美國整形外科軟組織對策市場：2011年 是由出版商Millennium Research Group在2011年04月所出版的。
這份英文市場調查報告書價格從美金6995起跳。
美國整形外科軟組織對策市場由於高齡化使得處置件數增加。高齡世代尋求關節機能的改善與運動傷害的整形外科手術，透過高價格裝置的浸透支收益在今後擴大也將會擴大。美國整形外科軟組織對策市場今後也會確實成長，也受到很大期待。
本報告書為整形外科軟組織對策之概要與美國市場概要、各分類市場中的競爭動向等，概述如下。
總綱
調査手法
第1章 整形外科軟組織對策概要
- 肩膀固定、腱板再建概要
- 膝靭帶再建之概要
- 膝的半月版修復概要
- 關節半月修復概要
第2章 美國整形外科軟組織對策市場
第3章 肩膀固定市場
第4章 膝靭帶再建市場
第5章 膝半月版修復市場
第6章 關節半月修復市場
第7章 肩膀腱板再建接枝市場
附錄
圖表
The US orthopedic soft tissue solutions market comprises devices and grafts
used in shoulder fixation, knee ligament reconstruction, knee cartilage
repair, meniscus repair, and rotator cuff reinforcement. Over the forecast
period, market growth will be driven by rising procedure volumes stemming from
expansion of the aging population that is generally leading more physically
active lifestyles. The elderly generation is thus demanding higher joint
functionality and will seek out orthopedic surgery for their sports-related
injuries to maintain their physical activities. Revenues will also grow
because of the increasing penetration of premium-priced devices, such as
interference screws and suture anchors made from composite materials, which
resorb into the body and stimulate bone growth, as well as and knotless suture
anchors that facilitate procedures by eliminating the knot-tying step. The
market will be limited, however, by surgeon skepticism regarding whether the
benefits of these devices justify their higher cost. Also, a growing number of
soft tissue repairs will be performed in cost-conscious ambulatory surgery
centers (ASCs), which tend to use less expensive devices. Nonetheless, the US
orthopedic soft tissue solutions market will grow robustly over the forecast
period.
METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This Rreport uses a number of methodologies to gather and present data and
analysis. At the outset, a large survey of secondary sources is conducted.
These sources act as the basis for the primary research stage, which builds
and enhances the quantitative and qualitative attributes of the early research.
Secondary sources include
- Government sources:
- Securities and Exchange Commission filings
- Food and Drug Administration and patent filings
- National Center for Health Statistics data
- Orthopedic soft tissue solutions companies:
- Annual reports, product brochures, corporate profiles, etc.
- Internal databases and reports:
- Previous reports on similar/related sources
- General Internet searches, medical literature, and newspaper/magazine
searches:
- Identifying various centers of specialization and articles that might
provide leads for primary research secondary research stage builds the
foundation for the primary research.
The primary research methodology has four steps:
Step 1: The first step involves an impartial scan of all the
information gathered during the secondary research stage to determine its
utility based on the specific requirements of this report. Each piece of
information is either discarded or marked as high- or low-priority and then
organized appropriately determined by the structure and sectioning of the
report.
Step 2: At this stage, early assumptions are formed as to the
implications of the information for the various orthopedic soft tissue
solutions market segments. These assumptions are then used to determine
hypotheses using both inductive and deductive approaches. On the quantitative
front, these hypotheses result in full historical and projected market data
sets (market sizes - unit sales, average selling prices [ASPs], and revenues -
as well as market shares).
Step 3: At this stage, the research is in position for its most
important primary phase - expert interviews. Throughout the secondary research
phase, industry and medical experts are identified.
These experts are then contacted by telephone and asked to participate in
interviews on recent trends and developments in the industry. Interviews are
either conducted at the time of the initial call or scheduled at the
convenience of the expert. Interview questions are tailored to the expertise
of each particular interviewee, although in most cases, the most important
questions are asked of all experts.
The questions are largely based on the assumptions and hypotheses developed in
Step 2, which are then augmented, discarded, or adjusted based on the views
and positions put forth. Attempts are made, whenever possible, to cross-check
the views of various experts against each other and to reach positions of
consensus on issues and market numbers.
In addition, a sample of relevant physicians is surveyed or interviewed.
