DOCSIS 3.0從纜線到寬頻IP服務之轉移：全球市場動向已即預測-2010年 是由出版商Multimedia Research Group, Inc.在2010年07月所出版的。
這份英文市場調查報告書包含81 Pages 價格從美金1995起跳。
全球有線事業業者，探索著對更高速的網路服務的需求擴大之對應方法，以將來能夠整合影像服務的統合IP網路之實現為目標，導入了DOCSIS 3.0技術以及相關構造。
本報告書為DOCSIS 3.0與其架構對事業與市場造成的影響與其課題分析，包含2011-2014年市場預測與販售者動向等，概述如下。
第1章 總綱：對統合IP網路之轉移
第2章 序論以及背景
- DOCSIS的基本的概要
- DOCSIS 3.0與EuroDOCSIS 3.0之比較
- 事業概要
- DOCSIS 1.0事業促進要因
- DOCSIS 1.1事業促進要因
- DOCSIS 2.0事業促進要因
- DOCSIS 3.0事業促進要因
- DOCSIS 3.0 市場促進要因
- DOCSIS 3.0 課題
第3章 DOCSIS 3.0的架構：長處與短處
- 初期系統得重新審視
- 可切換數位影像
- 統合型vs模組型DOCSIS 3.0架構
- 迂迴架構
- 透過CMTS的DOCSIS
- 居住用閘道的使用
第4章 財務上以及事業上的檢討事項
- 可切換數位影像
- DOCSIS 3.0之成本以及成本管理
- 頻寬的再生
- 居住用閘道的使用
- 與DOCSIS國際服務計畫之比較
第5章 DOCSIS 3.0預測
第6章 對MSO的提案與結論
- 跌價的持續
- 「IPTV」之促進
- 將SDV做為長期架構之認知
- 頻寬的進一步解放
第7章 販售者簡介
- Vendor Matrix
- ARRIS
- Aurora Networks
- BelAir Networks（無線）
- BigBand Networks
- Casa Systems
- Cisco
- D-Link
- Harmonic
- Incognito Software
- Juniper Networks
- LiquidXStreams
- Motorola
- Netgear
- RGB Networks
- Technicolor（Thomson）
- Ubee Interactive（Ambit Microsystems）
- Vecima Networks
- Verivue
第8章 服務供應商簡介
- 亞太地區
- 歐洲
- 奧地利
- 比利時
- 捷克共和國
- 丹麥
- 芬蘭
- 法國
- 德國
- 匈牙利
- 愛爾蘭
- 荷蘭
- 挪威
- 波蘭
- 葡萄牙
- 羅馬尼亞
- 西班牙
- 瑞典
- 瑞士
- 英國
- 北美
- 總括：全球CMTS以及DOCSIS 3.0加入者
第9章 附錄1：DOCSIS/EuroDOCSIS標準概要
第10章 附錄2：CMAP概要
- CMAP不可缺的理由
- CMAP之目的
- CMAP主要機能目標
第11章 附錄3：用語集
第12章 企業索引
Abstract
Executive Summary
Cable industry Operators all over the world are deploying DOCSIS1 3.0
technology and related architectures in order to understand how they can serve
the growing demand for higher speed Internet service and eventually evolve to
an all IP network that also carries video services. There are a number of
issues that are causing the solution to not be very clear cut: the economy,
existing infrastructure, operational expenses and different approaches to
DOCSIS 3.0 upgrades. Since the intent is to deliver more bandwidth, there is
also a deeper issue on how the MSOs intend to free up channels to be upgraded
to DOCSIS 3.0 given that there isn' t usually excess bandwidth in their systems
today.
This report aims to clarify this picture both for the MSO and suppliers on a
global basis. It also helps other carriers (Satellite, Telco) to better
understand the competitive challenge they will be facing in 2011-2014. DOCSIS
3.0 products and architectures will be examined with attention to the pros and
cons for each of them. In some cases, there will be a step-by-step migration
strategy, while in other cases, it will be easier to quickly move to the final
destination of being a converged IP network, the stated long-term goal of many
of the major MSOs.
While the DOCSIS architecture has performed well for Operators, it is still
not seen as the ultimate goal. A new architecure has emerged as a candidate
for the latest NGAA (Next Generation Access Architecture) called the CMAP
(Converged Multiservice Access Platform) architecture, proposed primarily by
Comcast, but having industry-wide support. CMAP' s technology goals are aimed
at providing for lower costs, greater flexibility and incorporating a wide
range of headend components.
Another goal of CMAP, although not directly stated, is to allow for additional
Vendors to sell products to the Operators including Alcatel-Lucent and Juniper
Networks. Juniper was involved with building a modular CMTS product,2 but
withdrew as it did not seem to be a profitable business for them. One of the
hopes of CMAP supporters is to expand the “tri-opoly” of the
current major Cable Vendors: ARRIS, Cisco, and Motorola.
