首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
產業/市場分類
通訊 (11029)
企業概況 (728)
光纖網路 (252)
次世代無線通信 (543)
行動用戶 (134)
行動設備 (736)
軟體 (997)
電子商務 (202)
網路 (626)
網路與進入設備 (257)
數位廣播 (307)
數據中心 (342)
寬頻 (389)
衛星遠程通信 (134)
線上廣告 (143)
整合 (197)
整合通訊 (293)
機上盒 (63)
聯繫中心 (130)
Contents (606)
IT安全性 (474)
IT委外 (302)
LBS (149)
NFC (149)
RFID (246)
Web服務 (463)
WLAN/WiMAX (558)
市場調查報告書

FTTH的發展

FTTH Rollouts

出版商 IDATE
出版日期 2008年08月 商品編碼 72286
內容資訊 英文 50 pages
價格
本報告書已不再販售

本報告已在2011年11月23日停止出版。

簡介

本報告書內容包括:FTTH的發展調查、商業模式、各國的個案研究、解決方案分析、費用問題、地方政府、基礎環境建構企業、現有的通訊業者、土木工程等個別單位扮演的角色。內容綱要摘記如下:

第1章 FTTH的商業模式:方程式中土木工程的比重

  • FTTx模式架構
  • 技術參數
  • 方程式中土木工程的比重
  • 住宅結構:法國vs英國

第2章 傳輸線共享

  • 現有通訊業者扮演的角色
  • 技術及規範課題
  • 個案研究
    • 葡萄牙
    • 法國
    • 荷蘭
    • 加拿大
    • 其他OECD各國

第3章 天線安裝:可實現的解決方案?

  • 利用電力網路發展光纖網路的經費
    • 包括宴會的主人
    • 技術層面
    • 服務線路
  • 通訊及電纜網路發展的經費
  • 天線安裝實例

第4章 地方政府扮演的角色

  • 調整土木工程作業
  • 建構公開連線網路
    • 瑞典的例子
    • 歐洲各地

第5章 基礎環境建構企業扮演的角色、土木工程技術帶來的進歩

  • 創新發展的過程及技術
    • 微模組技術
    • non-visitable sewers 的發展
    • 創新解決方案實例:Kerb-IT
  • 基礎環境建構負責人扮演的角色
    • Reggefiber
    • H2O Network

第6章 個案研究:日本的例子

第7章 位元流:是減少替代性業者的土木工程費用的理想解決方案?

第8章 誰來付費?

圖表一覽

目錄

Abstract

For a greenfield FTTH rollout, civil engineering is by far the largest cost item.

Drawing on in-depth knowledge of FTTx cost models, IDATE examines solutions that can help bring down civil engineering costs, based on rollout experiences in the most advanced markets.

Key questions

  • What is civil engineering' s real weight in the equation?
  • Is ensuring access to incumbent carriers' ducts the most promising solution?
  • Can overhead deployment solutions used in the United States and Japan be adapted to Europe ?
  • What are the advantages and drawbacks of lighter civil engineering solutions (e.g. micro-trenches)?
  • Can local authorities help promote large-scale FTTH rollouts in the medium term?
  • Does shared private investment have a future?

Table of Contents

1. FTTH business model: civil engineering' s weight in the equation

  • 1.1. Structure of the FTTx model
  • 1.2. Technical parameters
  • 1.3. The weight of civil engineering in the equation
  • 1.4. Housing structure: France vs. the UK

2. Duct sharing

  • 2.1. Role played by the incumbent carrier
  • 2.2. Technical and regulatory issues
  • 2.3. Case studies
    • 2.3.1. Portugal
    • 2.3.2. France
    • 2.3.3. The Netherlands
    • 2.3.4. Canada
    • 2.3.5. Other OECD countries

3. Aerial deployments: a feasible solution?

  • 3.1. Overhead fibre optic rollouts on electrical networks
    • 3.1.1. A host of parties involved
    • 3.1.2. Technical aspects
    • 3.1.3. Service lines
  • 3.2. Overhead deployments on telecom and cable networks
  • 3.3. Examples of aerial deployments

4. Role played by local authorities

  • 4.1. Coordination of civil engineering works
  • 4.2. Building open access networks
    • 4.2.1. The Swedish example
    • 4.2.2. Elsewhere in Europe...

5. Role played by infrastructure providers and progress made in civil engineering techniques

  • 5.1. Innovative rollout procedures and techniques
    • 5.1.1. The micro-trench technique
    • 5.1.2. Deployment in non-visitable sewers
    • 5.1.3. Example of an innovative solution: Kerb-IT
  • 5.2. Role played by infrastructure owners
    • 5.2.1. Reggefiber
    • 5.2.2. H2O Networks

6. Dark fibre: the Japanese example

7. Bitstream: an ideal solution for reducing alternative operators' civil engineering costs?

8. Last mile: who should pay?

Tables

  • Table 1: The different types of player involved in FTTH
  • Table 2: Size of micro-tubes (mm)

Figures

  • Figure 1: Overall structure of the FTTx model
  • Figure 2: Diagram of the FTTN + VDSL architecture chosen
  • Figure 3: Ethernet point-to-point (P2P) technology
  • Figure 4: GPON technology
  • Figure 5: Cost per home passed of the three architectures in an urban setting
  • Figure 6: Cost per home passed with GPON technology, according to housing structure
  • Figure 7: Variations in the "civil engineering plus optical cable" cost item for a GPON rollout, according to population density (1) (EUR per home passed)
  • Figure 8: Variations in the "civil engineering plus optical cable" cost item for a GPON rollout, according to number of apartment units per building (1) (EUR per home passed)
  • Figure 9: Breakdown of the population by type of housing
  • Figure 10: Operator duct: access chamber
  • Figure 11: Example of the availability of France Telecom ducts in a neighbourhood in the city of Nice
  • Figure 12: Duct shared by several operators
  • Figure 13: Duct occupancy: GPON vs. Ethernet P2P
  • Figure 14: Distance and height rules applied in France
  • Figure 15: Regulation distances for shared support structures
  • Figure 16: NTT branch system for FTTH facilities
  • Figure 17: The Swedish example
  • Figure 18: Chief advantages of micro-trenches
  • Figure 19: Fibre optic deployment in a sewage network from an inspection pit
  • Figure 20: The five stages of a deployment in a sewage network, using the EasyFiber process
  • Figure 21: Connected Real Estate' s Kerb-IT solution
  • Figure 22: Reggefiber footprint in the Netherlands
  • Figure 23: Infrastructure sharing procedure in Japan
  • Figure 24: Dark fibre access procedures in Japan
  • Figure 25: New NTT tariffs for accessing fibre
  • Figure 26: Alternative system requested by KDDI for accessing NTT splitters
  • Figure 27: FTTH bitstream solution being examined in France
  • Figure 28: Ofcom' s reasons for promoting an Ethernet Bitstream offer
  • Figure 29: Estimated added value of an FTTH connection, according to households in the US
Back to Top