Cover Image
市場調查報告書

TEEMA報告 2015年:中國的城市競爭力的評估

2015 TEEMA Report: Overall Competitiveness of Chinese Cities

出版商 Market Intelligence & Consulting Institute (MIC) 商品編碼 357004
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 80 Pages
訂單完成後即時交付
價格
Back to Top
TEEMA報告 2015年:中國的城市競爭力的評估 2015 TEEMA Report: Overall Competitiveness of Chinese Cities
出版日期: 2016年04月27日 內容資訊: 英文 80 Pages
簡介

歐洲和北美的經濟減速之下,由於人事費用和生產成本的上升,中國面臨著逆風。

本報告以台灣區電機電子同業工業公會 (TEEMA) 的調查的計票結果為基礎,提供中國的城市競爭力相關的系統性資訊。

第1章 關於TEEMA報告

  • 中國城市的綜合性競爭力的評估
  • TEEMA調查樣品收集
  • 台灣供應商的產業分析
  • 台灣供應商的投資地方分析
  • 台灣供應商的未來的發展計劃分析
  • 台灣供應商在中國的業績
  • 台灣供應商在中國的產業糾紛
  • 台灣供應商未來發展的中國城市
  • 台灣供應商未來發展的中國城市:各產業
    • 高科技產業
    • 傳統產業
    • 服務業

第2章 中國的整體城市競爭力的評估

  • 中國的整體城市競爭力的評估:TEEMA的排行榜
  • 推薦層級評級的變化分析
  • 中國的主要經濟圈11處的排行榜
  • 排行榜上升最大的城市分析
  • 排行榜降低最大的城市分析

附錄

  • 詞彙表
  • 企業清單

圖表

目錄
Product Code: CHRPT16042503

Amid the economic slowdown in Europe and North America, China is facing headwinds in the wake of rising labor and production costs. Coupled with China's fast-changing policies, laws, and environments pertaining to foreign investment, it is getting tougher for foreign companies to invest and doing business in China. This report, which is one of a research series on the dynamics of the Chinese investment environment, serves as a reference for foreign companies when making investment decisions in China. The report presents the overall competitiveness of Chinese cities surveyed by TEEMA (Taiwan Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers' Association).

Table of Contents

1. Structure of 2015 TEEMA Report

  • 1.1. Evaluation of Chinese Cities' Comprehensive Competitiveness
    • 1.1.1. City Competitiveness
    • 1.1.2. Investment Environment
    • 1.1.3. Investment Risks
    • 1.1.4. Degree of Recommendation by Taiwanese Vendors
  • 1.2. TEEMA Survey Sample Collection from 2011 to 2015
  • 1.3. Analysis of Taiwanese Vendors' Industries
  • 1.4. Analysis of Taiwanese Vendors' Investment Locations
  • 1.5. Analysis of Taiwanese Vendors' Future Deployment Plans
  • 1.6. Taiwanese Vendors' Business Performance in China
  • 1.7. Taiwanese Vendors' Business Disputes in China
  • 1.8. Chinese Cities for Taiwanese Vendors' Future Deployment
  • 1.9. Chinese Cities for Taiwanese Vendors' Future Deployment by Industry
    • 1.9.1. High-Tech Industry
    • 1.9.2. Traditional Industry
    • 1.9.3. Service Industry

2. TEEMA's Survey of the Overall Competitiveness of Chinese Cities

  • 2.1. 2015 TEEMA Ranking of the Overall Competitiveness of Chinese Cities
    • 2.1.1. Suzhou Industrial Park
    • 2.1.2. Outer District of Xiamen Island
    • 2.1.3. Chengdu
    • 2.1.4. Suzhou Downtown
    • 2.1.5. Hangzhou Xiaoshan
  • 2.2. Analysis of Changes in Recommendation Level Ratings in the 2014 and 2015 TEEMA Survey Reports
    • 2.2.1. City Districts Included in 2015 TEEMA Survey
    • 2.2.2. Changes in the Investment Environment of the Cities Included for Evaluation in the 2014 and 2015 TEEMA Surveys
    • 2.2.3. Changes in the Overall Competitiveness of Investment Environment of the Cities Included for Evaluation in the 2014 and 2015 TEEMA Surveys
    • 2.2.4. Changes in the Grade-A (Highly Recommended) Cities in the 2014 and 2015 TEEMA Surveys
    • 2.2.5. Changes in the Grade-D (Not Recommended at Present) Cities in the 2014 and 2015 TEEMA Surveys
  • 2.3. The 2015 TEEMA Survey Report Ranking of China's 11 Major Economic Zones
  • 2.4. Analysis of the Cities that Posted the Biggest Improvement in Ranking in the 2014 - 2015 TEEMA Reports
  • 2.5. Analysis of the Cities that Posted the Biggest Fall in Ranking in the 2014 - 2015 TEEMA Reports
  • Appendix
  • Glossary of Terms
  • List of Companies

