Cover Image
市場調查報告書

放射治療市場概要:2014年

2016 Radiation Therapy Market Summary Report

出版商 IMV 商品編碼 326442
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 150 Pages; 237 Charts/Graphs
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
Back to Top
放射治療市場概要:2014年 2016 Radiation Therapy Market Summary Report
出版日期: 2016年05月31日 內容資訊: 英文 150 Pages; 237 Charts/Graphs
簡介

本報告以美國的放射治療的醫院/醫院以外的設施為對象,2013年4月∼2014年6月實施的採訪結果為基礎,提供主要趨勢、治療方針、治療的癌症種類、設備的功能與廠商、設備購買計劃、預算、網站營運的特徵等相關的系統性資訊。

第1章 調查目的

第2章 摘要整理

第3章 調查手法

第4章 調查結果

  • 放射線治療的治療容量
  • 外照射治療設備
  • 影像導航放射治療 (IGRT)
  • 近距離放射治療設備
  • 治療計劃
  • 治療計劃的實踐
  • 模擬器
  • 記錄和確認/腫瘤資訊系統
  • 資本設備預算
  • 網站營運的特徵

圖表

本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

目錄

This report summarizes the results of interviews conducted with sites participating in IMV Medical Information Division's census of U.S. hospital and non-hospital facilities that perform radiation therapy treatments. Interviews were conducted from July 2015 through February 2016. The report covers national trends in treatment visits, courses of treatment, types of cancers treated, features and manufacturers of installed equipment (including linear accelerators, remote afterloaders, IGRT, treatment planning units, and oncology information systems), equipment buying plans, capital equipment budgets and site operating characteristics.

Key Features

Radiation Therapy Treatment Volume

  • Total courses of treatment using radiation therapy - 2005-2015?
  • What is the trend in total annual treatment visits since 2005?
  • What are the top cancer types treated with radiation?

External Beam Installed Base and Purchase Plans (includes LINACS, and proton therapy units)

  • How many external beam units are installed, by facility type?
  • What type of features are being purchased for external beam units?
  • What is the brand loyalty of current external beam users?

Related Equipment Used in Radiation Therapy

  • What % of sites have Image Guided Radiotherapy
  • Who are the manufacturers of the IGRT systems?
  • What % of sites have remote afterloaders?
  • What is the market share for manufacturers of remote afterloaders? -What is the market share for treatment planning units -what is the brand loyalty of current treatment planning users? -What is the adoption rate for CT, PET/CT and MR simulators?
  • Who is gaining share in treatment planning units?
  • What % of the treatment plans use CT, MRI or PET?
  • What is the trend in average capital budgets per site?

Site Operations Characteristics

  • How many FTE radiation therapists, nurses, physicists, dosimetrists, and secretaries are employed per site?
  • What is the average number of new patients treated per linear accelerator and per staff type?

Table of Contents

I. Objectives

II. Executive Summary

III. Methodology

IV. Findings

  • A. Radiation Therapy Treatment Volume
  • B. External Beam Therapy Equipment.
  • C. Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT).
  • D. Brachytherapy Equipment.
  • E. Treatment Planning Units
  • F. Treatment Planning Practices
  • G. Simulators
  • H. Record and Verify / Oncology Information Systems
  • I. Capital Equipment Budgets
  • J. Site Operations Characteristics

