首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
- English Japanese Korean
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 醫療設備 > 整形外科 > 亞太地區的脊椎移植市場
產業/市場分類
醫療設備 (4528)
內視鏡檢查設備 (158)
分子呈像/呈影劑 (28)
心血管設備 (335)
可拋式醫學設備 (76)
核子醫學 (80)
病患監測 (382)
眼科設備 (102)
傷口護理 (159)
超音波 (54)
齒科設備 (174)
導管 (232)
整形外科 (335)
醫學影像診斷 (414)
體外診斷設備 (476)
CT/MRI/X光 (172)
e保健 (321)
市場調查報告書

亞太地區的脊椎移植市場

Asia Pacific Markets for Spinal Implants

出版商 Millennium Research Group
出版日期 2011年12月 商品編碼 225661
內容資訊 英文  
價格
US $ 6995 Web Access and PDF Download (Single user license)
US $ 10500 Web Access and PDF Download (Corporate use license)


亞太地區的脊椎移植市場 是由出版商Millennium Research Group在2011年12月所出版的。 這份英文市場調查報告書價格從美金6995起跳。

簡介

亞太地區的脊椎移植市場雖然在高齡化下持續成長,但也受到該地區的醫療費縮減負面影響。尤其是日本、韓國由於補助大量縮減,而威脅到整體收益。

本報告提供亞太地區的脊椎移植市場相關分析,彙整臨床環境,產品概要,品牌概要與競爭趨勢,市場資料分析,為您概述為以下內容。

摘要整理

第1章 臨床環境

  • 適應
    • 背景
    • 脊髓退化變形
    • 脊髓畸形障礙
    • 外傷·腫瘤脊椎障礙
  • 診斷和轉診模式
  • 治療概要
    • 脊椎移植治療
    • 治療方法的競爭
  • 各國概要
    • 澳洲
    • 日本
    • 韓國
      • 人口統計與經濟
      • 醫療制度
      • 法律制度
      • 製造與流通
  • 第2章 設備
  • 概要
    • 需要的設備
    • 差異化特性
  • 脊椎固定移植
    • 功能
    • 差異化特性
    • 臨床證據
    • 認證的適應
  • 脊椎非固定移植
    • 功能
    • 差異化特性
    • 臨床證據
    • 認證的適應

第3章 品牌及競爭分析

  • 概要
    • 競爭概要
    • 市場佔有率
    • 近幾年的活動
    • 持續中臨床實驗
  • 澳洲的脊椎移植市場
  • 日本的脊椎移植市場
  • 韓國的脊椎移植市場

第4章 持續中臨床實驗和新興產品

  • 持續中臨床實驗
  • 新興產品

第5章 亞太地區市場預測

  • 概要
  • 傳統的胸腰椎移植市場
  • 傳統的頸椎移植市場
  • 身體間設備市場
  • 脊椎非固定技術市場

第6章 澳洲市場預測

第7章 日本市場預測

第8章 韓國市場預測

附錄A:調查方法

附錄B:用語

附錄C:參考資訊

圖表

目錄

Abstract

The Asia Pacific spinal implant market comprises spinal fusion implants and spinal nonfusion technologies sold in Australia, Japan, and South Korea. The market continues to be driven primarily by the aging population; however, it has been negatively affected by efforts to reduce health care spending in the Asia Pacific. Most notably, these efforts have resulted in significant reductions in reimbursement in Japan and South Korea, thereby curbing average selling prices and overall revenues. In the Asia Pacific, regulatory systems vary from country to country. The Japanese system is most noted for its stringent regulations, which will curb innovation and growth in the spinal nonfusion technology segment, where products are typically developed by smaller companies that may not be able to afford the time and cost involved to attain regulatory approval in Japan. This will have an overall negative impact on the market potential in the Asia Pacific. Despite some of the challenges that exist, the Asia Pacific spinal implant market will grow modestly over the forecast period.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This report uses a number of methodologies to gather and present data and analysis. At the outset, a large survey of secondary sources is conducted. These sources act as the basis for the primary research stage, which builds and enhances the quantitative and qualitative attributes of the early research.

