|
市場調查報告書
產業控制POF(塑料光纖)
Plastic Optical Fiber (POF) In Industrial Controls
|
產業控制POF(塑料光纖) 是由出版商Information Gatekeepers, Inc.在2011年06月所出版的。
這份英文市場調查報告書價格從美金2995起跳。
2007年全球POF（塑料光纖）市場達到13億3,600萬美元的市場規模，預計2011年可達32億美元、2015年能展現超過47億美元規模的成長。
本報告針對POF（塑料光纖）產業控制網絡使用動向進行調查分析，提供產業用・汽車用・消費者網絡融合趨勢、產業控制網路中POF的可用性、產業控制網路使用POF的促進因素、相關標準、技術分案、市場預測、主要企業分析與範例分析，目錄介紹如下。
介紹
第1章 摘要整理
第2章 産業用・汽車用・消費者網路匯整
第3章 産業控制網絡：概要
第4章 産業控制POF可用性
第5章 ICN市場的POF引進動向
- POF規格
- POF系統產品
- POF技術
- 來源
- 光纖
- 編碼基模
- POF連接器
- 困難環境的有線
第6章 Cu與光纖成本比較
- 設備與基本設施的成本削減
- 準備工具（安裝）
- 安裝時間
第7章 市場預測
第8章 主要標準機構・産業團體・各種動向
- 乙太網路
- Profibus
- Interbus
- ControlNet
- DeviceNet
- SERCOS
- IEEE-1394
- Field Bus Foundation（Fieldbus協會）
- 産業控制網絡基準：摘要
第9章 技術方案
第10章 使用POF的産業控制系統
第11章 供給光纖產品的主要系統企業分析
- Rockwell Automation
- Siemens
- Phoenix Contact
- Bosch Rexroth
- Belden Electronics (Hirschmann)
- ABB
- GE Fanuc
- Mitsubishi Electric Automation
- Yokogawa
- Sony
第12章 光電與光纖供應商分析
第13章 産業用控制市場販售
第14章 総論
第15章 參考資料
圖表
Abstract
Overview:
|
The industrial control networking, automotive, and consumer data link markets
are converging at data rates of 100Mbps and higher. From 10Mbps to 400Mbps,
plastic optical fiber (POF) and polymer clad silica (PCS) solutions for
high-speed short- and moderate-distance data links are cost competitive with
copper cable. POF is superior to copper cable in providing low data errors in
electrically noisy environments.
|
The convergence is being driven by three major forces:
- 1. The integration of Ethernet with the field bus standards for
industrial control networks in factory automation applications;
- 2. The hardening of components for automotive applications makes
them suitable for use in industrial applications;
- 3. The extension of IEEE-1394 (FireWire) to higher data rates and
longer distances in the consumer electronics market.
The worldwide total POF market was estimated at $1,336 million for 2007,
growing to over $3.2 billion in 2011 and $4.7 billion by 2015.
POF and PCS cable have been used in industrial control networks for over 15
years, Many proprietary networks were configured on the factory floor to
connect controllers to devices and sensors to monitor data and provide simple
control feedback to production lines. Growth accelerated when standards
organizations such as ControlNet, Interbus, Profibus, and SERCOS adopted POF
and PCS as low-cost link media for electrically noisy and performance-critical
applications. The next generation of industrial control networks has moved to
10/100Mbps Industrial Ethernet, operating over extended temperature ranges and
harsher environments. Organizations such as ODVA, ControlNet International,
ProfiNet, and Interbus Club are defining interface specifications to integrate
Ethernet with the widely deployed DeviceNet, ControlNet, Profibus, Interbus,
and other field bus standards. In addition to the move to higher data rate use
of Ethernet, the all-fiber-optic standard of SERCOS has doubled its data rate
to 16Mbps from 8Mbps .
The traditional technology for low-cost fiber-optic data links used in
industrial control, consumer electronics, interconnect, and automotive
applications has been transmitters using 650nm red LEDs, silicon PIN diode
detectors, and SI-POF or PCS fiber-optic cable. The approximate cost of a
10-meter data link is currently $30 and has not changed much for the last five
years. However, with the acceptance of POF and the MOST standard in the
automotive market, several new companies have entered the business of
supplying SI-POF and GI-POF; transmitters using red LEDs, RCLEDs, and VCSELs;
and receivers. It is expected that the same 10-meter data link will cost under
$15 by early this year (2011) due to cost reduction driven by increased volume.
Significantly higher market growth rates are expected in the industrial
control networking market as POF and PCS displace copper cable networks at a
much higher rate. It is estimated that the worldwide market for POF data links
in industrial control networks will grow from $473 million in 2010 to $833
million in 2015. Most of this growth is expected to be in the harsh machine
areas where POF is best suited.
