|
|
|
市場調查報告書
特許學校之全球市場
Charter Schools
|
本報告已在2012年02月24日停止出版。
更改為出版
Charter Schools
出版日期 : 2012年01月
商品編碼: 232185
本報告為，調查分析特許學校之全球市場，並匯整市場概要、美國之特許學校及全球市場展望，以下列摘要形式闡述。
第1章 市場概要
- 簡介
- 特許學校
- 接受不受重視的孩童，不引人矚目
- "No Excuse"態度
- 教育期間增長
- 接受問題與失學的學生
- 教員與管理人之比例與業績相關
- 因規模小而效率高
- 特殊教育課程
- 受到政治支援之特許學校營運較好
第2章 部門概要
- 特許學校
- 美國特許學校之組織與結構
- 美國之學校
- 特許學校之設備
- 特許學校之特徵
- 特許學校許可機關
- 匯整特許教育方針
- 評價
- 學校教育制度中的民營企業
- 契約學校
- 營利特許學校
- 營運企業之優勢
- 營利特許學校之模式
- 美國之特許學校
- 網路特許學校之出現
- 成長促進音速
- K12：重要虛擬特許學校
- 美國特許學校許可機關
- 各式特許學校許可機關
- 支援多數特許學校許可機關的州
- 教育服務提供組織
- 教育營運組織
- 特許學校營運組織
- 包含學校設計營運組織
第3章 策略性企業拓展
第4章 地區市場展望
第5章 全球名錄
Abstract
The global outlook series on Charter Schools provides a collection of
statistical anecdotes, market briefs, and concise summaries of research
findings. The report provides unbiased research commentary and information
rich market data tables for a rudimentary understanding of the prevailing
market climate in the US. Brief write-ups are provided for other regions such
as Canada, Chile, Israel, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Also included
is an indexed, easy-to-refer, fact-finder directory listing the addresses, and
contact details of 524 companies worldwide.
Table of Contents
1. MARKET OVERVIEW 1
- Introduction 1
- Charter Schools: A Boon for the Society 1
- Serve the Disadvantaged Children and Remain Unnoticed 1
- Relying on ' No Excuse' Approach 2
- Extended Instructional Time 2
- Table 1: Proportion of Charter Schools with or without Extended
Instructional Time 2
- Targets the At-Risk and Dropout Students 2
- Table 2: Proportion of Target Student Population for Charter Schools 3
- High Teacher-Administrator Ratio Ensure Better Performance 3
- Smaller Size Ensure Greater Efficiency 3
- Specialized Educational Programs 3
- Charter Schools with Political Support Perform Better 4
2. SECTOR OVERVIEW 4
- Charter Schools: A Primer 4
- Challenges Faced While Establishing a Chartered School 4
- Aim of a State While Framing the Charter Law 4
- Organization and Structure of Charter Schools in the US 4
- Charter School Facilities 5
- Table 3: Proportion of Charter Schools Facilities by Acquisition Mode 5
- Table 4: Ownership of Major Rented Charter School Facilities 5
- Features of Charter Schools 6
- Charter Authorizing Institutions 6
- Role of Higher Educational Institutions 6
- Organizing Principles for Charters 6
- Evaluation 7
- Private Management Companies in Public Education System 7
- Contract Schools 7
- For Profit Charter Schools 7
- What' s In It for the Operating Company? 8
- For-Profit Contract School Models 8
- Management Fee Model 8
- Profit and loss model 8
- Selecting Between the Management Fee and Profit and loss Model 9
- Charter Schools and Company-Run Charter Schools - A Comparison 9
- Virtual Charter Schools in the US 9
- Evolution of Cyber Charter Schools 9
- Growth Drivers 10
- K12: A Leading Player in Virtual Charters 10
- US Charter Authorizers 11
- Alternative Charter Authorizers 11
- Table 5: Total Number of Active Alternative Charter Authorizers in 14
US States, as of 2006 11
- Table 6: List of Independent State Charter Boards, as of 2006 12
- Table 7: List of Municipal Office Charter Authorizers in the US, as of
2006 12
- States that Support Charter Schools have Multiple Authorizers 12
- Table 8: Charter Approvals for the Years 2006 & 2007 - Percentage
Share by Authorizing Body - Local School Boards, State Boards of
Education, State Chartering Boards, Universities/ Colleges, Mayor/City,
and Others (nonprofits) 13
- Education Service Providers 13
- Education Management Organizations 13
- Virtual School Management Organizations 13
- Comprehensive School Design Management Organizations 13
3. STRATEGIC CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS 14
A REGIONAL MARKET PERSPECTIVE
1. THE UNITED STATES 22
