美國的牙科生物材料市場：2010年 是由出版商Millennium Research Group在2010年10月所出版的。
這份英文市場調查報告書價格從美金5995起跳。
美國的牙科生物材料市場持續著長年成長。2009年中雖然平均販售價格與處置件數有些下跌，之後將隨著景氣回復而成長的。
本報告書為美國牙科生物材料市場的相關分析，包含最新動向與各種適應、各種材料的市場動向、相關企業的市場佔有率與競爭動向，概述如下。
總綱
方法論
第1章 美國的牙科生物材料市場
- 市場概要
- 市場分析
- 最新動向
- 市場的定義
- 各種適應類別的牙科植入物處置
- 各類別使用代用骨的牙科植入物處置
- 各材料的牙科生物材料處置
- 市場預測
- 市場促進因子與阻礙因子
- 競爭分析
第2章 代用骨市場
- 市場概要
- 市場分析
- 市場的定義
- 處置
- 市場預測
- 市場促進因子與阻礙因子
- 競爭分析
- 新興市場
第3章 牙科用膜市場
- 市場概要
- 市場分析
- 市場的定義
- 處置
- 市場預測
- 市場促進因子與阻礙因子
- 競爭分析
第4章 組織再生市場
- 市場概要
- 市場分析
- 市場的定義
- 處置
- 市場預測
- 市場促進因子與阻礙因子
- 競爭分析
附錄
Abstract
The market for dental biomaterials in the US has exhibited steady growth for
many years. Despite the financial crisis in 2008, procedure volumes and
average selling prices (ASPs) climbed slightly in 2009. Further growth is
expected as the economy recovers and patients stop delaying surgeries. Revenue
increases in this market will continue to be further driven by the aging
population as well as by substantial efforts by manufacturers to educate
clinicians and patients about the benefits of using these products to
complement dental implant and periodontal procedures. The factor most
significantly curtailing this market is the lack of reimbursement and
insurance coverage for the surgeries and increasing oral awareness that will
prevent the need for these procedures. New developments in the industry will
also sustain revenue potential; for example, Straumann received Food and Drug
Administration approval for the use of its Emdogain product in more procedures
and will also release a new membrane in late 2010. BioHorizons has initiated
the process of going public, while Medtronic acquired Osteotech, thereby
expanding its product base in the dental biomaterial space.
METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This report uses a number of methodologies to gather and present data and
analysis. At the outset, a large survey of secondary sources is conducted.
These sources act as the basis for the primary research stage, which builds
and enhances the quantitative and qualitative attributes of the early research.
Secondary sources include
- Government sources:
- Securities and Exchange Commission filings
- Food and Drug Administration and patent filings
- National Center for Health Statistics data
- Dental Biomaterial companies:
- Annual reports, product brochures, corporate profiles, etc.
- Internal databases and reports:
- Previous reports on similar/related sources
- General Internet searches, medical literature, and newspaper/magazine
searches:
- Identifying various centers of specialization and articles that might
provide leads for primary research
The secondary research stage builds the foundation for the primary research.
The primary research methodology has four steps:
Step 1: The first step involves an impartial scan of all the
information gathered during the secondary research stage to determine its
utility based on the specific requirements of this report. Each piece of
information is either discarded or marked as high- or low-priority and then
organized appropriately as determined by the structure and sectioning of the
report.
Step 2: At this stage, early assumptions are formed as to the
implications of the information for the various dental biomaterial market
segments. These assumptions are then used to determine hypotheses using both
inductive and deductive approaches. On the quantitative front, these
hypotheses result in full historical and projected market data sets (market
sizes - unit sales, average selling prices [ASPs], and revenues - as well as
market shares).
Step 3: At this stage, the research is in position for its most
important primary phase - expert interviews. Throughout the secondary research
phase, industry and medical experts are identified.
These experts are then contacted by telephone and asked to participate in
interviews on recent trends and developments in the industry. Interviews are
either conducted at the time of the initial call or scheduled at the
convenience of the expert. Interview questions are tailored to the expertise
of each particular interviewee, although in most cases, the most important
questions are asked of all experts. The questions are largely based on the
assumptions and hypotheses developed in Step 2, which are then augmented,
discarded, or adjusted based on the views and positions put forth. Attempts
are made, whenever possible, to cross-check the views of various experts
against each other and to reach positions of consensus on issues and market
numbers.