Table of Contents
Introduction
E.0 Executive Summary
2.0 Convergence of the Industrial, Auto and Consumer Networks
3.0 Overview of Industrial Control Networks
4.0 Why POF for Industrial Controls?
5.0 Trends Driving POF in the ICN Market
- 5.1. POF Standards
- 5.2. POF Systems Products
- 5.3. POF Technology
- 5.3.1. Sources
- 5.3.2. Fibers
- 5.3.3. Coding Schemes
- 5.3.4. POF Connectors
- 5.3.5. Cables for Harsh Environments
6.0 Cost Comparison to Cu and Fiber
- 6.1. Device and Infrastructure Savings
- 6.2. Tooling (installation)
- 6.3. Installation Time
7.0 Market Forecasts
- 7.1. Industrial Protocols
- 7.2. Glass Optical Fiber
8.0 Overview of Major Standards Organizations, Trade Organizations, and Trends
- 8.1. Industrial Ethernet
- 8.2. Profibus
- 8.3. Interbus
- 8.4. ControlNet
- 8.5. DeviceNet
- 8.6. SERCOS
- 8.7. IEEE-1394
- 8.8. Field Bus Foundation
- 8.9. Summary of Industrial Control Networking Standards
9.0 Technology Solutions
10.0 Industrial Control Systems Using POF
11.0 Profiles of Major System Companies Supplying Fiber-optic Products
- 11.1. Rockwell Automation, Rockwell Automation Product Line
- 11.1.1. General Motors Case Study
- 11.2. Siemens
- 11.3. Phoenix Contact
- 11.3.1. Volkswagen Case Study
- 11.4. Bosch Rexroth
- 11.5. Belden Electronics (Hirschmann)
- 11.6. ABB
- 11.7. GE Fanuc
- 11.8. Mitsubishi Electric Automation
- 11.9. Yokogawa
- 11.10. Sony
12.0 Profiles of Optoelectronics and Optical Fiber Suppliers
- 12.1. Transceiver Companies
- 12.2. Plastic Optical Fiber Companies
13.0 Selling into the Industrial Control Market
14.0 Conclusion
15.0 References and Acknowledgements
Table of Figures:
- 1. Convergence of Industrial and Consumer Worlds at 100Mbps
- 2. Industrial Networking Applications
- 3. Traditional Automation Network Hierarchy
- 4. Network Hierarchy
- 5. The simplicity of Fiber Optic Cable
- 6. The complexity of Copper Cable
- 7. POF Commercial Systems
- 8. Device and Infrastructure Cost Comparison
- 9. Savings comparison in Tooling
- 10. Connectorizaton Time Study
- 11. Served Available Market for POF in Various Fields
- 12. Market for Industrial Control POF Data Links
- 13. POF World Industrial Control Market Geographic Distribution (%)
- 14. Industrial Control Standards Estimates (%)
- 15. Total Shipments of IC Ethernet Devices (Thousands of Units)
- 16. Fiber Cable (Km)
- 17. Cable Shipments (millions of $)
- 18. Single serial cable replaces heavy parallel copper cables for all signal types
- 19. Industrial Control Standards Application and Functionality
- 20. POF Industrial Control Market by Standard
- 21. Industrial Ethernet Compared to Office Ethernet
- 22. Interbus topology
- 23. Optical fiber and copper cable are easy to connect in an Interbus network
- 24. Typical SERCOS-Based Motion System
- 25. Foundation Field Bus Model
- 26. Overview of the Standards
- 27. Physical Characteristics
- 28. Transport Mechanism
- 29. Emitter, Cable Comparison
- 30. Transceiver, Receiver Comparison
- 31. Typical Factory Automation Network
- 32. Programmable Logic Controller (Rockwell/Rockwell Automation)
- 33. Protocol and Media Converters (Siemens, Phoenix Contact)
- 34. Photo Switch with POF/GOF Cables (Rockwell/Rockwell Automation)
- 35. Photoelectric Sensors with POF/GOF Connectors (Rockwell/Rockwell Automation)
- 36. Photoelectric Sensors with Fiber Optic Cables (Rockwell Automation)
- 37. Rockwell Automation Network Architecture
- 38. GM' s Phased Migration to a Com mon Architecture
- 39. GM' s Common Control System Architecture
- 40. Different transmission media combined in a hybrid network.
- 41. Profibus Optical Link Module (Siemens)
- 42. Connection Criteria
- 43. Sample product data sheets as an example of Phoenix Contact' s POF products.
- 44. Hirschmann OZD-485 copper to optical fiber converter
- 45. Mitsubishi Network Hierarchy
|