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary - Moving To A Converged IP Network
2. Introduction and Background
- 2.1 Basic DOCSIS Overview
- 2.2 DOCSIS 3.0 / EuroDOCSIS 3.0 Comparison
- 2.3 Business Overview
- 2.3.1 Business Drivers for DOCSIS 1.0
- 2.3.2 Business Drivers for DOCSIS 1.1
- 2.3.3 Business Drivers for DOCSIS 2.0
- 2.3.4 Business Drivers for DOCSIS 3.0
- 2.4 Market Drivers for DOCSIS 3.0
- 2.5 Issues for DOCSIS 3.0
- 2.5.1 Legal
- 2.5.2 Technical
- 2.5.3 Business
3. Architectures for DOCSIS 3.0 - Pros and Cons
- 3.1 Initial System Review
- 3.2 Switched Digital Video
- 3.3 Integrated vs. Modular DOCSIS 3.0 Architectures
- 3.4 Bypass Architecture
- 3.5 DOCSIS Through the CMTS
- 3.6 Residential Gateway Approach
4. Financial and Business Considerations
- 4.1 Switched Digital Video
- 4.2 DOCSIS 3.0 Costs & Control of Costs
- 4.3 Reclaiming Bandwidth
- 4.4 Residential Gateway Approach
- 4.5 DOCSIS Global Service Plan Comparisons
5. DOCSIS 3.0 Forecasts
- 5.1 Global
- 5.2 U.S.
- 5.3 Europe
- 5.4 Asia
6. Recommendations and Conclusions for MSOs
- 6.1 Continue with Price Reductions
- 6.2 Accelerate “IPTV”
- 6.3 Recognize SDV as a Long-Term Architecture
- 6.4 Free Up More Bandwidth
7. Vendor Profiles
- 7.1 Vendor Matrix
- 7.2 ARRIS
- 7.3 Aurora Networks
- 7.4 BelAir Networks (Wireless)
- 7.5 BigBand Networks
- 7.6 Casa Systems
- 7.7 Cisco
- 7.8 D-Link
- 7.9 Harmonic
- 7.10 Incognito Software
- 7.11 Juniper Networks
- 7.12 LiquidXStreams
- 7.13 Motorola
- 7.14 Netgear
- 7.15 RGB Networks
- 7.16 Technicolor (Thomson)
- 7.17 Ubee Interactive (Ambit Microsystems)
- 7.18 Vecima Networks
- 7.19 Verivue
8. Service Provider Profiles
- 8.1 Asia-Pacific
- 8.1.1 China
- 8.1.2 Japan
- 8.1.3 Korea
- 8.1.4 Singapore
- 8.2 Europe
- 8.2.1 Austria
- 8.2.2 Belgium
- 8.2.3 Czech Republic
- 8.2.4 Denmark
- 8.2.5 Finland
- 8.2.6 France
- 8.2.7 Germany
- 8.2.8 Hungary
- 8.2.9 Ireland
- 8.2.10 The Netherlands
- 8.2.11 Norway
- 8.2.12 Poland
- 8.2.13 Portugal
- 8.2.14 Romania
- 8.2.15 Spain
- 8.2.16 Sweden
- 8.2.17 Switzerland
- 8.2.18 United Kingdom
- 8.3 North America
- 8.3.1 Canada
- 8.3.2 United States
- 8.4 Summary - Global CMTS and DOCSIS 3.0 Susbscribers
9. Appendix 1: DOCSIS/EuroDOCSIS Standards Overview
10. Appendix 2: CMAP Overview
- 10.1 Why is there the need for CMAP?
- 10.2 CMAP Objectives
- 10.3 The Key Functional Goals for CMAP:
11. Appendix 3: Glossary of Terms
12. Index of Companies
Table of Figures
- Figure 2-1: Simple DOCSIS Network Diagram
- Figure 2-2: European RF Spectrum for HFC Networks
- Figure 3-1: Cisco' s SDV Architecture
- Figure 3-2: Before and After SDV
- Figure 3-3: RGB Networks' Next Gen SDV Architecture
- Figure 3-4: DOCSIS IP Video Bypass Diagram
- Figure 3-5: GoBackTV' s CMTS Bypass System
- Figure 3-6: Cisco Architecture for DOCSIS 3.0 Network
- Figure 5-1: Top Ten Countries By Broadband Lines in 2014
- Figure 5-2: Global Cable Broadband Forecast 2009 - 2014 (Million)
- Figure 5-3: Broadband Line Growth Forecast By Market
- Figure 5-4: U.S. Breakdown of Internet Connection Types
- Figure 5-5: Willingness to Pay for Very High-Speed Service
- Figure 5-6: European Cable Broadband Internet Subscribers By Country -
2010 (Thousands)
- Figure 5-7: Asian Cable Broadband Internet Subs By Country - 2010
(Thousands)
- Figure 8-1: Virgin Media Cable Broadband Net Adds
- Figure 10-1: CMAP Downstream Port Assignments
- Figure 10-2: Modular CMAP Architecture
- Figure 10-3: CMAP RF Port Configuration
- Figure 10-4: Possible CMAP Chassis
Table of Tables
- Table 2-1: DOCSIS vs. EuroDOCSIS - Usable Bandwidth
- Table 4-1: Global Comparison of DOCSIS 3.0 Service (US$)
- Table 5-1: Percentage of U.S. Consumers Likely to Subscribe to Very
High-Speed Internet
- Table 5-2: Consumer Usage of High-Speed Internet (more than 50 Mbps)
- Table 7-1: Vendor Matrix
- Table 8-1: Asia-Pacific D3 Service Pricing (US$) - 2010
- Table 8-2: Europe ED3 Service Pricing (US$) - 2010
- Table 8-3: North America D3 Service Pricing (US$) - 2010
- Table 8-4: Estimated DOCSIS 3.0 (Very High-Speed) Cable Broadband
Subscribers Worldwide