Physicians are asked to comment on various issues/trends, both in their own
practice and in the overall market. The responses provided are then used to
strengthen or augment the assumptions and hypotheses developed during the
primary research phase.
Step 4: The final stage of primary research involves individual and
group analysis by Millennium Research Group. All research results are assessed
and cross-checked thoroughly to determine their validity, relevance, and
weight. From this process, qualitative conclusions are reached and data points
finalized.
FORECAST METHODOLOGY
In addition to the research methodology outlined above, the following
“bottom-up” methodology is used to develop forecast assumptions
for the report.
A comprehensive breakdown of various orthopedic soft tissue solution
procedures and unit sales is prepared using data from several sources,
including professional associations, government statistics, and private
research/media sources. Industry experts and practitioners are consulted to
ensure accuracy and verify observed trends. As a cross-check, total industry
revenues available through annual reports and other sources are compared
against modeled industry revenues.
Using the best estimates of industry experts, practitioners, private
research/media sources, and inhouse experts, year-by-year growth rates and
ASPs are applied individually to each subcategory to derive forecasts. These
estimates are cross-checked by industry experts (marketing managers, product
managers, CEOs, etc.) and further refined.
Overall findings are compared against market and procedure forecasts published
by other sources to ensure reasonable estimates.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
METHODOLOGY
1.0 ORTHOPEDIC SOFT TISSUE SOLUTIONS BACKGROUND
- 1.1 Shoulder Fixation and Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Overview
- 1.1.1 Procedure Overview
- 1.1.1.1 Rotator Cuff Repair
- 1.1.1.2 Glenohumeral Instability Repair
- 1.2 Knee Ligament Reconstruction Overview
- 1.2.1 Procedure Overview
- 1.2.1.1 Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Only Reconstruction
- 1.2.1.2 Multiple Ligament Reconstruction
- 1.2.2 Graft Overview
- 1.2.2.1 Autografts
- 1.2.2.2 Allografts
- 1.3 Knee Cartilage Repair Overview
- 1.3.1 Procedure Overview
- 1.3.2 Treatment Alternatives
- 1.3.2.1 Debridement and Microfracture
- 1.3.2.2 Osteochondral Flap Repair
- 1.3.2.3 Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation
- 1.3.2.4 Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation
- 1.3.2.5 Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation
- 1.4 Meniscus Repair Overview
- 1.4.1 Procedure Overview
- 1.4.1.1 Meniscectomy
- 1.4.1.2 Meniscus Tear Repair
2.0 US ORTHOPEDIC SOFT TISSUE SOLUTIONS MARKET
- 2.1 Market Overview
- 2.2 Market Analysis
- 2.2.1 Key Report Updates
- 2.2.2 Procedures
- 2.2.3 Market Forecast
- 2.2.3.1 Shoulder Fixation Market
- 2.2.3.2 Knee Ligament Reconstruction Market
- 2.2.3.3 Knee Cartilage Repair Market
- 2.2.3.4 Meniscus Repair Market
- 2.2.3.5 Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Graft Market
- 2.3 Competitive Analysis
- 2.3.1 Market Shares
- 2.3.2 Competitor Discussions (in Alphabetical Order)
- Arthrex
- ArthroCare
- Biomet Sports Medicine
- ConMed Linvatec
- DePuy
- Genzyme Biosurgery
- Joint Restoration Foundation
- LifeNet Health
- Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation
- RTI Biologics
- Smith & Nephew Endoscopy
- Stryker Endoscopy
- Other
3.0 SHOULDER FIXATION MARKET
- 3.1 Market Overview
- 3.2 Market Analysis
- 3.2.1 Procedures
- 3.2.2 Market Forecast
- 3.2.2.1 Suture Anchor Market by Type
- 3.2.2.2 Suture Anchor Market by Material
- 3.2.2.3 High-Strength Suture Market
- 3.2.3 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 3.2.3.1 Market Drivers
- 3.2.3.2 Market Limiters
- 3.3 Competitive Analysis
- 3.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 3.3.2 Emerging Technologies
- Biomet Sports Medicine' s JuggerKnot
- 3.3.3 Market Shares
4.0 KNEE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION MARKET
- 4.1 Market Overview
- 4.2 Market Analysis
- 4.2.1 Procedures
- 4.2.1.1 Emerging Trends
- Interest in Return to Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair
- Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- 4.2.2 Market Forecast
- 4.2.2.1 Knee Ligament Reconstruction Device Market
- Disposables Market
- Soft Tissue Fixation Device Market
- Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Fixation Device Market
- 4.2.2.2 Knee Ligament Reconstruction Graft Market
