首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
- English Japanese Korean
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 通訊 > 光纖網路 > RBOC先進連線基盤建設的頻寬需求分析:FTTP與FTTN
產業/市場分類
通訊 (11616)
企業概況 (774)
光纖網路 (265)
次世代無線通信 (543)
行動用戶 (129)
行動設備 (764)
軟體 (1034)
電子商務 (209)
網路 (677)
網路與進入設備 (268)
數位廣播 (305)
數據中心 (345)
寬頻 (392)
衛星遠程通信 (141)
線上廣告 (144)
整合 (177)
整合通訊 (305)
機上盒 (63)
聯繫中心 (135)
Contents (627)
IT安全性 (503)
IT委外 (323)
LBS (160)
NFC (152)
RFID (215)
Web服務 (554)
WLAN/WiMAX (568)
市場調查報告書

RBOC先進連線基盤建設的頻寬需求分析:FTTP與FTTN

Bandwidth Needs Analysis of the RBOCs' Advanced Access Architectures: FTTP and FTTN

出版商 IGI Consulting, Inc.
出版日期 2008年10月 商品編碼 76611
內容資訊 英文  
價格
US $ 1995 Hard Copy
US $ 2395 PDF by E-mail (Single User License)
US $ 3995 PDF by E-mail (Site License)
US $ 5995 PDF by E-mail (Corporate License)


RBOC先進連線基盤建設的頻寬需求分析:FTTP與FTTN 是由出版商IGI Consulting, Inc.在2008年10月所出版的。 這份英文市場調查報告書價格從美金1995起跳。

簡介

2010年美國網路市場為了提供HDTV頻道服務,預測所使用的頻寬將會佔據全體的80%。而其次頻寬需求較大的,預測將會是高速資料通訊、 聲音通訊的需求,但無論任一項,與HDTV的需求相比,皆是非常微小。

此報告書是分析2003年以後由RBOC(貝爾區域營運公司)所推動的以FTTP/FTTN整備事業為中心,在美國的先進連線基盤建設動向之一連串調查報告書的其中之一,並將重點置於連線區域所需頻寬以及確保所需頻寬的方法。報告書之內容摘要如下所示。

說明

  • 所需的頻寬

頻寬需求的內容明細

  • 促進頻寬需求擴大的主要因素
  • 關於2010年頻寬需求的腳本

對於頻寬需求的對應

  • 目前的選項
    • FIOS-FTTP的頻寬容量
    • U-verse

為了確保必須頻寬的手段

  • Pair Bonding
  • 距離縮短
  • 混合式FTTN-FTTC
    • AT&T的BellSouth取向的新計畫-混合式FTTC/FTTN
  • 壓縮

NGPON的先進技術-10-GPON與WDM-PON

  • 10-GPON
  • WDM-PON
  • WDM-PON的廠商
    • 纏繞著WDM-PON的其他廠商動向
  • WDM廠商一覽與現狀
    • ADC
    • ADVA
    • Alcatel-Lucent
    • Ericsson
    • LG Electronics
    • Nortel
    • Novera
    • Pirelli
    • Tellabs