In addition, 70 periodontists were surveyed using an online questionnaire.
Physicians are asked to comment on various issues/trends, both in their own
practice and in the overall market. The responses provided are then used to
strengthen or augment the assumptions and hypotheses developed during the
primary research phase.
Step 4: The final stage of primary research involves individual and
group analysis by Millennium Research Group. All research results are assessed
and cross-checked thoroughly to determine their validity, relevance, and
weight. From this process, qualitative conclusions are reached and data points
finalized.
FORECAST METHODOLOGY
In addition to the research methodology outlined above, the following
“bottom-up” methodology is used to develop forecast assumptions
for the report.
A comprehensive breakdown of various dental biomaterial procedures and unit
sales is prepared using data from several sources, including professional
associations, government statistics, and private research/media sources.
Industry experts and practitioners are consulted to ensure accuracy and verify
observed trends. As a cross-check, total industry revenues available through
annual reports and other sources are compared against modeled industry
revenues.
Using the best estimates of industry experts, practitioners, private
research/media sources, and inhouse experts, year-by-year growth rates, and
ASPs are applied individually to each subcategory to derive forecasts. These
estimates are cross-checked by industry experts (marketing managers, product
managers, CEOs, etc.) and further refined.
Overall findings are compared against market and procedure forecasts published
by other sources to ensure reasonable estimates.
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
METHODOLOGY
1.0 US DENTAL BIOMATERIAL MARKET
- 1.1 Market Overview
- 1.2 Market Analysis
- 1.2.1 Key Report Updates
- 1.2.2 Market Definitions
- 1.2.2.1 Dental Biomaterial Procedures by Indication
- Periodontal Defects
- Dental Implants
- 1.2.2.2 Dental Bone Graft Procedures by Type
- Sinus Lift
- Ridge Augmentation
- Ridge Expansion
- Dental Implant Packing
- Socket Extraction
- 1.2.3 Dental Implant Procedures by Indication
- 1.2.4 Dental Implant Procedures Utilizing Bone Graft by Type
- 1.2.5 Dental Biomaterial Procedures by Material
- 1.2.5.1 Bone Graft Substitutes
- 1.2.5.2 Dental Membranes
- 1.2.5.3 Tissue Regeneration
- 1.2.6 Market Forecast
- 1.2.6.1 Bone Graft Substitute Market
- 1.2.6.2 Dental Membrane Market
- 1.2.6.3 Tissue Regeneration Market
- 1.2.7 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 1.2.7.1 Market Drivers
- 1.2.7.2 Market Limiters
- 1.3 Competitive Analysis
- 1.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 1.3.2 Market Shares
- 1.3.3 Competitor Discussions (in Alphabetical Order)
- ACE Surgical Supply
- BioHorizons
- BIOMET 3i
- DENTSPLY Friadent
- Geistlich (through Distributor Osteohealth)
- LifeNet Health
- Osteogenics Biomedical
- Osteohealth
- RTI Biologics (through Distributor Zimmer Dental)
- Straumann
- Other
2.0 BONE GRAFT SUBSTITUTE MARKET
- 2.1 Market Overview
- 2.2 Market Analysis
- 2.2.1 Market Definitions
- 2.2.1.1 Dental Autograft
- 2.2.1.2 Dental Allograft
- Nonproprietary Allograft
- Proprietary Allograft
- 2.2.1.3 Dental Xenograft
- 2.2.1.4 Synthetic Dental Bone Graft Substitute
- 2.2.1.5 Combination Therapies
- 2.2.2 Procedures
- 2.2.2.1 Dental Autograft
- 2.2.2.2 Dental Allograft
- 2.2.2.3 Dental Xenograft
- 2.2.2.4 Synthetic Dental Bone Graft Substitute
- 2.2.3 Market Forecast
- 2.2.3.1 Dental Allograft Market
- 2.2.3.2 Dental Xenograft Market
- 2.2.3.3 Synthetic Dental Bone Graft Substitute Market
- 2.2.4 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 2.2.4.1 Market Drivers
- 2.2.4.2 Market Limiters
- 2.3 Competitive Analysis
- 2.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 2.3.2 Market Shares
- 2.4 Emerging Markets
- 2.4.1 Bone Morphogenetic Protein Market
3.0 DENTAL MEMBRANE MARKET
- 3.1 Market Overview
- 3.2 Market Analysis
