|
|
|
市場調查報告書
美國商業・公共大樓的能源效率重整市場
Energy Efficiency Retrofits for Commercial and Public Buildings: Energy Savings Potential, Retrofit Business Cases, Financing Structures, Policy and Regulatory Factors, Demand Drivers by Segment, and Market Forecasts
|
美國商業・公共大樓的能源效率重整市場 是由出版商Pike Research在2010年07月所出版的。
這份英文市場調查報告書包含113 Pages 價格從美金3500起跳。
本報告,針對商業&公共大樓的能源重整市場的市場機會進行調查分析,並彙整現在市場的需求牽引因素、阻礙、產業動態、未來的發展情境、政策・法規動向、財務結構、商業案例、性能再驗證(Retro-Commissioning )的收益預測(∼2014年)、主要企業的檔案資料等,由下列摘要形式闡述。
第1章 報告摘要
- 簡介
- 節能的潛力
- 公共建築物的重整
- 民間建築物的重整
- 政策的建議
- 定義
第2章 市場的課題
第3章 能源效率相關產品・服務
- 簡介
- 財務面
- 成效式合約
- 購買・升級・售後回租
- PACE・匯票借貸
- 能源服務契約
- 文化面
- 軟體
- 需求反應
- 硬體
- 外觀結構與照明
- HVAC
- 屋內環境品質
- 共用建設的個別測量・即時監視&控制
- 耐久性
- 設計目標
第4章 主要產業企業
第5章 市場預測
- ESCO市場
- 建築物認證
- 潛在的能源效率重整市場
- 性能再驗證(Retro-Commissioning )
- 傳統的能源重整
- 政策的案例
- 訓練
- 情境
- 性能再驗證(Retro-Commissioning )與既有的建築物認證
- 傳統的能源重整
- 法律規範情境
第6章 企業指南
第7章 省略語等
圖表
Abstract
Several substantial, durable drivers are expanding the potential market for
energy efficiency retrofits in commercial buildings, which can provide energy
savings from 10% to more than 50%. In addition to cost savings, energy
retrofits are attractive for purposes of greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions,
energy independence, green branding, property valuation, and productivity.
However, the actual market is small compared to its potential, due to an
assortment of barriers within various industry segments.
The best-funded opportunities for energy retrofits today are major upgrades in
institutional buildings, especially in federal buildings. This market, already
strong because of federal policy mandates and creditworthiness, received a
boost from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). However, federal
non-industrial buildings comprise less than 3% of existing commercial space,
and the largest untapped potential is for energy retrofits in private
commercial buildings. Pike Research anticipates that the private retrofit
sector will experience strong growth through 2014 and beyond, especially as
several key market barriers are successfully overcome.
This Pike Research report analyzes the market opportunity for energy
efficiency retrofits of commercial and public buildings in the United States.
It provides a detailed examination of the market drivers, barriers, and
industry dynamics in today' s market, along with several scenarios for future
growth. The report includes an in-depth assessment of policy and regulatory
factors, financing structures, demand drivers by segment, retrofit business
cases, key industry players, and market forecasts.
Key questions addressed:
- Where are the biggest opportunities to save energy cost ( (which building
activities, regions, and owners)?
- How could federal and state legislation affect the energy efficiency
retrofit market?
- Which retrofit practices are most cost-effective and value-enhancing?
- What are the primary challenges and opportunities for energy ( efficiency
retrofits, for each market segment?
- What present and future best practices will address these challenges ( and
opportunities?
- What technologies, programs and policies will expand very rapidly in ( the
next 5 years?
Who needs this report?
