本報告已在2012年05月08日停止出版。
本報告，提供美國泌尿系統醫療裝置市場的整體分析、區塊別的市場概要・市場分析・競爭分析，由下列摘要形式闡述。
報告摘要
調查方式
第1章 美國的泌尿系統醫療裝置市場
第2章 尿失禁治療裝置市場
第3章 結石管理裝置市場
第4章 前列腺癌治療裝置市場
第5章 前列腺肥大症治療裝置市場
第6章 泌尿系統內視鏡市場
第7章 ED治療裝置市場
附錄A
附錄B
圖表一覽表
Abstract
The US urological device market will experience robust growth, largely fueled
by expansion in the urinary incontinence (UI) device segment. This particular
market represented the largest segment in 2009 and will experience the highest
growth through 2014. Reimbursement changes that took effect in 2008 will
continue to create significant unit growth in the intermittent catheter
segment of the UI device market, which will fuel revenue expansion.
Additionally, the desire among hospitals to reduce catheter-associated urinary
tract infections (CAUTIs) will support sales of anti-infective Foley
catheters, which are priced at a premium. The vaginal slings segment of the UI
device market will also experience strong growth through 2014, driven by the
demand for new, premium-priced minimally invasive fixationless vaginal slings,
which provide benefits such as high efficacy and reduced patient recovery
periods. Like the UI device market, the stone management, prostate cancer, and
benign prostatatic hyperplasia (BPH) device markets will all be driven by the
growing preference for minimally invasive treatment options. Physicians and
patients prefer minimally invasive procedures because of the fast recovery
times, shorter hospital stays, and reduced pain associated with these
procedures. Despite competition from pharmaceuticals that treat conditions
such as UI, kidney stones, and BPH, the US urological device market will
experience rapid growth through 2014.
METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This report uses a number of methodologies to gather and present data and
analysis. At the outset, a large survey of secondary sources is conducted.
These sources act as the basis for the primary research stage, which builds
and enhances the quantitative and qualitative attributes of the early research.
Secondary sources include
- Government sources:
- Securities and Exchange Commission filings
- Food and Drug Administration and patent filings
- National Center for Health Statistics data
- Urological device companies:
- Annual reports, product brochures, corporate profiles, etc.
- Internal databases and reports:
- Previous reports on similar/related sources
- General Internet searches, medical literature, and newspaper/magazine
searches:
- Identifying various centers of specialization and articles that might
provide leads for primary research
The secondary research stage builds the foundation for the primary research.
The primary research methodology has four steps:
Step 1: The first step involves an impartial scan of all the
information gathered during the secondary research stage to determine its
utility based on the specific requirements of this report. Each piece of
information is either discarded or marked as high- or low-priority and then
organized appropriately as determined by the structure and sectioning of the
report.
Step 2: At this stage, early assumptions are formed as to the
implications of the information for the various urological device market
segments. These assumptions are then used to determine hypotheses using both
inductive and deductive approaches. On the quantitative front, these
hypotheses result in full historical and projected market data sets (market
sizes - unit sales, average selling prices [ASPs], and revenues - as well as
market shares).
Step 3: At this stage, the research is in position for its most
important primary phase - expert interviews. Throughout the secondary research
phase, industry and medical experts are identified.
These experts are then contacted by telephone and asked to participate in
interviews on recent trends and developments in the industry. Interviews are
either conducted at the time of the initial call or scheduled at the
convenience of the expert. Interview questions are tailored to the expertise
of each particular interviewee, although in most cases, the most important
questions are asked of all experts. The questions are largely based on the
assumptions and hypotheses developed in Step 2, which are then augmented,
discarded, or adjusted based on the views and positions put forth. Attempts
are made, whenever possible, to cross-check the views of various experts
against each other and to reach positions of consensus on issues and market
numbers.
Step 4: The final stage of primary research involves individual and
group analysis by Millennium Research Group. All research results are assessed
and cross-checked thoroughly to determine their validity, relevance, and
weight. From this process, qualitative conclusions are reached and data points
finalized.
FORECAST METHODOLOGY
In addition to Steps 1 through 4 as outlined above, the following
“bottom-up” methodology is used to develop forecast assumptions
for the report.