- Rationale Behind the Formation of Charter Schools 22
- Ground Facts 22
- The ' No Child Left Behind' Act To Ensure Accountability 23
- A Peek Into History 23
- The Set Back 24
- Table 9: Major Reasons for Closure of Charter Schools Since 1992 24
- ...And the Remedial Measures 25
- Charter Schools - Present Scenario 25
- Table 10: Charter Schools in the US: Total Number of Charter Schools,
and Charter School Student Enrollments for the Academic Year 2007-08 and
2008-09 26
- Table 11: Charter School Enrollments in Academic Years From 1999-2000
to 2008-09 27
- Table 12: Number of Charter Schools in Academic Years From 1999-2000 to
2008-09 27
- Table 13: Updates on Charter Schools During Academic Years 2006-07 and
2007-08 28
- Inadequate Charter Approvals Contribute to Growing Waiting Lists 28
- Table 14: Enrollment and Waiting List Status in Charter Schools in
2006 and 2007 28
- State-Level Scenario 28
- Table 15: Ranks of States in Terms of Number of Charter School
Enrollments in the Academic Year 2007-08 29
- Community Level Scenario 30
- Table 16: Top Ten Communities with High Proportion of Charter School
Students as of 2008 30
- Growth in Terms of Geographic Presence 31
- Table 17: Growth of Charter Schools in Terms of Number of States
Implementing Charter School Laws 31
- Year of Establishment of Charter Legislation (State-wise) 31
- The States Yet to Pass Charter School Law as of 2009 32
- Sources of Finance 32
- Federal Grants Through the U.S. Department of Education (DE) 32
- Credit Enhancement for Charter School Facilities Program 32
- Community Development Financial Institutions 32
- Table 18: Volume of CDFI Loans (in US$ Million) Delivered to
Charter Schools for the Period 2000 through 2006 33
- State Charter School Facilities Incentive Grants 33
- Charter Schools Program 34
- Per pupil allocation from state tax dollars 34
- District Funding 34
- Private Investments 34
- Select Private Non-profit Finance Providers in the US 34
- Charter School Spending Pattern 35
- Administration Spending 35
- Table 19: Average Per-Pupil Administration Expenditures in US Dollars
in Select States - Minnesota, Florida, Connecticut, North Carolina,
Michigan, Arizona, Texas, and Colorado 36
- Instructional Spending 36
- Table 20: Average Per-Pupil Instructional Expenditures in US Dollars
in Select States - Connecticut, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Michigan,
Florida, North Carolina, Colorado, Texas, and 37
- Financial Impediments for Special Education 37
- Table 21: Charter Schools in the US (2001-02): Percentage Share of
Students with Special Needs in Select States - Florida, Massachusetts,
Connecticut, North Carolina, Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, District
of Columbia, Texas, California, Arizona, and Colorado 38
- Top Charter Schools By Performance 39
- List of Top Ranking Charter High Schools in the US in 2008 39
- Key Studies and Findings 39
- Challenges for the Charter Schools 40
- Facility and Start-up Funding Remain a Major Challenge 40
- Limited Operational Funds 40
- Other Challenges 40
- Criticism For Charter Schools 41
- Fragile Commitment for Accountability 41
- For-Profit Charter Schools 41
- High Staff Turnover Impacts Quality of Education 41
- Discrimination and Segregation 41
- US Charter Schools - State-wise Analysis 41
- Arizona 41
- California 42
- Overview 42
- Charter Launch 42
- Table 22: California State Charter Schools (2008): Percentage Share
of Charters Closed by Category - Finance, Mismanagement, District,
Facilities, Academic, and Others 43
- Colorado 43
- Overview 43
- Charter School Institute 43
- District of Columbia 44
- Florida 44
- Overview 44
- Table 23: Performance of Graded Charter Schools in Florida for the
year 2008 45
- Table 24: Enrollments to Charter Schools in Florida From Academic
Year 2005-06 to 2008-09 45
