2011年 日本的主要EA/BI包裝供應商的競爭力分析 是由出版商IDC在2011年11月所出版的。
這份英文市場調查報告書包含Pages: 55 價格從美金5000起跳。
本報告提供最新的調查資訊，報告，各種資訊來源為基礎，IDC定義的2011年版軟體市場定義為基礎的日本EA/BI供應商的競爭力分析相關彙整資料，為您概述為以下內容。
※本報告提供日文報告(商品編號:224306)的英譯版。
IDC的見解
調查概要
概況
- 日本的EA市場 前十名供應商的各產業領域銷售額比較
- 日本的EA市場 前十名供應商的各產業領域銷售額實際成果
- 日本的CRM市場 前十名供應商的各產業領域銷售額實際成果
- 日本的ERM市場 前十名供應商的各產業領域銷售額實際成果
- 日本的SCM市場 前十名供應商的各產業領域銷售額實際成果
- 日本的BI市場 前十名供應商的各產業領域銷售額比較
- 日本的BI市場 前十名供應商的各產業領域銷售額實際成果
- 日本的EA市場 前十名供應商的不同企業規模銷售額比較
- 日本的EA市場 前十名供應商的不同企業規模銷售額實際成果
- 日本的CRM市場 前十名供應商的不同企業規模銷售額實際成果
- 日本的ERM市場 前十名供應商的不同企業規模銷售額實際成果
- 日本的SCM市場 前十名供應商的不同企業規模銷售額實際成果
- 日本的Manufacturing市場 前十名供應商的不同企業規模銷售額實際成果
- 日本的BI市場不同企業規模銷售額比較和前十名供應商的競爭分析
- 日本的BI市場 前十名供應商的不同企業規模銷售額實際成果
- 前幾名EA/BI各供應商商務概況
- 1) SAP
- 2) 富士通
- 3) OBIC
- 4) Oracle
- 5) NEC
- 6) IBM
未來展望
ICD的建議
- SaaS(Software as a Services)的發展
- EA和BI的融合
- 行動商務的應對
參考資料
- 相關調查
- 定義
- 企業資源管理(ERM)應用程式
- 供應鏈經營(SCM)應用程式
- 營運/製造管理應用程式
- 顧客人際關係經營(CRM)應用程式
- 營運/製造管理應用程式
- 數據存取/分析/傳輸軟體
- Synopsis
圖表
This IDC study (a translation of the Japanese report IDC #J11300104) analyzes the competitiveness of leading enterprise applications (EA) and business intelligence (BI) software vendors based on the latest survey results, reports, and other information sources in accordance with IDC's software market taxonomy in 2011. While more than half of the leading EA and BI vendors recorded a negative growth rate in 2009, the number of vendors that recorded positive growth against negative growth in 2010 was divided into half. This year also witnessed vendors with double-digit growth rate, showing rapid business recovery trends. "While EA and BI investment in 2011 is likely to be replaced by business continuity (BCP) measures, enterprises are likely to recover quickly from this mindset by 2012. However, the impact of the recent power shortage situation is likely to affect business conditions in 2012, particularly owing to the difficult period between April and September. The competitive edge of the EA and BI market vendors largely depends on the content and success of these applications in 2011. Rather than chasing projects with short-term view, vendors are required to maximize their future potential in terms of cloud, business mobility, and EA and BI integration. Corporate business leaders must learn from the successful examples of vendors that focus on progressive and reform-oriented EA and BI projects rather than projects with gradual progress, in order to score competitive advantage," says Tomoko Akagi, group manager, Software and Security Research, IDC Japan.
