美國的腹腔鏡裝置市場：2012年

美國的腹腔鏡裝置市場：2012年 是由出版商Millennium Research Group在2011年12月所出版的。 這份英文市場調查報告書價格從美金6995起跳。

簡介

美國的腹腔鏡裝置市場在過去數年呈現穩定成長。此趨勢透過預測對象期間，預料將與針對更廣泛適應症的極小侵入手術選項的人氣上昇同時持續。此外，也會有急速的技術創新與增加新穎度的腹腔鏡裝置的導入，進而創造更高成長率的市場。伴隨適應症的範圍擴大與相對應的技術多樣化，市場將會出現過去所沒有的各種產品、製造商、消費的情況。

本報告，探詢整體美國腹腔鏡裝置市場，在周全的預備調查上所獲得的基礎情報，彙整業界相關人士的直接採訪的檢證結果，由下列摘要形式闡述。

目錄

圖表一覽

報告摘要

第1章 臨床環境

• 背景
  • 膽囊・胰臟疾病
  • 疝氣
  • 盲腸炎
  • 胃食道逆流
  • 病態肥胖
  • 大腸直腸癌
  • 潰瘍性大腸炎
  • 克隆氏症
  • 前列腺癌
  • 良性前列腺肥大
  • 腎癌
  • 月經量過多
  • 纖維瘤
  • 子宮內膜異位症
  • 子宮頸癌
  • 卵巢癌
  • 子宮癌
  • 骨盆底鬆弛
• 治療法的概要
  • 技法別腹腔鏡手術
  • 手術形式別腹腔鏡手術
  • 競爭療法
  • 抬頭的競爭療法以及技術

第2章 產品

• 概要
  • 對象產品
• 內腔用裝置
  • 功能
  • 抬頭的新產品
• 直接能源裝置
  • 功能
  • 抬頭的新產品
• 通路裝置
  • 功能
  • 差異化特徵
• 胃束帶
  • 功能
• 手持設備
  • 功能
  • 差異化特徵
• 吸引・洗淨裝置
  • 功能
• 吹氣裝置
  • 功能
• 腹腔鏡裝置
  • 功能
• 手持輔助裝置
  • 功能
• 抬頭的新技術
  • 軟式腹腔鏡

第3章 臨床實驗

• 結束的臨床實驗
• 進行中的臨床實驗

第4章 品牌以及競爭分析

• 概要
  • 競爭概況
  • 詳述競爭環境
  • 市佔率
  • 近期動態
• 內腔用裝置市場
• 直接能源裝置市場
• 通路裝置市場
• 手持設備市場
• 胃束帶市場
• 吸引・洗淨裝置市場
• 吹氣裝置市場
• 腹腔鏡裝置市場
• 手持輔助裝置市場
• 單一切口裝置

第5章 治療法的將來展望

• 概要
  • 治療法概況
  • 詳述治療法
• 傳統型腹腔鏡手術
  • 一般外科手術
  • 肥胖手術
  • 大腸直腸手術
  • 泌尿器手術
  • 婦產科手術
• 單一切口腹腔鏡手術
• 機器人支援手術

第6章 市場展望

• 概要
  • 市場概況
  • 詳述市場狀況
• 內腔用裝置市場
• 直接能源裝置市場
• 通路裝置市場
• 手持設備市場
• 胃束帶市場
• 吸引・洗淨裝置市場
• 吹氣裝置市場
• 腹腔鏡装置市場
• 手持輔助裝置市場
• 單一切口裝置

附錄

目錄

Abstract

The US market for laparoscopic devices has been witnessing steady growth for many years. This trend will continue over the forecast period with the rising popularity of minimally invasive surgical treatment options for a broader variety of indications. Furthermore, the fast pace of innovation and adoption of certain newer laparoscopic devices will lead to particularly high rates of growth in some markets. For example, advanced energy and single-port laparoscopic devices are being used in an increasing number of procedures. Overall growth in the laparoscopic device markets will, however, be curtailed to a certain extent by continued commoditization, as well as the introduction of alternative treatments and devices for the more established product categories, such as internal closure devices and gastric bands. Larger competitors in the laparoscopic device markets are reacting to these trends by establishing a presence in multiple markets, ensuring the stability of sales from established product categories as well as growth from innovative premium-priced products. This is evidenced by the large number of new product launches in high-growth device markets, and through numerous acquisitions and alliances to broaden product portfolios as a whole. Smaller competitors have also been able to take advantage of the market potential by establishing niche positions for themselves through the development and marketing of high-end laparoscopic devices, positioning themselves to take advantage of strong growth that will characterize these markets over the forecast period.