廠商一覽

  • Acterna(JDSU收購)
  • ADC
  • Adtran
  • Advanced Fibre Communications(AFCI)(現Tellabs)
  • Alcatel-Lucent
  • Alloptic
  • Amino Technologies
  • AOC Technologies
  • Avanex Corporation
  • Broadlight
  • Calix
  • Cisco
  • Conexant
  • Corrigent
  • Entrisphere(Ericsson收購)
  • Ericsson
  • Fiberxon(與Source Photonics、Luminent合併)
  • Finisar Corporation
  • FlexLight Networks(解散)
  • 富士通
  • Genone3 Technologies
  • 日立Communication Technologies
  • Humax USA
  • Iamba Networks
  • JDS Uniphase
  • Kreatel Communications AB(Motorola收購)
  • LG Electronics
  • LightComm Technology
  • Marconi
  • Microsoft
  • Motorola
  • NeoPhotonics
  • Nortel
  • Novera Optics(Nortel/LG共資公司所有)
  • OFS
  • O-Net Communications
  • Oplink Communications
  • Optiviva
  • Optical Solutions(Calix收購)
  • Osaki Electric
  • Paceon(三菱)
  • Passave(PMC-Sierra收購)
  • PMC-Sierra
  • Quantum Bridge Communications(Motorola收購)
  • Salira Optical Network Systems
  • Scientific-Atlanta(Cisco)
  • Siemens
  • Source Photonics(與Fiberxon、Luminent合併)
  • Tandberg(Ericsson)
  • Tellabs
  • Terawave(Occam Networks收購)
  • Tut Systems(Motorola收購)
  • Vinci Systems(Tellabs收購)
  • Wave7 Optics
  • Worldwide Packets(Ciena收購)
  • Zhone Technologies

附錄1:連線基盤建設

  • 對於光纖基礎的連線基盤建設之各種研究方法
  • FTTX
  • xDSL版本
  • 既有計畫的設計內容
    • Fiber to the Neighborhood(FTTN)
    • AT&T的Fibre to the node(FTTN)
    • BellSouth的Fiber to the Curb(FTTC)
  • 利用PON的構想
    • PON為何
    • PON的現狀
    • PON的強項與關鍵
    • PON的類型
    • 初期PON構想
    • GPON
  • 可對應頻寬需求的基盤建設

圖表

目錄

Abstract

Overview

Information Gatekeepers has recognized the Advanced Access Architecture thrusts of the major US carriers as one of the most important events in telecommunications history. As such, IGI has been periodically issuing major reports on the FTTP/FTTn activities of the RBOCs since it began in 2003. Earlier this year we issued “Advanced Access Architectures - 2008 - AT&T, Verizon, and Qwest Plans and Forecasts,” the most comprehensive of our reports on this subject. In recognition of the wide interest and deep importance of the FTTP/FTTN phenomena, we are now issuing a series of reports that focus on narrower aspects of Advanced Access Architectures. Specifically, this report focuses on the bandwidth needed in the access area and on ways to get that bandwidth.

This report provides the following:

  • A basis for forecasting access network bandwidth needs;
  • Specific forecasts for that bandwidth;
  • Description of the components of that needed bandwidth;
  • The basic drivers of bandwidth requirements;
  • A review of the loop architecture options for achieving the bandwidth;
  • Options that may be available to those architectures that are deficient.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Figures

The Lightwave Network Series of Reports

The Lightwave Network

The Lightwave Series of Reports

  • General Reports on the Network
  • General Market Reports
  • Specific Systems Reports

Introduction

How Much Bandwidth Is Enough?

What are the Bandwidth Needs?

Drivers of Bandwidth Requirements

Bandwidth Requirement 2010 Scenario

Meeting the Bandwidth Needs

The Current Options

  • FIOS - FTTP Bandwidth Capacity
  • Uverse

Alternatives to Achieve the Required Bandwidth

  • Pair Bonding
  • Reduce the Distance
  • Hybrid FTTN - FTTC
    • AT&T' s New Plans for BellSouth - a Hybrid FTTC/FTTN
  • Compression

NGPONs - Advanced Options - 10-GPON and WDM-PON

  • 10-GPON
  • WDM-PONs
  • Vendors of WDM-PON
    • Other WDM-PON Activities
  • Vendors of WDM - Listing and Summary of Status
    • ADC
    • ADVA
    • Alcatel-Lucent
    • Ericsson
    • LG Electronics
    • Nortel
    • Novera
    • Pirelli
    • Tellabs