- Energy Service Companies (ESCOs)
- Green building technology and materials providers
- Construction professionals
- Building owners and property managers
- Policy makers and policy analysts
- Academic institutions
- Government agencies
- Industry associations
- Nonprofit and advocacy groups
- Investor community
Report Statistics
- Pages: 113
- Tables, Charts, Figures: 81
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
- 1.1 Introduction
- 1.2 Energy Savings Potential
- 1.3 Retrofits in Public Buildings
- 1.4 Retrofits in Private Buildings
- 1.4.1 Building Retrofit Benefits
- 1.4.2 Cost-Effective GHG Reduction
- 1.4.3 Financial Barriers
- 1.4.4 Market Fragmentation
- 1.4.5 Economic Downturn and Oversupply of Commercial Space
- 1.5 Policy Recommendations
- 1.5.1 Overview
- 1.5.2 Federal Buildings
- 1.5.3 State Buildings
- 1.6 Definition of Commercial Buildings
2. Market Issues
- 2.1 Introduction
- 2.2 Demand Drivers
- 2.2.1 Energy Cost Reduction
- 2.2.2 Non-Energy Benefits to Owners and Tenants
- 2.2.2.1 Green Branding
- 2.2.2.1.1 LEED
- 2.2.2.1.2 Corporate Sustainability Reporting
- 2.2.2.2 Occupancy
- 2.2.2.3 Productivity
- 2.2.3 Awareness
- 2.2.4 Policy
- 2.2.4.1 Public Benefits
- 2.2.4.1.1 GHG Emissions, Carbon Footprint, Carbon Trading
- 2.2.4.1.2 Energy Independence
- 2.2.4.2 Public Energy Efficiency Promotion
- 2.2.4.2.1 Least Cost Procurement
- 2.2.4.3 Mandatory Energy Performance Disclosure
- 2.2.4.4 Building Codes
- 2.2.4.5 Utility Profits and Decoupling
- 2.2.4.6 U.S. Department of Energy
- 2.2.4.6.1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
- 2.2.4.6.2 Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Commercial Building
Energy Alliances
- 2.2.4.6.3 National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency
- 2.2.4.6.4 Commercial Building Partnerships
- 2.2.4.7 Regional Policies and Programs
- 2.2.4.7.1 New York City, PlaNYC 2030, Greener Greater Buildings
- 2.2.5 Appraisal and Valuation
- 2.3 Market Segmentation and Barriers
- 2.3.1 Centralized vs. Local Control in Each Segment
- 2.3.2 Market Segments, Building Activity, and Ownership
- 2.3.2.1 Introduction
- 2.3.2.2 Office
- 2.3.2.3 Education
- 2.3.2.3.1 K-12
- 2.3.2.3.2 LEED for Schools
- 2.3.2.3.3 Colleges and Universities
- 2.3.2.3.4 Challenges
- 2.3.2.3.5 Opportunities
- 2.3.2.4 Retail
- 2.3.2.5 Lodging
- 2.3.2.6 Healthcare
- 2.3.2.7 Food Sales and Services
- 2.3.2.8 Warehouse and Storage
- 2.3.2.9 Data Centers
- 2.3.3 Market Segments, Ownership
- 2.3.3.1 Credit Availability
- 2.3.3.2 Private Owner Occupied
- 2.3.3.3 Private Lease
- 2.3.3.4 Public
- 2.3.3.5 Federal Government
- 2.3.3.6 State and Local Government-Owned Facilities
- 2.3.4 Market Segments, Building Size
- 2.3.5 Market Segments, Building Age
- 2.3.6 Market Segments, Regional
- 2.3.7 Market Segments by Energy Use
- 2.3.8 Training
- 2.3.9 Summary
3. Energy Efficiency Products and Services
- 3.1 Introduction
- 3.2 Financial
- 3.2.1 Performance Contracting
- 3.2.2 Purchase-Upgrade-Leaseback
- 3.2.3 PACE and On-Bill Finance
- 3.2.4 Energy Services Agreements
- 3.3 Cultural
- 3.3.1 Changing Habits
- 3.3.2 Popularity: Energy Efficiency vs. Renewable Energy
- 3.4 Software
- 3.5 Demand Response
- 3.6 Hardware
- 3.6.1 Shell and Lighting
- 3.6.2 HVAC
- 3.6.3 Indoor Environmental Quality
- 3.6.4 Submeters and Real-Time Monitoring & Control
- 3.6.5 Durability
- 3.7 Design Targets
- 3.7.1 Introduction
- 3.7.2 Retro-Commissioning: 10% to 20% Savings
- 3.7.3 Conventional ESCO: 20% to 40% Savings
- 3.7.4 Integrated Design: 30% to 60% Savings
- 3.7.5 Net Zero Energy or Zero Energy Buildings: 40% to 90% Savings
4. Selected Industry Players
- 4.1 Introduction
- 4.2 CB Richard Ellis
- 4.3 Johnson Controls
- 4.4 Lime Energy
- 4.5 Aqua Products Company
- 4.6 Sunoptics Prismatic Skylights
- 4.7 Sonoma County Energy Independence Program
- 4.8 California Sustainability Alliance
5. Market Forecasts
- 5.1 ESCO Market
- 5.2 Building Certification
- 5.3 Potential Energy Efficiency Retrofit Market
- 5.3.1 Retro-Commissioning
- 5.3.2 Conventional Energy Retrofit
- 5.3.3 Policy Examples
- 5.3.3.1 Submeter College and University Campuses
- 5.3.3.2 Retrofit K-12 Schools for NZE
- 5.3.4 Training
- 5.4 Scenarios
- 5.4.1 Retro-commissioning and Existing Building Certification
- 5.4.2 Conventional Energy Retrofits
- 5.4.3 Legislation Scenario
6. Company Directory
7. Acronym and Abbreviation List
8. Table of Contents
9. Table of Charts and Figures
11. Scope of Study, Sources and Methodology, Notes
List of Charts and Figures
- Significance in Your Organization' s Energy Efficiency Decisions (Survey
Results)
- Longest Payback Period Allowed for a Significant Energy Efficiency
Investment
- Total Space by Sector: ENERGY STAR Rated vs. Not Rated