METHODOLOGY

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This report uses a number of methodologies to gather and present data and analysis. At the outset, a large survey of secondary sources is conducted. These sources act as the basis for the primary research stage, which builds and enhances the quantitative and qualitative attributes of the early research.

Secondary sources include

• Government sources:
  • Securities and Exchange Commission filings
  • Food and Drug Administration and patent filings
  • National Center for Health Statistics data
  • Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services
  • US Census Bureau
  • US Economic Research Service International Macroeconomic Data Set
• Laparoscopic device manufacturers:
  • Annual reports, product brochures, corporate profiles, etc.
• Internal databases and reports:
  • Procedure Finder National Trending
  • Previous reports on similar/related sources
  • Decision Resources Group's PatientBase database
• General Internet searches, medical literature, and newspaper/magazine searches:
  • Identifying various centers of specialization and articles that might provide leads for primary research

The secondary research stage builds the foundation for the primary research.

The primary research methodology has four steps:

Step 1: The first step involves an impartial scan of all the information gathered during the secondary research stage to determine its utility based on the specific requirements of this report. Each piece of information is either discarded or marked as high- or low-priority and then organized appropriately as determined by the structure and sectioning of the report.

Step 2: At this stage, early assumptions are formed as to the implications of the information for the various laparoscopic device market segments. These assumptions are then used to determine hypotheses using both inductive and deductive approaches. On the quantitative front, these hypotheses result in full historical and projected market data sets (market sizes - unit sales, average selling prices [ASPs], and revenues - as well as market shares).

Step 3: At this stage, the research is in position for its most important primary phase - expert interviews. Throughout the secondary research phase, industry and medical experts are identified. These experts are then contacted by telephone and asked to participate in interviews on recent trends and developments in the industry. Interviews are either conducted at the time of the initial call or scheduled at the convenience of the expert. Interview questions are tailored to the expertise of each particular interviewee, although in most cases, the most important questions are asked of all experts.

The questions are largely based on the assumptions and hypotheses developed in Step 2, which are then augmented, discarded, or adjusted based on the views and positions put forth. Attempts are made, whenever possible, to cross-check the views of various experts against each other and to reach positions of consensus on issues and market numbers.

In addition, a sample of relevant physicians were interviewed. Physicians are asked to comment on various issues/trends, both in their own practice and in the overall market. The responses provided are then used to strengthen or augment the assumptions and hypotheses developed during the primary research phase.

Step 4: The final stage of primary research involves individual and group analysis by Millennium Research Group. All research results are assessed and cross-checked thoroughly to determine their validity, relevance, and weight. From this process, qualitative conclusions are reached and data points finalized.

FORECAST METHODOLOGY

In addition to the research methodology outlined above, the following “bottom-up” methodology is used to develop forecast assumptions for the report.

A comprehensive breakdown of various laparoscopic device procedures and unit sales is prepared using data from several sources, including professional associations, government statistics, and private research/media sources. Industry experts and practitioners are consulted to ensure accuracy and verify observed trends. As a cross-check, total industry revenues available through annual reports and other sources are compared against modeled industry revenues.

Using the best estimates of industry experts, practitioners, private research/media sources, and inhouse experts, year-by-year growth rates and ASPs are applied individually to each subcategory to derive forecasts. These estimates are cross-checked by industry experts (marketing managers, product managers, CEOs, etc.) and further refined.

Overall findings are compared against market and procedure forecasts published by other sources to ensure reasonable estimates.