- Table 25: Number of Charter Schools in Florida From Academic Year
2005-06 to 2008-09 45
- Table 26: Florida State Charter Schools (2008-09): Proportion of
Students in Charter Schools by Ethnicity - Asians, Non-Hispanic
Whites, Non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, and Others
(Multiracial) 46
- Table 27: Florida State Charter Schools (2008): Percentage Share of
Charters Closed by Category - Finance, Academic, Mismanagement,
Facilities, District, and Others 46
- Idaho 46
- Illinois 47
- Overview 47
- Table 28: Illinois State Charter Schools (2007-08): Percent Share of
Charter School Students by Ethnicity - White, Hispanic, Black, Asian
Pacific, Native American, and Other/Multiracial 47
- Table 29: Number of Charter School Students in Illinois From
Academic Year 2004-05 to 2007-08 48
- Table 30: Illinois State Charter Schools (2008): Percentage Share of
Charters Closed by Category -Finance, District, Mismanagement, and
Academic 48
- Indiana 48
- Overview 48
- Charter Authorization Scenario 49
- Michigan 49
- Overview 49
- Table 31: Michigan State Charter Schools (2008): Percentage Share of
Charters Closed by Category - Finance, Mismanagement, Academic,
Facility, and District 49
- Minnesota 50
- Overview 50
- Students Migrate from Public Schools to Charter Schools 50
- Table 32: Minnesota State Charter Schools (2008): Percentage Share
of Charters Closed by Category - Finance, Mismanagement, Academic, and
Facility 50
- New Hampshire 51
- Overview 51
- Educational Funding Legislature Restricts Growth of charted Schools
51
- New York 51
- Overview 51
- Failure of For-profit Educational Management Organizations 51
- North Carolina 51
- Overview 51
- Charter Schools Draw Demand Amid Speculations on Performance 52
- Table 33: North Carolina State Charter Schools (2008): Percentage
Share of Charters Closed by Category - Facility, Finance, and
Mismanagement 52
- Ohio 52
- Overview 52
- Table 34: Number of Charter Schools and Charter School Students
From 1998 to 2006 53
- Charter Schools Grow Behind Iron Curtains 53
- The Accountability issue 53
- Funding Mechanism 54
- Table 35: Charter Schools in Ohio (2007-08): Average Per Pupil
Revenue in Select School Systems by City - Akron, Canton, Cincinnati,
Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, Toledo, and Youngstown 54
- Table 36: Ohio State Charter Schools (2008): Percentage Share of
Closed Charter Schools by Category - Finance, Mismanagement, Academic,
District, Facility, and Others 55
- Pennsylvania 55
- Overview 55
- Cyber Charter Schools in Pennsylvania 55
- Tennessee 55
- Overview 55
- Recent Efforts to Facilitate Growth of Charter Schools 56
- Texas 56
- Overview 56
- Table 37: Texas State Charter Schools (2006-07): Percentage Share
of Minority Students by Ethnicity - Hispanic, African American,
Caucasian, and Others 56
- Charter School Types 57
- Open Enrollment Charters 57
- District Charters 57
- University Charters 57
- Home-Rule School District Charters 57
- Table 38: Texas State Charter Schools (2007-08): Student Enrollments
in Open Enrollment Charters, District Charters, University Charters, and
Home- Rule School District Charters 57
- Waiting Lists Emphasize the Popularity of Charter Schools 57
- Table 39: Texas State Charter Schools (2007-08): Student
Enrollments and Waiting Lists by Select Region - Austin, Corpus
Christi, Dallas/ Fort Worth, El Paso, Houston, Rio Grande Valley, and
San Antonio 58
- Table 40: Texas State Charter Schools (2008): Percentage Share of
Closed Charter Schools by Category -Academic, Mismanagement, Finance,
Facility, and Others 58
- Charter Schools Operating Outside the US 58
2. CANADA 59
3. CHILE 59
4. ISRAEL 59
- Parental Choice of Schools 59
- Charter Schools: A Viable Solution 59
5. NEW ZEALAND 60
6. THE UNITED KINGDOM 60
GLOBAL DIRECTORY
|
 |
