fuel cell market.

Top 17 Vendors:

  • 1. FuelCell Energy
  • 2. UTC Power
  • 3. Hydrogenics
  • 4. POSCO Power
  • 5. ClearEdge Power
  • 6. Ceramic Fuel Cells
  • 7. Fuji Electric
  • 8. Panasonic; Toshiba Fuel Cell Power; Eneos Celltech
  • 9. Topsoe Fuel Cell
  • 10. Bloom Energy
  • 11. Intelligent Energy
  • 12. Baxi Innotech
  • 13. Ceres Power
  • 14. Hexis
  • 15. GS Fuel Cells

Key Questions Addressed:

  • Who are the leading manufacturers of prime power stationary fuel cell systems?
  • What are the evolving business models and global company positioning?
  • Which companies are explorers and which are settlers, and why this is important?
  • Which companies potentially face large barriers to entry to market?
  • What business relationships are critical to long term success in the market?

Who needs this report?

  • Utilities
  • Prime power stationary fuel cell manufacturers
  • Energy companies
  • Government agencies
  • Investor community
  • Industry associations

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1 Market Definition
    • 2.1.1 Global Market for Prime Power
    • 2.1.2 Residential and Commercial
    • 2.1.3 Business Models
  • 2.2 Market Trends
    • 2.2.1 Explorers vs. Settlers
    • 2.2.2 Geography
    • 2.2.3 Cross-Border Deals
    • 2.2.4 Adoption Subsidies - Not R&D Funding
  • 2.3 Market Drivers
    • 2.3.1 Residential
    • 2.3.2 Commercial
      • 2.3.2.1 Grid Outages
      • 2.3.2.2 Policy and Legislation

3. The Pike Pulse

  • 3.1 Pike Pulse Grid
  • 3.2 Company Rankings
    • 3.2.1 FuelCell Energy
    • 3.2.2 UTC Power
    • 3.2.3 Hydrogenics
    • 3.2.4 POSCO Power
    • 3.2.5 ClearEdge Power
    • 3.2.6 Ceramic Fuel Cells
    • 3.2.7 Fuji Electric
    • 3.2.8 Panasonic, Toshiba Fuel Cell Power, and Eneos Celltech
    • 3.2.9 Topsoe Fuel Cell
    • 3.2.10 Bloom Energy
    • 3.2.11 Intelligent Energy
    • 3.2.12 Baxi Innotech
    • 3.2.13 Ceres Power
    • 3.2.14 Hexis
    • 3.2.15 GS Fuel Cells

4. Vendor Profiles

  • 4.1 Leaders
    • 4.1.1 FuelCell Energy (MCFC: United States)
  • 4.2 Contenders
    • 4.2.1 UTC Power (PAFC: United States)
    • 4.2.2 Hydrogenics (PEM: Canada)
    • 4.2.3 POSCO Power (MCFC, SOFC: South Korea)
    • 4.2.4 ClearEdge Power (HTPEM: United States)
    • 4.2.5 Ceramic Fuel Cells (SOFC: Australia/United Kingdom)
    • 4.2.6 Fuji Electric (PAFC: Japan)
    • 4.2.7 Panasonic/Toshiba Fuel Cell Power/Eneos Celltech (PEM: Japan)
  • 4.3 Challengers
    • 4.3.1 Topsoe Fuel Cell (SOFC: Denmark)
    • 4.3.2 Bloom Energy (SOFC: United States)
    • 4.3.3 Intelligent Energy (PEM: United Kingdom)
    • 4.3.4 Baxi Innotech (PEM: Germany)
    • 4.3.5 Ceres Power (SOFC: United Kingdom)
    • 4.3.6 Hexis (SOFC: United Kingdom)
    • 4.3.7 GS Fuel Cells (PEM: South Korea)
  • 4.4 Followers

5. Company Directory

6. Acronym and Abbreviation List

7. Table of Contents

8. Table of Charts and Figures

9. Methodology

  • 9.1 Scope of Study
  • 9.2 Sources and Methodology
    • 9.2.1 Vendor Selection
    • 9.2.2 Ratings Scale
      • 9.2.2.1 Score Calculations
    • 9.2.3 Criteria Definitions
      • 9.2.3.1 Strategy
      • 9.2.3.2 Execution