Secondary sources include

  • Government sources:
    • Australian Government Department of Health and Aging
    • Korean Food and Drug Administration
    • Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare Japan
    • Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Japan
    • US Census Bureau
    • US Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Spinal implant companies:
    • Annual reports, product brochures, corporate profiles, etc.
  • Internal databases and reports:
    • Previous reports on similar/related sources
  • General Internet searches, medical literature, and newspaper/magazine searches:
    • Identifying various centers of specialization and articles that might provide leads for primary research

The secondary research stage builds the foundation for the primary research.

The primary research methodology has four steps:

Step 1: The first step involves an impartial scan of all the information gathered during the secondary research stage to determine its utility based on the specific requirements of this report. Each piece of information is either discarded or marked as high- or low-priority and then organized appropriately as determined by the structure and sectioning of the report.

Step 2: At this stage, early assumptions are formed as to the implications of the information for the various spinal implant market segments. These assumptions are then used to determine hypotheses using both inductive and deductive approaches. On the quantitative front, these hypotheses result in full historical and projected market data sets (market sizes - unit sales, average selling prices [ASPs], and revenues - as well as market shares).

Step 3: At this stage, the research is in position for its most important primary phase - expert interviews. Throughout the secondary research phase, industry and medical experts are identified.

These experts are then contacted by telephone and asked to participate in interviews on recent trends and developments in the industry. Interviews are either conducted at the time of the initial call or scheduled at the convenience of the expert. Interview questions are tailored to the expertise of each particular interviewee, although in most cases, the most important questions are asked of all experts.

The questions are largely based on the assumptions and hypotheses developed in Step 2, which are then augmented, discarded, or adjusted based on the views and positions put forth. Attempts are made, whenever possible, to cross-check the views of various experts against each other and to reach positions of consensus on issues and market numbers.

Step 4: The final stage of primary research involves individual and group analysis by Millennium Research Group. All research results are assessed and cross-checked thoroughly to determine their validity, relevance, and weight. From this process, qualitative conclusions are reached and data points finalized.

FORECAST METHODOLOGY

In addition to the research methodology outlined above, the following “bottom-up” methodology is used to develop forecast assumptions for the report.

A comprehensive breakdown of various spinal implant procedures and unit sales is prepared using data from several sources, including professional associations, government statistics, and private research/media sources. Industry experts and practitioners are consulted to ensure accuracy and verify observed trends. As a cross-check, total industry revenues available through annual reports and other sources are compared against modeled industry revenues.

Using the best estimates of industry experts, practitioners, private research/media sources, and inhouse experts, year-by-year growth rates and ASPs are applied individually to each subcategory to derive forecasts. These estimates are cross-checked by industry experts (marketing managers, product managers, CEOs, etc.) and further refined.

Overall findings are compared against market and procedure forecasts published by other sources to ensure reasonable estimates.

Companies mentioned in this report:

  • Aesculap
  • Australian Surgical Innovations
  • Biomet Spine
  • BK MEDITECH
  • Centinel Spine
  • DePuy Spine
  • Device Technologies Australia
  • Global Orthopaedic Technology
  • GS Medical
  • Inion Oy
  • Japan Medical Dynamic Marketing
  • Japan Medical Materials
  • Korea Bone Bank
  • LDR Spine
  • LifeHealthcare
  • Medtronic Spinal & Biologics
  • Medyssey
  • Mizuho Medical
  • National Surgical Corporation
  • NuVasive
  • Orthotech Orthopaedic Group
  • Paradigm Spine
  • Peter-Brehm
  • Scient'x - Alphatec Spine
  • Shinwoo Medical
  • Showa Ika Kohgyo (acquired by Century Medical)
  • Soelim International
  • Solco Biomedical
  • Stryker Spine
  • Surgical House
  • Synthes Spine
  • Tokibo (distributes for Eurosurgical)
  • U&I
  • Zimmer Spine

