日本的外傷治療裝置市場：2010年 是由出版商Millennium Research Group在2010年08月所出版的。
這份英文市場調查報告書價格從美金4197起跳。
本報告書為日本之外傷治療裝置市場分析。提供全體概要與市場預測、市場促進以及抑制要因、競爭、市場動向、各產品市場預測等的檢驗，概述如下。
總綱
方法論
第1章 外傷導論
第2章 日本外傷治療市場
第3章 骨髓内釘市場
第4章 板與螺絲市場
第5章 壓縮型股關節螺絲市場
第6章 套管螺絲市場
第7章 外部固定裝置市場
附錄
Abstract
Through 2014, revenues generated by the Japanese trauma device market will be
stagnant. Growth in procedure volumes will be attributed to the aging
population in Japan, which will primarily fuel uptake of internal fixation
devices (plates and screws, intramedullary [IM] nails, cannulated screws, and
compression hip screws). In addition, surgeons are increasingly adopting
innovative devices - such as anatomic, locking, small and mini standard
plates, as well as cephalomedullary nails - that are backed by clinical data
suggesting that they offer improved outcomes. These devices offer surgeons
more options for open reduction internal fixation of fractures that may
otherwise have been treated with a cast or splint. Surgeons are also adopting
circular and hybrid external fixation devices for elective procedures, such as
limb deformity corrections. Nevertheless, market growth for internal fixation
devices will be offset by biennial reimbursement cuts instituted by the
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) in order to curb rising health
care costs. This will create downward pressure on average selling prices
(ASPs), thereby impeding revenue gains. Although external fixation devices are
not reimbursed in Japan, sales of the devices will also be limited by
declining rates of motor vehicle and industrial accidents as a result of
improved safety measures established by the Japanese government. Consequently,
overall growth of the Japanese market for trauma devices will be negligible
over the forecast period.
METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This report uses a number of methodologies to gather and present data and
analysis. At the outset, a large survey of secondary sources is conducted.
These sources act as the basis for the primary research stage, which builds
and enhances the quantitative and qualitative attributes of the early research.
Secondary sources include
- Government sources:
- Securities and Exchange Commission filings
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
- Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma
- Trauma device companies:
- Annual reports, product brochures, corporate profiles, etc.
- Internal databases and reports:
- Previous reports on similar/related sources
- General Internet searches, medical literature, and newspaper/magazine
searches:
- Identifying various centers of specialization and articles that might
provide leads for primary research
The secondary research stage builds the foundation for the primary research.
The primary research methodology has four steps:
Step 1: The first step involves an impartial scan of all the
information gathered during the secondary research stage to determine its
utility based on the specific requirements of this report. Each piece of
information is either discarded or marked as high- or low-priority and then
organized appropriately as determined by the structure and sectioning of the
report.
Step 2: At this stage, early assumptions are formed as to the
implications of the information for the various trauma device market segments.
These assumptions are then used to determine hypotheses using both inductive
and deductive approaches. On the quantitative front, these hypotheses result
in full historical and projected market data sets (market sizes - unit sales,
average selling prices [ASPs], and revenues - as well as market shares).
Step 3: At this stage, the research is in position for its most
important primary phase - expert interviews. Throughout the secondary research
phase, industry and medical experts are identified.
These experts are then contacted by telephone and asked to participate in
interviews on recent trends and developments in the industry. Interviews are
either conducted at the time of the initial call or scheduled at the
convenience of the expert. Interview questions are tailored to the expertise
of each particular interviewee, although in most cases, the most important
questions are asked of all experts. The questions are largely based on the
assumptions and hypotheses developed in Step 2, which are then augmented,
discarded, or adjusted based on the views and positions put forth. Attempts
are made, whenever possible, to cross-check the views of various experts
against each other and to reach positions of consensus on issues and market
numbers.
Step 4: The final stage of primary research involves individual and
group analysis by Millennium Research Group. All research results are assessed
and cross-checked thoroughly to determine their validity, relevance, and
weight. From this process, qualitative conclusions are reached and data points
finalized.
FORECAST METHODOLOGY
In addition to the research methodology outlined above, the following
“bottom-up” methodology is used to develop forecast assumptions
for the report.
A comprehensive breakdown of various trauma device procedures, unit sales,
average selling prices and market values is prepared using data from several
sources, including professional associations, government statistics, and
private research/media sources. Industry experts and practitioners are
consulted to ensure accuracy and verify observed trends. As a cross-check,
total industry revenues available through annual reports and other sources are
compared against modeled industry revenues.