A comprehensive breakdown of various urological device procedures is prepared
using data from several sources, including professional associations,
government statistics, and private research/media sources. Industry experts
and practitioners are consulted to ensure accuracy and verify observed trends.
As a cross-check, total industry revenues available through annual reports and
other sources are compared against modeled industry revenues.
Using the best estimates of industry experts, practitioners, private
research/media sources, and inhouse experts, year-by-year growth rates and
ASPs are applied individually to each subcategory to derive forecasts. These
estimates are cross-checked by industry experts (marketing managers, product
managers, CEOs, etc.) and further refined.
Overall findings are compared against market and procedure forecasts published
by other sources to ensure reasonable estimates.
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
METHODOLOGY
1.0 US UROLOGICAL DEVICE MARKET
- 1.1 Market Overview
- 1.2 Market Analysis
- 1.2.1 Key Report Updates
- 1.2.2 Procedures
- 1.2.3 Market Forecast
- 1.2.4 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 1.3 Competitive Analysis
- 1.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 1.3.2 Market Shares
- 1.3.3 Competitor Discussions (in Alphabetical Order)
- American Medical Systems
- Boston Scientific
- Coloplast
- C. R. Bard
- Olympus/Gyrus-ACMI
- Other
2.0 URINARY INCONTINENCE DEVICE MARKET
- 2.1 Market Overview
- 2.2 Market Analysis
- 2.2.1 Device Overview and Procedures
- 2.2.1.1 Urinary Catheters
- 2.2.1.2 Vaginal Slings
- 2.2.1.3 Urine Drainage Bags
- 2.2.1.4 Artificial Urinary Sphincters
- 2.2.1.5 Male Slings
- 2.2.1.6 Urethral Bulking Agents
- 2.2.1.7 Electrical Stimulation and Magnetic Innervation (Qualitative
Discussion Only)
- Implantable Sacral Nerve Stimulation
- Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation
- Direct Pelvic Floor Electrical Stimulation
- Magnetic Innervation
- 2.2.2 Market Forecast
- 2.2.2.1 Urinary Catheter Market
- Intermittent Catheter Market
- Foley Catheter Market
- Male External Catheter Market
- 2.2.2.2 Vaginal Sling Market
- Fixationless Vaginal Sling Market
- Traditional Vaginal Sling Market
- 2.2.2.3 Urine Drainage Bag Market
- 2.2.2.4 Artificial Urinary Sphincter Market
- 2.2.2.5 Male Sling Market
- 2.2.2.6 Urethral Bulking Agent Market
- 2.3 Competitive Analysis
- 2.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 2.3.2 Market Shares
3.0 STONE MANAGEMENT DEVICE MARKET
- 3.1 Market Overview
- 3.2 Market Analysis
- 3.2.1 Device Overview and Procedures
- 3.2.1.1 Ureteral Stents
- 3.2.1.2 Holmium Lasers
- 3.2.1.3 Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Devices
- 3.2.1.4 Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Devices
- Combination Lithotripsy Devices
- Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy Devices
- Ultrasonic Lithotripsy Devices
- Pneumatic Lithotripsy Devices
- 3.2.2 Market Forecast
- 3.2.2.1 Ureteral Stent Market
- 3.2.2.2 Holmium Laser Market
- Holmium Laser Fiber Market
- Holmium Laser System Market
- 3.2.2.3 Retrieval Device Market
- 3.2.2.4 Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Device Market
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripter Market
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Disposable Accessory Market
- 3.2.2.5 Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Device Market
- Combination Lithotripsy Device Market
- Ultrasonic Lithotripsy Device Market
- Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy Device Market
- Pneumatic Lithotripsy Device Market
- 3.3 Competitive Analysis
- 3.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 3.3.2 Market Shares
4.0 PROSTATE CANCER DEVICE MARKET
- 4.1 Market Overview
- 4.2 Market Analysis
- 4.2.1 Device Overview and Procedures
- 4.2.1.1 Brachytherapy Seeds
- Iodine-125 Brachytherapy Seeds
- Palladium-103 Brachytherapy Seeds
- Cesium-131 Brachytherapy Seeds
- 4.2.1.2 Cryoablation Devices
- 4.2.1.3 High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Devices (Qualitative
Discussion Only)
- 4.2.2 Market Forecast
- 4.2.2.1 Brachytherapy Seed Market
- Iodine-125 Brachytherapy Seed Market
- Palladium-103 Brachytherapy Seed Market
- Cesium-131 Brachytherapy Seed Market
- 4.2.2.2 Cryoablation Device Market
- 4.3 Competitive Analysis
- 4.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 4.3.2 Market Shares
5.0 BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA DEVICE MARKET
- 5.1 Market Overview
- 5.2 Market Analysis
- 5.2.1 Device Overview and Procedures
- 5.2.1.1 Laser Treatments
- 5.2.1.2 Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
- 5.2.1.3 Minimally Invasive Procedures
- 5.2.2 Market Forecast
- 5.2.2.1 Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate Device Market
- 5.2.2.2 Holmium Laser Market
- 5.2.2.3 Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy Device Market
- 5.2.2.4 Radiofrequency Device Market
- 5.2.2.5 Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Device Market
- 5.2.2.6 Prostatic Stent Market
- 5.3 Competitive Analysis
