Cover Image
市場調查報告書

歐洲的髖關節置換設備市場分析

European Market Report for Hip Replacement Devices 2016 - MedCore

出版商 iData Research Inc. 商品編碼 366809
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 124 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
Back to Top
歐洲的髖關節置換設備市場分析 European Market Report for Hip Replacement Devices 2016 - MedCore
出版日期: 2016年08月01日 內容資訊: 英文 124 Pages
簡介

全人工髖關節置換術(THR)是以人造植入物完全取代髖關節。植入物有單體販賣及模組型等類型,近年來受到產品小型化、非黏合(轉換為壓貼)、複雜化等影響,模組型正在廣泛普及。單體型則主要用於手術中感染風險高時的選擇。

本報告提供歐洲各國髖關節置換設備的市場相關分析,提供您整體市場規模的轉變和預測,各產品種類 (植入/軸承類別等)的詳細趨勢,主要的推動及阻礙市場要素等調查評估。

摘要整理

歐洲的整形外科用大關節重建設備市場概要

競爭分析

市場趨勢

市場發展

相關治療的實施數量

分析對象市場

主要報告的更新情形

過去的版本

調查手法

  • 調查範圍
  • IDATA的9級分析方法

各國市場簡介

  • 簡介
    • 人口
    • 平均年齡
    • 每人GDP
    • 價格指數
  • 德國
  • 法國
  • 英國
  • 義大利
  • 西班牙
  • 荷比盧三國
  • 北歐各國
  • 奧地利
  • 瑞士
  • 葡萄牙

髖關節置換設備的市場

  • 簡介
    • 人體結構
    • 病理學
    • 治療方法
    • 植入的種類
      • 完全置換
      • 部分置換
      • 表面置換
      • 重新置換
    • 固定手法
    • 植入的材料
    • 軸承表面技術
      • 聚乙烯·軸承
      • 高交聯聚乙烯 (HCPE) 軸承
      • 金屬軸承
      • 陶瓷軸承
  • 市場概要
  • 市場分析與預測
    • 髖關節完全置換設備的市場
      • 各黏合方法的明細
        • 水泥式
        • 非水泥式
        • 混合式
      • 軸承類別
        • 金屬·HCPE
        • 陶瓷·HCPE
        • 陶瓷·陶瓷
    • 髖關節部分置換設備的市場
      • 雙極式
      • 單極式
    • 髖關節重新置換的市場
    • 髖關節表面置換的市場
  • 推動及阻礙市場要素
    • 推動市場要素
    • 阻礙市場要素
  • 企業間市場佔有率分析

簡稱一覽

目錄
Product Code: iDATA_EULJ16_MC_HR

A primary total hip replacement (THR) replaces the entire hip joint. THR implants typically have three components: a stem, a head and an acetabular cup. The stem anchors the implant in the femur; the portion of the stem that emerges from the femur and attaches to the head is known as the neck. The head is ball-shaped and replaces the natural head of the femur. It articulates with the cup, which sits in the acetabular fossa. THR implants are either sold in one-piece (monobloc) or modular designs. In a modular implant, the head, neck and stem can be separated, replaced or adjusted for greater versatility in matching the system to a patient's body. The majority of THR implants sold are of the monobloc variety. This is driven by a desire for expediency during the surgical procedure. However, the advantage of a modular design is also its downside because the device adds complexity and time to surgical procedures. The second reason for surgeon preference for one-piece implants is their concern over a greater risk of infection because of the increased number of surfaces in modular systems.

The hip reconstruction device market has rapidly adopted cementless, or press-fitted, systems. These devices are implanted into a tight, form-fitting cavity hollowed out in the remaining bone. It is held in place by friction, but the design of such systems encourages bone growth and more natural and long-lasting adhesion. The disadvantage is the lesser amount of initial fixation. This makes press-fitted implants technically challenging for highly mobile joints such as the elbow. Some surgeons also use hybrid implants which involve both cemented and cementless components.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF CHARTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EUROPEAN ORTHOPEDIC LARGE JOINT REPLACEMENT DEVICE MARKET OVERVIEW

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

MARKET TRENDS

MARKET DEVELOPMENTS

PROCEDURE NUMBERS

MARKETS INCLUDED

KEY REPORT UPDATES

VERSION HISTORY

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  • 1.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
  • 1.2 IDATA'S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
    • Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
    • Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
    • Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
    • Step 4: Performing Primary Research
    • Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
    • Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
    • Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
    • Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
    • Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring

COUNTRY PROFILES

  • 2.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 2.1.1.1 Population
    • 2.1.1.2 Median Age
    • 2.1.1.3 GDP Per Capita
    • 2.1.1.4 Price Index
  • 2.2 GERMANY
  • 2.3 FRANCE
  • 2.4 UNITED KINGDOM
  • 2.5 ITALY
  • 2.6 SPAIN
  • 2.7 BENELUX
  • 2.8 SCANDINAVIA
  • 2.9 AUSTRIA
  • 2.10 SWITZERLAND
  • 2.11 PORTUGAL

HIP REPLACEMENT DEVICE MARKET

  • 3.1 INTRODUCTION
    • 3.1.1 Anatomy
    • 3.1.2 Pathology
    • 3.1.3 Treatment
    • 3.1.4 Implant Types
      • 3.1.4.1 Primary Hip Replacement
      • 3.1.4.2 Partial Hip Replacement
      • 3.1.4.3 Resurfacing Hip Replacement
      • 3.1.4.4 Hip Revision
    • 3.1.5 Fixation Method
    • 3.1.6 Implant Material
    • 3.1.7 Bearing Surface Technology
      • 3.1.7.1 Polyethylene Bearings
      • 3.1.7.2 Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings
      • 3.1.7.3 Metal Bearings
      • 3.1.7.4 Ceramic Bearings
  • 3.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
  • 3.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    • 3.3.1 Total Hip Replacement Device Market
      • 3.3.1.1 Total Hip Replacement Device Market by Cementation Type
        • 3.3.1.1.1 Cemented Total Hip Replacement Device Market
        • 3.3.1.1.2 Cementless Total Hip Replacement Device Market
        • 3.3.1.1.3 Hybrid Total Hip Replacement Device Market
      • 3.3.1.2 Total Hip Replacement Device Market by Bearing Type
        • 3.3.1.2.1 Metal-on-HCPE Total Hip Replacement Device Market
        • 3.3.1.2.2 Ceramic-on-HCPE Total Hip Replacement Device Market
        • 3.3.1.2.3 Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Device Market
    • 3.3.2 Partial Hip Replacement Device Market
      • 3.3.2.1 Bipolar Partial Hip Replacement Device Market
      • 3.3.2.2 Unipolar Partial Hip Replacement Device Market
    • 3.3.3 Hip Replacement Revision Market
    • 3.3.4 Resurfacing Hip Replacement Market
  • 3.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
    • 3.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 3.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 3.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

ABBREVIATIONS

Back to Top