Cover Image
市場調查報告書

微創脊椎移植的美國市場

US Market Overview for Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants 2017 - MedView

出版商 iData Research Inc. 商品編碼 499479
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 462 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
Back to Top
微創脊椎移植的美國市場 US Market Overview for Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants 2017 - MedView
出版日期: 2017年05月01日 內容資訊: 英文 462 Pages
簡介

這份報告提供美國的微創脊椎移植市場調查,提供您整體市場預測(銷售量·收益額·平均價格·市場成長率)和市場趨勢,主要市場促進·阻礙因素,競爭情形,市場佔有率和疾病·治療概要,主要企業簡介等系統性資訊。

目錄

圖表一覽

摘要整理

美國的微創脊椎移植市場

競爭分析

市場趨勢

市場發展

調查對象市場

分析的更新資訊

修訂履歷

第1章 調查手法

  • 調查範圍
  • iData的9級分析方法

第2章 疾病概要

  • 簡介
    • 椎間盤退化性疾病
    • 椎間盤突出
    • 椎間滑脫
    • 風濕性脊椎炎
  • 脊椎變形
    • 脊椎側彎症
    • 脊椎後彎症
    • 脊椎前彎症
  • 外傷·腫瘤
  • 脊椎壓迫性骨折
    • 骨質疏鬆症
    • 脊椎壓迫性骨折

第3章 美國的微創脊椎移植市場概要

  • 簡介
    • 微創融合術
      • 一側插入腰椎後側椎間融合術(TLIF)
      • 後方插入椎間融合術(PLIF)
      • 一側插入椎間融合術(LLIF)
      • 前方插入椎間融合術(OLIF)
    • 椎弓骨釘術
      • 經皮插入的椎弓骨釘術
      • 侵入式椎弓骨釘術
    • 脊椎突起融合術
    • 椎間關節融合術
    • 薦腸關節融合術
    • MIS脊椎內視鏡術
  • 市場概要
  • 趨勢分析:各市場區隔
  • 市場促進·阻礙因素
    • 推動市場要素
    • 市場阻礙因素
  • 市場佔有率分析
  • 企業簡介
    • Alphatec Spine
    • DePuy Synthes
    • Globus Medical
    • K2M
    • Medtronic
    • Orthofix
    • Stryker
    • Zimmer Biomet

簡稱一覽

企業的新聞稿

目錄
Product Code: iDATA_USMIS17_MV

The full report suite on the U.S. market for minimally invasive spinal implants includes segments for MIS interbody devices, MIS pedicle screws, spinous process fixation, facet fixation, MIS sacroiliac joint fusion, spine endoscope, and MIS spine instrumentation. Despite multiple challenges, growth is expected in many market segments, as patient demographics in the U.S. maintain a steady demand for such procedures. Growth has increased across all segments as regulations become better adapted to MIS procedures.

General Report Contents:

  • Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends
  • Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment
  • Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment
  • Section on recent mergers & acquisitions

The spinal implant market is considered by many to be the most exciting and controversial segment of the orthopedics industry. This market has traditionally been a segment of the orthopedics market, but due to rapid growth and a large market size, many manufacturers view spine as a key business division separate from traditional orthopedics.

Historically, the majority of spinal implants were implanted in open surgical procedures through large incisions. However, open surgery can cause considerable tissue damage and lead to a large number of complications. Minimally invasive techniques, which require only small puncture wounds, have been developed for the implantation of a number of spinal implant types. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) methods are frequently used for implanting traditional spinal implant devices, such as interbody devices and pedicle screws. However, new technologies such as facet fixation and spinous process fixation have also been developed using MIS techniques.

For the purposes of this report, the U.S. minimally invasive spinal implant market is segmented into spinous process fixation, facet fixation, MIS interbody fusion, MIS pedicle screws and MIS sacroiliac joint fusion.

Rapid growth is expected in all segments of the U.S. minimally invasive spinal implant market as a result of the physiological and surgical advantages of MIS procedures over open procedures.