- 5.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 5.3.2 Market Shares
6.0 UROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPE MARKET
- 6.1 Market Overview
- 6.2 Market Analysis
- 6.2.1 Device Overview and Procedures
- 6.2.2 Market Forecast
- 6.2.2.1 Flexible Ureteroscope Market
- 6.2.2.2 Rigid Cystoscope Market
- 6.2.2.3 Flexible Cystoscope Market
- 6.2.2.4 Semirigid Ureteroscope Market
- 6.2.2.5 Rigid Resectoscope Market
- 6.2.2.6 Rigid Nephroscope Market
- 6.3 Competitive Analysis
- 6.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 6.3.2 Market Shares
7.0 ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION DEVICE MARKET
- 7.1 Market Overview
- 7.2 Market Analysis
- 7.2.1 Device Overview and Procedures
- 7.2.2 Market Forecast
- 7.2.2.1 Inflatable Erectile Dysfunction Device Market
- 7.2.2.2 Malleable Erectile Dysfunction Device Market
- 7.3 Competitive Analysis
- 7.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 7.3.2 Market Shares
APPENDIX A: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS
APPENDIX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Figure 1: Urological Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Figure 2: UI Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Figure 3: Stone Management Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Figure 4: Prostate Cancer Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Figure 5: BPH Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Figure 6: Urological Endoscope Market, by Scope Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Figure 7: ED Device Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 1: Companies Mentioned in This Report
METHODOLOGY
1.0 US UROLOGICAL DEVICE MARKET
- Figure 8: US Urological Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 2: Key Report Updates, 2010
- Table 3: Urological Device Procedures, by Segment, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 4: Urological Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 5: Drivers of the Urological Device Market, US
- Table 6: Limiters of the Urological Device Market, US
- Figure 9: Leading Competitors in the Urological Device Market, as a % of
Total, US, 2009
- Table 7: Leading Competitors in the Urological Device Market, by Segment,
as a % of Total, US, 2009
2.0 URINARY INCONTINENCE DEVICE MARKET
- Figure 10: UI Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 8: Types of UI
- Table 9: UI Management Options
- Table 10: UI Treatment Options
- Table 11: Types of Urinary Catheters
- Table 12: Selected Indications for Urinary Catheterization
- Table 13: Advantages and Disadvantages of Vaginal Slings, by Material
- Table 14: Vaginal Sling Procedures, by Segment, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 15: Commercial Sling Procedures, by Segment, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 16: UI Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 17: Urinary Catheter Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 18: Intermittent Catheter Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 19: Intermittent Catheter Strip Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 20: Intermittent Catheter Tray Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 21: Intermittent Catheter Closed System Market, by Type, US (US$),
2008 - 2014
- Table 22: Foley Catheter Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 23: Foley Catheter Tray Market, by Material, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 24: Foley Catheter Strip Market, by Material, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 25: Latex Foley Catheter Tray Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 26: Latex Foley Catheter Strip Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 27: Silicone Foley Catheter Tray Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 28: Silicone Foley Catheter Strip Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 29: MEC Market, by Material, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 30: MEC Market Growth, by Material, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 31: Vaginal Sling Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 32: Fixationless Vaginal Sling Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 33: Fixationless Vaginal Sling Market Growth, by Segment, US, 2009 -
2014
- Table 34: Traditional Vaginal Sling Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 35: Urine Drainage Bag Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 36: Urine Drainage Bag Market Growth, by Segment, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 37: AUS Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 38: Male Sling Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 39: Urethral Bulking Agent Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 40: Leading Competitors in the UI Device Market, by Segment, as a %
of Total, US, 2009
- Table 41: Leading Competitors in the Urinary Catheter Market, by Segment,
as a % of Total, US, 2009
- Table 42: Leading Competitors in the Urine Drainage Bag Market, by
Segment, as a % of Total, US, 2009
3.0 STONE MANAGEMENT DEVICE MARKET
