Cover Image
市場調查報告書

Gigabit城市的公私部門合作方案:4個案例研究

Gigabit Cities Public-Private Initiatives: Four Case Studies

出版商 Heavy Reading 商品編碼 329299
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 15 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
Back to Top
Gigabit城市的公私部門合作方案:4個案例研究 Gigabit Cities Public-Private Initiatives: Four Case Studies
出版日期: 2015年05月01日 內容資訊: 英文 15 Pages
簡介

本報告提供美國的城市、州的Gigabit城市的官民合作關係的配合措施相關著4個案例研究、引起夥伴關係提案的關心事、這些關心事在官民合作關係的背景中如何應對,還有目前的計劃結果等的議論彙整,為您概述為以下內容。

第1章 簡介:對Gigabit城市的混合負載

第2章 案例研究:諾思堪薩斯城、密蘇里州

第3章 案例研究:Rock Hill、南卡羅來納州

第4章 案例研究:西雅圖、華盛頓州

第5章 案例研究:康乃狄克州

第6章 結論

目錄
Product Code: Vol. 15, No. 4

"Gigabit Cities" is a label encompassing efforts to at once energize technological innovation, stimulate economic development and centrally democratize super-high-speed Internet access, diffusing adoption of massively higher (and often synchronous) speeds on "gigabit" networks. Exactly how these goals are realized is now a major issue facing network operators, local and state governments, and users of broadband services.

There is no single blueprint for how a Gigabit Cities project should be built or how it should be financed and run. The case studies contained in this report offer a few examples illustrating elements of and issues in the specifically "public-private partnership" model for Gigabit Cities, one of three major structural approaches to the new networks. Rather than primarily dramatizing prominent examples or major successes, they show complexities and inherent problems at various stages of the process, including what can be viewed as examples of implicit partnerships, still-potential partnerships and failed partnerships.

Part of the concept of Gigabit Cities from the public perspective has been that under-served neighborhoods - whether lower-income, minority or more mainstream middle-class - will get better service, helping residents more fully participate in the increasingly technology-driven "knowledge economy," equalizing opportunity while increasing U.S. worker productivity.

For most public entities, money is tight and private investor partners alleviate political resistance while spreading the risk, most importantly providing the capital. For these reasons the public-private partnership concept intensely interests those promoting Gigabit Cities, though the model also partakes of some of the disadvantages of both public and private modalities, even while mitigating them.

Despite their complexities and potential for failure, private-public partnerships will continue to play a major role in the Gigabit Cities arena, spreading risk and ameliorating obstacles for both sectors. This report illustrates some of the problems and possibilities of public-private partnerships toward Gigabit Cities at multiple stages in the process.

When today's cities started their gigabit quests, there were only a few Gigabit Cities. By the time they actually are up and running, there will be quite a few more. With diffusion of the Gigabit Cities model, it will be a major issue to find a sustainable competitive advantage as higher and higher bandwidth levels become more widely established. In other words, while cities try to adopt Gigabit Cities to gain competitive advantage in economic development, that advantage inevitably becomes more elusive over time. And as more metropolitan centers increase their available bandwidth, what is required to be competitive increases, as is what is required to stand out with a unique competitive advantage.

Gigabit Cities Public-Private Initiatives: Four Case Studies presents four case studies of efforts at public-private partnerships for Gigabit Cities in U.S. cities and states. It discusses the concerns that led to proposals for partnership, how these were addressed in the context of public-private partnerships, and the projects' results at their various current stages, derived from documentation and recent interviews with nine representatives of cities and service providers of various kinds.

Table of Contents

  • I. Introduction: The Hybrid Road to Gigabit Cities
  • II. Case Study: North Kansas City, MO
  • III. Case Study: Rock Hill, SC
  • IV. Case Study: Seattle, WA
  • V. Case Study: State of Connecticut
  • VI. Conclusion
Back to Top