- 3.2.1 Market Definitions
- 3.2.2 Procedures
- 3.2.3 Market Forecast
- 3.2.4 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 3.2.4.1 Market Drivers
- 3.2.4.2 Market Limiters
- 3.3 Competitive Analysis
- 3.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 3.3.2 Market Shares
4.0 TISSUE REGENERATION MARKET
- 4.1 Market Overview
- 4.2 Market Analysis
- 4.2.1 Market Definitions
- 4.2.2 Procedures
- 4.2.3 Market Forecast
- 4.2.4 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 4.2.4.1 Market Drivers
- 4.2.4.2 Market Limiters
- 4.3 Competitive Analysis
- 4.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 4.3.2 Market Shares
APPENDIX A: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS
APPENDIX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Figure 1: Dental Biomaterial Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Figure 2: BGS Market, by Material, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Figure 3: Dental Membrane Procedures, by Type, as a % of Total, US, 2009
and 2014
- Figure 4: Tissue Regeneration Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 1: Companies Mentioned in This Report
METHODOLOGY
1.0 US DENTAL BIOMATERIAL MARKET
- Figure 5: Dental Biomaterial Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 2: Key Report Updates, 2010
- Table 3: Dental Bone Graft Procedures, by Indication, 2008 - 2014
- Table 4: Dental Implant Procedures Utilizing Bone Graft, by Type, 2008 -
2014
- Table 5: Total Grams of Bone Graft Utilized in Dental Implant Procedures,
by Type, 2008 - 2014
- Table 6: Dental Biomaterial Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 7: Dental Biomaterial Market Growth, By Segment, US, 2009-2014
- Table 8: Dental Biomaterial Market, by Segment, as a % of Total, US, 2008
- 2014
- Table 9: Drivers and Limiters of the Dental Biomaterial Market, US
- Figure 6: Leading Competitors in the Dental Biomaterial Market, as a % of
Total, US, 2009
- Table 10: Leading Competitors in the Dental Biomaterial Market, by
Segment, as a % of Total, US, 2009
2.0 BONE GRAFT SUBSTITUTE MARKET
- Figure 7: BGS Market, by Material, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Figure 8: Dental Bone Graft Procedures, by Material, as a % of Total, US,
2008 - 2014
- Table 11: Dental Bone Graft Procedures, by Material, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 12: BGS Procedures, by Material, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 13: BGS Market, by Material, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 14: BGS Market Growth, by Material, US, 2009 - 2014
- Table 15: Drivers and Limiters of the BGS Market, US
- Table 16: Leading Competitors in the BGS Market, by Material, as a % of
Total, US, 2009
3.0 DENTAL MEMBRANE MARKET
- Figure 9: Dental Membrane Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 17: Dental Membrane Procedures, by Type, US, 2008 - 2014
- Table 18: Dental Membrane Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 19: Drivers and Limiters of the Dental Membrane Market, US
- Table 20: Leading Competitors in the Dental Membrane Market, by Type, as a
% of Total, US, 2009
4.0 TISSUE REGENERATION MARKET
- Figure 10: Tissue Regeneration Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 21: Tissue Regeneration Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 22: Drivers and Limiters of the Tissue Regeneration Market, US
- Table 23: Leading Competitors in the Tissue Regeneration Market, as a % of
Total, US, 2009
APPENDIX A: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS
- MRG Acronyms and Initialisms
APPENDIX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
- Figure 11: Dental Biomaterial Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2008 - 2014
(Detailed Format)
- Figure 12: BGS Market, by Material, US (US$), 2008 - 2014 (Detailed Format)
- Figure 13: Dental Membrane Procedures, by Type, as a % of Total, US, 2009
and 2014 (Detailed Format)
- Figure 14: Tissue Regeneration Market, US (US$), 2008 - 2014 (Detailed
Format)
|