Table of Contents
IDC OPINION
In this Study
Methodology
Executive Summary
Situation Overview
Japan EA Market Top 10 Vendors Comparison by Industry
Japan EA Market Leading 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry
Japan CRM Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry
Japan ERM Market Top 10 Vendor Revenue Performance by Industry
Japan SCM Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry
Japan BI Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Comparison by Industry
Japan EA Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Comparison by Industry Size
Japan EA Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry Size
Japan CRM Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry Size
Japan ERM Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry Size
Japan SCM Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry Size
Japan Manufacturing Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry Size
Japan BI Market Revenue Comparison by Industry Size and Competitive Analysis of Top 10 Vendors
EA and BI Business Overview by Leading Vendors
SAP
Fujitsu
OBIC
Oracle
NEC
IBM
Future Outlook
Essential Guidance
Learn More
Related Research
Definitions
Enterprise Resource Management Application
Financial Accounting Application
Accounting Applications
Treasury/Risk Management
Human Capital Management
Payroll Accounting
Procurement
Order Management
Financial Performance and Strategy Management
Project and Portfolio Management
Enterprise Asset Management
Supply Chain Management Applications
Logistics
Production Planning
Inventory Management
Operation/Manufacturing Applications
Customer Relationship Management Applications
Sales
Marketing
Customer Services
Contact Center
Operation/Manufacturing Applications
Data Access/Analysis/Software Delivery
Synopsis
Table: Japan EA Market Top 10 Vendors Oligopolistic Situation, 2008-2010
Table: Japan BI Market Top 10 Vendors Oligopolistic Trends, 2008-2010
Table: Japan EA Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry, 2010
Table: Japan CRM Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue by Industry, 2010
Table: Japan ERM Market Top 10 Vendor Revenue Performance by Industry, 2010
Table: Japan SCM Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry, 2010
Table: Japan BI Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry, 2010
Table: Japan EA Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry Size, 2010
Table: Japan CRM Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry Size, 2010
Table: Japan ERM Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry Size, 2010
Table: Japan SCM Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry Size, 2010
Table: Japan Manufacturing Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry Size, 2010
Table: Japan BI Market Top 10 Vendors Revenue Performance by Industry Size, 2010
Table: SAP EA and BI Product Portfolio and Revenue Trends, 2008-2010
Table: Fujitsu EA/BI Product Portfolio and Revenue Trends, 2008-2010
Table: OBIC EA Product Portfolio and Revenue Trends, 2008-2010
Table: Oracle EA and BI Product Portfolio and Revenue Trends, 2008-2010
Table: NEC's EA Product Portfolio and Revenue Trends, 2008-2010
Table: IBM EA and BI Product Portfolio Revenue Trends, 2008-2010
Figure: Japan EA Software Market Top 5 Vendors Oligopolistic Situation, 2009 and 2010
Figure: Japan BI Market Top 5 Vendors Oligopolistic Trends/Market Size, 2009 and 2010
Figure: SAP Product Portfolio Revenue YoY Growth Trends Based on Software Classification, 2009 and 2010
Figure: SAP EA and BI Product Portfolio Revenue Trends Comparison, 2008-2010
Figure: SAP EA and BI Product Portfolio Revenue Share by Industry, 2010
Figure: SAP EA and BI Product Revenue Share by Industry Size, 2010
Figure: Fujitsu Product Portfolio Revenue YoY Growth Trends Based on Software Classification, 2009 and 2010
Figure: Fujitsu EA and BI Product Portfolio Revenue Share Trends, 2008-2010
Figure: Fujitsu EA and BI Product Revenue Share by Industry, 2010
Figure: Fujitsu EA and BI Product Share Based on Industry Size, 2010
Figure: OBIC Product Portfolio Revenue and YoY growth Trends Based on Software Classification, 2009 and 2010
Figure: OBIC ERM/Manufacturing Product Portfolio Revenue Share Trends, 2008-2010
Figure: OBIC ERM Product Revenue Share by Industry, 2010
Figure: OBIC ERM/Manufacturing Product Revenue Share by Industry Size, 2010
Figure: Oracle Product Portfolio Revenue YoY Growth Trends Based on Software Classification, 2009 and 2010
Figure: Oracle EA and BI Product Portfolio Revenue Share Trends, 2008-2010
Figure: Oracle EA and BI Product Revenue Share by Industry, 2010
Figure: Oracle EA and BI Product Revenue Share by Industry Size, 2010
Figure: NEC Product Portfolio YoY Growth Trends Based on Software Classification, 2009 and 2010
Figure: NEC EA and BI Product Portfolio Revenue Share Trends, 2008-2010
Figure: NEC EA and BI Product Revenue Share by Industry, 2010
Figure: NEC EA and BI Product Revenue Share by Industry Size, 2010
Figure: IBM Product Portfolio YoY Growth Trends Based on Software Classification, 2009 and 2010
Figure: IBM EA and BI Product Portfolio Revenue Share Trends, 2008-2010
Figure: IBM EA and BI Product Revenue Share by Industry, 2010
Figure: IBM EA and BI Product Revenue Share by Industry Size, 2010
|