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.0. CLINICAL LANDSCAPE

  • 1.1. Indications
    • 1.1.1. Background
    • 1.1.2. Degenerative Spinal Disorders
      • 1.1.2.1. Herniated Disc
      • 1.1.2.2. Osteoarthritis
      • 1.1.2.3. Osteoporosis
      • 1.1.2.4. Rheumatoid Arthritis
      • 1.1.2.5. Spinal Stenosis
      • 1.1.2.6. Spondylosis
      • 1.1.2.7. Spondylolisthesis
    • 1.1.3. Deformity Spinal Disorders
      • 1.1.3.1. Scoliosis
      • 1.1.3.2. Lordosis
      • 1.1.3.3. Kyphosis
    • 1.1.4. Trauma/Tumor Spinal Disorders
  • 1.2. Diagnosis and Referral Patterns
  • 1.3. Procedure Overview
    • 1.3.1. Spinal Implant Procedures
    • 1.3.2. Competing Treatments
  • 1.4. Guidelines
  • 1.5. Country Overviews
    • 1.5.1. Australia
      • 1.5.1.1. Demographics and Economy
      • 1.5.1.2. Health Care System
      • 1.5.1.3. Regulatory Environment
      • 1.5.1.4. Manufacturing and Distribution
    • 1.5.2. Japan
      • 1.5.2.1. Demographics and Economy
      • 1.5.2.2. Health Care System
      • 1.5.2.3. Regulatory Environment
      • 1.5.2.4. Manufacturing and Distribution
    • 1.5.3. South Korea
      • 1.5.3.1. Demographics and Economy
      • 1.5.3.2. Health Care System
      • 1.5.3.3. Regulatory Environment
      • 1.5.3.4. Manufacturing and Distribution

2.0. DEVICES

  • 2.1. Overview
    • 2.1.1. Devices Covered
    • 2.1.2. Differentiating Features
  • 2.2. Spinal Fusion Implants
    • 2.2.1. Functions
      • 2.2.1.1. Thoracolumbar Fusion Devices
        • Pedicle Screw Systems
        • Anterior Plating Systems
      • 2.2.1.2. Cervical Fusion Devices
        • Anterior Cervical Systems
        • Posterior Cervical Systems
      • 2.2.1.3. Interbody Fusion Devices
        • By Approach
        • Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
        • Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
        • Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
        • Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
        • Cervical Interbody Fusion
        • Stand-Alone Interbody Devices
        • Corpectomy Devices
    • 2.2.2. Differentiating Features
    • 2.2.3. Clinical Evidence
    • 2.2.4. Labeled Indications
  • 2.3. Spinal Nonfusion Implants
    • 2.3.1. Functions
      • 2.3.1.1. Spinal Nonfusion Technologies
        • Dynamic Stabilization
        • Pedicle Screw-Based Dynamic Stabilization Systems
        • Interspinous Process Decompression Devices
        • Facet Arthroplasty Devices
        • Artificial Discs
        • Cervical Artificial Discs
        • Lumbar Artificial Discs
        • Nuclear Disc Prostheses
        • Annulus Repair Devices
    • 2.3.2. Clinical Evidence
    • 2.3.3. Labeled Indications

3.0. BRANDS AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

  • 3.1. Overview
    • 3.1.1. Competitive Snapshot
    • 3.1.2. Market Shares
    • 3.1.3. Recent Events
    • 3.1.4. Ongoing Head-to-Head Clinical Trials
  • 3.2. Australian Spinal Implant Market
    • 3.2.1. Competitive Snapshot
    • 3.2.2. Current Market Shares
  • 3.3. Japanese Spinal Implant Market
    • 3.3.1. Competitive Snapshot
    • 3.3.2. Current Market Shares
  • 3.4. South Korean Spinal Implant Market
    • 3.4.1. Competitive Snapshot
    • 3.4.2. Current Market Shares