Companies mentioned in this report:

• Advanced Surgical Concepts
• Aesculap (a subsidiary of B. Braun)
• Allergan
• Apollo Endosurgery
• Apple Medical (acquired by CooperSurgical)
• Applied Medical
• Aragon Surgical (acquired by Aesculap)
• Ascent Healthcare Solutions (a subsidiary of Stryker)
• BaroSense
• BioEnterics
• Cambridge Endo
• Cardinal Health
• Conceptus
• ConMed Linvatec
• Covidien
• Davol (a subsidiary of C. R. Bard)
• DeRoyal
• Domain Surgical
• EndoGastric Solutions
• ERBE
• Ethicon Endo-Surgery
• Fujinon
• GENICON
• GI Dynamics
• KARL STORZ
• LSI Solutions
• Microline Surgical
• Novare Surgical Systems (acquired)
• Olympus/Gyrus-ACMI
• Pare Surgical
• PEAK Surgical
• Ranfac
• Richard Wolf
• Salient Surgical Technologies (acquired by Medtronic)
• Satiety
• Smith & Nephew
• Solos Endoscopy
• SterilMed (acquired by Ethicon Endo-Surgery)
• Stryker
• Surgical Innovations
• Teleflex Medical
• TransEnterix
• ValenTx

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.0. CLINICAL LANDSCAPE

• 1.1. Background
  • 1.1.1. Gallbladder/Pancreatic Disease
  • 1.1.2. Hernias
  • 1.1.3. Appendicitis
  • 1.1.4. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
  • 1.1.5. Morbid Obesity
  • 1.1.6. Colorectal Cancer
  • 1.1.7. Ulcerative Colitis
  • 1.1.8. Crohn's Disease
  • 1.1.9. Prostate Cancer
  • 1.1.10. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • 1.1.11. Kidney Cancer
  • 1.1.12. Menorrhagia
  • 1.1.13. Fibroids
  • 1.1.14. Endometriosis
  • 1.1.15. Cervical Cancer
  • 1.1.16. Ovarian Cancer
  • 1.1.17. Uterine Cancer
  • 1.1.18. Pelvic Organ Prolapse
• 1.2 Procedure Overview
  • 1.2.1. Laparoscopic Device Procedures by Technique
    • 1.2.1.1. Single-Port Laparoscopy
    • 1.2.1.2. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy
  • 1.2.2. Laparoscopic Device Procedures by Procedure Type
    • 1.2.2.1. General Surgical Procedures
    • 1.2.2.2. Bariatric Procedures
    • 1.2.2.3. Colorectal Procedures
    • 1.2.2.4. Urological Procedures
    • 1.2.2.5. Gynecological Procedures
  • 1.2.3. Competing Treatments
    • 1.2.3.1. Open Surgery
    • 1.2.3.2. Robotic-Assisted Surgery
    • 1.2.3.3. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery
    • 1.2.3.4. Transcervical Female Sterilization
    • 1.2.3.5. Female Sterilization via Mini-Laparotomy
  • 1.2.4. Emerging Competing Treatments and Technologies
    • 1.2.4.1. Bariatric NOTES
    • 1.2.4.2. Alternative Obesity Treatments
• 1.3. Reimbursement Guidelines
• 1.4. Country Overview
  • 1.4.1. Demographics and Economy
  • 1.4.2. Health Care System
  • 1.4.3. Regulatory Environment