One of the key drivers for the MIS spinal device market is the increase in the target population, which is composed of aging baby boomers. The majority of procedures are performed on those individuals in the final third and quarter of their lifespan, usually over the age of 60. This age group is the fastest growing demographic cohort in the United States. The biggest limiting factor for the MIS spinal device market is the complexity of the procedures and the skill required to master them. In particular, percutaneous techniques, and, to a lesser extent, retractor techniques, are considered by many to be considerably more difficult to master than traditional open surgical methods. Older generations of doctors and surgeons are especially reluctant to switch to MIS, as it takes a considerable time investment to master the procedure. The MIS interbody market continues to see a shift toward OLIF and LLIF devices and away from MIPLIF and MITLIF devices. The oblique and lateral lumbar approaches are expected to see more growth than their posterior and transforaminal lumbar counterparts, although positive growth is expected across segments.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF CHARTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

MARKET TRENDS

MARKET DEVELOPMENTS

PROCEDURE NUMBERS

PROCEDURE CODES INVESTIGATED

MARKETS INCLUDED

KEY REPORT UPDATES

VERSION HISTORY

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • 1.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
  • 1.2 IDATA'S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
    • Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
    • Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
    • Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
    • Step 4: Performing Primary Research
    • Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
    • Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
    • Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
    • Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
    • Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring

DISEASE OVERVIEW

  • 2.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 2.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease
      • 2.1.1.1 Disc Herniation
      • 2.1.1.2 Stenosis
      • 2.1.1.3 Spondyloisthesis
      • 2.1.1.4 Arthritis
    • 2.1.2 Spinal Deformities
      • 2.1.2.1 Scoliosis
      • 2.1.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis
    • 2.1.3 Trauma and Tumor
    • 2.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures
      • 2.1.4.1 Osteoporosis
      • 2.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures

U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW

  • 3.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 3.1.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion
      • 3.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
      • 3.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
      • 3.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
      • 3.1.1.4 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    • 3.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws
      • 3.1.2.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
      • 3.1.2.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems
    • 3.1.3 Spinous Process Fixation
    • 3.1.4 Facet Fixation
    • 3.1.5 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
    • 3.1.6 MIS Spine Endoscopes
  • 3.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 3.3 TREND ANALYSIS BY SEGMENT
  • 3.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 3.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 3.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 3.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
  • 3.6 COMPANY PROFILES
    • 3.6.1 Alphatec Spine
    • 3.6.2 DePuy Synthes
    • 3.6.3 Globus Medical
    • 3.6.4 K2M
    • 3.6.5 Medtronic
    • 3.6.6 Orthofix
    • 3.6.7 Stryker
    • 3.6.8 Zimmer Biomet

ABBREVIATIONS

APPENDIX: COMPANY PRESS RELEASES

LIST OF CHARTS

  • Chart 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market by Segment, U.S., 2013 - 2023
  • Chart 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Overview, U.S., 2013 & 2023
  • Chart 3 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2013 - 2023
  • Chart 3 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Breakdown, U.S., 2016
  • Chart 3 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Breakdown, U.S., 2023
  • Chart 3 4: Growth Rates by Segment, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2013 - 2023
  • Chart 3 5: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2016

LIST OF FIGURES

  • Figure 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2016 (1 of 2)
  • Figure 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2016 (2 of 2)
  • Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, U.S., 2016
  • Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2)
  • Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2)
  • Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, U.S., 2015 - 2017
  • Figure 1 7: Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures Covered, U.S., 2016
  • Figure 1 8: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2016 (1 of 2)
  • Figure 1 9: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2016 (2 of 2)
  • Figure 1 10: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Markets Covered, U.S., 2016
  • Figure 1 11: Key Report Updates
  • Figure 1 12: Version History
  • Figure 3 1: Total Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2013 - 2023 (US$M)
  • Figure 3 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2013 - 2023 (US$M)
  • Figure 3 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Growth by Segment, U.S., 2013 - 2023
  • Figure 3 4: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2016
  • Figure 3 5: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2016 (1 of 2)
  • Figure 3 6: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2016 (2 of 2)
Back to Top