巴西的整形外科裝置市場：2011年 是由出版商Millennium Research Group在2011年01月所出版的。
這份英文市場調查報告書價格從美金5995起跳。
巴西的整形外科裝置市場由再建關節植入物、外傷裝置、脊椎植入物、代用骨所構成，到2015年為止預測將確實擴大。整形外科裝置臨床上的導入增加、另外醫療旅遊之利用人口增加等因素也牽動了市場擴大。但是另一方面巴西醫療預算集中在都市，地方上的患者連接是目前的課題。 本報告書為巴西整形外科裝置市場相關調査，同時包含各分類別市場動向、競爭分析等項目的相關整理，概述如下。
總綱
調査方法
第1章 整形外科裝置概要
- 骨折的一般的種類
- 脊柱的作用
- 脊椎固定處置用裝置分類
- 胸腰部固定裝置分類
- 頸部固定裝置分類
- IBD分類
第2章 巴西整形外科裝置市場
- 各領域市場成長：2010∼2015年
- 主要健康・經濟指標
- 各類別整形外科處置：2009∼2015年
- 各領域整形外科裝置市場：2009∼2015年
- 各領域主要競爭企業
第3章 再建關節植入物市場
- 再建關節植入物市場
- 各領域 再建關節植入物處置
- 各領域 再建關節植入物市場
- 股關節植入物市場
- THA植入物市場
- 膝關節植入物市場
- TKA植入物市場
- 肩關節植入物市場
- 平均販售價格
- 促進因子與阻礙因子
- 主要競爭企業
第4章 外傷固定裝置市場
- 外傷裝置市場
- 各領域市場
- 内部固定裝置市場
- 螺旋板市場
- IM釘市場
- 外部固定裝置市場
- 平均販售價格
- 促進因子與阻礙因子
- 主要競爭企業
第5章 脊椎植入物市場
- 脊椎植入物市場
- 各領域市場
- 平均販售價格
- 促進因子與阻礙因子
- 主要競爭企業 其他
第6章 代用骨市場
- 材料市場
- 平均處置件數
- 用途市場
- 材料市場
- 促進因子與阻礙因子
- 主要競爭企業
附錄
Abstract
The Brazilian orthopedic device market comprises sales of reconstructive joint
implants, trauma devices, spinal implants, and bone graft substitutes (BGS)
and will expand robustly through 2015. Market growth will be driven primarily
by the expanding aging population - this demographic is most susceptible to
injuries and degenerative health conditions that require the use of orthopedic
devices. Increasing clinical adoption of orthopedic devices and the growing
popularity of medical tourism will also help drive the Brazilian orthopedic
device market through 2015. Improving economic conditions and government
efforts to make healthcare more accessible and affordable for patients will
also contribute to procedural growth. That being said, accessibility remains
an obstacle for many potential patients. This is especially the case in rural
areas, given the degree to which health care financing in Brazil has centered
on fiscally strained urban areas. Nevertheless, the aforementioned market
drivers will cause the Brazilian orthopedic device market to grow at a
steadily increasing rate over the forecast period.
METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This report uses a number of methodologies to gather and present data and
analysis. At the outset, a large survey of secondary sources is conducted.
These sources act as the basis for the primary research stage, which builds
and enhances the quantitative and qualitative attributes of the early research.
Secondary sources include
- Government sources:
- Securities and Exchange Commission filings
- Food and Drug Administration and patent filings
- National Center for Health Statistics data
- Ministerio de Saude (Brazil)
- Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (ANVISA)
- Orthopedic device companies:
- Annual reports, product brochures, corporate profiles, etc.
- Internal databases and reports:
- Previous reports on similar/related sources
- General Internet searches, medical literature, and newspaper/magazine
searches:
- Identifying various centers of specialization and articles that might
provide leads for primary research
- Scientific Electronic Library Online
The secondary research stage builds the foundation for the primary research.
