Cover Image
市場調查報告書

乳房病變定位法市場:比較分析及終端用戶偏好的調查

Breast Lesion Localization Methods Market Comparative Analysis and End User Preference Study - Market Assessment (Field Force, Comparative Analysis, Business Model, End User Preference Survey, Competitive Product Portfolio and Strategic Consolidation)

出版商 MarketsandMarkets 商品編碼 356859
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 55 Pages
訂單完成後即時交付
價格
Back to Top
乳房病變定位法市場:比較分析及終端用戶偏好的調查 Breast Lesion Localization Methods Market Comparative Analysis and End User Preference Study - Market Assessment (Field Force, Comparative Analysis, Business Model, End User Preference Survey, Competitive Product Portfolio and Strategic Consolidation)
出版日期: 2016年04月15日 內容資訊: 英文 55 Pages
簡介

乳房病變定位法市場預計從2015到2020年以14.5%的年複合成長率發展,從2015年的4億4,590萬美元到2020年達到8億7,790萬美元。該市場主要由於乳癌手術數的增加及對定位裝置有利的醫療費報銷指南的實施,預計今後數年急速成長。可是,由於乳房病變定位設備相關的風險的法規批審的不確定性,該市場的成長有受限的可能性。

本報告提供乳房病變定位法市場相關調查分析,市場影響成長要素分析,乳房病變定位法的各種比較分析,經營模式分析,及終端用戶偏好調查等。

第1章 簡介

第2章 調查手法

第3章 摘要整理

第4章 力場分析

  • 簡介
  • 促進要素
  • 抑制因素:醫療費償付
  • 機會
  • 目前趨勢
  • 力場分析的評估

第5章 乳房病變定位法:比較分析

  • 乳房病變定位的領域的發展
  • 市場區隔
  • 乳房病變定位法:定位設備的各類型
    • 使用引線的定位
    • 使用放射性同位素的定位
      • RSL (放射性粒子定位)
      • ROLL (放射線誘導式潛在性病變定位)
    • 磁描繪器
    • 其他定位手法
    • 乳房病變定位法:比較分析

第6章 乳房病變定位法:經營模式

  • 技術授權
  • 聯盟/協定的共同販賣
  • 獨立商業生產
  • 經營模式:C. R. BARD 公司

第7章 終端用戶偏好調查

  • 選擇標準的評估
  • 調換趨勢的定性評估

第8章 比較產品系列、策略性整合

目錄
Product Code: MD 4236

Growing Number of Breast Cancer Surgeries and Implementation of Favorable Reimbursement Guidelines for Localization Devices are the Major Factors Driving the Breast Lesion Localization Methods Market

The breast lesion localization methods market is projected to reach USD 877.9 million by 2020 from USD 445.9 million in 2015, at a CAGR of 14.5% from 2015 to 2020.

The overall market for breast lesion localization methods is expected to witness rapid growth in the coming years, primarily due to the increasing number of breast cancer surgeries and implementation of favorable reimbursement guidelines for localization devices. However, the growth of this market will be restrained by the uncertainty in regulatory approval procedures due to the risks associated with breast lesion localization devices.

This report categorizes the breast lesion localization methods market in four distinct segments-wire localization, radioisotope localization (radioactive seed localization, radio occult lesion localization), magnetic tracers, and others. Wire localization commands the major market share as it is an established technique. However, the magnetic tracers segment is expected to witness the highest growth owing to advantages such as increased workflow, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness; elimination of issues related to nonradioactive technology; and improved surgical planning.

The qualitative data in this study covers various levels of industry analysis, such as market dynamics (drivers, restraints, opportunities, and threats). The competitive landscape covers detailed information of the product portfolio of key players and their strategic consolidations. This qualitative assessment also covers an end-user preference study which focuses on the assessment of selection criteria and replacement trends based on a number of factors, such as detection and success rate, re-excision rate, cost, mean localization time, effectiveness, safety, ease of use, and mean operating time.