List of Charts and Figures

  • The Pike Pulse Grid
  • Fuel Cell Shipments by Application, World Markets: 2008-2010
  • Breakdown by Unit Size of Prime Power Fuel Cell Systems Being Developed by Companies Outlined in This Pike Pulse
  • The Pike Pulse Grid for Prime Power Fuel Cell Companies
  • The Pike Pulse Grid for Residential Prime Power Fuel Cell Companies
  • The Pike Pulse Grid for Commercial Prime Power Fuel Cell Companies
  • FuelCell Energy Pike Pulse Position
  • FuelCell Energy Strategy & Execution Scores
  • UTC Power Pike Pulse Position
  • UTC Power Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Hydrogenics Pike Pulse Position
  • Hydrogenics Strategy & Execution Scores
  • POSCO Power Pike Pulse Position
  • POSCO Power Strategy & Execution Scores
  • ClearEdge Power Pike Pulse Position
  • ClearEdge Power Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Ceramic Fuel Cells Pike Pulse Position
  • Ceramic Fuel Cells Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Fuji Electric Pike Pulse Position
  • Fuji Electric Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Panasonic Pike Pulse Position
  • Panasonic Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Toshiba Fuel Cell Power Pike Pulse Position
  • Toshiba Fuel Cell Power Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Eneos Celltech Pike Pulse Position
  • Eneos Celltech Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Topsoe Fuel Cell Pike Pulse Position
  • Topsoe Fuel Cell Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Bloom Energy Pike Pulse Position
  • Bloom Energy Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Intelligent Energy Pike Pulse Position
  • Intelligent Energy Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Baxi Innotech Pike Pulse Position
  • Baxi Innotech Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Ceres Power Pike Pulse Position
  • Ceres Power Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Hexis Pike Pulse Position
  • Hexis Strategy & Execution Scores
  • GS Fuel Cells Pike Pulse Position
  • GS Fuel Cells Strategy & Execution Scores
  • Percentage Change in Residential Energy Consumption: 1996-2006
  • Japanese Ten-Year Fuel Cell Roadmap

List of Tables

  • Vendor Overall Scores
  • Fuel Cell Shipments by Application, World Markets: 2008-2010
  • Breakdown by Unit Size of Prime Power Fuel Cell Systems Being Developed by Companies
  • Vendor Overall Scores
  • The Pike Pulse Grid for Residential Prime Power Fuel Cell Companies
  • The Pike Pulse Grid for Commercial Prime Power Fuel Cell Companies
  • Vendor Scores
  • Vendor Scores on Strategy Criteria
  • Vendor Scores on Execution Criteria

Press Release

FuelCell Energy與UTC Power在主力電源用燃料電池販售者評價中得到最高評價:取自Pike Research的最新調査

2011年07月29日

日商環球訊息股份有限公司開始販賣美國的調査公司Pike Research所發行的報告書「Pike Pulse Report: Prime Power Fuel Cells - Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 17 Leading Prime Power Fuel Cell System Manufacturers (主要電源用定置型燃料電池:17家主要製造業者的策略以及實踐評價)」。

主力電源用定置型燃料電池市場現已經急速成長了。對於前所未有的大量企業提供住宅以外市場用的產品,商用產品採用者也顯示了更強的興趣。Pike Research的最新調査結果中,FuelCell Energy與UTC Power兩家公司的主力電源用定置型燃料電池,在市場的初期階段中得到了最高評價。

「主力電源用定置型燃料電池市場在其成長軌道中也處於流動且充滿活力的局面」調査主任Kerry-Ann Adamson氏如此描述。「發展過程的如此重要的局面中,新市場傾向出現了。其中也包含了『電子還是硬體』這樣的商務模式(採用者以確保電力為主要目的,不買裝置而用租的,還是購買硬體,這樣的問題)。兩者的優點是利用者與企業因所在國家不同而不同。以地理上的觀點來說、許多企業針對像是日本的住宅市場等只在一國流通的特殊產品而進行開發。也因此現在的企業就算看來是以產品導入的觀點為主導,當要在其他地區導入自家產品時也會面臨不小的障礙。」

Adamson氏更說,FuelCell因為融合了明快的市場參加戰略、地理上的影響力、與其他企業的合作等事項,再加上降低成本的系統與大量生產,而能得到Pike Research調査中的最高評價。由於市場不總是要求高品質與大量生產,基於市場需求而強化製造的FuelCell之能力讓該企業佔有明確的優勢,Adamson氏如此描述。

Back to Top