List of Topics

  • Overview of the structure of the 2015 TEEMA (Taiwan Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers' Association) Report, which evaluates the competitiveness of Chinese cities from the view of Taiwanese vendors who are running business in China
  • Ranking of the overall competitiveness of Chinese cities based on the four aspects: (1) City competitiveness; (2) Investment environment; (3) Level of investment risk; (4) Level of recommendation by Taiwanese vendors; also included are an analysis of changes in recommendation level ratings in the 2014 and 2015 TEEMA reports and the ranking of China's 11 major economic zones

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Highly Recommended Cities, 2014 - 2015
  • Figure 2: Recommended City, 2014 - 2015
  • Figure 3: Recommended with Reservations Cities, 2014 - 2015
  • Figure 4: Not Recommended Cities at Present, 2014 - 2015
  • Figure 5: General Performance Rating for City in Different Economic Zones by TEEMA 2015 Report
  • Figure 6: Western Triangle Economic Zone's General Ranking by District, 2015
  • Figure 7: Yangtze River Delta Economic Zone's General Ranking by City and District, 2015
  • Figure 7: Yangtze River Delta Economic Zone's General Ranking by City and District, 2015 (Continued)
  • Figure 8: Yellow River Delta Economic Zone's General Ranking by City and District, 2015
  • Figure 9: Bohai Economic Rim's General Ranking by City and District, 2015
  • Figure 10: Central Triangle Economic Zone's General Ranking by City and District, 2015
  • Figure 11: Western China Economic Zone's General Ranking by City and District, 2015
  • Figure 12: Western Taiwan Straits Economic Zone's General Ranking by City and District, 2015
  • Figure 13: Central Chinese Economic Zone's General Ranking by City and District, 2015
  • Figure 14: Pan-North Bay Economic Zone's General Ranking by City and District, 2015
  • Figure 15: The Ranking of the Cities in Northeast China, 2015
  • Figure 16: Pearl River Delta Economic Zone's General Ranking by City and District, 2015
  • Figure 17: 11 Chinese Economic Zones' General Ranking, 2015

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Categories and Indicators of the TEEMA Report 2015
  • Table 2: TEEMA Survey Sample Collection by Region, 2011 - 2015
  • Table 3: Analysis of Taiwanese Vendors' Business Operating by Industries, 2011 - 2015
  • Table 4: Analysis of Taiwanese Vendors' Business Operating by Invested Locations, 2011 - 2015
  • Table 5: Analysis of Taiwanese Vendors' Future Deployment Plans, 2011 - 2015
  • Table 6: Analysis of Taiwanese Vendors' Performance in China, 2015
  • Table 7: Taiwanese Companies' Business Disputes by Region, 2015
  • Table 8: Growth of Disputes Encountered by Taiwanese Vendors in China, 2014 - 2015
  • Table 9: Resolution Approaches and the Degree of Satisfaction with the Resolution, 2015
  • Table 10: Places for Taiwanese Vendors' Future Deployment, 2011 - 2015
  • Table 11: Places for Taiwanese Vendors' Future Deployment by Industry, 2015
  • Table 12: 2015 TEEMA's Survey of the Overall Competitiveness of Chinese Cities
  • Table 13: TEEMA's Survey of Chinese City Recommendation Level by Taiwanese Vendors, 2011 - 2015
  • Table 14: Percentage of Chinese City Recommendation Level by Region, 2006 - 2015
  • Table 15: Changes in Chinese City Recommendation Level, 2000 - 2015
  • Table 16: Cities that Posted Improvement in Ranking in the 2014 - 2015 TEEMA Reports
  • Table 17: Cities that Posted Deterioration in Ranking in the 2014 - 2015 TEEMA Reports

Companies covered

Bosch, CCIA, Economist, Forbes, General Electric, Johnson & Johnson, National Academy of Economic Strategy, Samsung, Siemens, Sustain Think Tank, UNESCO, Wal-mart, Zhongrong Metal.

Back to Top