2.0 PRODUCTS

• 2.1. Overview
  • 2.1.1. Products Covered
• 2.2. Internal Closure Devices
  • 2.2.1. Functions
    • 2.2.1.1. Endolinear Staplers and Cutters
    • 2.2.1.2. Clip Appliers
    • 2.2.1.3. Endosuturing Devices
    • 2.2.1.4. Endostaplers
  • 2.2.2. Emerging Products
• 2.3. Direct Energy Devices
  • 2.3.1. Functions
    • 2.3.1.1. Advanced Energy Devices
    • 2.3.1.2. Standard Bipolar Energy Devices
  • 2.3.2. Emerging Products
• 2.4. Access Devices
  • 2.4.1. Functions
  • 2.4.2. Differentiating Features
• 2.5. Gastric Bands
  • 2.5.1. Functions
• 2.6. Hand Instruments
  • 2.6.1. Functions
  • 2.6.2. Differentiating Features
• 2.7. Suction/Irrigation Devices
  • 2.7.1. Functions
    • 2.7.1.1. Disposable Suction/Irrigation Kits
    • 2.7.1.2. Reusable Suction/Irrigation Tips
    • 2.7.1.3. Suction/Irrigation Pumps
• 2.8. Insufflation Devices
  • 2.8.1. Functions
• 2.9. Laparoscopes
  • 2.9.1. Functions
    • 2.9.1.1. Rod Lens Laparoscopes
    • 2.9.1.2. Video Laparoscopes
• 2.10. Hand-Assist Devices
  • 2.10.1. Functions
• 2.11. Emerging Technologies
  • 2.11.1. Flexible Laparoscopy

3.0. CLINICAL TRIALS

• 3.1. Completed Clinical Trials
• 3.2. Ongoing Clinical Trials

4.0. BRANDS AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

• 4.1. Overview
  • 4.1.1. Competitive Snapshot
  • 4.1.2. Detailed Competitive Landscape
  • 4.1.3. Market Shares
  • 4.1.4. Recent Events
• 4.2. Internal Closure Device Market
  • 4.2.1. Competitive Snapshot
  • 4.2.2. Current Market Shares
• 4.3. Direct Energy Device Market
  • 4.3.1. Competitive Snapshot
  • 4.3.2. Current Market Shares
• 4.4. Access Device Market
  • 4.4.1. Competitive Snapshot
  • 4.4.2. Current Market Shares
• 4.5. Hand Instrument Market
  • 4.5.1. Competitive Snapshot
  • 4.5.2. Current Market Shares
• 4.6. Gastric Band Market
  • 4.6.1. Competitive Snapshot
  • 4.6.2. Current Market Shares
• 4.7. Suction/Irrigation Device Market
  • 4.7.1. Competitive Snapshot
  • 4.7.2. Current Market Shares
• 4.8. Insufflation Device Market
  • 4.8.1. Competitive Snapshot
  • 4.8.2. Current Market Shares
• 4.9. Laparoscope Market
  • 4.9.1. Competitive Snapshot
  • 4.9.2. Current Market Shares
• 4.10. Hand-Assist Device Market
  • 4.10.1. Competitive Snapshot
  • 4.10.2. Current Market Shares
• 4.11. Single-Port Device Market
  • 4.11.1. Competitive Snapshot
  • 4.11.2. Current Market Shares

5.0. PROCEDURE OUTLOOK

• 5.1. Overview
  • 5.1.1. Procedure Snapshot
  • 5.1.2. Detailed Procedure Overview
• 5.2. Traditional Laparoscopic Procedures
  • 5.2.1. General Surgical Procedures
    • 5.2.1.1. Cholecystectomies
    • 5.2.1.2. Hernia Repairs
    • 5.2.1.3. Appendectomies
    • 5.2.1.4. Antireflux Surgeries
  • 5.2.2. Bariatric Procedures
    • 5.2.2.1. Gastric Banding
    • 5.2.2.2. Gastric Bypass
    • 5.2.2.3. Sleeve Gastrectomies
  • 5.2.3. Colorectal Procedures
    • 5.2.3.1. Bowel Resections
  • 5.2.4. Urological Procedures
    • 5.2.4.1. Prostatectomies
    • 5.2.4.2. Nephrectomies
  • 5.2.5. Gynecological Procedures
    • 5.2.5.1. Female Sterilizations
    • 5.2.5.2. Hysterectomies
• 5.3. Single-Port Laparoscopic Procedures
• 5.4. Robotic-Assisted Procedures

