Cover Image
市場調查報告書

美國的頁岩天然氣產業

US Shale Gas Industry Analysis

出版商 KuicK Research 商品編碼 318513
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 96 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
Back to Top
美國的頁岩天然氣產業 US Shale Gas Industry Analysis
出版日期: 2014年11月01日 內容資訊: 英文 96 Pages
簡介

由於到目前為止無法到達的天然氣田的支援進入的技術和改善生產能力的技術等,技術方面的進步,對美國的頁岩天然氣E&P關注高漲。過去數年中,數十億美元規模的頁岩天然氣開發也簽訂了不少契約,美國及全球企業表示對該產業的關注看作是有很大潛力的產業。

本報告提供美國的頁岩天然氣產業現狀及預測的相關調查、美國的頁岩天然氣產業概要、蘊藏量與主要的礦床、天然氣及頁岩天然氣的生產規模的變化與預測、有利於產業發展的材料與市場機會、應解決課題、頁岩天然氣開發相關的投資及契約趨勢、相關法律與支援策略,主要經營者簡介等彙整資料。

第1章 美國的頁岩天然氣產業:概要

第2章 頁岩天然氣產業:勘探、技術、科學技術方面

  • 價值鏈分析
  • 勘探
  • 開採、開發
  • 生產、加工
  • 流通

第3章 美國的頁岩天然氣蘊藏量

  • 可采蘊藏量
  • 各所在地
    • Antrim Shale(密西根州)
    • Barnett Shale(德克薩斯州)
    • Caney Shale(奧克拉荷馬州)
    • Conesauga Shale(阿拉巴馬州)
    • Fayetteville Shale(阿肯色州)
    • Floyd Shale(阿拉巴馬州)
    • Gothic Shale(科羅拉多州)
    • Haynesville Shale(路易斯安那州)
    • Collingwood-Utica Shale(密西根州)
    • New Albany Shale(伊利諾斯盆地)
    • Pearsall Shale(德克薩斯州)
    • Devonian Shales(阿巴拉契亞盆地)
    • Utica Shale(紐約州、俄亥俄州)
    • Woodford Shale(奧克拉荷馬州)

第4章 頁岩天然氣E&P的投資

第5章 美國的頁岩天然氣生產分析

第6章 美國的頁岩天然氣產業的動態

  • 有利的要素
  • 應該解決課題
  • 成長機會

第7章 美國的頁岩天然氣開發:未來展望

第8章 頁岩熱潮推動LNG出口計劃

第9章 美國的頁岩天然氣相關的法律規章等

  • 政府的支援
  • 政策、規定
  • 相關機關

第10章 競爭環境

  • Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
  • BHP Billiton
  • Chesapeake Energy Corporation
  • CONSOL Energy Inc
  • Devon Energy Corporation
  • Encana Corporation
  • Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • Marathon Oil
  • Noble Energy
  • Southwestern Energy Company

圖表

目錄

Shale gas has emerged as one of the sought after investments areas in the energy sector, especially in the US. Combined with the technical advances that have helped access huge and previously inaccessible natural gas reserves and the production capability in the industry, there has been increased interest in the US shale gas industry, both on the production and exploration side. The first commercial shale gas well was drilled in the US in 1821 in the Devonian Fredonia Shale formation in Fredonia, New York. The scope, potential and importance of shale gas production was however overshadowed by the much larger volumes produced from conventional gas reservoirs. The Barnett field in the Dallas Fort Worth area of Texas has been historically the major shale gas producing area of the US. This area saw significant drilling activity in the late 1990s and has grown to be one of the largest natural gas fields in the US. This area had a production of 1.83 TCF in 2010, accounting for more than a third of all shale gas production in the US. The Barnett field has a productive use of about 5,000 square miles.

The technical expertise and information gained from over a decade of production from developing the Barnett Shale play in Texas has been immense. This has played a major role in improving the efficiency of shale gas development around the country. The Marcellus Shale in the eastern United States has also been an important one and other well locations that are suitable and have potential for economical gas production is being identified. This has been achieved by using surface, subsurface geology techniques and seismic techniques to generate maps of the subsurface.

Combined with the technical advances that have helped access huge and previously inaccessible natural gas reserves and the production capability in the industry, there has been increased interest in the US shale gas industry, both on the production and exploration side. In recent months and years we have seen many multibillion dollar shale gas development deals over the past year. American and global companies have shown an interest in the industry that is seen to have much potential. Between 2008 and 2012, the country saw investments of about US$ 130 Billion in tight oil and shale gas projects and about a fifth of these came from abroad through joint ventures.

The prospects for shale gas production are significant and hold much promise but there are considerable aspects of uncertainty with respect to the size and economics of this resource. While there are many large shale formations, some formations such as the Marcellus are so large that it has been possible to do extensive production testing on only a limited portion of the entire formation. Moreover most of the shale gas wells drillings have been recent and this gives rise to apprehensions and considerable uncertainty regarding their long term productivity. Though there have been achievements with regard to development of well drilling and completion technology there is uncertainty in the future course of development of technology that would enable the country to substantially increase well productivity and reduce production costs.