- 4.2.3 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 4.2.3.1 Market Drivers
- 4.2.3.2 Market Limiters
- 4.3 Competitive Analysis
- 4.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 4.3.2 Emerging Technologies
- Alacer Biomedical' s AlacerACL_
- Soft Tissue Regeneration' s L-C Ligament
- Corin Group' s LARS
- 4.3.3 Market Shares
5.0 KNEE CARTILAGE REPAIR MARKET
- 5.1 Market Overview
- 5.2 Market Analysis
- 5.2.1 Procedures
- 5.2.1.1 Debridement and Microfracture Procedures
- 5.2.1.2 Osteochondral Flap Repairs
- 5.2.1.3 Osteochondral Autograft Procedures
- 5.2.1.4 Osteochondral Allograft Procedures
- 5.2.1.5 Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation
- 5.2.1.6 Synthetic Implant Procedures (Qualitative Discussion Only)
- 5.2.2 Market Forecast
- 5.2.2.1 Knee Cartilage Repair Graft Market
- Osteochondral Allograft Market
- Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Market
- 5.2.2.2 Knee Cartilage Repair Device Market
- Osteochondral Flap Repair Device Market
- Osteochondral Autograft Instrument Kit Market
- 5.2.3 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 5.2.3.1 Market Drivers
- 5.2.3.2 Market Limiters
- 5.3 Competitive Analysis
- 5.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 5.3.2 Emerging Competitors and Technologies
- 5.3.2.1 Next-Generation Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Products
- Acologix' s AC-100
- Arthro Kinetics' CaReS
- BioTissue Technologies' BioSeed-C
- co.don' s chondrosphere and ACT-3D
- DePuy Mitek' s Cartilage Autograft Implantation System
- Fidia Advanced Biopolymers' Hyalograft C and TiGenix' s ChondroCelect
- Geistlich Group, Cell Matrix, and CellGenix Technologie Transfer' s
Chondro-Gide and
- CartiGro
- Genzyme Biosurgery' s Matrix-induced Autologous Chondrocyte
Implantation
- Histogenics' VeriCart and NeoCart
- ProChon Biotech' s BioCart
- TETEC Tissue Engineering Technologies' NOVOCART 3D
- 5.3.2.2 Biomaterials
- BioMimetic Therapeutics' GEM 21S
- BioSyntech' s BST-CarGel
- Core Dynamics' Preserved Osteochondral Dowels
- Kensey Nash' s Cartilage Repair Device
- Scil Technology' s ST03
- Zimmer and ISTO Technologies' DeNovo ET Engineered Tissue Graft
- 5.3.2.3 Synthetics
- Carticept Medical' s Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant
- SaluMedica' s SaluCartilage
- 5.3.3 Market Shares
6.0 MENISCUS REPAIR MARKET 132
- 6.1 Market Overview
- 6.2 Market Analysis
- 6.2.1 Procedures
- 6.2.2 Market Forecast
- 6.2.2.1 Meniscus Repair Device Market
- 6.2.2.2 Meniscus Repair Graft Market
- 6.2.3 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 6.2.3.1 Market Drivers
- 6.2.3.2 Market Limiters
- 6.3 Competitive Landscape
- 6.3.1 Emerging Technologies
- 6.3.1.1 Graft Alternatives
- ReGen Biologics' Menaflex
- Kensey Nash' s Actifit
- 6.3.1.2 Stem Cells
- Osiris Therapeutics' Chondrogen
- 6.3.2 Market Shares
7.0 ROTATOR CUFF REINFORCEMENT GRAFT MARKET
- 7.1 Market Overview
- 7.2 Market Analysis
- 7.2.1 Procedures
- 7.2.2 Market Forecast
- 7.2.2.1 Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Allograft Market
- 7.2.2.2 Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Xenograft Market
- 7.2.2.3 Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Synthetic Implant Market
- 7.2.3 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 7.2.3.1 Market Drivers
- 7.2.3.2 Market Limiters
- 7.3 Competitive Analysis
- 7.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 7.3.2 Market Shares
APPENDIX A: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS
APPENDIX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Figure 1: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Solutions Market, by Segment, US (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Figure 2: Shoulder Fixation Procedures, by Method, as a % of Total, US,
2010 and 2015
- Figure 3: Knee Ligament Reconstruction Device Market, by Segment, US
(US$), 2009 - 2015
- Figure 4: Knee Cartilage Repair Market, by Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010
- Figure 5: Meniscus Repairs, by Method, US, 2009 - 2015
- Figure 6: Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Graft Market, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 1: Companies Mentioned in This Report
METHODOLOGY
1.0 ORTHOPEDIC SOFT TISSUE SOLUTIONS BACKGROUND
- Table 2: BTB Autograft Advantages and Disadvantages
- Table 3: Soft Tissue Autograft Advantages and Disadvantages
2.0 US ORTHOPEDIC SOFT TISSUE SOLUTIONS MARKET
- Figure 7: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Solutions Market, by Segment, US (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 4: Key Report Updates, 2011