6.0. MARKET OUTLOOK

• 6.1. Overview
  • 6.1.1. Market Snapshot
  • 6.1.2. Detailed Market Overview
• 6.2. Internal Closure Device Market
  • 6.2.1. Market Snapshot
  • 6.2.2. Detailed Market Overview
• 6.3. Direct Energy Device Market
  • 6.3.1. Market Snapshot
  • 6.3.2. Detailed Market Overview
• 6.4. Access Device Market
  • 6.4.1. Market Snapshot
  • 6.4.2. Detailed Market Overview
• 6.5. Hand Instrument Market
  • 6.5.1. Market Snapshot
  • 6.5.2. Detailed Market Overview
• 6.6. Gastric Band Market
  • 6.6.1. Market Snapshot
  • 6.6.2. Detailed Market Overview
• 6.7. Suction/Irrigation Device Market
  • 6.7.1. Market Snapshot
  • 6.7.2. Detailed Market Overview
• 6.8. Insufflation Device Market
  • 6.8.1. Market Snapshot
  • 6.8.2. Detailed Market Overview
• 6.9. Laparoscope Market
  • 6.9.1. Market Snapshot
  • 6.9.2. Detailed Market Overview
• 6.10. Hand-Assist Device Market
  • 6.10.1. Market Snapshot
  • 6.10.2. Detailed Market Overview
• 6.11. Laparoscopic Single-Port Device Market
  • 6.11.1. Market Snapshot

APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY

APPENDIX B: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS

APPENDIX C: BIBLIOGRAPHY

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

• Figure 1: Laparoscopic Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 1: Laparoscopic Device Market Landscape, US (US$), 2011 and 2016
• Table 2: Laparoscopic Device Market Leaders, by Product Type and Revenue, US, 2011
• Table 3: Promising Emerging Technologies in the Laparoscopic Device Market, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 4: Expected Key Events in the Laparoscopic Device Market, US, 2012 - 2016
• Table 5: Factors Impacting the Laparoscopic Device Market, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 6: Companies Mentioned in This Report
• Table 7: Key Report Updates, 2012 XVI

1.0 CLINICAL LANDSCAPE

• Table 8: Major Types of POP
• Table 9: Key Health and Economic Indicators, US, 2011

2.0 PRODUCTS

• Table 10: Laparoscopic Device Market, by Product Type, US
• Table 11: Internal Closure Device Functions, by Product Type
• Table 12: Advantages of Endolinear Stapler-Cutters Differentiating Features
• Table 13: Clip Applier Advantages and Disadvantages, by Material
• Table 14: Emerging Products in the Internal Closure Device Market, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 15 Direct Energy Devices Functions, by Product Type
• Table 16: Emerging Products for the Direct Energy Device Market, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 17: Features of Access Devices, by Product Feature
• Table 18: Functions and Applications of Hand Instruments, by Product Type
• Table 19: Advantages and Disadvantages of Hand Instruments, by Product Type
• Table 20: Functions and Applications of Insufflation Devices, by Product Type
• Table 21: Emerging Technologies in Development for the Laparoscopic Device Market, US, 2011 - 2016

3.0 CLINICAL TRIALS

• Table 22: Summary of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass vs. LAP-BAND for Treatment of Morbid Obesity Study
• Table 23: Summary of NOTES
• Table 24: Summary of Tri Staple Technology Stapler Used in Gastric Bypass Study
• Table 25: Summary of EnSeal Efficacy and Bursting Pressure in Human Vessels Study
• Table 26: Summary of 5 Year Post-Approval Study with the REALIZE Adjustable Gastric Band
• Table 27: Summary of Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) Registry Study for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

4.0 BRANDS AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

• Table 28: Leading Competitors in the Laparoscopic Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 29: Recent Events in the Laparoscopic Device Market, US, 2011
• Table 30: Leading Competitors in the Internal Closure Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 31: Leading Competitors in the Direct Energy Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 32: Leading Competitors in the Disposable Direct Energy Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 33: Leading Competitors in the Reusable Direct Energy Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 34: Leading Competitors in the Access Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 35: Leading Competitors in the Disposable Access Device Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 36: Leading Competitors in the Hand Instrument Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 37: Leading Competitors in the Gastric Band Market, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 38: Leading Competitors in the Suction/Irrigation Device Market, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 39: Leading Competitors in the Insufflation Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 40: Leading Competitors in the Laparoscope Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 41: Leading Competitors in the Hand-Assist Device Market, as a % of Total, US, 2011
• Table 42: Leading Competitors in the Single-Port Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011