- ENERGY STAR Space by Sector: Labeled (Official Certification) vs. Not
Labeled
- Survey Respondents Who Consider Energy Efficiency a Priority
- Undergoing or Planning New Construction or Retrofits in the Next 12 Months
- Respondents Planning Energy Efficiency Investments in the Next 12 Months
- Buildings & Appliances Provide the Best Payoff for GHG Emission Reductions
- Energy Efficiency Resource Standards, 19 States
- States with Decoupling Legislation
- Commercial Space by Building Activity
- Energy Use by Commercial Buildings Built Before 2000, by Building Activity
- Energy Efficiency Capital Expenditures Planned in the Next 12 Months, by
Sector
- Energy Use in Office Buildings with Various ENERGY STAR Ratings
- K-12 Enrollment
- Post-Secondary Enrollment
- Government Space by Building Activity
- Total Area of Commercial Buildings by Size Category
- Number of Commercial Buildings by Size Category
- Planning Energy Efficiency Capital Expenditures in the Next 12 Months, by
Building Size
- Existing Space Constructed before 2000
- Commercial Building Space by Age and Principal Building Activity
- Energy Intensity (Primary) in California Commercial Buildings
- Energy Intensity (Delivered) in Commercial Buildings of Different Vintages
- Energy Expenditures in Commercial Buildings by State: 2006
- Annual Energy Expenditure in Commercial Buildings by State, Waterfall Chart
- Annual Energy Expenditure in Commercial Buildings by Use
- Top Barrier to Capturing Energy Savings for your Organization (Survey
Results)
- Frequency of Key Technologies in Buildings with Good vs. Low Performance
- Energy Efficiency Tools Implemented by Building Activity
- Percent of the Total Energy Cost in Commercial Buildings by Equipment
Category
- ESCO Annual Revenue for Energy Efficiency Retrofits in Commercial Buildings
- Certified New Construction & Major Renovation, ENERGY STAR & LEED-EBOM
- Retro-Commissioning Cost and Payback, by Building Use
- Potential Cost and Cost Savings to Retro-Commission all Buildings, by
Building Use
- Potential Cost and Cost Savings to Retrofit all Buildings, by Building Use
- Retro-Commissioning Revenue, 2009-2014
List of Tables
- Energy Savings and Payback from Energy Retrofits of Various Types
- Quantitative Overview of the Commercial Building Retrofit Market
- Quantitative Overview of the Commercial Building Retrofit Market, Part 2
- Principal Policies Supporting LEED-EB
- Focus of Energy Programs vs. Climate Programs
- Direct and Indirect Benefits of High Performance Buildings
- Anecdotal Benefits
- Sources for Tables 2.4 and 2.5
- Influences on Adoption of Sustainable Building Practices for Global
Corportations
- Increase in Building Space & Commerical Energy Intensity, from 1980 to 2010
- Energy Efficiency Drivers in Fifteen Leading States
- Overview of Green Campuses
- Food Sales and Services Centralization
- Government Space by Building Activity
- Energy Efficiency Retrofit Challenges and Opportunities, by Market Niche
- Total Space by Sector: ENERGY STAR Rated vs. Not Rated
- ENERGY STAR Space by Sector: Labeled (Official Certification) vs. Not
Labeled
- Commercial Space by Building Activity
- Energy Use by Commercial Buildings Built Before 2000, by Building Activity
- K-12 Enrollment, millions
- Post-Secondary Students Degree and Non-Degree
- Government Space by Building Activity
- Total Area of Commercial Buildings by Size Category
- Number of Commercial Buildings by Size Category
- Planning Energy Efficiency Capital Expenditures in the Next 12 Months, by
Building Size
- Profiles of Main Building Activity, When Constructed, BSF
- Commercial Building Space by Age and Principal Building Activity
- Energy Intensity (Primary) in California Commercial Buildings
- Commercial Delivered Energy Consumption Intensities, by Vintage
- Annual Energy Expenditure in Commercial Buildings by State
- Annual Energy Expenditure in Commercial Buildings by Use
- Smart Building Components
- Common Energy Efficiency Tools and Technologies, Organized by Cost
- Energy Savings and Payback from Energy Retrofits of Various Types
- Primary Techniques Used by Energy Retrofits of Various Types
- Energy Efficiency Tools Implemented by Building Activity
- Percent of Total Energy Load in Commercial Buildings by Equipment Category
- Sonoma County, California PACE Applications as of 3/2010
- ESCO Annual Revenue for Energy Efficiency Retrofits in Commercial Buildings
- Retro-Commissioning Cost and Payback, by Building Use
- Potential Cost and Cost Savings to Retro-Commission all Buildings, by
Building Use
- Potential Cost and Cost Savings to Retrofit all Buildings, by Building Use
- Retro-Commissioning Revenue, 2009-2014
|

|