- Table 5: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Procedures, by Type, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 6: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Solutions Market, by Segment, US (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 7: Leading Competitors in the Orthopedic Soft Tissue Solutions
Market, by Segment, as a % of Total, US, 2010
- Table 8: Leading Competitors in the Orthopedic Soft Tissue Device Market,
by Segment, as a % of Total, US, 2010
- Table 9: Leading Competitors in the Orthopedic Soft Tissue Graft Market,
by Segment, as a % of Total, US, 2010
3.0 SHOULDER FIXATION MARKET
- Figure 8: Shoulder Fixation Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2009 - 2015_
- Table 10: Shoulder Fixation Procedures, by Type, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 11: Rotator Cuff Repairs, by Method, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 12: Rotator Cuff Repairs, by Technique, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 13: Glenohumeral Instability Repairs, by Method, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 14: Shoulder Fixation Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 15: Suture Anchor Market, by Type, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 16: Suture Anchor Market Growth, by Type, US, 2010 - 2015
- Table 17: Suture Anchor Market, by Type, as a % of Total, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 18: Suture Anchor Market, by Material, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 19: Suture Anchor Market Growth, by Material, US, 2010 - 2015
- Table 20: Suture Anchor Market, by Material, as a % of Total, US, 2009 -
2015
- Table 21: High-Strength Suture Market, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 22: Drivers and Limiters of the Shoulder Fixation Market, US
- Table 23: Leading Competitors in the Shoulder Fixation Market, by Segment,
as a % of Total, US, 2010_
- Table 24: Leading Competitors in the Suture Anchor Market, by Material, as
a % of Total, US, 2010
4.0 KNEE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION MARKET 58
- Figure 9: Knee Ligament Reconstruction Device Market, by Segment, US
(US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 25: Knee Ligament Reconstruction Procedures, by Scope, US, 2009 -
2015
- Table 26: Knee Ligament Reconstruction Procedures, by Graft Type, US, 2009
- 2015
- Table 27: Knee Ligament Reconstruction Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2009
- 2015
- Table 28: Knee Ligament Reconstruction Device Market, by Segment, US
(US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 29: Knee Ligament Reconstruction Disposables Market, US (US$), 2009
- 2015
- Table 30: Soft Tissue Fixation Device Market, by Anatomy, US (US$), 2009 -
2015
- Table 31: Soft Tissue Femoral Fixation Device Market, by Type, US (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 32: Soft Tissue Femoral Fixation Device Market Growth, by Type, US,
2010 - 2015
- Table 33: Soft Tissue Femoral Fixation Device Market, by Type, as a % of
Total, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 34: Soft Tissue Tibial Fixation Device Market, by Type, US (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 35: Soft Tissue Tibial Fixation Device Market Growth, by Type, US,
2010 - 2015
- Table 36: Soft Tissue Tibial Fixation Device Market, by Type, as a % of
Total, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 37: BTB Fixation Device Market, by Material, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 38: BTB Fixation Device Market Growth, by Material, US, 2010 - 2015
- Table 39: BTB Fixation Device Market, by Material, as a % of Total, US,
2009 - 2015
- Table 40: Knee Ligament Reconstruction Graft Market, by Type, US (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 41: Knee Ligament Reconstruction Graft Market Growth, by Type, US,
2010 - 2015
- Table 42: Knee Ligament Reconstruction Graft Market, by Type, as a % of
Total, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 43: Drivers and Limiters of the Knee Ligament Reconstruction Market,
US
- Table 44: Leading Competitors in the Knee Ligament Reconstruction Market,
by Segment, as a % of Total, US, 2010
- Table 45: Leading Competitors in the Knee Ligament Reconstruction Device
Market, by Segment, as a % of Total, US, 2010
- Table 46: Leading Competitors in the Soft Tissue Femoral Fixation Device
Market, by Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010
- Table 47: Leading Competitors in the BTB Fixation Device Market, by
Material, as a % of Total, US, 2010
