Cover Image
市場調查報告書

資料中心網路層疊:推動因素與課題

Overlays for Data Center Networking: Drivers & Challenges

出版商 Heavy Reading 商品編碼 325914
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 18 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
Back to Top
資料中心網路層疊:推動因素與課題 Overlays for Data Center Networking: Drivers & Challenges
出版日期: 2015年03月13日 內容資訊: 英文 18 Pages
簡介

資料中心中,伺服器網域虛擬化已經是一種標準,儲存網域虛擬化也正在發展。可是,網路、網域的虛擬化到近幾年才總算剛開始。層疊是簡略化物理性網路,更迅速連接虛擬機 (VM) 和其他的設備。不是提供物理性設備的途徑,層疊使用VXLAN、通訊協定NVGRE等簡略化流量,可縮短物理性網路,業者可改善對多用戶、雲端服務的支援。另一個推動因素是網路虛擬化功能 (VNF) ,一邊使用通用伺服器,一邊以VFN (虛擬網路功能) 的形式支持專用平台,使網路的彈性和擴充性改善。儘管有以上優點,層疊的資料中心引進認定將更複雜化。關於降低營運成本、效率改善的程度,及物理的網路的重要性,現在仍處於討論中狀態。

本報告提供通訊企業的資料中心網域導入層疊網路時的潛在影響度相關分析、引進促進相連的各種因素,及引進時需要討論的各種問題、業者方面現在重視或令人擔憂的事項、層疊網路相關想法、期待、計劃等相關調查與考察。

第1章 簡介與主要分析結果

  • 主要的分析結果
  • 層疊、網路定義
  • 分析的範圍、結構

第2章 資料中心的層疊、網路的推動因素

  • 雲端/多用戶功能
  • 虛擬網路功能 (VNF) 的彈性/行動
  • 虛擬網路擴張到資料中心外側

第3章 層疊相關課題

  • 管理容易度
  • 跟物理性網路的介面

第4章 供應商比較

第5章 層疊網路解決方案的供應商

  • Akanda Inc
  • Cisco Systems Inc.
  • CPlane Networks Inc.
  • Hewlett-Packard Co.
  • Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
  • Juniper Networks Inc.
  • Midokura Inc.
  • Nuage Networks (Alcatel-Lucent)
  • PLUMgrid Inc.
  • VMware Inc.

附錄A:關於作者

附錄B:法律上的免責聲明

圖表一覽

目錄

Virtualization has long been common within the server domains of data centers, and is increasingly so in the storage domain. Only recently, however, have operators considered virtualizing in the network domain. Networking is a complex endeavor, and tools such as OpenStack are generally perceived to lack some of the functionality required for highly available, highly scalable networks.

Overlays have been proposed as a way to provide the connectivity needed to support the networking needs within the data center. They abstract the details of the physical network, making it much faster to connect virtual machines (VMs) and other devices. Rather than provision paths on physical devices, overlays encapsulate traffic using protocols such as VXLAN and NVGRE to tunnel across the physical network. These newer protocols allow operators to move beyond the limitations of VLANs, which only support 4,096 virtual networks, so they can better support multi-tenant cloud services.

Another driver, which is not as clearly understood, is the emergence of network functions virtualization (NFV). In NFV, functions that had previously resided on purpose-built, proprietary platforms will be supported on general-purpose servers in the form of virtualized network functions (VNFs). How these workloads will behave in terms of elasticity and mobility is still be determined, but overlays are seen as an effective approach to providing the flexibility they will need to manage VNFs. Overlay networks also make it easier to move workloads between and across data centers. By mapping VXLAN to MPLS paths, virtual private networks can be extended beyond the data center across the WAN.

Despite these potential benefits, overlays are often seen as introducing more complexity into the data center environment. Opinions vary as to how significant this issue is: Some argue that in the end, operational expense will decline, because less time will be spent managing the physical network; others contend that managing service performance will become more complicated from having two domains to consider. Even when overlays are present, the physical network will remain critical for ensuring service quality. Discussions with operators suggest that the benefits will ultimately outweigh these concerns, although it will take time for operations to get comfortable with the new approach.

‘Overlays for Data Center Networking: Drivers & Challenges’ analyzes the potential impact of overlay networking on the telco data center domain, including the various drivers that support its deployment, as well as the main challenges it presents. It also provides insight into the current thinking of telco data center operators as regards their attitudes, expectations and plans for overlay networking.

The report also profiles 10 leading overlay networking solution suppliers*, including details of their approaches, solutions and partnerships.

As shown in the excerpt below, overlay networking describes the creation of a virtual network that runs on top of a Layer 2 or Layer 3 physical network. Most often, overlays are used to connect VMs to each other. They are also used to connect VMs to gateways to the physical network including bare metal. Tunnels are used to transport payloads across an underlay (physical) network that has no visibility into or awareness of the traffic in those tunnels. Overlays are an attractive option to data center operators because they reduce the need for frequent modifications to the physical network while providing more agile deployment of networking resources.

Excerpt 1: Typical Fourth-Generation Multicore Processor

                        Source: Earlswood Marketing

Report Scope & Structure

Overlays for Data Center Networking: Drivers & Challenges is structured as follows:

Section I is an introduction to the report, including the key findings of our research.

Section II describes the main drivers behind demand for overlay networking.

Section III provides a look at the main challenges that must be addressed when considering deploying overlay networks.

Section IV provides a comparison of the main suppliers of overlay networking solutions.

Section V provides brief descriptions of the main suppliers of overlay networking solutions.

‘Overlays for Data Center Networking: Drivers & Challenges’ is published in PDF format.

OVERLAY NETWORKING SOLUTION SUPPLIERS (10)*

  • Akanda Inc.
  • Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO)
  • CPlane Networks Inc.
  • Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: HPQ)
  • Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
  • Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR)
  • Midokura Inc.
  • Nuage Networks (Alcatel-Lucent)
  • PLUMgrid Inc.
  • VMware Inc. (NYSE: VMW)

Table of Contents

I. INTRODUCTION & KEY FINDINGS

  • 1.1. Key Findings
  • 1.2. Definition of Overlay Networking
  • 1.3. Report Scope & Structure

II. DRIVERS FOR OVERLAY NETWORKING IN THE DATA CENTER

  • 2.1. Cloud/Multi-Tenancy
  • 2.2. Elasticity/Mobility of VNFs
  • 2.3. Extending Virtual Networks Outside of the Data Center

III. CHALLENGES WITH OVERLAYS

  • 3.1. Manageability
  • 3.2. Interface to Physical Network

IV. VENDOR COMPARISONS

V. OVERLAY NETWORKING SOLUTION SUPPLIERS

  • 5.1. Akanda Inc
  • 5.2. Cisco Systems Inc.
  • 5.3. CPlane Networks Inc.
  • 5.4. Hewlett-Packard Co.
  • 5.5. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
  • 5.6. Juniper Networks Inc.
  • 5.7. Midokura Inc.
  • 5.8. Nuage Networks (Alcatel-Lucent)
  • 5.9. PLUMgrid Inc.
  • 5.10. VMware Inc.

APPENDIX A: ABOUT THE AUTHOR

APPENDIX B: LEGAL DISCLAIMER

LIST OF FIGURES

  • Figure 1: Virtual Overlay Network
  • Figure 2: Overlay Suppliers That Also Offer Physical Networking Gear
  • Figure 3: Overlay Suppliers That Do Not Offer Physical Networking Gear
Back to Top