4.0. ONGOING CLINICAL TRIALS AND EMERGING PRODUCTS

  • 4.1. Ongoing Clinical Trials
  • 4.2. Emerging Products

5.0. ASIA PACIFIC MARKET OUTLOOK

  • 5.1. Overview
    • 5.1.1. Market Snapshot
    • 5.1.2. Detailed Market Overview
  • 5.2. Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market
    • 5.2.1. Market Snapshot
    • 5.2.2. Detailed Market Overview
      • 5.2.2.1. Degenerative Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market
      • 5.2.2.2. Deformity Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market
      • 5.2.2.3. Tumor/Trauma Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market
  • 5.3. Traditional Cervical Implant Market
    • 5.3.1. Market Snapshot
    • 5.3.2. Detailed Market Overview
      • 5.3.2.1. Anterior Traditional Cervical Implant Market
      • 5.3.2.2. Posterior Traditional Cervical Implant Market
  • 5.4. Interbody Device Market
    • 5.4.1. Market Snapshot
    • 5.4.2. Detailed Market Overview
      • 5.4.2.1. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device Market
      • 5.4.2.2. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device Market
      • 5.4.2.3. Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device Market
      • 5.4.2.4. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device Market
      • 5.4.2.5. Cervical Interbody Fusion Device Market
      • 5.4.2.6. Corpectomy Device Market
  • 5.5. Spinal Nonfusion Technology Market
    • 5.5.1. Market Snapshot
    • 5.5.2. Detailed Market Overview
      • 5.5.2.1. Interspinous Process Decompression Device Market
      • 5.5.2.2. Pedicle Screw-Based Dynamic Stabilization System Market
      • 5.5.2.3. Facet Arthroplasty Device Market
      • 5.5.2.4. Cervical Artificial Disc Market
      • 5.5.2.5. Lumbar Artificial Disc Market
      • 5.5.2.6. Nuclear Disc Prosthesis Market
      • 5.5.2.7. Annulus Repair Device Market

6.0. AUSTRALIAN MARKET OUTLOOK

  • 6.1. Market Snapshot
  • 6.2. Market Overview

7.0. JAPANESE MARKET OUTLOOK

  • 7.1. Market Snapshot
  • 7.2. Market Overview

8.0. SOUTH KOREAN MARKET OUTLOOK

  • 8.1. Market Snapshot
  • 8.2. Market Overview

APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY

APPENDIX B: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS

APPENDIX C: BIBLIOGRAPHY

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • Figure 1: Spinal Implant Market, by Scope, as a % of Total, Asia Pacific, 2011 and 2016
  • Table 1: Spinal Implant Market Landscape, Asia Pacific (US$), 2011 and 2016
  • Table 2: Spinal Implant Market Leaders, by Segment, Asia Pacific, 2011
  • Table 3: Most Promising Emerging Technologies in the Spinal Implant Market, Asia Pacific, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 4: Expected Key Events in the Spinal Implant Market, Asia Pacific, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 5: Factors Impacting the Spinal Implant Market, by Segment, Asia Pacific, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 6: Companies Mentioned in This Report

1.0 CLINICAL LANDSCAPE

  • Table 6: Roles of the Spinal Column
  • Table 7: Spinal Implant Procedures, by Scope and Procedure Type, Asia Pacific
  • Table 8: Competing Treatments, Asia Pacific
  • Table 9: Spinal Implant Treatment Guidelines, by Product Type
  • Table 10: Key Health and Economic Indicators, Australia, 2011
  • Table 11: Key Health and Economic Indicators, Japan, 2011
  • Table 12: Key Health and Economic Indicators, South Korea, 2011

2.0 DEVICES

  • Table 13: Spinal Implant Market, by Scope and Product Type, Asia Pacific
  • Table 14: Advantages and Disadvantages of Spinal Implants, by Scope
  • Table 15: Spinal Fusion Implant Functions, by Product Type
  • Table 16: Advantages and Disadvantages of Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion Implants, by Approach
  • Table 17: Advantages and Disadvantages of Cervical Spinal Fusion Implants, by Approach
  • Table 18: Advantages and Disadvantages of IBDs, by Approach
  • Table 19: Summary of SPORT
  • Table 20: Spinal Nonfusion Implant Functions, by Procedure Type
  • Table 21: Summary of DYNORFUSE
  • Table 22: Summary of Wallis Mechanical Normalization System for Low Back Pain
  • Table 23: Summary of Postmarket Surveillance Study of the Paradigm Spine Dynamic Stabilization System (DSS)
  • Table 24: Summary of LDR Spine USA Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Study
  • Table 25: Summary of Pivotal IDE Study of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis in the Treatment of DDD versus ACDF
  • Table 26: Summary of Posterior Lateral Fusion (PLF) with Dynesys
  • Table 27: Summary of LTOS with X STOP
  • Table 28: Summary of CHARITE Artificial Disc Compared to Anterior Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease
  • Table 29: Labeled Indications for Spinal Nonfusion Technologies, by Product Type