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS

A. Radiation Therapy Treatment Volume

  • 1. Total Radiation Therapy Treatment Visit Volume, 2005-2015
  • 2. Radiation Therapy Sites and Total Treatment Visits, by Site Type, 2015
  • 3. Distribution of Treatment Visits, by Site Type, 2015
  • 4. Distribution of Treatment Visits, by Site Type, 2008-2015
  • 5. Average Treatment Visits per Site, by Site Type, 2015
  • 6. Average Treatment Visits per Site, by Site Type, 2008-2015
  • 7. Total Courses of Treatment, New vs. Prior, 2005-2015
  • 8. Distribution of Radiation Therapy Sites, Treatment Visits, and Courses of Treatment, by Site Type, 2015
  • 9. Average Annual Radiation Therapy Courses of Treatment per Site, 2015.
  • 10. Average Annual Radiation Therapy Courses of Treatment per Site, by Site Type, 2008-2015
  • 11. Average Annual New Radiation Therapy Courses of Treatment per Site, 2015
  • 12. Average Annual New Radiation Therapy Courses of Treatment per Site, by Site Type, 2009-2015
  • 13. Distribution of Courses of Treatment, by Cancer Type Treated, 2015
  • 14. Distribution of Courses of Treatment, by Cancer Type Treated, by Site Type, 2015
  • 15. Trend in the Distribution of Courses of Treatment, by Cancer Type Treated, 2006-2015
  • 16. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Performing Courses of Treatment, by Cancer Type, 2015
  • 17. Average Number of Courses of Treatment Performed per Radiation Therapy Site, by Cancer Type, for Sites Treating that Type, 2015
  • 18. Distributions, by Cancer Type, of Radiation Therapy Courses of Treatment in 2015, and Average Number of Courses of Treatment per Site Treating that Cancer Type
  • 19. Percent of Sites Performing External Beam vs. Brachytherapy Using Remote Afterloaders, by Cancer Type, 2015
  • 20. Percent of Courses of Treatment Using External Beam vs. Brachytherapy Using Remote Afterloaders, by Cancer Type, 2015
  • 21. Trend in the Distribution of External Beam Courses of Treatment vs. Other Types of Radiation Therapy, 2006-2015
  • 22. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Performing Specific Treatment Methods, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 23. Number of Radiation Therapy Sites Performing Specific Treatment Methods, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 24. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Performing Specific Treatment Methods, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 25. Percent of Sites Currently Providing vs. Planning to Provide Specific Treatment Methods, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 26. Number of Sites Currently Providing vs. Planning to Provide Specific Treatment Methods, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 27. Trend in Percent of Sites Providing Specific Treatment Methods, by Census Survey Year, 2010 to 2015/16

B. External Beam Therapy Equipment

  • 1. Distribution of Total External Beam Therapy Sites and Units, by Census Survey Year, 2010 to 2015/16
  • 2. Site Type Mix of External Beam Therapy Sites and Units, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 3. Distribution of Sites by Number of External Beam Therapy Units Installed, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 4. Percent Mix of External Beam Therapy Unit Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 5. Trend in External Beam Therapy Unit Manufacturer Installed Base Share, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2015/16
  • 6. Percent Mix of External Beam Therapy Unit Installed Base, by Manufacturer, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 7. Percent of Sites Having at Least One External Beam Therapy Manufacturer Installed, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 8. External Beam Therapy Unit Installed Base, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 9. External Beam Therapy Unit Installed Base Market Share, by Year of Installation, from 2010 to 2015, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 10. External Beam Therapy Unit Installed Base Market Share, by Installation Timeframes, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 11. External Beam Therapy Unit Installed Base, by Equipment Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 12. Percent of External Beam Therapy Units with Electronic Portal Imaging Capability, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 13. Percent of External Beam Therapy Unit Installed Base with Electronic Portal Imaging, by Census Survey Year, 2003 to 2015/16.
  • 14. Percent of External Beam Therapy Units with Electronic Portal Imaging Capability, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 15. Percent of Linear Accelerators with Rotational ARC Therapy Capability, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 16. Percent of Linear Accelerators with Rotational ARC Therapy Capability, by Census Survey Year, 2010 to 2015/16.
  • 17. Percent of Linear Accelerators with Rotational ARC Therapy Capability, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 18. Percent of Linear Accelerator Installed Base with Stereotactic Treatment Capability, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 19. Percent of Linear Accelerators with Stereotactic Treatment Capability, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 20. Percent of Linear Accelerators with Stereotactic Treatment Capability, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 21. Whether Site has Superficial X-ray/Orthovoltage Units, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 22. Proton Therapy System Installed Base Share, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16
  • 23. Distribution of Service Support Sources for External Beam Therapy Units, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 24. Distribution of Service Support Sources for External Beam Therapy Units, by Manufacturer of Installed Units, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 25. Distribution of Service Support Sources for External Beam Therapy Units, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 26. Mix of Owned vs. Leased External Beam Therapy Units, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 27. Radiation Therapy Site Plans for Purchasing External Beam Therapy Units Over the Next Three Years, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 28. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase External Beam Therapy Units Over the Next Three Years, by Census Survey Year, 2006 to 2015/16.
  • 29. Proportion of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase External Beam Therapy Units Over the Next Three Years, by Site Type, by Census Survey Year, 2006 to 2015/16
  • 30. Acquisition Plans for External Beam Therapy Units, by Equipment Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 31. Plans for New vs. Refurbished External Beam Therapy Unit Acquisitions, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 32. Plans for Additional vs. Replacement External Beam Therapy Units, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 33. Plans for Electronic Portal Imaging, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 34. Plans for Rotational ARC Therapy Capability for Planned Linear Accelerator Acquisitions, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 35. Plans for Using Future Linear Accelerators for Stereotactic Treatments, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 36. Whether Planned Linear Accelerators will be Used for Cranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Treatments, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 37. Whether Planned Linear Accelerators will be Used for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Treatments, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 38. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for External Beam Therapy Unit Acquisitions, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 39. Brand Loyalty: External Beam Therapy Vendors Being Considered, by Current External Beam Therapy Installed Base, as of 2015/16 Census Survey

C. Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT)

  • 1. Site Type Mix of Radiation Therapy Sites Providing Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT), as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 2. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Providing Image Guided Radiotherapy, by Census Survey Year, 2004 to 2015/16
  • 3. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Providing Image Guided Radiotherapy, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 4. Distribution of Sites by Number of Installed IGRT Systems, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 5. Type of Guidance System Used for IGRT, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 6. Percent Mix of IGRT Installed Base using CT or Cone Beam CT, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 7. Percent Mix of IGRT Installed Base using Electronic Portal Imaging, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/6 Census Survey
  • 8. Percent Mix of X-ray IGRT Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 9. Percent Mix of IGRT Installed Base with Portal Imaging Devices using Treatment Beams and Film, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 10. Percent Mix of IGRT Installed Base with OBI, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 11. Percent Mix of IGRT Installed Base using RF or Electromagnetic Transponders, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 12. Percent Mix of Ultrasound IGRT Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 13. Percent Mix of Total IGRT Imaging Device Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 14. Percent Mix of Total IGRT Imaging Device Installed Base, by Manufacturer, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 15. Percent of Sites Having at Least One IGRT Manufacturer Installed, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 16. Image Guided Radiotherapy Installed Base, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 17. IGRT Installed Base Market Share, by Year of Installation, from 2010 to Late 2015, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 18. IGRT Installed Base Market Share, by Installation Timeframes, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 19. Percent of IGRT Image Guidance System Types, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 20. Radiation Therapy Site Plans for Purchasing IGRT Equipment Over the Next Three Years, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 21. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase IGRT Equipment Over the Next Three Years, by Census Survey Year, 2010 to 2015/16
  • 22. Planned Type of Guidance Systems for IGRT Equipment, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 23. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for IGRT Acquisitions using CT or Cone Beam CT, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 24. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for X-ray IGRT Acquisitions, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 25. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for IGRT Acquisitions using Electronic Portal Imaging Devices, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 26. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for IGRT Acquisitions, Regardless of Image Guidance Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.

D. Brachytherapy Equipment

  • 1. Site Type Mix of Radiation Therapy Sites with Brachytherapy Equipment, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 2. Brachytherapy Equipment Unit Installed Base and Percent of Sites Having, by Census Survey Year, 2004 to 2015/16.
  • 3. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites with Brachytherapy Equipment, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 4. Type of Brachytherapy Equipment Installed, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 5. Percent Mix of Brachytherapy Equipment Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 6. Percent Mix of Brachytherapy Equipment Installed Base, by Manufacturer, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 7. Percent of Sites Having at Least One Brachytherapy Equipment Manufacturer Installed, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 8. Distribution of Installed Brachytherapy Equipment, by Manufacturer, by Census Survey Year, 2006 to 2015/16
  • 9. Brachytherapy Equipment Unit Installed Base, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 10. Brachytherapy Equipment Installed Base Market Share, by Installation Timeframes, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 11. Site Type Mix of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning Brachytherapy Equipment Units, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 12. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase Brachytherapy Equipment Units Over the Next Three Years, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2015/16.
  • 13. Type of Brachytherapy Equipment Planned, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 14. Mix of Planned Acquisitions of Low Dose vs. High Dose Remote Afterloaders, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 15. Brachytherapy Applicator Types Being Planned for Purchase, by Sites Currently Performing or Planning to Perform Brachytherapy, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 16. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Considered for Brachytherapy Equipment Acquisitions, as of 2015/16 Census Survey