“US Shale Gas Industry Analysis” Report Highlight:

  • US Shale Gas Industry Overview
  • Shale Gas Exploration, Technical and Technology Aspects
  • US Shale Gas Reserve Analysis: Technical & Recoverable Reserves
  • Investments in Shale Gas Exploration & Production
  • US Shale Gas Sector Dynamics
  • Shale Boom to Drive LNG Export Projects

Table of Contents

1. US Shale Gas Industry Overview

2. Shale Gas Sector - Exploration, Technical and Technology Aspects

  • 2.1. Value chain analysis
  • 2.2. Exploration
  • 2.3. Drilling and Development
  • 2.4. Production & Processing
  • 2.5. Distribution

3. US Shale Gas Reserve Analysis

  • 3.1. Technical & Recoverable Reserves
  • 3.2. By Location
    • 3.2.1. Antrim Shale, Michigan
    • 3.2.2. Barnett Shale, Texas
    • 3.2.3. Caney Shale, Oklahoma
    • 3.2.4. Conesauga Shale, Alabama
    • 3.2.5. Fayetteville Shale, Arkansas
    • 3.2.6. Floyd Shale, Alabama
    • 3.2.7. Gothic Shale, Colorado
    • 3.2.8. Haynesville Shale, Louisiana
    • 3.2.9. Collingwood-Utica Shale, Michigan
    • 3.2.10. New Albany Shale, Illinois Basin
    • 3.2.11. Pearsall Shale, Texas
    • 3.2.12. Devonian Shales, Appalachian Basin
    • 3.2.13. Utica Shale, New York and Ohio
    • 3.2.14. Woodford Shale, Oklahoma

4. Investments in Shale Gas Exploration & Production

5. US Shale Gas Production Analysis

6. US Shale Gas Sector Dynamics

  • 6.1. Favorable Parameters
  • 6.2. Challenges to be Resolved
  • 6.3. Growth Opportunities

7. US Shale Gas Development Future Outlook

8. Shale Boom to Drive LNG Export Projects

9. US Shale Gas Regulatory Aspects

  • 9.1. Government Support
  • 9.2. Policy & regulations
  • 9.3. Institutions

10. Competitive Landscape

  • 10.1. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
  • 10.2. BHP Billiton
  • 10.3. Chesapeake Energy Corporation
  • 10.4. CONSOL Energy Inc
  • 10.5. Devon Energy Corporation
  • 10.6. Encana Corporation
  • 10.7. Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • 10.8. Marathon Oil
  • 10.9. Noble Energy
  • 10.10. Southwestern Energy Company

List of Figures:

  • Figure 2-1: Lifecycle Phases of Wellhead
  • Figure 3-1: US - Shale Gas Reserves Comparison With Top 10 Global Shale Gas Reserves
  • Figure 3-2: US - Share in Global Shale Gas Reserves
  • Figure 3-3: US - Proven Shale Gas Reserves, 2007-2012 (Trillion Cubic Feet)
  • Figure 3-4: US - Shale Gas Reserves By Region (%)
  • Figure 3-5: Antrim Shale Play - Average General Properties
  • Figure 3-6: Barnett Shale Play - Average General Properties
  • Figure 4-1: Investment in Chemical Industry Arising from Shale Gas, 2010-2020 (US$ Billion)
  • Figure 5-1: US - Natural Gas Production (Trillion Cubic Feet), 2007-2013
  • Figure 5-2: US - Natural Gas Producing Wells, 2008-2013
  • Figure 5-3: US - Shale Gas Production (Trillion Cubic Feet), 2007-2012
  • Figure 5-4: Shale Gas Share of Natural Gas Production (%), 2007-2012
  • Figure 5-5: US - Share of Natural Gas in Total Energy Consumption, 2013
  • Figure 5-6: US - Natural Gas Consumption by Sector, 2013
  • Figure 7-1: US - Shale Gas Production Estimates (Trillion Cubic feet), 2012 & 2040
  • Figure 7-2: US - Chemical Industry Output Driven by Shale Gas Induced Competitiveness, 2012-2020 (US$ Billion)
  • Figure 8-1: US - Natural Gas Export (Trillion Cubic Feet), 2008-2013

List of Tables:

  • Table 3-1: US - Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Unproved Resources, 2012
  • Table 3-2: US - Shale Gas Reserves by State (Billion Cubic Feet), 2007-2012
  • Table 3-3: Barnett & Fayetteville Shale Gas Play Descriptive Technical Data
  • Table 3-4: Haynesville-Bossier & Marcellus Shale Gas Play Descriptive Technical Data
  • Table 3-5: Woodford & Antrim Shale Gas Play Descriptive Technical Data
  • Table 3-6: New Albany & Utica-Pt. Pleasant Shale Gas Play Descriptive Technical Data
  • Table 3-7: Eagle Ford & Pearsall Shale Gas Play Descriptive Technical Data
  • Table 3-8: Mancos & Lewis Shale Gas Play Descriptive Technical Data
  • Table 3-9: Antrim Shale Play Net Acreage by Company
  • Table 3-10: Barnett Shale Play Net Acreage by Company
  • Table 3-11: Conesauga Shale Play Net Acreage by Company
  • Table 4-1: US - Shale Gas Deals
  • Table 4-2: US - Shale Play Acquisition & Deal Value (US$ Billion)
  • Table 4-3: Current and Planned Investment Related to Shale Gas Extraction
  • Table 5-1: US - Natural Gas Producing Wells by State, 2008-2013
  • Table 5-2: US - Shale Gas Production by State & Region Level
Back to Top