5.0 PROCEDURE OUTLOOK

• Figure 2: Laparoscopic Procedures, by Procedure Type, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 43: Total Procedures, by Approach, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 44: Total Procedures, by Procedure Type and Procedure Subtype, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 45: Total Procedure Growth, by Procedure Type and Procedure Subtype, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 46: Total Procedures, by Procedure Type and Procedure Subtype, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 47: Laparoscopic Penetration, by Procedure Type and Procedure Subtype, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 48: Laparoscopic Procedures, by Procedure Type and Procedure Subtype, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 49: Laparoscopic Procedure Growth, by Procedure Type and Procedure Subtype, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 50: Laparoscopic Procedures, by Procedure Type and Procedure Subtype, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 51: Prostatectomies, by Technique, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 52: Hysterectomies, by Technique, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 53: Minimally Invasive Procedures, by Procedure Type, US, 2010 - 2016

6.0 MARKET OUTLOOK

• Figure 3: Laparoscopic Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011 and 2016
• Table 54: Factors Impacting the Laparoscopic Device Market, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 55: Laparoscopic Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Figure 4: Internal Closure Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 56: Internal Closure Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 57: Internal Closure Device Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 58: Internal Closure Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
• Figure 5: Direct Energy Device Units, by Product Type, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 59: Direct Energy Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 60: Advanced Energy Device Market, by Durability, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 61: Advanced Energy Device Market Growth, by Durability, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 62: Advanced Energy Device Market, by Durability, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 63: Standard Bipolar Device Market, by Durability, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 64: Standard Bipolar Device Market Growth, by Durability, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 65: Standard Bipolar Device Market, by Durability, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 66: Reprocessed Direct Energy Device Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Figure 6: Access Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 67: Access Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 68: Access Device Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 69: Access Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 70: Disposable Access Device Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 71: Disposable Access Device Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 72: Disposable Access Device Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
• Figure 7: Hand Instrument Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 73: Hand Instrument Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 74: Disposable Hand Instrument Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 75: Reusable Hand Instrument Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 76: Reposable Hand Instrument Market, by Component, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 77: Reposable Hand Instrument Market Growth, by Component, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 78: Reposable Hand Instrument Market, by Component, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 79: Articulating Hand Instrument Market, by Product Feature, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 80: Articulating Hand Instrument Market Growth, by Product Feature, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 81: Articulating Hand Instrument Market, by Product Feature, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
• Figure 8: Gastric Band Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 82: Gastric Band Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Figure 9: Suction/Irrigation Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 83: Suction/Irrigation Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 84: Disposable Suction/Irrigation Kit Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 85: Disposable Suction/Irrigation Kit Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 86: Disposable Suction/Irrigation Kit Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, 2010 - 2016
• Table 87: Reusable Suction/Irrigation Tip Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 88: Reusable Suction/Irrigation Tip Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 89: Reusable Suction/Irrigation Tip Market Growth, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
• Table 90: Suction/Irrigation Pump Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Figure 10: Insufflation Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 91: Insufflation Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 92: Insufflation Device Market Growth, by Product Type, US, 2011 - 2016
• Table 93: Insufflation Device Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010 - 2016
• Figure 11: Laparoscope Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, US, 2011 and 2016
• Table 94: Laparoscope Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 95: Rod Lens Laparoscope Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 96: Video Laparoscope Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Figure 12: Hand-Assist Device Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 97: Hand-Assist Device Market, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Figure 13: Laparoscopic Single-Port Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016
• Table 98: Single-Port Device Market, by Product Type, US (US$), 2010 - 2016

APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY

• Table 99: ICD-9-CM Procedure Codes and Descriptions

APPENDIX B: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS

• MRG Acronyms and Initialisms

APPENDIX C: BIBLIOGRAPHY

相關商品