E. Treatment Planning Units

  • 1. Site Type Mix of Radiation Therapy Sites with Treatment Planning Units, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 2. Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base and Percent of Sites Having, by Census Survey Year, 2004 to 2015/16
  • 3. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites with Treatment Planning Systems, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 4. Distribution of Sites by Number of Treatment Planning Systems Installed, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 5. Percent Mix of Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 6. Percent Mix of Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base, by Manufacturer, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 7. Trend in Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Share, by Manufacturer, by Census Survey Year, 2006 to 2015/16.
  • 8. Percent of Sites Having Treatment Planning System Manufacturers, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 9. Treatment Planning Hardware/Server Installed Base, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 10. Treatment Planning Hardware/Server Installed Base Market Share, by Installation Timeframes, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 11. Distribution of Sites, by Number of Treatment Planning Seats Installed, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 12. Average Number of Treatment Planning Seats Installed per Site and per Treatment Planning System, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 13. Mix of 2D, 3D, and 4D Treatment Planning Units, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 14. Mix of 2D, 3D, and 4D Treatment Planning Units, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 15. Distribution of Installed Base of 2D, 3D, and 4D Treatment Planning Units, by Census Survey Year, from 2007 to 2015/16.
  • 16. Mix of 2D, 3D, and 4D Treatment Planning Units, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 17. Percent Mix of 4D Treatment Planning Units, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 18. Percent Mix of 3D Treatment Planning Units, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 19. Percent Mix of 2D Treatment Planning Units, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 20. Current Uses of Treatment Planning Units, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 21. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Providing Planning for Electron Therapy, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 22. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Providing Planning for Electron Therapy, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 23. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Providing Planning for Electron Therapy, by Census Year, from 2006 to 2015/16.
  • 24. Percent of Treatment Planning Units with Electron Therapy Capability, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 25. Percent Mix of Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Providing Planning for Electron Therapy, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 26. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Brachytherapy with Remote Afterloaders, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 27. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Brachytherapy with Remote Afterloaders, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 28. Trend in Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Brachytherapy with Remote Afterloaders, by Census Survey Year, 2012 to 2015/16
  • 29. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Brachytherapy with Remote Afterloaders, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 30. Percent Mix of Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Used for Brachytherapy with Remote Afterloaders, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 31. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Prostate Seed Therapy, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 32. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Prostate Seed Therapy, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 33. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Prostate Seed Therapy, by Census Survey Year, 2012 to 2015/16
  • 34. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for Prostate Seed Therapy, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 35. Percent Mix of Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Used for Prostate Seed Therapy, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 36. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for External Beam Therapy, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 37. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for External Beam Therapy, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 38. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for External Beam Therapy, by Census Survey Year, 2012 to 2015/16.
  • 39. Percent of Treatment Planning Units Used for External Beam Therapy, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 40. Percent Mix of Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Used for External Beam Therapy, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 41. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used for Rotational ARC Therapy, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 42. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used for Rotational ARC Therapy, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 43. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used for Rotational ARC Therapy, by Census Survey Year, 2012 to 2015/16.
  • 44. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used for Rotational ARC Therapy, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 45. Percent Mix of External Beam Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Being Used for Rotational ARC Therapy, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 46. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units with Inverse Planning Capability, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 47. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units with Inverse Planning Capability, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 48. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units with Inverse Planning Capability, by Census Survey Year, from 2012 to 2015/16
  • 49. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units with Inverse Planning Capability, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 50. Percent Mix of External Beam Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base with Inverse Planning Capability, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 51. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used to Plan for Image-Guided IMRT, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 52. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used for Image-Guided IMRT, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 53. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used for Image-Guided IMRT, by Census Survey Year, from 2012 to 2015/16
  • 54. Percent of External Beam Treatment Planning Units Being Used for Image-Guided IMRT, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 55. Percent Mix of External Beam Treatment Planning Unit Installed Base Being Used for Image-Guided IMRT, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 56. Radiation Therapy Site Plans for Purchasing Treatment Planning Units Over the Next Three Years, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 57. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase Treatment Planning Units Over the Next Three Years, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2015/16
  • 58. Type of Treatment Planning Acquisitions Planned, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 59. Plans for Replacement vs. Additional Treatment Planning Systems, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 60. Number of Seats Planned for Future Treatment Planning Systems, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 61. Whether Treatment Planning Acquisition Will be Bundled with the Purchase of a Linear Accelerator, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 62. Whether Treatment Planning Acquisition Will be Bundled with the Purchase of a Linear Accelerator, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 63. Planned Uses of Future Treatment Planning Units, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 64. Planned Uses of Future Treatment Planning Units that will be Used for External Beam Therapy, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 65. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for Treatment Planning Unit Acquisitions, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 66. Brand Loyalty: Treatment Planning Vendor Being Considered, by Current Treatment Planning Installed Base, as of 2015/16 Census Survey