3.0 BRANDS AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

  • Table 30: Leading Competitors in the Spinal Implant Market, by Country, as a % of Total, Asia Pacific, 2011
  • Table 31: Leading Competitors in the Spinal Implant Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, Asia Pacific, 2011
  • Table 32: Recent Events in the Spinal Implant Market, by Procedure Type, Asia Pacific, 2011
  • Table 33: Summary of MAVERICK Total Disc Replacement-Pivotal Study
  • Table 34: Summary of XLIF vs. MAS TLIF for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With or Without Central Stenosis
  • Table 35: Summary of Meta-Analysis of Four Prospective Randomized Cervical Arthroplasty FDA Trials -Superiority of Neurologic Outcomes
  • Table 36: Summary of Prospective Randomized Multi-Center Trial Comparing 3 Lumbar Disc Prosthesis
  • Table 37: Leading Competitors in the Spinal Implant Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, Australia, 2011
  • Table 38: Leading Competitors in the Spinal Implant Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, Japan, 2011
  • Table 39: Leading Competitors in the Spinal Implant Market, by Product Type, as a % of Total, South Korea, 2011

4.0 ONGOING CLINICAL TRIALS AND EMERGING PRODUCTS

  • Table 40: Summary of Cage Versus Plate in One Level Cervical Disc Disease
  • Table 41: Summary of Study of Barricaid Device
  • Table 42: Summary of Randomized Study of Annular Repair With the Xclose Tissue Repair System
  • Table 43: Summary of Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of NUBAC Disc Arthroplasty
  • Table 44: Summary of Satellite PEEK Nucleus Replacement Retrospective Analysis
  • Table 45: Summary of a Pivotal Study of a Facet Replacement System to Treat Spinal Stenosis
  • Table 46: Summary of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Treating Patients with Spinal Tumors
  • Table 47: Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Study of ProDisc to Spinal Fusion Surgery (PDL)
  • Table 48: Summary of Safety and Efficacy Comparing ProDisc-C to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Surgery to Treat Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease (SCDD)
  • Table 49: Summary of COAST
  • Table 50: Summary of Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Artificial Cervical Disc - Low Profile Device at Two Adjacent Levels
  • Table 51: Summary of PRESTIGE Cervical Disc Post-Approval Study
  • Table 52: Summary of MASTERS-D
  • Table 53: Summary of Prospective Study of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
  • Table 54: Summary of Scoliosis Surgery Using the PASS LP System
  • Table 55: Emerging Technologies in Development for the Spinal Implant Market, Asia Pacific, 2011 - 2016

5.0 ASIA PACIFIC MARKET OUTLOOK

  • Figure 2: Spinal Implant Market, by Country, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 56: Factors Impacting the Spinal Implant Market, by Product Type, Asia Pacific, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 57: Spinal Implant Procedures, by Country, Asia Pacific, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 58: Instrumented Spinal Fusions, by Country, Asia Pacific, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 59: Instrumented Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusions, by Country, Asia Pacific, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 60: Instrumented Cervical Spinal Fusions, by Country, Asia Pacific, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 61: Spinal Implant Market, by Scope, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 62: Spinal Implant Market, by Country, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 63: Spinal Fusion Implant Market, by Country, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 64: Spinal Fusion Implant Market, by Procedure Type, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 65: Spinal Fusion Implant Market, by Procedure Type and Country, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Figure 3: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market, by Country, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 66: Traditional Thoracolumbar Fusions, by Country, Asia Pacific, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 67: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market, by Country, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Figure 4: Traditional Instrumented Cervical Fusions, by Country, Asia Pacific, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 68: Traditional Cervical Fusions, by Country, Asia Pacific, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 69: Traditional Cervical Implant Market, by Country, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Figure 5: IBD Market, by Procedure Type, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 70: IBD Fusions, by Country, Asia Pacific, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 71: IBD Market, by Country, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Figure 6: Spinal Nonfusion Technology Market, by Procedure Type, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 72: Spinal Nonfusions, by Country, Asia Pacific, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 73: Spinal Nonfusions, by Procedure Type, Asia Pacific, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 74: Spinal Nonfusion Technology Market, by Country, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 75: Spinal Nonfusion Technology Market, by Procedure Type, Asia Pacific (US$), 2010 - 2016

