|
市場調查報告書
建物一體型太陽光發電（BIPV）：光只是展示的時代已經結束
Building Integrated Photovoltaics: Moving Beyond Showcase Projects
| 出版商 |
Lux Research |
| 出版日期 |
2011年10月 |
商品編碼 |
225963 |
| 內容資訊 |
英文 Pages: 23 |
| 價格 |
|
|
建物一體型太陽光發電（BIPV）：光只是展示的時代已經結束 是由出版商Lux Research在2011年10月所出版的。
這份英文市場調查報告書包含Pages: 23 價格從美金3500起跳。
從起步的企業到大企業、受到各種業者所關注的訴求力、建物一體型太陽光發電系統（BIPV）因高成本、嚴格的規格要件、以及、替換傳統建物的關鍵，薄膜太陽光發電模組開發的不成熟、還有許多待填補的空隙。
本報告書為蘊含60億美元規模市場性的建物一體型太陽光發電（BIPV）依技術的・商業的側面做檢驗、收集了今後主要市場中發展的可行與否之探求的最新調査情報，概述如下。
總綱
- 即使至今具有高訴求力、BIPV系統對於太陽光發電市場全體仍無法有什麼貢獻
- 掌握BIPV領域的命運的現地分散發電
- 克服成本與標準化課題的技術屬於少數
概況
- BIPV：是一場夢幻嗎？
- 對於性能要件與採用的課題之理解是、BIPV系統與建物附屬型太陽光發電系統（BAPV）的明確區別是必要的
- BIPV系統開發者設法以各種形式與傳統型太陽光發電技術做融合
- BIPV商品在傳統建材中比起來通常很貴
- 現時點的BIPV系統導入要因是固定價格買賣制度與美的意識
- BIPV，仍是全體太陽光發電市場的1個領域、歐美占了其大半
- 今後十年受到期待的LEED認定以及零能源建築（NEZEB）
- 特例優待措施與標準化的遲緩造成的不透明感防礙了普及
- 推進要因與障礙混雜、看不輕的BIPV系統將來性
- 概況相關結論
分析
- BIPV系統發展關鍵是透過高效率能源生產達到成本節約
- 做為太陽光資源所見的BIPV之評價所尋求的電力成本平準化
- 將BIPV系統認定為建築資源是因為存在多數必須基準、但同時也不是LCOE（LaneCat Outside Edition）這樣簡單的東西
- 在加州與印度，做為屋根建材的用途是最現實的
- 一體型壁板材料是初始企業中受到歡迎的東西，但其性能怎麼看都不安定
- BIPV系統普及的推進角色是零能源以及LEED認定建築
- 最容易猜測的情況是、歐洲牽引了BIPV系統設置數的增加、2016年中發電力會升到1.2G瓦
- 長期展望：BIPV在2017-2018年將迎向關鍵時刻
將來展望
關於Lux Research
巻末注
Description
Despite attracting attention from start-ups as well as large corporations, building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) has remained a niche due to high costs, stringent specification requirements, and the early developmental stage for thin-film solar modules best suited for replacing traditional building materials. In this report, we examine the technological and commercial status of BIPV and answer the $6 billion question: "Will BIPV ever become a a major market, or will it stay limited to the aesthetics-minded buyer?"
Table of Contents
- Executive Summary
- Despite this Appeal, BIPV Has Failed to Make a Dent in the Larger Solar Market
- On-site Distributed Generation Will Prove to be a Lifeline for the BIPV Sector
- A Few Technologies Will Overcome the Cost and Standardization Challenges
- Landscape
- BIPV: A Dream Deferred or a Dream Denied?
- A Clear Distinction between BIPV and BAPV Is Critical to Understand Performance Requirements and Adoption Challenges
- BIPV Developers Take a Number of Different Approaches in Adapting Conventional PV Technologies
- All BIPV Products Exhibit a Price Premium over Conventional Building Construction Materials
- FiT Premiums and Aesthetics have Driven the Current Adoption of BIPV
- BIPV Remains a Small Fraction of the Larger Solar Installed Base, Dominated by Europe and the U.S.
- LEED-certified and Net-zero-energy Buildings Might Take Over in the Coming Decade
- Uncertainty Surrounding BIPV-specific Financial Incentives and a Lack of Standardization Slows Adoption
- Mix of Drivers and Barriers Makes BIPV's Prospects Uncertain
- Landscape Conclusions
- Analysis
- BIPV's Case Hinges on Cost Savings through Efficient Energy Generation
- Levelized Cost of Electricity Proves Useful for Evaluating BIPV as a Solar Asset
- Many Necessary Criteria Exist to Qualify BIPV as a Structural Asset, but None are as Easily Quantifiable as LCOE
- Roofing Applications Prove Most Viable in California, India
- BIPV Siding has Proven Popular for Start-ups, but Performance Is Shaky at Best
- BIPV's Growth is Driven by NZEBs and LEED-certified Buildings
- In the Most Likely Scenario, Europe Drives the Growth of BIPV Installations, Propelling Them to 1.2 GW by 2016
- Long-term Outlook: BIPV's inflection point comes in the 2017-2018 timeframe
- Outlook
- About Lux Research
- Endnotes
|