The primary research methodology has four steps:
Step 1: The first step involves an impartial scan of all the
information gathered during the secondary research stage to determine its
utility based on the specific requirements of this report. Each piece of
information is either discarded or marked as high- or low-priority and then
organized appropriately as determined by the structure and sectioning of the
report.
Step 2: At this stage, early assumptions are formed as to the
implications of the information for the various orthopedic device market
segments. These assumptions are then used to determine hypotheses using both
inductive and deductive approaches. On the quantitative front, these
hypotheses result in full historical and projected market data sets (market
sizes - unit sales, average selling prices [ASPs], and revenues - as well as
market shares).
Step 3: At this stage, the research is in position for its most
important primary phase - expert interviews. Throughout the secondary research
phase, industry and medical experts are identified. These experts are then
contacted by telephone and asked to participate in interviews on recent trends
and developments in the industry. Interviews are either conducted at the time
of the initial call or scheduled at the convenience of the expert. Interview
questions are tailored to the expertise of each particular interviewee,
although in most cases, the most important questions are asked of all experts.
The questions are largely based on the assumptions and hypotheses developed in
Step 2, which are then augmented, discarded, or adjusted based on the views
and positions put forth. Attempts are made, whenever possible, to cross-check
the views of various experts against each other and to reach positions of
consensus on issues and market numbers.
Step 4: The final stage of primary research involves individual and
group analysis by Millennium Research Group. All research results are assessed
and cross-checked thoroughly to determine their validity, relevance, and
weight. From this process, qualitative conclusions are reached and data points
finalized.
FORECAST METHODOLOGY
In addition to the research methodology outlined above, the following
“bottom-up” methodology is used to develop forecast assumptions
for the report.
A comprehensive breakdown of various orthopedic device procedures and unit
sales is prepared using data from several sources, including professional
associations, government statistics, and private research/media sources.
Industry experts and practitioners are consulted to ensure accuracy and verify
observed trends. As a cross-check, total industry revenues available through
annual reports and other sources are compared against modeled industry
revenues.
Using the best estimates of industry experts, practitioners, private
research/media sources, and inhouse experts, year-by-year growth rates and
ASPs are applied individually to each subcategory to derive forecasts. These
estimates are cross-checked by industry experts (marketing managers, product
managers, CEOs, etc.) and further refined.
Overall findings are compared against market and procedure forecasts published
by other sources to ensure reasonable estimates.
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
METHODOLOGY
1.0 ORTHOPEDIC DEVICE OVERVIEW
- 1.1 Reconstructive Joint Implant Overview
- 1.1.1 Selected Joints of the Anatomy
- 1.1.1.1 The Knee Joint
- 1.1.1.2 The Hip Joint
- 1.1.1.3 The Shoulder Joint
- 1.1.2 Reconstructive Implants
- 1.1.2.1 Reconstructive Hip Implants
- 1.1.2.2 Reconstructive Knee Implants
- 1.1.2.3 Reconstructive Shoulder Implants
- 1.2 Trauma Device Overview
- 1.2.1 Overview of Bone and Joint Anatomy
- 1.2.1.1 Bone Formation
- 1.2.1.2 Bone Disorders and Diseases
- Fractures
- Osteoporosis
- Arthritis
- 1.2.2 Treatment Options
- 1.2.2.1 Fracture Management
- 1.2.2.2 Internal Fixation
- 1.2.2.3 External Fixation
- 1.2.2.4 Bone Growth Stimulation
- 1.2.2.5 Joint Arthroplasty
- 1.3 Spinal Implant Overview