6.0 AUSTRALIAN MARKET OUTLOOK

  • Figure 7: Spinal Implant Market, by Scope, Australia (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 76: Spinal Implant Procedures, by Scope, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 77: Thoracolumbar Spinal Implant Procedures, by Procedure Type, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 78: Cervical Spinal Implant Procedures, by Procedure Type, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 79: Instrumented Thoracolumbar Fusions, by Procedure Type, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 80: Posterior Minimally Invasive Traditional Instrumented Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusions, by Procedure Type, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 81: Traditional Instrumented Thoracolumbar Fusions, by Indication, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 82: Instrumented Cervical Fusions, by Procedure Type, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 83: Traditional Instrumented Cervical Fusions, by Approach, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 84: IBD Fusions, by Procedure Type, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 85: Lumbar IBD Fusions, by Approach, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 86: Spinal Nonfusions, by Procedure Type, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 87: Dynamic Stabilization Procedures and Units, by Procedure Type, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 88: Artificial Disc Procedures and Units, by Procedure Type, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 89: Spinal Implant Market, by Scope, Australia (US$ and AU$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 90: Spinal Fusion Implant Market, by Procedure Type, Australia (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 91: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market, by Indication, Australia (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 92: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market, by Indication, Australia (AUS$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 93: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market Growth, by Indication, Australia, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 94: Traditional Cervical Implant Market, by Approach, Australia (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 95: Traditional Cervical Implant Market, by Approach, Australia (AU$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 96: Traditional Cervical Implant Market Growth, by Approach, Australia, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 97: IBD Market, by Procedure Type, Australia (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 98: IBD Market, by Procedure Type, Australia (AU$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 99: IBD Market Growth, by Procedure Type, Australia, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 100: Spinal Nonfusion Technology Market, by Procedure Type, Australia (US$ and AUS$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 101: Dynamic Stabilization Device Market, by Procedure Type, Australia (US$ and AU$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 102: Dynamic Stabilization Device Market Growth, by Procedure Type, Australia, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 103: Dynamic Stabilization Device Market, by Procedure Type, as a % of Total, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 104: Artificial Disc Market, by Procedure Type, Australia (US$ and AU$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 105: Artificial Disc Market Growth, by Procedure Type, Australia, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 106: Artificial Disc Market, by Procedure Type, as a % of Total, Australia, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 107: Nuclear Disc Prosthesis Market, Australia (US$ and AUS$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 108: Annulus Repair Device Market, Australia (US$ and AUS$), 2010 - 2016

7.0 JAPANESE MARKET OUTLOOK

  • Figure 8: Spinal Implant Market, Japan (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 109: Spinal Implant Procedures, by Scope, Japan, 2010 - 20116
  • Table 110: Thoracolumbar Spinal Implant Procedures, by Procedure Type, Japan, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 111: Cervical Spinal Implant Procedures, by Procedure Type, Japan, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 112: Instrumented Thoracolumbar Fusions, by Procedure Type, Japan, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 113: Posterior Minimally Invasive Traditional Instrumented Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusions, by Procedure Type, Japan, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 114: Traditional Instrumented Thoracolumbar Fusions, by Indication, Japan, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 115: Instrumented Cervical Fusions, by Procedure Type, Japan, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 116: Traditional Instrumented Cervical Fusions, by Approach, Japan, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 117: IBD Fusions, by Procedure Type, Japan, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 118: Lumbar IBD Fusions, by Approach, Japan, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 119: Interspinous Process Decompression Device Procedures and Units, by Procedure Type, Japan, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 120: Spinal Implant Market, by Scope, Japan (US$ and \), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 121: Spinal Fusion Implant Market, by Procedure Type, Japan (US$ and \), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 122: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market, by Indication, Japan (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 123: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market, by Indication, Japan (\), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 124: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market Growth, by Indication, Japan, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 125: Traditional Cervical Implant Market, by Approach, Japan (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 126: Traditional Cervical Implant Market, by Approach, Japan (\), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 127: Traditional Cervical Implant Market Growth, by Approach, Japan, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 128: IBD Market, by Procedure Type, Japan (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 129: IBD Market, by Procedure Type, Japan (\), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 130: IBD Market Growth, by Procedure Type, Japan, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 131: Interspinous Process Decompression Device Market, by Procedure Type, Japan (US$ and \), 2010 - 2016