Using the best estimates of industry experts, practitioners, private
research/media sources, and inhouse experts, year-by-year growth rates and
ASPs are applied individually to each subcategory to derive forecasts. These
estimates are cross-checked by industry experts (marketing managers, product
managers, CEOs, etc.) and further refined.
Overall findings are compared against market and procedure forecasts published
by other sources to ensure reasonable estimates.
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
METHODOLOGY
1.0 INTRODUCTION TO TRAUMA
- 1.1 Bone and Joint Anatomy
- 1.1.1 Bone Anatomy
- 1.1.2 Bone Formation
- 1.1.3 Bone Disorders and Diseases
- 1.1.3.1 Fractures
- 1.1.3.2 Osteoporosis
- 1.1.3.3 Arthritis
- 1.2 Treatment Options
- 1.2.1 Fracture Management
- 1.2.2 Internal Fixation Devices
- 1.2.2.1 Intramedullary Nails
- 1.2.2.2 Plates and Screws
- 1.2.2.3 Compression Hip Screws
- 1.2.2.4 Cannulated Screws
- 1.2.3 External Fixation Devices
2.0 JAPANESE TRAUMA DEVICE MARKET
- 2.1 Market Overview
- 2.2 Market Analysis
- 2.2.1 Key Report Updates
- 2.2.2 Procedures
- 2.2.3 Market Forecast
- 2.2.3.1 Internal Fixation Device Market
- Intramedullary Nail Market
- Plate and Screw Market
- Compression Hip Screw Market
- Cannulated Screw Market
- 2.2.3.2 External Fixation Device Market
- 2.2.4 Market Drivers and Limiters
- 2.2.4.1 Market Drivers
- 2.2.4.2 Market Limiters
- 2.3 Competitive Analysis
- 2.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 2.3.2 Market Shares
- 2.3.3 Competitor Discussions (in Alphabetical Order)
- DePuy (through distributor Japan MDM)
- Smith & Nephew
- Stryker
- Synthes
- Zimmer
- Other
3.0 INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL MARKET
- 3.1 Market Overview
- 3.2 Market Analysis
- 3.2.1 Procedures
- 3.2.2 Market Forecast
- 3.2.3 Market Forecast by Material
- 3.2.4 Market Forecast by Indication
- 3.3 Competitive Analysis
4.0 PLATE AND SCREW MARKET
- 4.1 Market Overview
- 4.2 Market Analysis
- 4.2.1 Procedures
- 4.2.2 Market Forecast
- 4.2.3 Market Forecast by Mechanism
- 4.2.4 Market Forecast by Material
- 4.2.5 Market Forecast by Type
- 4.3 Competitive Analysis
5.0 COMPRESSION HIP SCREW MARKET
- 5.1 Market Overview
- 5.2 Market Analysis
- 5.2.1 Procedures
- 5.2.2 Market Forecast
- 5.2.3 Market Forecast by Material
- 5.3 Competitive Analysis
6.0 CANNULATED SCREW MARKET
- 6.1 Market Overview
- 6.2 Market Analysis
- 6.2.1 Procedures
- 6.2.2 Market Forecast
- 6.2.3 Market Forecast by Material
- 6.3 Competitive Analysis
7.0 EXTERNAL FIXATION DEVICE MARKET
- 7.1 Market Overview
- 7.2 Market Analysis
- 7.2.1 Procedures
- 7.2.2 Market Forecast
- 7.2.3 Market Forecast by Type
- 7.3 Competitive Analysis
- 7.3.1 Competitive Landscape
- 7.3.2 Market Shares
APPENDIX A: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS
APPENDIX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Figure 1: Trauma Device Market, by Type, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Figure 2: IM Nail Market, by Indication, as a % of Total, Japan, 2009 and
2014
- Figure 3: Plate and Screw Market, by Type, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Figure 4: Compression Hip Screw Market, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Figure 5: Cannulated Screw Market, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Figure 6: External Fixation Device Market, by Type, as a % of Total,
Japan, 2009 and 2014
- Table 1: Companies Mentioned in This Report
METHODOLOGY
- Table 2: Average Currency Exchange Rates, 2009
1.0 INTRODUCTION TO TRAUMA
- Table 3: Types of Bone Fractures
- Table 4: Advantages and Disadvantages of External Fixation Devices
- Table 5: Types of External Fixation Devices
2.0 JAPANESE TRAUMA DEVICE MARKET
- Figure 7: Trauma Device Market, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 6: Key Report Updates, 2010