5.0 KNEE CARTILAGE REPAIR MARKET
- Figure 10: Knee Cartilage Repair Market, by Type, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 48: Knee Cartilage Repairs, by Type, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 49: Knee Cartilage Repair Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 50: Knee Cartilage Repair Graft Market, by Type, US (US$), 2009 -
2015
- Table 51: Knee Cartilage Repair Graft Market Growth, by Type, US, 2010 -
2015
- Table 52: Knee Cartilage Repair Graft Market, by Type, as a % of Total,
US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 53: Knee Cartilage Repair Device Market, by Type, US (US$), 2009 -
2015
- Table 54: Knee Cartilage Repair Device Market Growth, by Type, US, 2010 -
2015
- Table 55: Knee Cartilage Repair Device Market, by Type, as a % of Total,
US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 56: Drivers and Limiters of the Knee Cartilage Repair Market, US
- Table 57: Leading Competitors in the Knee Cartilage Repair Market, by
Segment, as a % of Total, US, 2010
- Table 58: Leading Competitors in the Knee Cartilage Repair Graft Market,
by Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010
- Table 59: Leading Competitors in the Knee Cartilage Repair Device Market,
by Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010
6.0 MENISCUS REPAIR MARKET
- Figure 11: Meniscus Repair Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 60: Meniscus Procedures, by Type, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 61: Meniscus Repairs, by Method, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 62: Meniscus Repair Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 63: Meniscus Repair Device Market, by Type, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 64: Meniscus Repair Device Market Growth, by Type, US, 2010 - 2015
- Table 65: Meniscus Repair Device Market, by Type, as a % of Total, US,
2009 - 2015
- Table 66: Meniscus Repair Graft Market, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 67: Drivers and Limiters of the Meniscus Repair Market, US
- Table 68: Leading Competitors in the Meniscus Repair Market, by Segment,
as a % of Total, US, 2010
- Table 69: Leading Competitors in the Meniscus Repair Device Market, by
Type, as a % of Total, US, 2010
7.0 ROTATOR CUFF REINFORCEMENT GRAFT MARKET
- Figure 12: Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Graft Market, by Material, US (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 70: Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Graft Procedures, by Scope, US, 2009
- 2015
- Table 71: Major Rotator Cuff Repairs, by Type, US, 2009-2015
- Table 72: Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Graft Market, by Material, US (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 73: Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Allograft Market, US (US$), 2009 -
2015
- Table 74: Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Xenograft Market, by Source, US
(US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 75: Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Xenograft Market Growth, by Source,
US, 2010 - 2015
- Table 76: Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Xenograft Market, by Source, as a %
of Total, US, 2009 - 2015
- Table 77: Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Synthetic Implant Market, US (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 78: Drivers and Limiters of the Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Graft
Market, US
- Table 79: Leading Competitors in the Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Graft
Market, by Segment, as a % of
- Total, US, 2010
- Table 80: Leading Competitors in the Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Xenograft
Market, by Source, as a % of Total, US, 2010
APPENDIX A: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS 174
- MRG Acronyms and Initialisms
APPENDIX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES 176
- Figure 13: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Solutions Market, by Segment, US (US$),
2009 - 2015 (Detailed Format)
- Figure 14: Shoulder Fixation Procedures, by Method, as a % of Total, US,
2010 and 2015 (Detailed Format)
- Figure 15: Knee Ligament Reconstruction Device Market, by Segment, US
(US$), 2009 - 2015 (Detailed Format)
- Figure 16: Knee Cartilage Repair Market, by Type, as a % of Total, US,
2010 (Detailed Format)
- Figure 17: Meniscus Repairs, by Method, US, 2009 - 2015 (Detailed Format)
- Figure 18: Rotator Cuff Reinforcement Graft Market, US (US$), 2009 - 2015
(Detailed Format)
|