- 1.3.1 Anatomy of the Human Spine
- 1.3.1.1 Degenerative Spinal Disorders
- 1.3.1.2 Deformity Spinal Disorders
- 1.3.1.3 Tumor/Trauma Spinal Disorders
- 1.3.1.4 Treatment Options
- 1.3.2 Thoracolumbar Fusion Devices
- 1.3.2.1 Implant Design
- 1.3.2.2 Thoracolumbar Pathology
- 1.3.3 Cervical Fusion Devices
- 1.3.4 Interbody Fusion Devices
- 1.3.4.1 Implant Design
- 1.3.4.2 Implant Material
- 1.3.4.3 Surgical Approach
- 1.3.5 Spinal Nonfusion Technologies
- 1.3.5.1 Dynamic Stabilization Devices
- 1.3.5.2 Artificial Discs
- 1.4 Bone Graft Overview
- 1.4.1 Autografts
- 1.4.2 Nonproprietary Allografts
- 1.4.3 Demineralized Bone Matrices
- 1.4.4 Xenografts
- 1.4.5 Synthetics
- 1.4.6 Growth Factors
- 1.4.7 Orthopedic Stem Cell Products
2.0 BRAZILIAN ORTHOPEDIC DEVICE MARKET
- 2.1 Market Overview
- 2.2 Country Overview
- 2.3 Market Analysis
- 2.3.1 Procedures
- 2.3.1.1 Reconstructive Joint Implant Procedures
- 2.3.1.2 Trauma Device Procedures
- 2.3.1.3 Spinal Implant Procedures
- 2.3.1.4 Bone Graft Substitute Procedures
- 2.3.2 Market Forecast
- 2.3.2.1 Reconstructive Joint Implant Market
- 2.3.2.2 Trauma Fixation Device Market
- 2.3.2.3 Spinal Implant Market
- 2.3.2.4 Bone Graft Substitutes Market
- 2.4 Competitive Analysis
- 2.4.1 Competitive Landscape
- 2.4.2 Market Shares
3.0 RECONSTRUCTIVE JOINT IMPLANT MARKET
- 3.1 Market Overview
- 3.2 Market Analysis
- 3.2.1 Procedures
- 3.2.2 Market Forecast
- 3.2.2.1 Reconstructive Hip Implant Market
- Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Implant Market
- Partial Hip Implant Market
- Revision Hip Implant Market
- Resurfacing Hip Implant Market
- 3.2.2.2 Reconstructive Knee Implant Market
- Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant Market
- Revision Knee Implant Market
- Unicondylar Knee Implant Market
- 3.2.2.3 Reconstructive Shoulder Implant Market
- 3.2.2.4 Reconstructive Joint Implant Price Comparison
- 3.2.3 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 3.2.3.1 Market Drivers
- 3.2.3.2 Market Limiters
- 3.3 Competitive Analysis
- 3.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 3.3.2 Market Shares
- 3.3.3 Competitor Discussions (in Alphabetical Order)
- 3.3.3.1 Foreign Competitors
- B. Braun Aesculap
- Biomet
- DePuy
- Smith & Nephew
- Stryker
- Zimmer
- Other
- 3.3.3.2 Domestic Competitors
- Baumer
- Biomecanica
- MDT Group
- Ortosintese
- Other
4.0 TRAUMA DEVICE MARKET
- 4.1 Market Overview
- 4.2 Market Analysis
- 4.2.1 Procedures
- 4.2.2 Market Forecast
- 4.2.2.1 Internal Fixation Device Market
- Plate and Screw Market
- Intramedullary Nail Market
- 4.2.2.2 External Fixation Device Market
- 4.2.2.3 Trauma Device Price Comparison
- 4.2.3 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 4.2.3.1 Market Drivers
- 4.2.3.2 Market Limiters
- 4.3 Competitive Analysis
- 4.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 4.3.2 Market Shares
- 4.3.3 Competitor Discussions (in Alphabetical Order)
- 4.3.3.1 Foreign Competitors
- B. Braun Aesculap
- DePuy
- Orthofix
- Smith & Nephew
- Stryker
- Synthes
- Zimmer
- Other
- 4.3.3.2 Notable Domestic Competitors
- Baumer
- GMReis
- Hexagon
- MDT Group
- Ortosintese
- Other
5.0 SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET
- 5.1 Market Overview
- 5.2 Market Analysis
- 5.2.1 Procedures
- 5.2.1.1 Spinal Fusions
- 5.2.1.2 Spinal Nonfusions
- 5.2.2 Market Forecast
- 5.2.2.1 Spinal Fusion Implant Market
- 5.2.2.2 Spinal Nonfusion Technology Market
- 5.2.2.3 Vertebral Compression Fracture Treatment Market
- 5.2.3 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 5.2.3.1 Market Drivers
- 5.2.3.2 Market Limiters
- 5.3 Competitive Analysis
- 5.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 5.3.2 Market Shares
- 5.3.3 Competitor Discussions (in Alphabetical Order)
- 5.3.3.1 Foreign Competitors
- Aesculap Implant Systems
- DePuy Spine
- Medtronic Spinal & Biologics
- Stryker Spine
- Synthes Spine
- Other
- 5.3.3.2 Domestic Competitors
6.0 BONE GRAFT SUBSTITUTES MARKET
- 6.1 Market Overview
- 6.2 Market Analysis