- Figure 11: Stone Management Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 43: Stone Management Treatment Options
- Table 44: Stone Management Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 45: Stone Management Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 46: Ureteral Stent Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 47: Holmium Laser Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 48: Holmium Laser Fiber Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 49: Holmium Laser Fiber Market Growth, by Segment, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 50: Holmium Laser System Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 51: Retrieval Device Market, by Material, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 52: Retrieval Device Market Growth, by Material, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 53: ESWL Device Market, by Segment, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 54: ESWL Device Market Growth, by Segment, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 55: Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Device Market, by Segment, US (US$),
2008 - 2014
- Table 56: Combination Lithotripsy Device Market, by Segment, US (US$),
2008 - 2014
- Table 57: Combination Lithotripsy Device Market Growth, by Segment, US,
2009 - 2014
- Table 58: Ultrasonic Lithotripsy Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008
- 2014
- Table 59: Ultrasonic Lithotripsy Device Market Growth, by Segment, US,
2009 - 2014
- Table 60: Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy Device Market, by Segment, US
(US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 61: Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy Device Market Growth, by Segment,
US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 62: Pneumatic Lithotripsy Device Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 63: Leading Competitors in the Stone Management Device Market, by
Segment, as a % of Total, US, 2009
- Table 64: Leading Competitors in the Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Device
Market, by Segment, as a % of Total, US, 2009
4.0 PROSTATE CANCER DEVICE MARKET
- Figure 12: Prostate Cancer Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 65: Selected Prostate Cancer Treatment Options
- Table 66: Prostate Cancer Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 67: Radiation Prostate Cancer Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 68: Prostatectomy Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 69: Brachytherapy Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 70: I-125 Brachytherapy Seed Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 71: I-125 Brachytherapy Seed Procedure Growth, by Type, US, 2009 -
2014
- Table 72: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Seed Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 73: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Seed Procedure Growth, by Type, US, 2009 -
2014
- Table 74: Cs-131 Brachytherapy Seed Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 75: Cs-131 Brachytherapy Seed Procedure Growth, by Type, US, 2009 -
2014
- Table 76: Prostate Cancer Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 77: Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 78: I-125 Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 79: I-125 Brachytherapy Seed Market Growth, by Type, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 80: I-125 Brachytherapy Stranded Seed Market, by Type, US (US$),
2008 - 2014
- Table 81: I-125 Brachytherapy Stranded Seed Market Growth, by Type, US,
2009 - 2014
- Table 82: I-125 Brachytherapy Loose Seed Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 83: I-125 Brachytherapy Loose Seed Market Growth, by Type, US, 2009
- 2014
- Table 84: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 85: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Seed Market Growth, by Type, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 86: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Stranded Seed Market, by Type, US (US$),
2008 - 2014
- Table 87: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Stranded Seed Market Growth, by Type, US,
2009 - 2014
- Table 88: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Loose Seed Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008
- 2014
- Table 89: Pd-103 Brachytherapy Loose Seed Market Growth, by Type, US, 2009
- 2014
- Table 90: Cs-131 Brachytherapy Seed Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 91: Cs-131 Brachytherapy Seed Market Growth, by Type, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 92: Cs-131 Brachytherapy Stranded Seed Market, by Type, US (US$),
2008 - 2014
- Table 93: Cs-131 Brachytherapy Stranded Seed Market Growth, by Type, US,
2009 - 2014
- Table 94: Cryoablation Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 95: Cryoablation Disposables Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 96: Cryoablation Capital Equipment Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 97: Leading Competitors in the Prostate Cancer Device Market, as a %