F. Treatment Planning Practices

  • 1. Proportion of Treatment Plans Using Images, by Imaging Modality, 2007 to 2015
  • 2. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Using Images in Treatment Plans, by Imaging Modality, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2015/16
  • 3. Distribution of Sites Using MR with Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Protocols, by Census Survey Year, 2010 to 2015/16
  • 4. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase PET or MR in the Next Three Years, as of 2015/16 Census Survey

G. Simulators

  • 1. Site Type Mix of Radiation Therapy Sites with Simulators, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 2. Simulator Unit Installed Base and Percent of Sites Having, by Census Survey Year, 2004 to 2015/16
  • 3. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites with Simulators, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 4. Distribution of Sites by Number of Simulators Installed, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 5. Percent Mix of Simulator Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 6. Percent Mix of Simulator Installed Base, by Manufacturer, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 7. Trend in Simulator Installed Base Share, by Manufacturer, by Census Survey Year, 2006 to 2015/16
  • 8. Percent of Sites Having at Least One Simulator Manufacturer Installed, as of 201516 Census Survey
  • 9. Distribution of Installed Simulators, by Manufacturer, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2015/16
  • 10. Simulator Installed Base, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 11. Mix of Installed CT, X-ray, PET/CT, and MR Simulators, by Census Survey Year, 2006 to 2015/16
  • 12. Installed Base of CT, X-ray, PET/CT, and MR Simulators, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2015/16
  • 13. Mix of CT, X-ray, PET/CT, and MR Simulators, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 14. Mix of CT, X-ray, PET/CT, and MR Simulators Installed, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 15. Percent Mix of CT Simulator Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 16. Percent Mix of X-ray Simulator Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 17. Percent Mix of PET/CT Simulator Installed Base, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 18. Number of Slices for CT vs. PET/CT Simulators, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 19. Number of Slices for CT and PET/CT Simulators, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 20. Number of Slices for CT and PET/CT Simulators, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 21. Whether the CT, PET/CT, or MR Simulators have a Wide Bore, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 22. Whether the CT, PET/CT, and MR Simulators have a Wide Bore, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 23. Whether the CT, PET/CT, and MR Simulators have a Wide Bore, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 24. Percent Distribution of Simulators, by Location, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 25. Percent Distribution of Simulators, by Location, by Simulator Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 26. Percent of Simulators with Virtual Simulation Software Capability, by Census Survey Year, 2003 to 2015/16
  • 27. Percent of Simulators with Virtual Simulation Capability, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 28. Percent Mix of Virtual Simulation Software Vendors, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 29. Whether Simulators have Virtual Simulation Software, by Simulator Hardware Vendor, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 30. Radiation Therapy Site Plans for Purchasing Simulators Over the Next Three Years, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 31. Proportion of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase Simulators Over the Next Three Years, by Census Survey Year, 2003 to 2015/16
  • 32. Whether the Planned Simulator Acquisition will be New or Refurbished, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 33. Mix of Planned Acquisitions of CT, X-ray, PET/CT, or MR Simulators, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 34. Number of Slices for Planned CT or PET/CT Simulators, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 35. Whether the Planned CT or PET/CT Simulator Will Have a Wide Bore, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 36. Planned Purchases of Virtual Simulation Software, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 37. Percent of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for Simulator Acquisitions, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 38. Brand Loyalty: Simulator Vendor Being Considered, by Current Simulator Installed Base, as of 2015/16 Census Survey