- 6.2.1 Procedures
- 6.2.1.1 Bone Graft Procedures by Material
- 6.2.1.2 Bone Graft Procedures by Application
- 6.2.2 Market Forecast
- 6.2.3 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 6.2.3.1 Market Drivers
- 6.2.3.2 Market Limiters
- 6.3 Competitive Analysis
- 6.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 6.3.2 Market Shares
- 6.3.3 Competitor Discussions (in Alphabetical Order)
- Biomet
- DePuy
- Medtronic Spinal & Biologics
- Stryker
- Synthes
- Other
APPENDIX A: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS
APPENDIX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Figure 1: Orthopedic Device Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Figure 2: Reconstructive Joint Implant Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Figure 3: Trauma Device Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Figure 4: Spinal Implant Procedures, by Segment, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Figure 5: BGS Market, by Material, Brazil (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 1: Companies Mentioned in This Report
METHODOLOGY
- Table 2: Average Currency Exchange Rates, 2010
1.0 ORTHOPEDIC DEVICE OVERVIEW
- Table 3: Common Types of Bone Fractures
- Table 4: Roles of the Spinal Column
- Table 5: Instrumented Spinal Fusion Procedure Classification
- Table 6: Thoracolumbar Fusion Device Classification
- Table 7: Select Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Systems, by Company, Brazil,
2009
- Table 8: Select Thoracolumbar Anterior Plating Systems, by Company,
Brazil, 2009
- Table 9: Cervical Fusion Device Classification
- Table 10: Select Anterior Cervical Fixation Systems, by Company and
Design, Brazil, 2009
- Table 11: Select Posterior Cervical Fixation Systems, by Company and
Design, Brazil, 2009
- Table 12: IBD Classification
- Table 13: Select Nonbone IBDs, by Company and Surgical Approach, Brazil,
2009
- Table 14: Characteristics of Bone Graft Materials
- Table 15: Advantages and Disadvantages of Various Bone Graft Materials
- Table 16: Select Synthetic BGS Materials
2.0 BRAZILIAN ORTHOPEDIC DEVICE MARKET
- Figure 6: Orthopedic Device Market Growth, by Segment, Brazil, 2010 - 2015
- Table 17: Key Health and Economic Indicators, Brazil, 2010
- Table 18: Orthopedic Device Procedures, by Type, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 19: Brazilian Orthopedic Device Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$ and
R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 20: Leading Competitors in the Orthopedic Device Market, by Segment,
as a % of Total, Brazil, 2010
3.0 RECONSTRUCTIVE JOINT IMPLANT MARKET
- Figure 7: Reconstructive Joint Implant Market, Brazil (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 21: Reconstructive Joint Implant Procedures, by Segment, Brazil,
2009 - 2015
- Table 22: Reconstructive Joint Implant Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$ and
R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 23: Reconstructive Hip Implant Market, by Type, Brazil (US$ and R$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 24: Reconstructive Hip Implant Market Growth, by Type, Brazil, 2010
- 2015
- Table 25: Reconstructive Hip Implant Market, by Type, as a % of Total,
Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 26: Primary THA Implant Market, by Type, Brazil (US$ and R$), 2009 -
2015
- Table 27: Primary THA Implant Market Growth, by Type, Brazil, 2010 - 2015
- Table 28: Primary THA Implant Market, by Type, as a % of Total, Brazil,
2009 - 2015
- Table 29: Reconstructive Knee Implant Market, by Type, Brazil (US$ and
R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 30: Reconstructive Knee Implant Market Growth, by Type, Brazil, 2010
- 2015
- Table 31: Reconstructive Knee Implant Market, by Type, as a % of Total,
Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 32: Primary TKA Implant Market, by Type, Brazil (US$ and R$), 2009 -
2015
- Table 33: Primary TKA Implant Market Growth, by Type, Brazil, 2010 - 2015