of Total, US, 2009
- Table 98: Leading Competitors in the Brachytherapy Seed Market, by
Segment, as a % of Total, US, 2009
5.0 BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA DEVICE MARKET
- Figure 13: BPH Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 99: BPH Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 100: BPH Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 101: PVP Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 102: PVP Device Market Growth, by Segment, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 103: Holmium Laser Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 104: Holmium Laser Market Growth, by Segment, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 105: TUMT Device Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 106: RF Device Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 107: TURP Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 108: TURP Device Market Growth, by Segment, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 109: Prostatic Stent Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 110: Prostatic Stent Market Growth, by Segment, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 111: Leading Competitors in the BPH Device Market, by Segment, as a
% of Total, US, 2009
6.0 UROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPE MARKET
- Figure 14: Urological Endoscope Market, by Scope Type, US (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 112: Types of Urological Endoscopes
- Table 113: Urological Endoscope Market, by Scope Type, US (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 114: Urological Endoscope Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 115: Urological Endoscope Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 116: Flexible Ureteroscope Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 117: Flexible Ureteroscope Market Growth, by Type, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 118: Rigid Cystoscope Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 119: Rigid Cystoscope Market Growth, by Type, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 120: Flexible Cystoscope Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 121: Fiber Flexible Cystoscope Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 122: Fiber Flexible Cystoscope Market Growth, by Type, US, 2009 -
2014
- Table 123: Video Flexible Cystoscope Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 124: Semirigid Ureteroscope Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 125: Semirigid Ureteroscope Market Growth, by Type, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 126: Rigid Resectoscope Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 127: Rigid Resectoscope Market Growth, by Type, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 128: Rigid Nephroscope Market, by Type, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 129: Rigid Nephroscope Market Growth, by Type, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 130: Leading Competitors in the Urological Endoscope Market, by
Scope Type, as a % of Total, US, 2009
7.0 ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION DEVICE MARKET
- Figure 15: ED Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 131: Nonsurgical ED Treatment Options
- Table 132: Surgical ED Treatment Options
- Table 133: ED Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 134: Inflatable ED Device Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 135: Malleable ED Device Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 136: Leading Competitors in the ED Device Market, as a % of Total,
US, 2009
APPENDIX A: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS
- MRG Acronyms and Initialisms
APPENDIX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
- Figure 16: Urological Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
(Detailed Format)
- Figure 17: UI Device Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014 (Detailed
Format)
- Figure 18: Stone Management Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014 (Detailed
Format)
- Figure 19: Prostate Cancer Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014 (Detailed
Format)
- Figure 20: BPH Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014 (Detailed Format)
- Figure 21: Urological Endoscope Market, by Scope Type, US (US$), 2008 -
2014 (Detailed Format)
- Figure 22: ED Device Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014 (Detailed Format)
預估間歇式導管市場將從現在的2億3,000萬美元到2014年時倍增
2010年11月11日
Global Information, Inc.已開始銷售加拿大市場調查公司Millennium Research Group所發行的報告書「US Markets for Urological Devices 2010 (美國的泌尿系統醫療裝置市場：2010年)」
因2008年4月Medicare修改償還制度，每月導管償還對象數從到現在為止的4件擴大到200件。之後2年，因患者轉換成單次使用處方，促使市場擴大。然常使用間歇式導管的大部分患者覺得迄今多年使用標準且可再利用的導管現在依然容易使用，故該市場還殘留大幅成長的可能性。這些患者每月只使用4∼5個導管。
因其堅固的營業力，Coloplast於2009年時佔有50％以上的市場，C．R. Bard、Astra Tech、Rusch、Hollister則共同分享此區塊剩餘的部分。作為處方，為指定使用特定製造商的產品時，須與醫療服務提供商建構適當的關係。此外，為推銷產品給終端顧客，亦須與銷售業者建構關係。市場上大戶獨佔與醫療服務提供商及銷售業者建構關係的機會，卻成為小規模企業要進入、或在該市場成功上的障礙。
MRG的首席分析師Aaron McCracken先生陳述：「為了成功，製造業者須與醫療服務提供商及醫療機器銷售業者建構良好的關係。為了向銷售業者訂購導管時能指定規定的品牌，亦須直接兜售給患者。」。
|
