|
市場調查報告書
投資自主創新事業：中國新興技術創投公司的概況
Investing in Indigenous Innovation: China's Emerging Technology VC Landscape
| 出版商 |
Lux Research |
| 出版日期 |
2011年06月 |
商品編碼 |
225951 |
| 內容資訊 |
英文 Pages: 36 |
| 價格 |
|
|
投資自主創新事業：中國新興技術創投公司的概況 是由出版商Lux Research在2011年06月所出版的。
這份英文市場調查報告書包含Pages: 36 價格從美金3500起跳。
中國2010年創投公司的活躍顯著，其投資額整體為54億美元，並留下成長率全球第一的實績。中國的經濟成長為其原動力，可說是一目瞭然，創投公司的成長也受到獎勵投資以及研發的具體政策的推動。針對新興技術的企業投資從2010年初期以後到現在，佔了超過中國企業投資整體的40%。此外，依照技術領域、地區差異、國內・國外創投公司企業別而明顯不同的投資模式所構成的複雜結構，加速整體企業環境，同時也規定其形式。在北京以及上海的金融中心內，還有江蘇和廣東的產業據點，企業投資熱絡，另一方面，與這些投資的集中相反，交易普及至國內31地區中的26個地區。新興技術領域的國內創投公司將重點轉移至通路和財務、退出時期，另一方面，國外投機群堅持各自所熟知地區的技術差異化。該創投公司環境顯示，（1）投資家基於各自的網路、現在地、技術・市場觀點，分別以不同的形式在中國進行投資、（2）技術偵測無法只以單一地區為基礎、（3）主要大學和科學・產業園區的偵測產生決定性的影響等事實。
本報告，彙整中國創投公司的現狀與動向的最新調查情報，由下列摘要形式闡述。
報告摘要
概況
- 金融危機後，超越V字復甦的創投公司活動
- 橫跨整體產業，加速各種企業投資活動的因素為將來性與市場
- 新興技術領域的創投公司總價額和交易件數的地區分布不均等
- 領先的北京、上海、江蘇、廣東
- 北京vs上海
- 江蘇vs廣東
- 比較京津冀、揚子江三角洲、珠江三角洲
- 促進投資的地理擴大的因子：比較大學、高科技園區、國內總生產（GDP）
- 針對概況的結論
分析
- 橫跨所有標準並呈現明顯不同行動的外國・國內創投公司
- 背負Series A的國內創投公司企業
- 不同地區行動的外國・國內創投公司
- 具不同產業前提和活動的外國・國內創投公司
- 各產業領域的概況
- 先進素材
- 生物科技
- 能源儲存
- 環境保護
- 環保建築
- 醫療機器
- 肥料
- 醫藥品
- 智慧電網
- 新興電子技術（機器）
- 太陽能
- 食品・營養食品
- 水
- 生物素材・生質燃料
將來展望
調查方法
關於Lux Research
Description
A huge jump in VC activity was seen in China during 2010, delivering $5.4 billion in VC investment overall and a growth rate second to none globally. While China's economic growth is a clear driver, VC growth was also boosted by specific policies both to drive investment and R&D activity. Venture investment focused on emerging technology now represents over 40% of overall venture investment in China since the start of 2010. A complex structure of technology domain, regional difference and distinct investment patterns by domestic and foreign VC firms fuels and defines the overall venture landscape. Strong venture investment is delivered within the financial centers of Beijing and Shanghai, and the industrial powerhouses in Jiangsu and Guangdong, but despite some level of focus, deals are spread across 26 of the 31 regions in China. Domestic VC firms in emerging technology more heavily weight market channels, financials and time to exit, while foreign venture capitalists remain more heavily attached to technology differentiation in locations they know well. This VC landscape provides compelling evidence that investors play China differently based on their network, location and technology/market focus, that technology scouting can not be based in one area, and scouting of leading universities and science and industrial parks is critical.
Table of Contents
- Executive Summary
- Landscape
- VC Activities Bounce Back Stronger than Ever after the Financial Crisis
- Capability and Markets Drive Diverse VC Investment Activity Across Industries
- Investment Amounts and Deal Sizes Vary Greatly
- Total VC Investment and Deal Count in Emerging Technology Are Unevenly Distributed by Regions
- Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Guangdong Lead the Way
- Beijing vs. Shanghai
- Guangdong vs. Jiangsu
- Jing-Jin-Ji vs. Yangtze River Delta vs. Pearl River Delta
- Factors Driving Investment's Geographic Distribution: 211 University vs. Hi-Tech Park vs. GDP
- Landscape Conclusions
- Analysis
- Foreign and Domestic VC Firms Display Distinct Behavior across All Metrics
- Domestic VC Firms Load up on Series A
- Foreign and Domestic VC Firms Play Location Differently
- Foreign and Domestic VCs have Different Industry Hypotheses and Activities
- Walking the landscape: VC Investment Patterns by Industry
- Advanced Materials
- Biotechnology
- Energy Storage
- Environmental Protection
- Green Building
- Medical Equipment
- Pesticide and Fertilizer
- Pharmaceutical
- Smart Grid
- Emerging Electronics
- Solar
- Food and Nutrition
- Water
- Biomaterials and Biofuels
- Outlook
- Methodology
- About Lux Research
|