Vendors Listing

Summary of Vendors

Detailed Listing of Vendors

  • Acterna (acquired by JDSU)
  • ADC
  • Adtran
  • Advanced Fibre Communications Inc. (AFCI) (Now Tellabs)
  • Alcatel-Lucent
  • Alloptic Inc
  • Amino Technologies plc
  • AOC Technologies
  • Avanex Corporation
  • Broadlight
  • Calix
  • Cisco
  • Conexant
  • Corrigent
  • Entrisphere Inc. (Acquired by Ericsson)
  • Ericsson
  • Fiberxon (Now Source Photonics combined with Luminent)
  • Finisar Corporation
  • FlexLight Networks (Defunct)
  • Fujitsu
  • Genone3 Technologies Inc.
  • Hitachi Communication Technologies Ltd.
  • Humax USA Inc.
  • Iamba Networks
  • JDS Uniphase
  • Kreatel Communications AB (Acquired by Motorola)
  • LG Electronics
  • LightComm Technology
  • Marconi
  • Microsoft
  • Motorola
  • NeoPhotonics
  • Nortel
  • Novera Optics (owned by Nortel / LG JV)
  • OFS
  • O-Net Communications Ltd
  • Oplink Communications, Inc.
  • Optiviva Inc.
  • Optical Solutions (Acquired by Calix)
  • Osaki Electric Co. Ltd.
  • Paceon (Mitsubishi)
  • Passave (Acquired by PMC-Sierra)
  • PMC-Sierra
  • Quantum Bridge Communications (Acquired by Motorola)
  • Salira Optical Network Systems
  • Scientific-Atlanta (Cisco)
  • Siemens
  • Source Photonics (Combined with Fiberxon and Luminent)
  • Tandberg Ltd. (Ericsson)
  • Tellabs
  • Terawave (Acquired by Occam Networks)
  • Tut Systems (Acquired by Motorola)
  • Vinci Systems, Inc. (Acquired by Tellabs)
  • Wave7 Optics
  • Worldwide Packets, Inc. (Acquired by Ciena)
  • Zhone Technologies

Appendix I - Access Architecture

Various Approaches for Fiber-based Access Architecture

Fiber to the “X”

xDSL Versions

Design Details for Current Plans

  • Fiber to the Neighborhood (FTTN)
  • AT&T' s Fiber to the node (FTTN)
  • BellSouth' s Fiber to the Curb (FTTC)

The RFP - PONs Will Set Us Free

  • What Are PONs?
    • The PON Design
  • Status of PON
  • Advantage and Disadvantages of PON
  • Types of PONs
    • BPON
    • EPON
    • GPON
  • The PON in the First RFP
  • GPONs

Architectures to Meet the Needs

Table of Figures

  • Figure 1: Lightwave Network
  • Figure 2: Bandwidth Needs - Forecast Through 2010
  • Figure 3: Drivers of Access Bandwidth Requirements
  • Figure 4: Usage Scenario - 2010
  • Figure 5: 2010 Bandwidth Requirements
  • Figure 6: Forecast Access Bandwidth Requirements 2010
  • Figure 7: Comparison of Internet Access Speed Offered
  • Figure 8: PONs' Bandwidth Capacity
  • Figure 9: VDSL2 Bandwidth vs. Distance
  • Figure 10: AT&T - BellSouth Hybrid FTTC
  • Figure 11: Fiber Required Upgrading to Hybrid FTTC
  • Figure 12: Summary of Vendors
  • Figure 13: Fiber to the ' X' Varieties
  • Figure 14: Chart of Various xDSL Technologies
  • Figure 15: Fiber to the Neighborhood
  • Figure 16: Fiber to the node
  • Figure 17: Fiber to the Curb
  • Figure 18: PON Basic Arrangement
  • Figure 19: RFP PON - Central Office Portion
  • Figure 20: RFP PON - Outside Plant Portion
  • Figure 21: RFP PON Service Assignments
  • Figure 22: BPON/GPON Comparison
  • Figure 23: Typical GPON
  • Figure 24: Bandwidth Needs vs. Capabilities
Back to Top