- Table 7: Trauma Device Procedures, by Fixation Type, Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 8: Trauma Device Procedures, by Type, Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 9: Trauma Device Procedures, by Type, as a % of Total, 2008 - 2014
- Figure 8: Internal Fixation Device Market, by Type, Japan (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 10: Trauma Device Market, by Type, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 11: Trauma Device Market, by Type, Japan (¥), 2008 - 2014
- Table 12: Internal Fixation Device Market, by Type, Japan (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 13: Internal Fixation Device Market, by Type, Japan (¥), 2008 - 2014
- Table 14: Drivers and Limiters of the Trauma Device Market, Japan
- Figure 9: Leading Competitors in the Trauma Device Market, as a % of
Total, Japan, 2009
- Table 15: Leading Competitors in the Trauma Device Market, by Type, as a %
of Total, Japan, 2009
- Table 16: Leading Competitors in the Internal Fixation Device Market, by
Type, as a % of Total, Japan, 2009
3.0 INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL MARKET
- Figure 10: IM Nail Market, by Indication, Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 17: IM Nail Procedures and Units, Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 18: IM Nail Market, by Material, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 19: IM Nail Market, by Material, Japan (¥), 2008 - 2014
- Table 20: IM Nail Market Growth, by Material, Japan, 2009 - 2014
- Table 21: IM Nail Market, by Material, as a % of Total, Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 22: IM Nail Market, by Indication, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 23: IM Nail Market, by Indication, Japan (¥), 2008 - 2014
- Table 24: IM Nail Market Growth, by Indication, Japan, 2009 - 2014
- Table 25: IM Nail Market, by Indication, as a % of Total, Japan, 2008 -
2014
- Table 26: Leading Competitors in the IM Nail Market, by Indication, as a %
of Total, Japan, 2009
4.0 PLATE AND SCREW MARKET
- Figure 11: Plate and Screw Market, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 27: Plate and Screw Procedures and Units, Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 28: Anatomic Plate and Screw Procedures and Units, Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 29: Standard Plate and Screw Procedures and Units, by Size, Japan,
2008 - 2014
- Figure 12: Plate and Screw Market, by Mechanism, as a % of Total, Japan,
2009 and 2014
- Table 30: Plate and Screw Market, by Mechanism, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 31: Plate and Screw Market, by Mechanism, Japan (¥), 2008 - 2014
- Table 32: Plate and Screw Market Growth, by Mechanism, Japan, 2009 - 2014
- Table 33: Plate and Screw Market, by Mechanism, as a % of Total, Japan,
2008 - 2014
- Table 34: Plate and Screw Market, by Material, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 35: Plate and Screw Market, by Material, Japan (¥), 2008 - 2014
- Table 36: Plate and Screw Market Growth, by Material, Japan, 2009 - 2014
- Table 37: Plate and Screw Market, by Material, as a % of Total, Japan,
2008 - 2014
- Figure 13: Plate and Screw Market, by Type, as a % of Total, Japan, 2009
and 2014
- Table 38: Plate and Screw Market, by Type, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 39: Plate and Screw Market, by Type, Japan (¥), 2008 - 2014
- Table 40: Plate and Screw Market Growth, by Type, Japan, 2009 - 2014
- Table 41: Plate and Screw Market, by Type, as a % of Total, Japan, 2008 -
2014
- Table 42: Anatomic Plate and Screw Market, by Indication, Japan (US$),
2008 - 2014
- Table 43: Anatomic Plate and Screw Market, by Indication, Japan (¥), 2008
- 2014
- Table 44: Anatomic Plate and Screw Market Growth, by Indication, Japan,
2009 - 2014
- Table 45: Anatomic Plate and Screw Market, by Indication, as a % of Total,
Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 46: Standard Plate and Screw Market, by Size, Japan (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 47: Standard Plate and Screw Market, by Size, Japan (¥), 2008 - 2014
- Table 48: Standard Plate and Screw Market Growth, by Size, Japan, 2009 -
2014
- Table 49: Standard Plate and Screw Market, by Size, as a % of Total,
Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 50: Leading Competitors in the Plate and Screw Market, as a % of
Total, Japan, 2009
5.0 COMPRESSION HIP SCREW MARKET
- Figure 14: Compression Hip Screw Market, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 51: Compression Hip Screw Procedures and Units, Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 52: Compression Hip Screw Market, by Material, Japan (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 53: Compression Hip Screw Market, by Material, Japan (¥), 2008 - 2014
- Table 54: Compression Hip Screw Market Growth, by Material, Japan, 2009 -
2014
- Table 55: Compression Hip Screw Market, by Material, as a % of Total,
Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 56: Leading Competitors in the Compression Hip Screw Market, as a %
of Total, Japan, 2009
6.0 CANNULATED SCREW MARKET
- Figure 15: Cannulated Screw Market, Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 57: Cannulated Screw Procedures and Units, Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 58: Cannulated Screw Market, by Material, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 59: Cannulated Screw Market, by Material, Japan (¥), 2008 - 2014
- Table 60: Cannulated Screw Market Growth, by Material, Japan, 2009 - 2014
- Table 61: Cannulated Screw Market, by Material, as a % of Total, 2008 -
2014
- Table 62: Leading Competitors in the Cannulated Screw Market, as a % of
Total, Japan, 2009
7.0 EXTERNAL FIXATION DEVICE MARKET
- Figure 16: External Fixation Device Market, by Type, Japan (US$), 2008 -
2014
- Table 63: External Fixation Procedures and Units, Japan, 2008 - 2014
- Table 64: External Fixation Market, by Type, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
- Table 65: External Fixation Market, by Type, Japan (¥), 2008 - 2014
- Table 66: External Fixation Market Growth, by Type, Japan, 2009 - 2014
- Table 67: External Fixation Market, by Type, as a % of Total, Japan, 2008
- 2014
- Table 68: Leading Competitors in the External Fixation Market, as a % of
Total, Japan, 2009
APPENDIX A: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS
MRG Acronyms and Initialisms
APPENDIX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
- Figure 17: Trauma Device Market, by Type, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
(Detailed Format)
- Figure 18: IM Nail Market, by Indication, as a % of Total, Japan, 2009 and
2014 (Detailed Format)
- Figure 19: Plate and Screw Market, by Type, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
(Detailed Format)
- Figure 20: Compression Hip Screw Market, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014
(Detailed Format)
- Figure 21: Cannulated Screw Market, Japan (US$), 2008 - 2014 (Detailed
Format)
- Figure 22: External Fixation Device Market, by Type, as a % of Total,
Japan, 2009 and 2014 (Detailed Format)
日本的金屬板、螺絲釘市場在2014年之前將超過1億7,000萬美元的規模
2010年09月08日
Global Information, Inc.將送交Millennium Research Group的市場調查報告「Japanese Markets for Trauma Devices 2010 (日本的外傷治療裝置市場：2010年)」
依據在全球醫療技術市場知識方面為全球權威的Millennium Research Group(MRG)之預測，金屬板及螺絲釘廣被外科醫生接受並採用，日本的金屬板•螺絲釘市場於2014年之前將達超過1億7,000萬美元的規模。
日本的外科醫生對於關節周圍的複雜骨折，廣泛採用Acumed製的Acu-Loc金屬板與Synthes製的Locking Compression金屬板等解剖學的rocking plating系統。其乃配合解剖學金屬板治療對象關節周圍部位的尺寸而預先調節，能將軟組織的炎症抑制到最小限度，及早治癒骨折。已知日本外科醫生在長骨骨折方面特別喜歡使用髓內釘勝於解剖學的金屬板。
「對國內企業及多國籍公司而言，解剖學的金屬板變成有很大的成長機會。與歐美外科醫生比較，日本的外科醫生使用解剖學的金屬板代替髓內釘，乃因更喜好穩定感與癒後改善的臨床證據。關於此點，醫療業界眾說紛紜。另一方面，日本採用解剖學金屬板的外科醫生持續增加，呈現侵蝕該領域髓內釘市場銷售額的狀況。」。MRG的分析者Arun Jaganathan先生如此陳述。
本報告留意如何促進到2014年為止的日本金屬板與螺絲釘、髓內釘、壓迫股關節螺絲釘、針頭螺絲釘、外部固定裝置等產品引進與市場擴大的新動向。而且總括性分析各裝置的處理件數與銷售台數、平均銷售價格、收益等，加上詳細定性分析送交5年的預測與最新的市場佔有率資料。
|