8.0 SOUTH KOREAN MARKET OUTLOOK

  • Figure 9: Spinal Implant Market, South Korea (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 132: Spinal Implant Procedures, by Scope, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 133: Thoracolumbar Spinal Implant Procedures, by Procedure Type, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 134: Cervical Spinal Implant Procedures, by Procedure Type, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 135: Instrumented Thoracolumbar Fusions, by Procedure Type, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 136: Posterior Minimally Invasive Traditional Instrumented Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusions, by Procedure Type, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 137: Traditional Instrumented Thoracolumbar Fusions, by Indication, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 138: Instrumented Cervical Fusions, by Procedure Type, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 139: Traditional Instrumented Cervical Fusions, by Approach, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 140: IBD Fusions, by Procedure Type, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 141: Lumbar IBD Fusions, by Approach, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 142: Spinal Nonfusions, by Procedure Type, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 143: Dynamic Stabilization Procedures and Units, by Procedure Type, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 144: Artificial Disc Procedures and Units, by Procedure Type, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 145: Spinal Implant Market, by Scope, South Korea (US$ and KRW), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 146: Spinal Fusion Implant Market, by Procedure Type, South Korea (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 147: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market, by Indication, South Korea (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 148: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market, by Indication, South Korea (KRW), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 149: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market Growth, by Indication, South Korea, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 150: Traditional Cervical Implant Market, by Approach, South Korea (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 151: Traditional Cervical Implant Market, by Approach, South Korea (KRW), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 152: Traditional Cervical Implant Market Growth, by Approach, South Korea, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 153: IBD Market, by Procedure Type, South Korea (US$), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 154: IBD Market, by Procedure Type, South Korea (KRW), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 155: IBD Market Growth, by Procedure Type, South Korea, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 156: Spinal Nonfusion Technology Market, by Procedure Type, South Korea (US$ and KRW), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 157: Dynamic Stabilization Device Market, by Procedure Type, South Korea (US$ and KRW), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 158: Dynamic Stabilization Device Market Growth, by Procedure Type, South Korea, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 159: Dynamic Stabilization Device Market, by Procedure Type, as a % of Total, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 160: Artificial Disc Market, by Procedure Type, South Korea (US$ and KRW), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 161: Artificial Disc Market Growth, by Procedure Type, South Korea, 2011 - 2016
  • Table 162: Artificial Disc Market, by Procedure Type, as a % of Total, South Korea, 2010 - 2016
  • Table 163: Nuclear Disc Prosthesis Market, South Korea (US$ and KRW), 2010 - 2016
  • Table 164: Annulus Repair Device Market, South Korea (US$ and KRW), 2010 - 2016

APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY

  • Table 165: Average Currency Exchange Rates, 2011

APPENDIX B: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS

  • MRG Acronyms and Initialisms

APPENDIX C: BIBLIOGRAPHY

Press Release

亞太地區脊椎移植市場的償還和競爭壓力抑制成長

2012年01月17日

Global Information, Inc. 已開始銷售市場調查公司Millennium Research Group所發行的報告書「Asia Pacific Markets for Spinal Implants (亞太地區的脊椎移植市場)」

Millennium Research Group (MRG)預測,亞太地區脊椎移植的平均價格將因償還和競爭壓力而大幅下跌。

然包含導入環形物修復設備和形成椎間關節設備的非固定技術,以及低侵襲技術的提高,預測在2016年之前將對亞太地區脊椎移植市場全體成長有所貢獻。

2011年5月韓國因大幅度削減償還費,影響到脊椎移植市場。預定在2012年的1月之前將進行下一次的削減償還費。

韓國預計在脊椎固定移植市場約削減30%的償還費,並預估銷售價格會下跌。然之後的價格將趨穩定。

而且因最近的財政赤字,韓國政府在認定移植處理的償還之前,要求要進行以往的替代治療,削減高額的脊椎移植處理數。

由於日本隔年要進行削減償還,預計到2016年為止將抑制市場的成長。

日本可進行的脊椎非固定技術只有棘狀突起間減壓處理用設備,由於有嚴格的法規製程,故無法期待在日本的脊椎非固定市場能大幅成長。

Back to Top