- Table 34: Primary TKA Implant Market, by Type, as a % of Total, Brazil,
2009 - 2015
- Table 35: Reconstructive Shoulder Implant Market, by Type, Brazil (US$ and
R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 36: Reconstructive Joint Implant ASPs, by Manufacturer and Device
Type, Brazil (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 37: Reconstructive Joint Implant ASPs, by Manufacturer and Device
Type, Brazil (R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 38: Reconstructive Joint Implant ASP Growth, by Manufacturer and
Device Type, Brazil, 2010 - 2015
- Table 39: Drivers and Limiters of the Reconstructive Joint Implant Market,
Brazil
- Table 40: Leading Competitors in the Reconstructive Joint Implant Market,
as a % of Total, Brazil, 2010
4.0 TRAUMA DEVICE MARKET
- Figure 8: Trauma Device Market, Brazil (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 41: Trauma Device Procedures, by Segment, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 42: Internal Fixation Units, by Segment, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 43: Trauma Device Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$ and R$), 2009 -
2015
- Table 44: Internal Fixation Device Market, by Type, Brazil (US$ and R$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 45: Plate and Screw Market, by Type, Brazil (US$ and R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 46: Plate and Screw Market Growth, by Type, Brazil, 2010 - 2015
- Table 47: Plate and Screw Market, by Type, as a % of Total, Brazil, 2009 -
2015
- Table 48: IM Nail Market, by Type, Brazil (US$ and R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 49: IM Nail Market Growth, by Type, Brazil, 2010 - 2015
- Table 50: IM Nail Market, by Type, as a % of Total, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 51: External Fixation Device Market, Brazil (US$ and R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 52: Trauma Device ASPs, by Manufacturer and Device Type, Brazil
(US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 53: Trauma Device ASPs, by Manufacturer and Device Type, Brazil
(R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 54: Trauma Device ASP Growth, by Manufacturer and Device Type,
Brazil, 2010 - 2015
- Table 55: Drivers and Limiters of the Trauma Device Market, Brazil
- Table 56: Leading Competitors in the Trauma Device Market, as a % of
Total, Brazil, 2010
5.0 SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET
- Figure 9: Spinal Implant Market, by Segment, as a % of Total, Brazil, 2010
and 2015
- Table 57: Spinal Implant Procedures, by Segment, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 58: Thoracolumbar Spinal Implant Procedures, by Segment, Brazil,
2009 - 2015
- Table 59: Cervical Spinal Implant Procedures, by Segment, Brazil, 2009 -
2015
- Table 60: Thoracolumbar Fusions, by Instrumentation, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 61: Posterior Minimally Invasive Thoracolumbar Fusions, by Procedure
Type, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 62: Traditional Thoracolumbar Fusions, by Pathology, Brazil, 2009 -
2015
- Table 63: Cervical Fusions, by Instrumentation, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 64: Traditional Cervical Fusions, by Approach, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 65: IBD Fusions, by Region of the Spine, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 66: Lumbar IBD Fusions, by Approach, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 67: Spinal Nonfusions, by Segment, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 68: Spinal Implant Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$ and R$), 2009 -
2015
- Table 69: Spinal Implant and Other Spine Markets, by Segment, Brazil (US$
and R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 70: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market, by Pathology, Brazil
(US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 71: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market, by Pathology, Brazil