H. Record and Verify/Oncology Information Systems

  • 1. Site Type Mix of Radiation Therapy Sites with Record & Verify /Oncology Information Systems, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 2. Record & Verify/Oncology Information System Installed Base and Percent of Sites Having, by Census Survey Year, 2003 to 2015/16
  • 3. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites with Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 4. Percent Mix of Record & Verify vs. Oncology Information Systems, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 5. Whether Oncology Information Systems are Interfaced with Another IMS or HIS at This or Any Other Site, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 6. Whether Oncology Information Systems are Interfaced with Another IMS or HIS at This or Any Other Site, by Census Survey Year, 2010 to 2015/16
  • 7. Type of Data Available on Oncology Information Systems, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 8. Type of Data Available on Oncology Information Systems, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2015/16
  • 9. Type of Data Available on Oncology Information Systems, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 10. Installed Base Market Share of Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 11. Trend in Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems Installed Base Share, by Manufacturer, by Census Survey Year, 2006 to 2015/16
  • 12. Distribution of Record & Verify/Oncology Information System Installed Base, by Manufacturer, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2015/16
  • 13. Installed Base Market Share of Record and Verify-Only Systems, by Manufacturer, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 14. Record & Verify/Oncology Information System Installed Base, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 15. Mix of Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems, by Year of Installation, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 16. Radiation Therapy Site Plans for Purchasing or Upgrading Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems Over the Next Three Years, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 17. Proportion of Radiation Therapy Sites Planning to Purchase or Upgrade Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems, by Census Survey Year, 2011 to 2015/16
  • 18. Plans for New vs. Upgrade Purchases of Record & Verify/Oncology Information Systems Over the Next Three Years, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 19. Mix of Planned Acquisitions of New Record & Verify vs. Oncology Information Systems, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 20. Type of Data Being Planned for Availability on Oncology Information Systems, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 21. Type of Data Being Planned for Availability on Oncology Information Systems, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 22. Percent Distribution of Sites Mentioning Manufacturers Being Considered for New Record & Verify/Oncology Information System Acquisitions, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 23. Status of Image Management Systems in Radiation Therapy Sites, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 24. Status of Image Management Systems in Radiation Therapy Sites, by Census Survey Year, 2003 to 2015/16

I. Capital Equipment Budgets

  • 1. Distribution of 2016 Radiation Therapy Capital Equipment Budgets, All Sites.
  • 2. Radiation Therapy Capital Equipment Budget Trend, 2010-2016.
  • 3. Distribution of 2016 Radiation Therapy Capital Equipment Budgets, by Site Type
  • 4. Average Radiation Therapy Capital Equipment Budget per Site, for Sites with Budgets >$0, by Site Type, 2010-2016.

J. Site Operations Characteristics

  • 1. Department Administering Radiation Therapy Site Operations, as of 2015/16 Census Survey.
  • 2. Percent of Respondents Mentioning Departments Performing Radiation Treatments Other Than Reporting Departments, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 3. Whether Facility Belongs to a Larger Provider Network of Radiation Therapy Sites, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 4. Whether Physicians Belong to a Physician-Owned Network Serving More Than One Radiation Therapy Site, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 5. Estimated Total FTE Staffing of Radiation Therapy Sites, by Staff Type, All Sites, by Census Survey Year, 2007 to 2015/16
  • 6. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites with Staff Types, All Sites, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 7. Percent of Radiation Therapy Sites with Staff Types, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 8. Average Number of FTE Staff per Site Having That Type, All Sites, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 9. Average Number of FTE Staff per Site Having That Type, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 10. Percent of Sites Providing Medical Oncology Services at Their Current Location, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 11. Whether Site Works with Medical Oncology Departments at Other Locations, as of 2015/15 Census Survey
  • 12. Percent of Sites Providing Surgical Oncology Services at Their Current Location, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 13. Whether Site Works with Surgical Oncology Departments at Other Locations, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 14. Utilization Statistics, 2015
  • 15. Percent of Respondents Considering Their Facility to be a Free-Standing Facility When Submitting Claims for Reimbursement, by Site Type, as of 2015/16 Census Survey
  • 16. 2015 Radiation Therapy Treatment Visits per Thousand Population, by State
Back to Top