The abovementioned market research data, current market size, and forecast of the future trends will help key players and new entrants make necessary decisions regarding product offerings, change in approach, R&D investments for innovation in products and technologies, and levels of output in order to remain successful. This report also provides qualitative assessment of the breast lesion localization methods market in terms of replacement trends, competitor portfolio analysis, and selection criteria for adopting breast lesion localization methods from an end-user perspective.

Reasons to Buy the Report:

The report will enrich both established firms as well as new entrants/smaller firms to gauge the pulse of the market. Insights cited in the report will help these firms to stay competitive in the market and garner a greater market share. The study analyzes end-user preferences, their needs, and position of particular products in the breast lesion localization methods market. This will result in enhanced consumer understanding and increase the effectiveness of their overall business processes. Companies purchasing the report can use the below-mentioned information for strategy development, market penetration, product development/innovation, and for strengthening market shares.

The report provides insights on the following pointers:

  • Comparative Assessment: This section provides comparative analysis of different breast lesion localization methods on the basis of different parameters for selection criteria
  • End-user Preference Analysis: This section provides important parameters considered during the selection of breast lesion localization methods by particular end users. It also provides insights on the adoption trends of breast lesion localization methods
  • Competitive Product Portfolio Assessment: In-depth assessment of detailed information of product portfolios and strategic consolidations by leading players in the breast lesion localization methods market
  • Replacement Trends: This section provides exhaustive information on replacement trends for breast lesion localization methods
  • Selection criteria for Breast Lesion Localization Methods (End-user Perspective): This section provides in-depth assessment of critical factors that are important from an end-user viewpoint. These parameters include detection and success rate, re-excision rate, cost, mean localization time, effectiveness, safety, ease of use, and mean operating time, among other factors

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1. INTRODUCTION
  • 1.2. SCOPE OF THE STUDY SEGMENTATION

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • 2.1. METHODOLOGY
  • 2.2. PRIMARY RESEARCH: SAMPLING FRAME

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. FORCE FIELD ANALYSIS

  • 4.1. INTRODUCTION
  • 4.2. DRIVERS
  • 4.3. RESTRAINT: REIMBURSEMENT
  • 4.4. OPPORTUNITY
  • 4.5. CURRENT TREND
  • 4.6. FORCE FIELD ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT

5. BREAST LESION LOCALIOZATION METHODS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

  • 5.1. EVOLUTION IN THE FIELD OF BREAST LESION LOCALIZATION
  • 5.2. MARKET SEGMENTATION
  • 5.3. BREAST LESION LOCALIZATION METHODS, BY TYPE OF LOCALIZATION DEVICES
    • 5.3.1. WIRE LOCALIZATION
    • 5.3.2. RADIOISOTOPE LOCALIZATION
      • 5.3.2.1. RADIOACTIVE SEED LOCALIZATION (RSL)
      • 5.3.2.2. RADIO OCCULT LESION LOCALIZATION (ROLL)
      • 5.3.2.3. OTHERS
    • 5.3.3. MAGNETIC TRACERS
    • 5.3.4. OTHER LOCALIZATION METHODS
    • 5.3.5. BREAST LESION LOCALIZATION METHODS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

6. BREAST LESION LOCALIZATION METHODS MARKET: BUSINESS MODEL

  • 6.1. TECHNOLOGY LICENSING
  • 6.2. CO-DISTRIBUTION THROUGH PARTNERSHIPS/AGREEMENTS
  • 6.3. INDEPENDENT COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION
  • 6.4. BUSINESS MODEL: C. R. BARD

7. END USER PREFERENCE SURVEY

  • 7.1. SELECTION CRITERIA EVALUATION
  • 7.2. QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF REPLACEMENT TREND

8. COMPETITIVE PRODUCT PORTFOLIO AND STRATEGIC CONSOLIDATION

Back to Top