(R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 72: Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market Growth, by Pathology,
Brazil, 2010 - 2015
- Table 73: Traditional Cervical Implant Market, by Approach, Brazil (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 74: Traditional Cervical Implant Market, by Approach, Brazil (R$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 75: Traditional Cervical Implant Market Growth, by Approach, Brazil,
2010 - 2015
- Table 76: Laminoplasty Device Market, Brazil (US$ and R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 77: IBD Market, by Approach, Brazil (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 78: IBD Market, by Approach, Brazil (R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 79: IBD Market Growth, by Approach, Brazil, 2010 - 2015
- Table 80: ASP of Spinal Fusion Implants, by Type and Instrumentation,
Brazil (R$), 2010 and 2015
- Table 81: Spinal Nonfusion Technology Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 82: Spinal Nonfusion Technology Market, by Segment, Brazil (R$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 83: Dynamic Stabilization Device Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 84: Dynamic Stabilization Device Market, by Segment, Brazil (R$),
2009 - 2015
- Table 85: Dynamic Stabilization Device Market Growth, by Segment, Brazil,
2010 - 2015
- Table 86: Dynamic Stabilization Device Market, by Segment, as a % of
Total, Brazil, 2010 - 2015
- Table 87: Artificial Disc Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 88: Artificial Disc Device Market, by Segment, Brazil (R$), 2009 -
2015
- Table 89: Artificial Disc Market Growth, by Segment, Brazil, 2010 - 2015
- Table 90: Artificial Disc Market, by Segment, as a % of Total, Brazil,
2010 - 2015
- Table 91: Vertebral Compression Fracture Treatment Market, by Segment,
Brazil (US$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 92: Vertebral Compression Fracture Treatment Market, by Segment,
Brazil (R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 93: Vertebral Compression Fracture Treatment Market Growth, by
Segment, Brazil, 2010 - 2015
- Table 94: Vertebral Compression Fracture Treatment Market, by Segment, as
a % of Total, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 95: Drivers and Limiters of the Spinal Implant Market, Brazil
- Table 96: Leading Competitors in the Spinal Implant Market, as a % of
Total, Brazil, 2010
6.0 BONE GRAFT SUBSTITUTES MARKET
- Figure 10: Bone Graft Procedures, by Material, as a % of Total, Brazil,
2010 and 2015
- Table 97: Average Volume of Bone Graft Used per Procedure, by Application,
Brazil, 2010
- Table 98: Bone Graft Procedures, by Material, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 99: BGS Procedures, by Application, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
- Table 100: BGS Market, by Material, Brazil (US$ and R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 101: BGS ASPs, by Application, Brazil (US$ and R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 102: BGS Market, by Application, Brazil (US$ and R$), 2009 - 2015
- Table 103: Drivers and Limiters of the BGS Market, Brazil
- Table 104: Leading Competitors in the BGS Market, as a % of Total, Brazil,
2010
APPENDIX A: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS
- MRG Acronyms and Initialisms
APPENDIX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
- Figure 11: Orthopedic Device Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$), 2009 - 2015
(Detailed Format)
- Figure 12: Reconstructive Joint Implant Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$),
2009 - 2015 (Detailed Format)
- Figure 13: Trauma Device Market, by Segment, Brazil (US$), 2009 - 2015
(Detailed Format)
- Figure 14: Spinal Implant Procedures, by Segment, Brazil, 2009 - 2015
(Detailed Format)
- Figure 15: BGS Market, by Material, Brazil (US$), 2009 - 2015 (Detailed
Format)
|
